US to hold QUAD Foreign Ministers meeting on July 1: State Department
By Reena Bhardwaj
Washington DC [US], June 27 (ANI): Secretary of State Marco Rubio will host the Foreign Ministers from the QUAD countries on July 1 in Washington DC for the QUAD Foreign Ministers Meeting, the Principal Deputy Spokesperson for US Department of State Tommy Pigott announced on Thursday (US local time).
Making the remarks during a press briefing, Pigott said, 'Next week, Secretary Rubio will host foreign Ministers from Australia, India and Japan for the 2025 Quad Foreign Ministers Meeting on July 1 in Washington, DC. The secretary's first diplomatic engagement was with the Quad, and next week's summit builds on that momentum to advance a free, open, and secure Indo-Pacific. This is what American leadership looks like: strength, peace and prosperity'.
Dhruva Jaishankar at ORF Washington DC, spoke to ANI about the expectations and impressions on the American priorities for the QUAD Summit.
'US relations with its Quad partners have been complicated of late, given differences with Japan over defense spending, Australia over AUKUS, and India over Pakistan. For these reasons, even maintaining the Quad agenda going forward is difficult, despite the US concentrating the groups's focus on security, prosperity, tech, and homeland security,' he said.
The developments follow after, earlier on June 18, when US President Donald Trump accepted Prime Minister Narendra Modi's invitation to attend the QUAD Summit, which will take place in New Delhi later this year, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri had previously informed. The telephonic conversation with US President Donald Trump took place on the sidelines of the G7 Summit in Canada.
'For the next meeting of QUAD, PM Modi invited President Trump to India. While accepting the invitation, President Trump said that he is excited to come to India', Misri had said in a video message.
The QUAD is a diplomatic partnership between Australia, India, Japan, and the United States committed to supporting an open, stable and prosperous Indo-Pacific that is inclusive and resilient. The QUAD's origins date back to our collaboration in response to the December 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami.
Earlier in January, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, on his first day in office, hosted the Foreign Ministers of Australia, India, and Japan for a significant meeting of the QUAD alliance.
'On day one as Secretary of State, I hosted the Foreign Ministers of Australia, India, and Japan for an important meeting of the Quad. We are committed to strengthening economic opportunity and peace and security in the Indo-Pacific region,' Rubio posted on X. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio held the meeting with his Quad counterparts--External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, Japan's Takeshi Iwaya, and Australia's Penny Wong--at the US Department of State.
In a joint statement, the Foreign ministers of QUAD countries reaffirmed their shared commitment to strengthening a free and open Indo-Pacific where 'sovereignty and territorial integrity are upheld and defended.' The Quad nations also expressed strong opposition 'to any unilateral actions aimed at changing the status quo through force or coercion.' (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
Thinking of buying the Tata Harrier EV? Check out the maximum range that each variant offers
Tata Motors recently announced pricing for the rear-wheel drive (RWD) variants of the Harrier EV, which starts at ₹ 21.49 lakh and goes up to ₹ 27.49 lakh (both ex-showroom). In a fresh update, the automaker has now disclosed more information about the Harrier EV, especially the range figures for the RWD variants. The electric SUV will be offered with two battery configurations: 65 kWh and 75 kWh. Here's a detailed look at the range capabilities of each option: The rear-wheel drive versions of the Tata Harrier EV will come equipped with either a 65 kWh or 75 kWh battery, both paired with a single-motor setup. The larger 75 kWh battery will also be available on the Quad Wheel Drive (QWD) version, which features a dual-motor layout. According to the company claims, the 65 kWh RWD variant can travel up to 538 km on a full charge, while the 75 kWh RWD offers a maximum driving range of 627 km. The 75 kWh QWD variant, while slightly behind in overall range at 622 km, delivers more performance and enhanced off-road capability due to its dual-motor configuration. These range numbers are based on the MIDC (Modified Indian Driving Cycle) standard. As test cycle ratings often differ from everyday usage, Tata Motors has also shared more practical, real-world range estimates for the Harrier EV. Referred to as the 'C75' range, which is an approximation of what 75 per cent of typical users can expect in regular driving scenarios. Under this, the 65 kWh RWD variant is expected to deliver between 420 and 445 km. The 75 kWh RWD model is estimated to return a range of 480 to 505 km, while the 75 kWh QWD version is rated at around 460 to 490 km in real-world conditions. Tata Motors will offer a lifetime battery warranty on the Harrier EV, which is valid for up to 15 years from the vehicle's registration date. Additionally, the brand has confirmed that second-hand buyers of the EV will still be eligible for a 10-year or 2,00,000 km warranty package, whichever comes first. It's important to note that the ex-showroom price does not cover the cost of a home charger or installation. The company will provide a 7.3 kW AC wall charger, which takes around 9.3 hours to fully charge the 65 kWh battery. For the 75 kWh unit, charging from 10 per cent to 100 per cent will require approximately 10.7 hours.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Where is Ayatollah Ali Khamenei? Iran's Supreme Leader resurfaces on TV, yet questions linger over his whereabouts
On June 26, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, gave his first address to the nation since the country's 12-day war with Israel ended with a ceasefire that the US President Donald Trump and the Emir of Qatar brokered earlier this week. Khamenei, in a pre-recorded video message, downplayed reports of damage to the country's nuclear programme by US strikes and declared victory over both Israel and the United States. 'The Islamic republic slapped America in the face,' said Khamenei, 86. He said that the US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities did not do 'anything important' and that the United States only intervened to save Israel from being 'completely destroyed.' Khamenei has reportedly been hiding for nearly two weeks after Israel's strike on the country on June 13. Israel also eliminated Iran's senior military leadership and some scientists during the strikes. The Islamic Republic retaliated with missile strikes on Israel. The US said on Sunday that the country's military 'obliterated' Iran's main nuclear sites using 14 bunker-buster bombs, more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles and over 125 military aircraft. Iran attacked a US air base in neighbouring Qatar. Iranian officials claimed the attacks left 627 people dead and nearly 5,000 injured. Iran's retaliation targeted parts of Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, leaving a trail of damaged buildings and at least 14 people dead, according to reports. On Tuesday, however, Israel and Iran confirmed a ceasefire, hours after President Trump announced an imminent ceasefire between the two nations on Truth Social. In his address on Thursday, the ageing Iranian leader Khamenei sat flanked by an Iranian flag and a portrait of his predecessor and the founder of the Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. Khamenei spoke while looking into the camera. But it was unclear exactly when the video was recorded. According to a Reuters investigation citing five sources with direct knowledge of succession planning, Khamenei has gone into hiding with his family and is being protected by the elite Vali-ye Amr unit of the Revolutionary Guards. While he is reportedly still being briefed on internal matters, a special three-member committee—appointed by Khamenei himself two years ago—is accelerating efforts to identify his successor, sources told Reuters. In the event of Khamenei's death, the ruling establishment aims to swiftly announce a new leader to maintain national stability. As the supreme leader, Khamenei has the last word on all major state matters. As the commander in chief of the armed forces, he would be expected to approve any military decision, including the attack on the American base or the ceasefire deal with Israel. President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu both suggested during the war that Khamenei was vulnerable and not immune from their strikes. In an interview with The New York Times on June 25, Mehdi Fazaeli, head of Khamenei's archives office, was asked about the Supreme Leader's well-being. "People are very worried about the Supreme Leader," the host said. Without offering a direct answer, Fazaeli said, "We all should be praying." He added that he received numerous inquiries from officials, and viewers had sent a flood of messages asking the same question. The interview was done before Khamenei's June 26 televised address Fazaeli claimed that the people who are responsible for protecting the Supreme Leader are doing their job well, adding, "God willing, our people can celebrate victory next to their leader, God willing." Earlier, officials said that Khamenei had been hiding in a secure underground bunker and was avoiding all electronic communication to prevent assassination attempts. During the anti-US and anti-Israel protest last week, before the ceasefire, women were seen carrying portraits of Khamenei in their hands. Newspapers in Iran had voiced the concern about Khamenei whereabouts, too. "His days-long absence has made all of us who love him very worried," Mohsen Khalifeh, editor of Khaneman, a daily newspaper. The three-member panel of the top clerical body in Iran, appointed by Khamenei himself two years ago to identify his replacement, has accelerated its planning, according to news agency Reuters. According to an earlier in The New York Times, Khamenei has also picked replacements in his chain of military commands in case they are killed in Israeli strikes. The report, citing three Iranian officials familiar with Khamenei's emergency war plans, said that the Supreme Leader 'mostly speaks with his commanders through a trusted aide now, suspending electronic communications to make it harder to find him'. 'He would be well advised to be cautious, despite the fragile ceasefire that the US President Donald Trump and the Emir of Qatar brokered. Though President Trump reportedly told Israel not to kill Iran's supreme leader, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not rule it out,' wrote Kasra Naji, Special Correspondent, BBC Persian. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said on Thursday that his country's forces would have killed Khamenei if it had been possible during the recent 12-day war fought between both nations. 'I estimate that if Khamenei had been in our sights, we would have taken him out," Katz said in an interview with Israel's Kan public television. But Khamenei understood this, went underground to very great depths, and broke off contacts with the commanders who replaced those commanders who were eliminated, so it wasn't realistic in the end," Katz was quoted as saying. The Islamic republic slapped America in the face. Sanctions have crippled the Iranian economy, reducing a top oil exporter to a poor and struggling shadow of its former self, Naji said in the BBC report. Netanyahu and Trump had both suggested at various times during the air war that Khamenei's life could be in danger as regime change could be a result of the war that ended with the ceasefire on Tuesday.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Days After US Strikes, What We Know About Damage To Iran's Nuclear Program
Vienna: The big question following US and Israeli attacks on Iran's nuclear program is: What remains of it? US President Donald Trump has said three targets hit by American strikes were "obliterated." His defense secretary said they were "destroyed." A preliminary report issued by the US Defense Intelligence Agency, meanwhile, said the strikes did significant damage to the Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan sites, but did not totally destroy the facilities. The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said that as a result of Israeli and US strikes, the agency has "seen extensive damage at several nuclear sites in Iran," including those three. Israel claims it has set back Iran's nuclear program by "many years." Officials and experts are still assessing the damage, and their evaluation could change. Two of the major questions they are trying to address are where Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium is and what is the state of the centrifuges that enrich the fuel. The answer to the first is not clear, but the IAEA believes significant damage was done to centrifuges at the two enrichment facilities in Natanz and Fordo. The IAEA - and the world - want to know the state of both the uranium and centrifuges because if Iran chooses to make a nuclear weapon, then making the fuel required would be just a short, technical step away. Iran has always maintained that its nuclear program is peaceful. But it has enriched significant quantities of uranium beyond the levels required for any civilian use, and Israel launched strikes on nuclear and military targets on June 13, accusing Iran of trying to develop atomic weapons. The US joined that attack on Sunday, dropping 14 bunker-buster bombs on two sites. Iran retaliated with strikes on Israeli and American targets. Israel and Iran have since agreed to a ceasefire. Here's what we know - and don't know - about the state of Iran's nuclear program. It's possible the nuclear fuel was moved At least some of Iran's highly enriched uranium may have been moved before the US strikes, the assessment from the DIA suggests, according to two people familiar with the evaluation. The people were not authorized to address the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. That would mean that some of the stockpile may have survived. The assessment was preliminary and will be refined as new information becomes available, the agency has said. Its authors also characterized it as "low confidence," an acknowledgement that the conclusions could be mistaken. The White House has called the assessment "flat-out wrong," pointing to the power of the bombs to back up the president's characterization that the sites hit had been destroyed. Iran has previously threatened to hide its enriched uranium if attacked, and reiterated its pledge the day Israel launched its military campaign. Enriched uranium is stored in canisters that can be moved around fairly easy. In May, the IAEA, which is the UN nuclear watchdog, said Iran had amassed 408.6 kilograms (900.8 pounds) of uranium enriched up to 60%. If it is further enriched to 90%, it would be enough to make nine nuclear weapons, according to the U.N.'s yardstick, though a weapon would require other expertise, such as a detonation device. Before the war, experts believe the stockpile was mainly stored in two places: underground tunnels at a facility in Isfahan, and in a heavily fortified underground enrichment site in Fordo. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told reporters Thursday that he was "not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be - moved or otherwise." Trucks seen at nuclear facility prompt speculation Satellite imagery showed trucks and bulldozers at the Fordo site beginning June 19, three days before the US struck. Eric Brewer, a former US intelligence analyst and now deputy vice president at the Nuclear Threat Initiative, said it's "plausible" that Iran used the trucks to take nuclear fuel away. But Jacob Kirkegaard, senior fellow at the Breugel think tank in Brussels, disagreed: "I think that that was a decoy more than anything else." Subsequent satellite imagery "revealed that the tunnel entrances into the underground complex had been sealed off with dirt prior to the U.S. airstrikes," said Stephen Wood, senior director at American satellite imagery and analysis firm Maxar Technologies. "We believe that some of the trucks seen on 19 June were carrying dirt to be used as part of that operation." Trump offered a similar explanation In a post on his Truth Social network on Thursday, he wrote: "The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the shafts. Nothing was taken out of facility. Would take too long, too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move!" Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters that the bombs were dropped onto the two main ventilation shafts of Fordo. He said Iran attempted to cover the shafts with concrete before the U.S. attack, but the cap was "forcibly removed by the main weapon." Centrifuges are highly sensitive and vulnerable to damage Inspectors from the IAEA have remained in Iran throughout the war, but they are currently unable to inspect any nuclear sites due to safety concerns. But with the "explosive payload utilized, and the extreme vibration-sensitive nature of centrifuges," the agency believes "very significant damage is expected to have occurred" as a result of U.S. airstrikes at Fordo, according to a statement from IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi to the agency's board earlier this week. The centrifuges there are "no longer operational," Grossi told Radio France Internationale on Thursday. Centrifuges are used to enrich uranium - and could eventually bring it up to weapons-grade levels, if Iran chooses to do so. Natanz, Iran's biggest enrichment site, also houses centrifuges. In its underground plant, the IAEA believes most if not all of the centrifuge cascades - groups of centrifuges working together to more quickly enrich uranium - were destroyed by an Israeli strike that cut off power to the site. Its aboveground plant has also been "functionally destroyed," the agency said. Strikes also caused "extensive damage" at Isfahan, according to the IAEA, especially at the uranium conversion facility and the plant for making uranium metal that's vital to producing a nuclear bomb. What the damage means for Iran's program is disputed Much like Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said Iran's nuclear program has been brought "to ruin." The Israel Atomic Energy Commission believes the recent strikes have set back Tehran's ability to develop an atomic weapon by years. Israeli officials have not said how they reached this assessment. The DIA assessment, however, suggested that Iran's nuclear program has been set back only a few months, according to the people familiar with it. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking in an interview with Politico, limited his own evaluation to saying Iran was "much further away from a nuclear weapon today than they were before the president took this bold action." Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has said that Trump "exaggerated" the impact of the American strikes.
