Elon Musk and Cory Booker made similar salutes but media reacted much differently
The media hyperventilated earlier this year when Elon Musk made a gesture that his critics from the left insisted was a Nazi salute, but have turned a blind eye to Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., doing a similar move.
Musk was famously accused of doing the Nazi salute in January while celebrating President Donald Trump's inauguration at the Capital One Arena in Washington, D.C., when the Tesla mogul placed his hand over his heart and quickly extended it in a motion that startled liberal pundits. Booker made a similar gesture on Saturday when he capped off a speech to the California Democratic Party's convention by placing his right hand on his chest before raising it to the crowd.
When Musk made the motion, he told the crowd he wanted to thank Trump supporters "from my heart to yours," but many quickly accused Musk of the Nazi-era salute.
Booker Slammed For Alleged 'Nazi Salute' To Cali Dems Just Months After Musk Was Dragged For Same Gesture
"That salute was evocative of things we've seen through history," CNN host Kasie Hunt said at the time. "It's not something you typically see at American political rallies."
CNN commentator Catherine Rampell accused Musk of making two "Sieg Heil" salutes.
Read On The Fox News App
Speaking with MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, former Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Walz suggested Musk had given a "Nazi salute" at a Trump inauguration rally.
"Of course he did," Walz told Maddow.
In contrast, as of Monday morning, CNN and MSNBC had ignored Booker's gesture, according to a search of respective transcripts using Grabien.
The New York Times ran a lengthy piece in January headlined, "What Elon Musk's Salute Was All About," which asked, "So was it a Hitler salute or wasn't it?"
"The straight-arm salute has meant very different things in different places and during different periods of history. But at a time when the far right is once again on the rise, the interpretation of this gesture being performed deliberately and publicly was straightforward — especially in Germany, where the salute's history lingers most powerfully," Times Berlin bureau chief Katrin Bennhold wrote.
The Times had not covered Booker's gesture as of Monday morning.
Elon Musk's Mother Urges Him To Sue Cnn, Other News Outlets For Peddling 'Nazi Salute' Narrative
The Associated Press published a headline, "Musk's straight-arm gesture embraced by right-wing extremists regardless of what he meant," that declared the billionaire "elicited outrage" in Europe, where the salute "is associated with the hate, death and destruction of World War II."
The AP had not put a spotlight on Booker's gesture as of Monday morning.
The PBS News Hour X account posted that Musk "gave what appeared to be a fascist salute." The Guardian ran the headline "Elon Musk appears to make back-to-back fascist salutes at inauguration rally."
PBS and The Guardian have both ignored Booker's gesture.
Politico also covered Musk with the headline, "Elon Musk's 'Nazi' salute sparks fury from Europe's left wing," but has given a pass to Booker more than 24 hours after his gesture.
The Washington Post published a report, "Elon Musk's inauguration salute stokes debate in Congress, Europe," but has skipped the Booker gesture.
USA Today, Reuters and Axios each also covered the Musk wave, but not Booker's version.
ABC News, NBC News and CBS News did not cover Booker's gesture through Monday's morning newscasts.
Joe Rogan Calls Out Liberals For Insisting Musk Used Nazi Salute: 'Bulls--- Game'
Heritage Foundation media fellow Tim Young believes this is yet another "of the many instances where you see a clear media bias against anything related to Trump."
"Cory Booker and Elon Musk clearly made the exact same gesture, a wave that starts over their heart then 'sends their love' to the crowd they're speaking to. Neither have ever supported Nazis nor the Nazi Party, but the media created the lie about Elon to support their false 'Trump is literally Hitler' narrative and refuse to associate that same narrative with any Democrat, no matter how exact the wave was," Young told Fox News Digital.
"It's exhausting to see how biased legacy media has become," Young continued. "Similar to covering up for Joe Biden's obvious declining health, this is just a false narrative to degrade conservatives and make the left look like the winners."
Fox News Digital reached out to CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, AP, Axios, USA Today, Politico, Reuters, The Guardian, PBS and the Washington Post for comment.
Musk has noticed that Booker has gotten a pass.
"Legacy media is one big psy op," Musk wrote on X Sunday.
Musk hit back at the accusations in January, stating, "Frankly, they need better dirty tricks. The 'everyone is Hitler' attack is sooo tired."
While the media pounced, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) issued a statement defending Musk, saying that he had made an "awkward gesture in a moment of enthusiasm, not a Nazi salute."
"In this moment, all sides should give each one another a bit of grace, perhaps even the benefit of the doubt and take a breath," the statement said.
Booker's team has attempted to downplay the similar hand gesture.
"Cory Booker was obviously just waving to the crowd. Anyone who claims his wave is the same as Elon Musk's gesture is operating in bad faith. The differences between the two are obvious to anyone without an agenda," a Booker spokesperson told Forbes.
Booker's office did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
Fox News Digital's Emma Colton, David Spector, Gabriel Hays and Joseph A. Wulfsohn contributed to this report. Original article source: Elon Musk and Cory Booker made similar salutes but media reacted much differently
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
17 minutes ago
Ex-White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre book out this fall, 'Independent'
NEW YORK -- Former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has a book out this fall that promises a close look at President Biden's decision not to run for reelection and calls for thinking beyond the two-party system. Jean-Pierre herself has switched her affiliation to independent after working in two Democratic administrations, according to Legacy Lit, a Hachette Book Group imprint that will publish 'Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines' on Oct. 21. 'Until January 20, I was responsible for speaking on behalf of the President of the United States," Jean-Pierre, the first Black woman and openly gay person to hold the position of White House press secretary, said in a statement released Wednesday. 'At noon on that day, I became a private citizen who, like all Americans and many of our allies around the world, had to contend with what was to come next for our country. I determined that the danger we face as a country requires freeing ourselves of boxes. We need to be willing to exercise the ability to think creatively and plan strategically.' Jean-Pierre, 50, succeeded Jen Psaki as press secretary in 2022 after previously serving as deputy press secretary and also working as a senior adviser during Biden's victorious 2020 campaign. During President Barack Obama's first term, she was a regional political director. Jean-Pierre was criticized at times for being evasive about Biden's physical condition. Wednesday's announcement from Legacy Lit says that she will take readers 'through the three weeks that led to Biden's abandoning his bid for a second term and the betrayal by the Democratic Party that led to his decision.' 'She presents clear arguments and provocative evidence as an insider about the importance of dismantling the torrent of disinformation and misinformation that has been rampant in recent elections and provides passionate insight for moving forward,' the announcement said.
Miami Herald
20 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Can Trump Tackle US ‘Chronic Disease Crisis'? Experts Weigh In
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s vow to "Make America Healthy Again" could fall short when it comes to chronic disease, experts have warned. When the MAHA Commission report on chronic disease came out in May, President Donald Trump made it clear his administration was committed to tackling the epidemic "We will not stop until we defeat the chronic disease epidemic in America, we're going to get it done for the first time ever," said Trump during a MAHA event at the White House on May . In a statement included in the press release accompanying the report, Kennedy Jr. said: "We will end the childhood chronic disease crisis by attacking its root causes head-on-not just managing its symptoms." Nearly 130 million Americans are estimated to have at least one form of chronic disease, which could be heart disease, cancer, diabetes, obesity or hypertension, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Experts told Newsweek that, while the Trump administration's ambition to "defeat" the "epidemic" is clear, whether its policies will help or hinder chronic-disease patients remains to be seen. On one hand, Kennedy Jr.'s recent MAHA report, which detailed what the administration believed to be the leading causes of chronic disease in children, indicated the aim was to reduce the prevalence of chronic conditions through public education and research. On the other hand, the proposed cuts to Medicaid funding and work requirements for eligibility to the benefits, which are set to come as part of the broader GOP budget bill, could leave many with chronic disease without access to vital care. As many as three in four adults enrolled in Medicaid report having one or more chronic conditions, and many are unable to work the hours needed to meet the new eligibility requirements, according to nonprofit health policy research and news organization, KFF. So, while some may be medically exempt, others will lose their health coverage, meaning their conditions could worsen without access to care. Newsweek has contacted the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) via email on Tuesday. Since he became health secretary, Kennedy Jr. has promised to increase research in the root causes of illness and ensure the American diet is full of high-quality foods, while limiting access to ultra-processed food and certain chemicals, which he believes are contributors to chronic disease. The report states that consumption of ultra-processed foods "has gone up at an exponential rate as share of the American diet." Earlier in the year, Kennedy, had described products from companies like Kellogg's and McDonald's as "mass poison to children." Prioritizing research on the issue is crucial, Kenneth E. Thorpe, a professor of health policy at Emory University, Georgia, and honorary chair of the Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease (PFCD), told Newsweek. "Renewed focus on chronic disease and the impact that the U.S. diet has on it-focusing on artificial or chemical ingredients in food, particularly the impact of ultra processed foods-is important," he said. He added that this was because of the fact diet has "a direct impact on the growing rates of chronic conditions like obesity and obesity-related comorbidities such diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancers and many more." "I applaud the Trump administration's focus on addressing the number one cause of death and disability in the U.S.-chronic, non-communicable disease," said Thorpe, who has been an advocate of chronic disease prevention in the U.S. for over 30 years. "We have more people with more chronic diseases, with just 5 percent of the population accounting for 50 percent of the costs in health care." He added that it is estimated that from 2016 to 2030 the cost of chronic disease will be in excess of $42 trillion. "The time is now to focus on the prevention and better management of chronic disease," Thorpe added. While it's too early to tell if the Trump administration is heading down the right path to lower chronic disease prevalence, Dr. Adrian Hernandez, director of the Duke Clinical Research Institute at the Duke University School of Medicine, told Newsweek that "leading indicators appear to be going the wrong way." He said this was partly because of the changes being proposed to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). A proposal for the HHS, most of which was reported on in April, reduces by almost 40 percent its budget for 2026 and reveals major funding cuts for the NIH, according to CNN. Newsweek has contacted the NIH via email on Tuesday. Hernandez added that changes, such as the proposed cuts in federal funding, to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other agencies within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) were also going down the wrong path. Rather than cuts to these federal health agencies, Hernandez said tackling chronic disease will require "an investment" in science and health. He said that the same was needed for health care delivery models like Medicaid and Medicare-rather than making cuts to the programs, the administration should "invest in preventative health." The GOP budget bill, which is progressing through the legislative ranks, instructs the committee to reduce the Department of Health and Human Services budget by $880 billion over 10 years, which would include cuts to Medicaid alongside other measures such as implementing work requirements. Ross Brownson, director of the Prevention Research Center at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, told Newsweek that Medicaid cuts would "likely have a detrimental effect on chronic disease risk among the most vulnerable populations," adding Medicaid-enrolled adults have significantly higher rates of chronic disease than individuals privately insured. "The drive to defeat chronic disease stalls if Medicaid patients are placed in the backseat," Thorpe said. "Today, the federal program is far from perfect, but it is a lifeline for those who need it," Thorpe added, saying it was "often the only pathway to care" for many with chronic disease. Experts insist that chronic disease is a deeply complex issue that requires long-term solutions and attention. Brownson noted that there has been "sparse attention to physical inactivity and tobacco use," as major risk factors for chronic disease. "This is a two-edged sword," Brownson told Newsweek. He said that while "on one hand, labeling this issue a crisis implies a sense of urgency and may mobilize action." Ultimately "the jury is still out on whether they will solve the chronic disease crisis." "We often have a short attention span and with this crisis label, policy makers may think the problem can be solved quickly and then move on to a new issue. We need to think of this as a long-term challenge in need of attention," he added. Related Articles Foods That May Lower Risk of Early Death RevealedRFK Is Right-Food Additive Transparency Can Make America Healthy Again | OpinionManaging PoTS: Tips for Living with the Chronic Illness Affecting MillionsWhat to Eat When You're Living With Long COVID 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Miami Herald
21 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Full List of Senate Republicans Who Might Vote Against Trump's Tax Bill
President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" is advancing to the Senate, where several Republican lawmakers have expressed reservations about or outright opposition to the legislation. Republicans hold a slim majority in the upper chamber, with 53 senators to the 47 who caucus with the Democrats. If all Democratic senators vote against the bill, as is expected, it will take only a handful of GOP rebels to defeat it. Some Republican senators have cited concerns over general fiscal responsibility and specific policy provisions in the bill. On Tuesday, tech billionaire Elon Musk, who recently left his role as the head of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, described the bill as "a disgusting abomination," arguing that it would impose "crushingly unsustainable debt" on the American people. Below is a list of Senate Republicans who have expressed concerns about or outright opposition to the president's spending bill. Newsweek contacted the listed senators for comment via email or telephone and voicemail message on Wednesday outside regular office hours. Stance: OpposedConcerns: Paul has criticized the bill for its projected increase in the nation's debt, saying it would lead to an unprecedented rise and shouldn't be considered fiscally prudent. He has called for the removal of the debt ceiling increase component to gain his On Tuesday, Paul wrote on X, formerly Twitter: "The math doesn't add up. I'm not supporting a bill that increases the debt by $5T. I refuse to support maintaining Biden spending levels." On his Truth Social website, Trump shot back: "Rand votes NO on everything, but never has any practical or constructive ideas. His ideas are actually crazy (losers!). The people of Kentucky can't stand him. This is a BIG GROWTH BILL!" Stance: OpposedConcerns: Johnson has advocated for a return to pre-pandemic spending levels, meaning substantial government spending cuts. He believes the bill lacks serious deficit reduction Speaking to Semafor, Johnson said: "Right now, the 'big, beautiful bill'? That's just rhetoric. It's completely false advertising. It's literally divorced from reality." He continued: "We're currently projecting $2.2 trillion. ... Obama is under a trillion. Trump had increased it, Biden increased dramatically. Trump's not doing anything to fix that." Stance: OpposedConcerns: Scott has called for more substantial budget cuts to restore "fiscal sanity," criticizing the bill for not going far enough in reducing spending. He has also emphasized the urgency of addressing the escalating national Speaking on Fox Business' Mornings With Maria, Scott said he was a "no" on the bill. He added: "We're running $2 trillion deficits. If we follow the path of the House bill, we'll have close to, I think, $60 trillion worth of debt in 10 years." Stance: OpposedConcerns: Lee has joined his colleagues in pushing for deeper spending cuts, expressing dissatisfaction with the bill's fiscal On The Charlie Kirk Show, Lee said he would not support the "big, beautiful bill" in its current form. Stance: CriticalConcerns: Hawley has raised concerns about the bill's proposed Medicaid cuts, arguing that it's unjust to target the working poor. He has warned that such cuts could be politically Referring to the prospect of sweeping Medicaid cuts, Hawley told The Independent: "I'm very worried about that. I won't vote for that." Stance: UndecidedConcerns: Collins has expressed reservations about the bill's potential effects on Medicaid and renewable energy tax credits, indicating that these issues could influence her "The House bill tries to thread the needle," Collins said, per WMTW. "I'm not certain that they succeeded, but I'm still looking at the specifics." Stance: UndecidedConcerns: Murkowski has also shared concerns regarding Medicaid and the renewable energy provisions in the bill. Stance: CriticalConcerns: Ernst has criticized the bill's potential effects on Medicaid spending, suggesting that targeting the working poor is unjust and could be politically damaging. Stance: UndecidedConcerns: Curtis has expressed concerns over the bill's elimination of green energy tax credits, indicating that this could affect his Speaking with Deseret News, Curtis said, "I'll make sure that we're taking into account our energy future." Stance: UndecidedConcerns: Tillis has raised issues regarding the bill's potential effects on Medicaid and renewable energy incentives, suggesting that these factors are under consideration in his decision-making In May, Tillis—along with Curtis, Murkowski and Senator Jerry Moran of Kansas—wrote to the Senate majority leader to "emphasize the importance of maintaining a stable and predictable tax framework to promote domestic energy development." Given the Republican Party's narrow majority in the Senate, even a few defections could jeopardize the bill's passage. Senate Majority Leader John Thune faces the challenge of addressing these concerns to unify the party and advance the legislation to the president's desk. Related Articles How To Ruin a Country's Image, Economy, and Global Standing in Six Easy Steps | OpinionDonald Trump's Scores Highest Approval Rating in WeeksElon Musk Issues Social Security Warning Over Spending BillMortgage Rates Are Trapped in 'Groundhog Day' 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
