logo
A Century On, the Tiffany Lamp Still Shines Bright

A Century On, the Tiffany Lamp Still Shines Bright

New York Times03-05-2025

The pieces couples acquire when decorating their first home are often significant. Few purchases, though, prove as influential as the one made by the Neustadts in 1935.
The newlyweds were browsing tchotchkes in a secondhand store in Manhattan when Hildegard Steininger Neustadt discovered what her husband, Egon Neustadt, an orthodontist, later described in a poem as a 'strange, old-fashioned lamp.'
Made from hundreds of pieces of oddly shaped glass in a kaleidoscope of greens and yellows, it illuminated a scene straight from spring, when daffodils herald the end of winter — a scene of hope.
According to Neustadt's memoirs, he and his wife asked the shopkeeper about the lamp and were told that it was the work of an American artist, Louis Comfort Tiffany. Though they did not recognize the name, they eventually handed over $12.50 (somewhere around $290, in today's dollars) and took the lamp — with its Tiffany 'Daffodil' lampshade — home, where Neustadt placed it on his desk.
While unfamiliar to the Neustadts in 1935, Tiffany's prismatic creations have since become widely known, and beloved by many. Today, the lamps are on view in venues across New York, including at the upcoming TEFAF New York art fair, running May 9-13 at the Park Avenue Armory.
The decades have brought discovery, as well, as scholars have uncovered the importance of women to Tiffany's success, and consumers who have encountered the lamps in museums and stores have brought them into their homes. Even younger generations have succumbed to the charm of Tiffany lamps, with some who cannot afford the real deal committing Tiffany's designs to ink as tattoos.
According to Neustadt's handwritten memoirs, which recall the purchase of that first lamp in 1935, his 'friends didn't like it.' But their opinions were of little consequence.
'Tiffany blended perfectly with the Jacobean furnishings in our Long Island home,' Neustadt told The New York Times in an interview in 1971. 'Our home was large and needed many lamps,' he said, 'and the prices were low.'
And so the Neustadts bought more, over 200 of them, making theirs 'one of the largest private collections of Tiffany lamps in the world,' according to Neustadt's obituary that was published in The Times in 1984.
Much of that collection remains in New York City, on display on both sides of the East River: at the Queens Museum, less than two miles from where some of the pieces would have been made at Tiffany Studios in Queens; and at the New York Historical in Manhattan.
The remainder is kept at the Neustadt Collection of Tiffany Glass, a private archive in Long Island City containing over 100 lamps, 40 windows and nearly half a million examples of flat glass. The collection is accessible by appointment, and pieces from it occasionally travel the country in temporary exhibitions.
The Tiffany lamps at the Queens Museum are displayed thanks to a partnership with the Neustadt Collection, which is also home to Neustadt's memoirs.
Lindsy R. Parrott, the executive director and curator of the collection, said in an email interview that she first 'fell in love with the beauty and the history' of Tiffany in the late 1990s.
'I was especially transfixed by how much remained unknown about this celebrated and internationally recognized artist — there was so much detective work that still needed to be done, which I found tantalizing,' Parrott said.
The son of Charles Lewis Tiffany, who co-founded the store that became Tiffany & Company, Louis Comfort Tiffany was an artist and designer who believed in translating the beauty of nature into the decorative arts. He ran various art- and design-focused companies from the 1880s until the 1930s, the most famous of which was Tiffany Studios, which produced, among other things, the leaded-glass lamps and windows that became synonymous with his name and that, for a time, captivated a populace enchanted with Art Nouveau. At least, they fascinated the public until styles shifted toward the more minimal appeal of modernism, which took root after World War I.
As Parrott noted, 'Tiffany's work had fallen deeply out of favor by the mid-1930s,' which explained why Neustadt was able to begin his collection for $12.50.
A Tiffany 'Wisteria' table lamp, made around 1905 from more than 2,000 pieces of cascading glass, will be exhibited by the DeLorenzo Gallery at TEFAF New York. Such items today can carry a price in the hundreds of thousands of dollars and have been known to sell for well over $1 million at auction. In 2018, a 'Pond Lily' table lamp brought $3.37 million at Christie's.
How much people are willing to pay for a piece of Tiffany's history is not the only thing that has changed over the decades. A 2007 exhibition at the New York Historical, to which Neustadt had donated 132 of his lamps before his death, revealed something that had previously gone uncelebrated: the role of women in Tiffany's company.
This centrality of female employees, known as Tiffany girls, was discovered when two scholars — Nina Gray and Martin Eidelberg — separately yet almost simultaneously unearthed letters written by Clara Driscoll to her family.
'The correspondence describes her work as a designer and department supervisor as well as the goings-on at Tiffany Studios,' Rebecca Klassen, the curator of material culture at the New York Historical, said in an email interview.
Driscoll ran the Women's Glass Cutting Department, which was formed in 1892 in response to a strike by the Lead Glaziers and Glass Cutters Union, which allowed only men to be members. Tiffany had needed workers to complete windows and mosaics for the 1893 Chicago World's Fair, officially known as the World's Columbian Exposition, Klassen said. 'But it was also his belief that women had better color sensitivity and feel for naturalistic design than men,' she added. 'Women had an undeniable impact on the output of Tiffany Studios.'
In an email interview, Alice Cooney Frelinghuysen, a curator of American decorative arts at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, called herself 'somewhat of a crusader' for Agnes Northrop, whom Frelinghuysen described as one of Tiffany's most important female employees and 'an extraordinary designer.'
Where Driscoll was behind many of Tiffany's lamps, Northrop's visions came to life in the studios' large-scale landscape windows, including one installed last November at the Met. The three-panel window that was commissioned by Sarah Cochran, a philanthropist and leader in the coal industry, and conceived by Northrop, offers a glimpse into the craftsmanship that is at the heart of Tiffany's glasswork, and the skilled women behind it.
'In our window alone, I have estimated over 10,000 individual pieces of glass,' Frelinghuysen said.
Ninety years after the Neustadts acquired their first piece of Tiffany's history, the lamps are back in favor.
'Once again, 'Tiffany' lamps are everywhere, from tattoos to culture,' notes the prospectus of a new traveling exhibition from the Neustadt Collection, 'Tiffany or Ti-phony? A Story of Desire,' which will be on view at Leigh Yawkey Woodson Art Museum in Wausau, Wis., from January to May 2026.
Beth Mintzer, a tattoo artist who is based in Los Angeles, did her first Tiffany-style ink on a friend when she was learning how to tattoo in 2021. Since then, she has done so many that she has called her business Lamp Lady Tattoo. 'I love them as a tattoo subject because I can't imagine it being something that you grow out of with age,' Mintzer said by email.
'Younger generations have grown to seek out more unique, one-of-a-kind home décor pieces that have their own character and charm, and Tiffany lamps definitely fit that description,' she added.
Parrott said she thought that recent enthusiasm for Tiffany stemmed from nostalgia, 'a nostalgia for what is perceived to be simpler, less complicated times.'
Klassen also suggested that younger generations' fondness for Tiffany lamps was linked to nostalgia. 'However, that era is not the turn of the 20th century,' she said. Instead they were referencing, in their tattoos and décor choices, the Tiffanyesque lamps of 1980s restaurants, and the lamps their parents decorated with.
'Authentic Tiffany lamps command prices that are out of reach for many, so it makes sense to me that these more accessible iterations are a base of inspiration,' Klassen said.
While Frelinghuysen said she found the Tiffany-inspired ink 'fascinating,' she could not explain it.
'I would like to think that the more the public is aware and learns about the subject, the more they appreciate it,' Frelinghuysen said, adding that Northrop's recently installed window had been incredibly well received. 'Perhaps during these ever more challenging times we are living in right now, it provides some joy and solace.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Walton Goggins And Aimee Lou Wood Break Silence On Feud Rumours
Walton Goggins And Aimee Lou Wood Break Silence On Feud Rumours

Buzz Feed

time41 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

Walton Goggins And Aimee Lou Wood Break Silence On Feud Rumours

Walton Goggins and Aimee Lou Wood have given a joint interview in which they addressed the media scrutiny they've been under in the last few months. The pair were co-stars in the most recent season of The White Lotus, but found themselves at the centre of speculation when it was spotted that they were no longer following one another on Instagram just before the finale aired. In fact, it even appeared that Walton had gone as far as blocking Aimee on the platform, although both parties had still been speaking favourably about one another at the time, most notably in separate social media posts, which were soundtracked by the Fleetwood Mac anthem Silver Springs. Walton then failed to join most of the cast at a viewing party for the White Lotus finale, in which both he and Aimee played pivotal roles. During a new interview with Variety, Walton put his absence down to his busy schedule as he had been filming the new season of Fallout. However, he told Aimee as part of their joint interview: 'I wish I would have been able to watch this with you. It was so cathartic and so painful, and I regret that. I really do.' Walton later added: 'There is no feud. I adore, I love this woman madly, and she is so important to me. '[She] is Goldie Hawn. [She] is Meg Ryan. She can do anything, and she will. You watch what the next 20 years of her experience will be.' 'We care about each other very deeply,' he added. The Emmy nominee also said that he'd chosen not to dispel the feud reports during a now-infamous interview with The Times because he didn't want to 'speak for both of us' when Aimee wasn't present. Similarly, she chose to remain schtum on the 'feud' reports until now because she felt anything she said would be misconstrued, instead opting to 'sit back and watch these people making something out of absolutely nothing'. HBO As for his unfollowing Aimee on Instagram, Walton put this down to wanting to put some distance between himself and The White Lotus once the show was over. 'I knew what we had gone through, and I knew how close that we had gotten, and I needed to begin to process saying goodbye to Rick and Chelsea,' he said, apparently beginning to tear up. 'And I knew that that was going to take a while for me, so I let her know, this is what I've gotta do. And she was extremely supportive about that.' It's noted in Variety 's piece that Walton had more of a personal connection to Thailand than most of the rest of the cast, as he went travelling near where The White Lotus was filmed years earlier after his first wife died by suicide. Branding the media furore 'ridiculous', he concluded: 'I'm emotional because we haven't been in the same city to ever talk about this. So for me, this is just so wonderful.' Variety noted that the interview took place on the first weekend of May, shortly before both actors walked the red carpet separately at this year's Met Gala. Since then, Walton's wife Nadia Conners has also spoken out about rumours of an affair between her husband and his White Lotus co-star, which she took in good humour.

WorldPride comes to the nation's capital
WorldPride comes to the nation's capital

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

WorldPride comes to the nation's capital

WorldPride comes to the nation's capital Good morning!🙋🏼‍♀️ I'm Nicole Fallert. I can't stop watching the "Wicked: For Good" trailer ✨ Get ready for Thursday with the news: At WorldPride, queer community vows to be heard 'The WorldPride stage is in front of the Capitol building at a time when they are trying to silence us, put us back in the closet, make us feel ashamed, take away so many of our freedoms, pull back DEI. And we are like: 'Oh no no no! We are going to the nation's capital; we are going to be louder than ever. You can't take this away from us. We are going to be ourselves.'' ~ Brooke Eden, a country singer/songwriter who will be performing in Washington, D.C., at WorldPride − a global festival that promotes LGBTQ+ visibility and awareness − at a historic juncture: When the queer community's rights are increasingly in hostile crosshairs. Trump launches Senate lobbying blitz for his tax bill President Donald Trump's second-term legislative agenda is on the line as the Senate gears up for a four-week sprint, during which they will seek to pass something that can also get through the House's narrow margins and onto the president's desk for signature into law. It won't be easy. As in the House, the Senate has fiscal conservatives who are concerned that the bill will add to the federal deficit and moderates who have problems with the potential impact on Medicaid health coverage. Deficit blues : Several senators have said they're worried about the massive price tag of the legislation. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the bill would add more than $3 trillion to the federal debt over the next 10 years, adding to the country's already massive $36.2 trillion debt. : Several senators have said they're worried about the massive price tag of the legislation. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the bill would add more than $3 trillion to the federal debt over the next 10 years, adding to the country's already massive $36.2 trillion debt. Musk is fanning the flames . The Tesla CEO argues the legislation's price tag undermines the work that he did leading the Department of Government Efficiency cost-cutting project. . The Tesla CEO argues the legislation's price tag undermines the work that he did leading the Department of Government Efficiency cost-cutting project. Meanwhile, American health care is on the line: New analysis shows about 11 million Americans would lose health insurance coverage under Trump's bill, and experts say the uninsured might delay care and accrue more medical debt. More news to know now What's the weather today? Check your local forecast here. Families scramble to find loved ones – and answers – after massive ICE raid in Florida Family members and friends of the more than 100 construction workers detained in what was deemed Florida's largest immigration raid this year say they are having trouble locating their loved ones. Some of the laborers were sent to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility in Baker County, while some went to Miami's Krome Detention Center. Others were quickly flown to El Paso, Texas, and were still there awaiting removal as of June 3. And some are already in Mexico, just five days after being detained and bused away from their job site in Tallahassee. But others are still silent, and their friends and family are worried and waiting for a call. Trump bans Harvard from admitting new international students In an executive order issued Wednesday, President Trump declared that Harvard University's admission of international students represents a threat to the United States. In his new order, Trump listed a litany of grievances against the university, which he accuses of failing to protect Jewish students from pro-Palestinian protesters. He also noted that Harvard has long used race as a factor in admissions, which led the Supreme Court in 2023 to strike down race-based admissions policies nationwide. Trump's order applies to new students who would be arriving to study at Harvard, and asks Secretary of State Marco Rubio to consider whether to also revoke the visas of current international students Today's talkers Meet the million-dollar creators of the Bop house They fly on private jets to the Super Bowl, own Porsches and Lamborghinis and rack up $4,000 dinner bills on a night out. It's all in a month's work at the Bop House, a content creator mansion where eight Gen Z OnlyFans creators produce content for their combined following of nearly 90 million users across social media platforms. But teenagers, particularly young girls, who see TikToks showcasing the content creators' opulent lifestyle, may get the impression that being an OnlyFans star is aspirational. While creators in the Bop House spoke openly with USA TODAY about their hardships growing up — and say they're not trying to be anyone's role model. Photo of the day: Checked! The Edmonton Oilers started the 2025 Stanley Cup Final on Wednesday the same way they started their last run to a championship - by winning Game 1 in overtime. Check out the best moments of the final so far.

The History of Music Copyright—Before (Taylor's Version)
The History of Music Copyright—Before (Taylor's Version)

Time​ Magazine

timean hour ago

  • Time​ Magazine

The History of Music Copyright—Before (Taylor's Version)

Taylor Swift wrote a letter to her fans announcing that she had finally secured ownership of the original master recordings for her entire catalog. It's the culmination of her efforts to gain full control of the copyright in her work. Rights to her catalog—including hugely successful albums like Fearless, Red, and 1989 —were purchased by a music industry mogul without her consent in June 2019. Although her legal team was unable to stop the sale, Swift won the high ground in the court of public opinion by arguing that such an action was morally wrong. In the process, she has achieved something unique in the history of American popular music. The pop star's efforts to control her master recordings has been an element of her ongoing advocacy for artist rights. The intricacies of publishing, licensing, and rights ownership in the modern music industry are quite complex. Though copyright may be law in one sense, public perception and popular opinion effect how the law is enforced in practice. The history of American popular music shows that the degree of agency an unsigned artist has to negotiate terms with industry representation can be profoundly affected by their class, race, and gender. Very few artists will ever reach the level of popularity and profitability that Swift enjoys, but by raising public discourse about music copyright she has helped to reinvigorate conversations about the value of music. Copyright protection for 'Authors and Inventors' is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, which highlights the importance the framers placed upon encouraging creativity and innovation. Congress passed the first copyright act in 1790 protecting any 'map, chart, book, or books,' which allowed authors the sole right to profit from the sale of their work for a limited time after which it would enter the public domain. Congress expanded copyright in 1802 to account for new advances in print technology and visual mediums. Interestingly, sheet music, which had existed for centuries, was not added to the list of protectable mediums until 1831. In truth, there was relatively little music generating revenue for copyright to protect in early America. That began to change when a 20-year-old Stephen Foster composed 'Oh! Susanna' in the late 1840s. The song was an unprecedented hit, selling well over 100,000 copies in multiple editions. Foster failed to properly register and protect his interests and made next to nothing off the song. Despite enjoying numerous fair and favorable contracts throughout his career. Foster never learned how to capitalize financially on the public success of his songs and he died penniless in 1864. The popularity of Foster's songs demonstrated that there was money to be made in American music, and publishing houses observed how songwriters could be easily taken advantage of in the process. Beginning with Tin Pan Alley at the turn of the 20th century, the music industry professionalized rapidly. Composers and songwriters, despite creating the product that generated income, became increasingly separated from the business of music. Record label executives, music publishers, lawyers, agents, and other professionals handled the paperwork and managed the money. While some songwriters like Irving Berlin also learned the business side of music, such cases were the exception, not the rule. Consider the career of Berlin's contemporary Woody Guthrie. Guthrie did not have access to the kinds of industry support more mainstream artists had, but he did have access to his local library. In 1937, he researched the copyright registration process on his own, sent in the required documentation along with a one-dollar fee to register 'California!,' and even asked the Copyright Office to send guidance about registration best practices. The Copyright Office responded promptly with an official registration certificate for 'California!,' several blank application cards, and instructions for how to optimize future registrations. This process was time consuming, however. Guthrie's transient lifestyle and prolific output meant that much of his catalog was not registered or managed properly. The copyright claim in Guthrie's most famous song, ' This Land is Your Land,' has been contested by artists and content creators looking to use the song in new ways. Rather than to maximize profitability, Guthrie's heirs have used copyright primarily to keep the song from being appropriated by commercial and political interests that are in direct opposition to his worldview. The key ethical question of copyright, like so many areas of the law, is not just about what rights are granted. It is about how the power granted by those rights gets wielded in practice. Over the course of the 20th century, many popular musicians like Chuck Berry and John Fogerty signed away their rights early in their careers, missing the full financial rewards when they later made it big. For many, accepting unfavorable terms had been their only option to break into the industry. Fogerty was famously sued by his former label and bandmates for sounding too much like himself when he went solo in 1972. Fogerty recently announced that, at the age of 80, he will be recording a (John's Version) album of his Greatest Hits, in a nod to Swift's success with the strategy. Before Swift's triumph, Prince is probably the artist who most skillfully used cultural influence to leverage their rights. When his label claimed a trademark in the rights to his name and all music marketed under it, he changed his name to an unpronounceable symbol until his contract with them expired in 2000. Similarly, much of Swift's success has come from relying more on public relations than litigation to assert her ownership. Inspired by a viral social media post from Kelly Clarkson, Swift began the process of rerecording her early work in November 2020. But that strategy only worked because she was also able to motivate her fans to choose (Taylor's Version) albums on streaming platforms and even to repurchase her rerecorded work on CD, cassette, and vinyl. Including bonus material and other incentives was certainly part of the strategy, but the level of fan involvement in policing the (Taylor's Version) transition has reached levels that are difficult to explain by marketing tactics alone. Swift's efforts to take legal control of her songwriting catalog have significantly raised the level of discourse about copyright law in popular culture. They have also provided a high-profile challenge to the trope of the struggling artist that has creative abilities but lacks savvy business skills. Swift's management of her career has been touted as a model to reduce the structural inefficiencies in music licensing and broadcasting, to promote equity sharing with record labels, and to give artists in general more control over their creative work. After her rerecording venture was so successful, some major labels have sought to add language to future contracts preventing that outcome. But to do so, they will have to navigate the fact that artists are more aware of the value that they bring in the post-(Taylor's Version) Era. Jason Lee Guthrie is an Associate Professor of Communication and Media Studies at Clayton State University in Morrow, GA. His research explores the intersections of creativity and economics, with a focus on copyright in the creative industries.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store