Will new road be 'key infrastructure' or 'insanity'?
Some people say it will be a "key piece of infrastructure", while others call parts of the plans "insanity".
Now a public consultation on the Newry Southern Relief Road has come to an end.
The road would link the main A1/N1/M1 Belfast to Dublin road with the A2 Warrenpoint to Newry dual carriageway.
If it goes ahead, the project is expected to cost between £110m and £130m, much of which is due to come from the Belfast Region City Deal (£93.4m).
Those in favour of the road say it will reduce congestion in Newry city centre, stimulate the economy, and improve access to Warrenpoint port.
But opponents have raised concerns about a fixed bridge crossing Newry Ship Canal, while residents of the rural Flagstaff and Fathom areas do not want a major road sweeping through the countryside.
Michael Savage from Newry Chamber of Commerce spoke to BBC News NI in the centre of Newry, standing by a stretch of road that perhaps best represents the rationale for the relief road.
A junction there sees HGV traffic from Belfast, Dublin, and everywhere trying to make its way through the relatively narrow Kilmorey Street on its way to and from Warrenpoint port.
"From day one the chamber has been fundamentally behind the delivery of this very key piece of infrastructure for this region," Mr Savage said.
"We fully support the southern relief road, and we want it delivered as quickly as possible.
"It's about relieving the lungs of the people of Newry and removing thousands of HGV vehicles coming from Warrenpoint port out of the city centre and also creating great access for the development of our port to the eastern seaboard and the A1 corridor between Belfast and Dublin."
Mr Savage said it would take thousands of HGV movements each year out of the city centre.
The preferred route is around 2.5 miles (4km) long, but the geographical layout of Newry means it is far from straightforward.
That is because the Warrenpoint dual carriageway effectively runs flush with the shoreline on the County Down side of Carlingford Lough.
To get to the Belfast-Dublin road (on the Armagh side of the lough), the new route must rise quickly up the steep inclines of Flagstaff and Fathom, with a river and canal in between.
As a result, not everyone is happy with the plan.
Brian Clelland, a member of the Newry 2020 campaign group, which was originally established to drive plans for a City Park, takes issue with the plan for a fixed bridge across the ship canal.
He said it would block the canal, which is nearly 300 years old and is the oldest working canal in Ireland.
"The Southern Relief Road in its current form will block that permanently, so they'll destroy access to Newry for tall ships and, in fact, most masted vessels," he said.
"It's also well known that the Dublin government is building the Narrow Water bridge just outside Warrenpoint, and the insanity of it is that they are spending millions to have a beautiful opening bridge that would allow tall ships up, but the Southern Relief Road that is being built by Stormont is building a fixed bridge that would block tall ships."
Higher up along the route is Roisín Morgan, who has lived in the Flagstaff area for most of her life.
Ms Morgan said the road would destroy the rural area.
"The ground I'm standing on, we're going to lose," she said.
"The road is going through several plots of land, and it's going to come up through the field below us.
"They have to dig down, so there'll be a lot of blasting through granite if the road goes ahead, which I hope it won't be.
"Then it goes into Benson's Glen, which is a historic woodland; there are trees there that are hundreds of years old."
Ms Morgan said the proposals would "put 7,000 vehicles a day coming up this hill".
"I know they are talking about the air pollution in Newry, but they should be reducing air pollution, not moving it," she said.
The new Infrastructure Minister Liz Kimmins is from Newry, and in the past she has spoken about her preference for a lifting bridge over Newry Canal as part of the project.
A Department for Infrastructure spokesperson said: "The minister will... consider responses as part of the consultation process, including whether or not to move forward to public inquiry."
They said Kimmins was unavailable for interview.
Newry bypass bridge won't open for passing boats
Newry regeneration scheme a bridge too far?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Missoula adopts Pride flag as official city flag
Missoula City Councilor Jennifer Savage sponsored a local ordinance to name the Pride flag as an official city flag, allowing it to fly on public property despite a new law. Savage stands here at a Missoula business flying the Pride flag near City Hall. (Keila Szpaller/The Daily Montanan) Adoption this week of a new official city flag in Missoula means the rest of the state can display Pride flags in public buildings — despite a new law meant to restrict such displays. On a 9-2 vote Monday night, Missoula City Council passed a resolution to adopt the Pride flag — as well 'as flags representing portions' of the Pride flag — as an official flag of the Garden City. The action by the city follows Gov. Greg Gianforte's signing of House Bill 819, which regulates which flags can be flown or displayed on government property. The law prohibits nongovernmental and 'politically charged' flags. But a stipulation in the law says any public building can display the flag of 'any county, municipality, special district, or other political subdivision within the state.' Since Missoula adopted the flag as its city flag, it opens up the possibility for other communities to also display the Pride flag. Rep. Braxton Mitchell, a Columbia Falls Republican who sponsored the bill, vowed in an email he would seek to change the law. He also said he believes it's likely the law will not be challenged in court. 'We will amend the law next session to make sure no city can make a political symbol their official flag,' Mitchell wrote. 'If they want to fly that flag, they can do it at home, not on the taxpayer's pole.' Council member Jennifer Savage, who sponsored the ordinance, said in an interview that Pride flags were starting to come down in schools as a result of HB 819. Missoula County Public Schools had previously said it would follow state law. For Savage, the mother of a queer daughter, the flag being displayed meant something else, too. 'When I see a Pride flag, I think that my kid is safe in that place,' Savage said. 'I think it symbolizes inclusion. I think when a public school teacher flies it in their classroom, it says to students, this is a safe place for you. And it also signals to other students that hate won't be tolerated there.' The law includes carveouts, such as for the Gadsden flag, law enforcement flags, school flags, and the flag of any nation recognized by the United States. Similar laws in Utah and Idaho prompted Salt Lake City and Boise to adopt Pride flags as city flags in response to state legislation. Savage said her inbox was flooded with Missoulians concerned over the law. Fellow council member Daniel Carlino said he hadn't seen Missoulians turn out to a city council meeting all year quite like they did on Monday night. The council took public comment for around an hour prior to voting to approve the change. 'I think it was important that Missoula did what we can to fight back when the state and federal government are trying to attack the LGBTQ+ community,' Carlino said on Tuesday. Missoula did not have a city flag prior to Monday night, Carlino said. There was some confusion about whether more than one city flag was allowed, though Savage said other flags could be brought before council for consideration. In a comment posted on Facebook, Gov. Greg Gianforte said Missoula City Council 'should be ashamed.' 'Last night, nine members of the Missoula City Council made clear their top priority is flying a divisive pride flag over government buildings and schools — all while ignoring the city's housing affordability crisis, raising taxes by 17% because of over spending, and refusing to take firm action to end encampments in the city,' Gianforte wrote. 'Missoulians deserve better, and fortunately, two council members voted against imposing this divisive, far-left agenda on their community.' Mitchell stated during his bill's Senate hearing that he'd seen Black Lives Matters and Pride flags in his classrooms growing up, and said he did not feel those issues should be pushed in schools. 'Leave it to Missoula to turn their city flag into a Pride flag. Nothing says 'unity' like politicizing public property,' Mitchell said in a statement. 'The ultra far left Missoula City Council and their mayor are completely out of touch with reality and the values of the vast majority of Montanans. Taxpayer owned property should represent everyone, not just the loudest political movements of the moment. The Pride flag, like any other political symbol, has no place replacing a city's identity.' He added situations like this are exactly why he pushed the law. 'We resoundingly passed HB 819 to stop governments from hijacking public property to push ideology,' Mitchell said. 'If this resolution passes, it only proves how necessary HB 819 is, and I'm sure it won't be good for Missoula's local economy either.' Missoula City council members Sandra Vasecka and Bob Campbell voted against the measure. Councilor Campbell said he had a request for the people who said the flag makes them feel safe. 'Stop and think for a minute whether or not that's true for everyone in the community, whether or not that the flag is the cure, the be all, the end, to feel safe,' Campbell said to council on Monday night. 'And I propose that's not always the case.'
Hypebeast
10 hours ago
- Hypebeast
JD Sports Goes 'From the Mountain, to the Street' With Joe James and the Salomon XT-6
This season,JD Sportsadds theSalomonXT-6to its extensive footwear roster. Known for crafting exclusive campaigns for its brands' collections, the launch is accompanied by the retailer's debut campaign with the outdoor label titled 'From the Mountain, to the Street.' Making its mark among athletes, explorers and outdoor enthusiasts alike, the XT-6 was originally designed for ultra-distance races across various terrains. In recent years, however, the silhouette has witnessed a rebirth, gaining new acclaim within the lifestyle space as more consumers increasingly prioritize comfort when shopping for footwear. Fusing technical innovation with stand-out design features, the sneaker's highly durable overlays, cushioned midsole, extra gripped outsole as well as signature Salomon Quicklace™ lacing system, have made the XT-6 a go-to silhouette for trail-to-city activities. Continuing its commitment to champion local stars, JD Sports enlists East London native and Salomon Sportstyle ambassadorJoe Jamesto front its debut campaign for the outdoor brand. As a rising voice in culture, the artist has garnered a cult following for his lyricism and presence within the city's streetwear scene. Possessing an authentic relationship with fashion and the outdoors, Joe James' versatility embraces the sneaker's roots as well as its current bridge into the lifestyle realm. The campaign visuals capture the sneaker in its natural element, both in the city and outdoors, with the artist sporting this season's two highlighted colorways: 'Cloud/Iron/Ultra' and 'Black/Grey/Orange.' Retailing for £165 GBP (approx. $220 USD), both of the Salomon XT-6 sneakers are available to purchase from JD Sports now. For more information and to explore further summer styles, visit the retailer'swebsite.
Forbes
13 hours ago
- Forbes
Stablecoins And The Banking System: Opportunity Or Threat?
The launch of a space rocket grabs everyone's attention, yet few are aware of the steadily growing number of satellites that silently circle the globe, enabling much of life as we know it. Similarly, crypto currencies may dominate the financial news today, but it is stablecoins that are subtly on track to transform banking. Stablecoins are simply the digital version of the cash in your wallet. Like cash, they don't earn interest, and they are pegged one-to-one to a currency, like a dollar. They have major advantages – efficiency, accessibility, transparency, and security – and can be exchanged back into your currency. As with the satellites overhead, most people would be surprised to learn how indispensable stablecoins have become: Opportunity or threat? Stablecoins could flatten the world of finance and allow banks to offer clients a vastly improved money transfer service that is both quicker and cheaper. This is already happening despite the lack of bank involvement as stablecoins account for a greater share of international money transfers than Visa and Mastercard combined. The use of stablecoins for payments could soon pick up, with Worldpay announcing that it will let customers in Europe and the U.S. make stablecoin payments and Stripe acquiring stablecoin payment platform Bridge. Another opportunity, pending regulation, is the use of stablecoins as an interest-free deposit source. Which bank would not be interested in a deposit product that incurs no cost? Brian Moynihan, CEO of Bank of America, said earlier this year: 'If they make it (stablecoins) legal, we will go into that business.' Regulators have emphasized their intention to give the industry the clarity it needs, with Congress proposing the GENIUS Act to establish a regulatory framework for stablecoins. On the flipside, stablecoins could pose a substantial risk to banks and the banking system as a whole, particularly if they are allowed to pay interest (which remains unsettled with regulators). Incumbents that are slow to add stablecoins could struggle to retain customers seeking to benefit from what could be a high rate checking account. More broadly, if stablecoins continue to grow without oversight they could drain critical reserves – sucking deposits out of the banking system and, ultimately, leading to a slowdown in bank lending. This liquidity drain isn't lost on US regulators, who have rejected narrow banking charters that focus strictly on payments to the exclusion of lending. The network is the key Most banks lack the readiness to launch a stablecoin today. The biggest hurdle will be solving distribution – creating a network effect that results in a coin being widely adopted. For example, Circle pays Coinbase $900M per year to distribute USDC broadly and to achieve this network effect. Banks will need efficient API structures to transfer stablecoins and switch back and forth between fiat and digital currencies. These on- and off-ramps are crucial to integrating with multiple third-parties. Metcalfe's Law says the value of any network grows proportionally to the square of the number of users. This was best illustrated when Edison launched the telephone. Many failed to grasp its potential, asking 'Who am I going to call – nobody I know has one!' So a stablecoin that fails to develop a network could end up being a road to nowhere. Plus, if every bank issues their own, we're back in the wildcat banking system from the 1800s. And who wins in that game? The player that creates the automated market maker that facilitates the exchange of wildcats. There may, instead, be safety in numbers by working together. Fit for purpose There is broad recognition that traditional financial rails, as well as the older crypto currency tools, cannot fully meet the demands of modern finance. Many believe stablecoins offer banks and their clients the prospect of significantly better performance. We could be on the precipice of a new era in banking, akin to when everyone was using BlackBerrys but the iPhone was rapidly coming around the corner. But creating an effective set of products and services won't be easy. Striking the right balance of KYC and risk management standards will be critical for building trust and navigating the many, often diverse, regulatory regimes that affect international banks. Lower standards may win the network game initially, with things being sorted out later. The big risk for banks is that they are so thoughtful about KYC that they develop a stablecoin that no one wants to use. However, while these considerations and hurdles may slow some banks' entry into this market, it's unlikely to prevent it. This may not be the Wild West, but it could prove to be a goldrush. With many in the industry enamored with crypto, bitcoin and the other shiny objects on the hill, stablecoins could actually change the game in banking. Are you ready for it?
