logo
How do you get rid of forever chemicals in your body? Eat more of these foods

How do you get rid of forever chemicals in your body? Eat more of these foods

New York Post2 days ago

They're in your household products, your beer — and even your drinking water.
Luckily, a recent study has found a way to rid your body of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) — commonly known as 'forever chemicals' due to their lingering presence in the environment and human body.
And all you have to do is add a few foods into your diet.
3 A new study has revealed that certain foods that can help you eliminate per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
Andrii – stock.adobe.com
The study — published in the journal Environmental Health — looked at 72 adult men aged 18 to 65, all of whom has detectable levels of forever chemicals in their blood.
Researchers gave 42 of the men a supplement containing one gram of oat beta-glucan — a soluble fiber found in some foods — three times daily, just before meals, as that's when the body produces the most bile.
The other 30 men were given a placebo made from rice.
After just four weeks, blood tests showed that the fiber group saw an 8% drop in two of the most dangerous PFAS types: PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid) and PFOS (perfluorooctanesulfonic acid).
These two chemicals have been found in drinking water, cosmetics and even food packaging — and both are known to build up in the human body over time.
3 After just four weeks, blood tests showed that the fiber group saw an 8% drop in two of the most dangerous PFAS types: PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid) and PFOS (perfluorooctanesulfonic acid).
Getty Images
Researchers tested for 17 different PFAS compounds total. They found that 70% of participants had 11 or more of them in their bloodstream, and every single participant had at least five.
While the reduction seen was modest, experts say it's an important first step — especially since PFAS are infamously difficult to eliminate from the body.
'Despite the growing concerns about the toxicity of PFAS, specific interventions to reduce PFAS levels in the body are limited,' the researchers wrote.
Beta-glucan has been shown to bind to PFAS in the digestive system, which might help you poop them out.
3 Researchers gave 42 of the men a supplement containing one gram of oat beta-glucan — a soluble fiber found in some foods.
Vladislav Noseek – stock.adobe.com
Foods high in beta-glucan include:
Oats
Barley
Rye
Wheat
Shiitake Mushrooms
Reishi Mushrooms
Seaweed
Nutritional Yeast
Forever chemicals — used in everything from nonstick pans to fast-food wrappers — have been linked to cancer, hormone disruption, liver damage and more.
While eliminating PFAS exposure entirely may be difficult, dietary choices can help mitigate their harmful impact.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kylie Jenner Shared Her Breast Implant Sizing. We Asked Plastic Surgeons to Explain
Kylie Jenner Shared Her Breast Implant Sizing. We Asked Plastic Surgeons to Explain

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Kylie Jenner Shared Her Breast Implant Sizing. We Asked Plastic Surgeons to Explain

Getty Images Kylie Jenner is getting transparent about the plastic surgery she's done. In a now viral TikTok comment, the beauty mogul shared the exact details and sizing of her breast implants. She even went a step further and shared the name of the doctor she used for the job: Garth Fisher, MD. On June 2, British YouTuber Rachel Leary posted a public callout on TikTok for Jenner to share the specifics of her boob job. 'Girl, please can you tell us what it is you asked for when you had your boobs done?' Leary said in the video. 'To me, you've got what I am looking for to have done in terms of a boob job. It's the most perfect, natural looking boob job ever. They're still big, but whatever way you had the implants, if they are implants, or if you had fat transfer, to me it is perfection. That is what I aspire mine to look like.' Ask and you shall receive. A day later Jenner, 27, responded in the comments from her verified account. '445 cc, moderate profile, half under the muscle!!! silicone!!! garth fisher!!! hope this helps lol.' It's clear Leary wasn't the only one who wanted Jenner's boob job deets. Fans in the comments expressed their gratitude for the information, sharing they also wanted the same look. 'Never saved something so fast in my life,' one wrote, while another praised Jenner's transparency. 'I love this. I didn't even know you could get half under the muscle! She a girls girl for sure.' But before you go running to book your appointment for Jenner's exact measurements, David Shafer, MD, a double board-certified plastic surgeon and founder of Shafer Clinic Fifth Avenue in NYC, says it's not that simple. For starters, it's important to keep in mind that plastic surgery is very specific to each person's unique body. 'When you look at what she had done and then with breast augmentation in general, you have to caution patients a little bit. Just because she had 445 ccs doesn't mean another person who got 445 ccs would have the same result that she has, because with implants, you need a match to the patient's anatomy,' says Dr. Shafer. However, using Jenner as inspiration is a good starting point. Dr. Shafer always encourages patients to come in with references during consultations. 'I like to talk to patients about their goals and expectations. I love to see inspiration pictures. So their inspiration board, bring a picture of Kylie or maybe bring a picture of somebody where they don't like how it looks.' If you want a look similar to Jenner's, your plastic surgeon can help find the right specs and sizing that makes sense for you. 'If you're somebody with a different body shape or size than Kylie and you put 445 in them, it's not going to look the same,' explains Dr. Shafer. 'You're looking more at the ratio of their chest diameter, their height, the size of the implants, the implant projection height, low, moderate or high to help kind of simulate maybe what Kylie had. But the number size of the implant might actually be different to get the same kind of ratio for the patient.' All that being said, Dr. Shafer says Jenners transparency is a good thing—and he hopes other celebs follow suit. 'So many times celebrities have stuff done and then they deny it, and it makes people who have never had anything done feel like there's something wrong with their body,' he says. 'When they're open about it, it really helps people feel like it's okay to search things out. It's okay to have procedures done when you go to the right people. And naming the doctors is also great because then they can look into that person or somebody with similar qualifications closer to where they live.' If you're curious about Jenner's boob job specifics and what they mean, we asked top plastic surgeons to break it down below. 'Kylie had 445 ccs, which is the size of the implant,' says Dr. Shafer. According to board-certified plastic surgeon Anthony Berlet, MD, this typically results in a full D cup, 'though the final look always depends on the patient's starting point and anatomy.' 'And then there's the profile of the implant. She had a moderate profile, and that's the most common,' says Dr. Shafer. In breast augmentation, there is low profile, moderate profile, and high profile, which describe how far the breast sticks out from the body and how wide the implant is. 'You're going to want to match this to the patient's body because someone who is shorter and wider, you might want to use a lower-profile implant so that it matches the width of their breast. But if you had a tall, thin person and you put a low-profile wide implant in them, it would be extending into their armpit,' says Dr. Shafer. According to Dr. Berlet, Jenner most likely used a standard breast augmentation technique called a dual-plane placement. 'Meaning the implant sits partially under the chest muscle and partially beneath the natural breast tissue,' he says. 'This approach helps the implant settle into a more natural, teardrop-like shape.' Dr. Shafer echoes that statement. 'Half under the muscle is typical for doing breast augmentation,' he says. 'When you put the implant just under the skin, especially if you have really thin skin, it can look almost like an apple with Saran Wrap on it." Placing the implant half under the muscle provides cushioning and a more natural look. 'If you just put it under the muscle and left the muscle connections at the bottom, the implant gets pushed up too high because the muscle's holding it up,' explains Dr. Shafer. 'So you divide the muscle on the bottom half of the breast just so the implant can relax and settle and have a more natural shape.' There are two main types of breast implants: silicone and saline. Both are encased in a silicone shell. Saline has salt water inside, while silicone is filled with cohesive silicone. 'And all modern implants now are a cohesive silicone,' says Dr. Shafer. 'It's kind of semisolid, so it holds its form, it holds its shape. And then how cohesive it is determines how stiff the implants are. So choosing which type of cohesiveness is also important for patients.' On Instagram Stories, Dr. Fisher confirmed that he used Natrelle silicone implants from Allergan Aesthetics for Jenner's augmentation. Originally Appeared on Glamour Body talk Why getting a breast reduction was the best decision I ever made If you survived the early 2000s without body issues, congratulations Selena Gomez wore a bikini on vacation. The comments are appalling. The very unwelcome return of eating disorder culture

GOP Rep.: The Truth About the One Big Beautiful Bill—and What Democrats Don't Want You to Know
GOP Rep.: The Truth About the One Big Beautiful Bill—and What Democrats Don't Want You to Know

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

GOP Rep.: The Truth About the One Big Beautiful Bill—and What Democrats Don't Want You to Know

Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Democrats have spent weeks fearmongering about so-called cuts to Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security in the One Big Beautiful Bill. Let's be clear: those talking points are false, and they know it. What this bill actually does is protect and preserve these critical safety net programs for the people they were designed to serve—pregnant women, children, individuals with disabilities, and seniors. It does so by taking on the real problem: waste, fraud, and abuse that have run rampant in our federal health programs for decades. The fact is, we are not cutting benefits for people who truly need them. We are ensuring that only those who are legal, eligible, and truly unable to work are receiving taxpayer-funded assistance. It is not compassionate to keep a broken system running. It is irresponsible and unsustainable. United States Capitol complex is pictured. United States Capitol complex is pictured. Getty Images Consider this: over 1.4 million illegal immigrants are receiving taxpayer-funded Medicaid benefits. That's not just wrong—it's dangerous. In some cases, these individuals are even on federal terror watch lists. Illegal immigrants with serious criminal records and links to terrorism have been receiving Medicaid. The One Big Beautiful Bill puts a stop to that. In addition to that, another 1.2 million people are enrolled in Medicaid despite being ineligible, and 4.8 million able-bodied adults without dependents are receiving full benefits with no requirement to work, volunteer, or pursue education or job training. Meanwhile, we hear from struggling families who actually qualify—disabled individuals, children, low-income seniors, pregnant women—who face delays and denials because Medicaid is being flooded by those who shouldn't be on it. Let's be honest: if you're fighting to protect benefits for people who are illegal, ineligible, or able to work and simply choose not to, you're not fighting for the vulnerable—you're fighting to protect the status quo of waste, fraud, and abuse. This bill restores common sense. It requires able-bodied adults to engage in 20 hours of work, job training, volunteering, or education each week in order to remain eligible for Medicaid. That's not radical—that's responsible. We also reduce federal funds to states that knowingly use Medicaid to cover illegal immigrants, like California, which plans to spend nearly $10 billion subsidizing health care for undocumented individuals using federal dollars. The One Big Beautiful Bill ends payments made for dead people and duplicate enrollees. One audit found over $4.3 billion in duplicate payments made to health insurers for just these cases. It also rolls back Biden-era rules that blocked states from removing ineligible individuals from their Medicaid rolls and imposed unrealistic mandates on nursing homes—mandates that would've forced 80 percent of facilities nationwide to shut down due to staffing requirements they simply cannot meet. The bill also improves access to care by increasing transparency in pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and cracking down on spread pricing schemes that, according to the FTC, cost Americans $7.3 billion in excess revenue in 2024 alone. This means lower drug prices and better access to medications, especially for seniors. We are bringing back accountability. We are making sure resources go to those who truly need them—not to those exploiting the system. The One Big Beautiful Bill is not about taking care—it's about fixing a broken system and saving it for the next generation. Democrats can keep shouting their talking points, but the facts are on our side. This is a bill that puts the American people first—one that prioritizes working families, protects the most vulnerable, and stops Washington from wasting your money. That's not extreme. That's leadership. Congresswoman Erin Houchin represents Indiana's 9th District and serves on the House Rules, Budget, and Energy & Commerce Committees. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

How much does a $750,000 annuity pay monthly?
How much does a $750,000 annuity pay monthly?

CBS News

time2 hours ago

  • CBS News

How much does a $750,000 annuity pay monthly?

We may receive commissions from some links to products on this page. Promotions are subject to availability and retailer terms. If you're looking for big (and predictable) monthly payments during retirement, a $750,000 annuity could be the answer. Getty Images For many older Americans, the transition from saving for retirement to actually spending in retirement can be uncomfortable. After decades of building up your retirement funds, investing wisely and diversely and keeping an eye on market trends, the focus suddenly shifts to preserving what you've saved — and, in many cases, figuring out how to turn it into a steady paycheck. But at a time when inflation is still chipping away at purchasing power and market corrections seem to come without warning, that task can feel more daunting than usual. That's why retirees are exploring guaranteed retirement income solutions, like annuities. Unlike stocks or mutual funds, annuities aren't designed to grow your money. They're designed to pay it back to you, month after month, often for the rest of your life. In other words, annuities are a different kind of financial product with a different goal: replacing uncertainty with predictability. If you've built up a sizable retirement fund and are wondering how far it can take you, you might be wondering what a $750,000 annuity would pay each month. And, while the answer depends on a few key details, the potential income could be more substantial than you think. Learn how to add an annuity to your retirement plan today. How much will a $750,000 annuity pay per month? The exact monthly payout from a $750,000 annuity depends on several key factors, like your age at the time of purchase, your gender and whether you're opting for a single or joint life annuity. The interest rate environment can also play a role, as a higher-rate environment typically equates to larger monthly payouts, while a lower-rate environment does the opposite. Here's what the payouts might look like for a fixed immediate annuity purchased with $750,000, according to an analysis of Cannex data from These payouts reflect lifetime income from an immediate annuity, meaning the income starts shortly after purchase and continues for life: Age 60 : : A 60-year-old male : About $4,430 per month : About $4,430 per month A 60-year-old female : About $4,294 per month : About $4,294 per month A joint life annuity at age 60 : $3,948 per month : $3,948 per month Age 65 : : A 65-year-old male : About $4,857 per month : About $4,857 per month A 65-year-old female : About $4,655 per month : About $4,655 per month A joint life annuity at age 65 : About $4,212 per month : About $4,212 per month Age 70 : : A 70-year-old male : About $5,483 per month : About $5,483 per month A 70-year-old female : About $5,183 per month : About $5,183 per month A joint life annuity at age 70 : About $4,594 per month : About $4,594 per month Age 75 : : A 75-year-old male : About $6,404 per month : About $6,404 per month A 75-year-old female : About $5,952 per month : About $5,952 per month A joint life annuity at age 75 : About $5,131 per month : About $5,131 per month Age 80 : : An 80-year-old male : About $7,844 per month : About $7,844 per month An 80-year-old female : About $7,196 per month : About $7,196 per month A joint life annuity at age 80: About $5,993 per month In general, men with immediate annuities will receive slightly higher payments than women, simply because the average life expectancy for men is shorter, so the insurance company expects to pay out over fewer years. And, if you're purchasing a joint life annuity, which continues paying a surviving spouse after your death, the monthly amount will be lower to account for the longer expected payout period. Likewise, if you want features like inflation adjustments or a guaranteed period, where payments continue to heirs even if you die early, that can reduce your monthly income as well. Compare your top annuity options online now. Is a $750,000 annuity worth it? A $750,000 annuity can be worth it for the right retirees. Whether or not this type of annuity is the right move for you, though, generally depends on what you're looking to accomplish with your retirement savings. One major benefit of a $750,000 annuity is that the income is guaranteed and predictable. For example, at age 70, a man receiving nearly $5,500 per month from his annuity could cover a good portion of his retirement expenses without having to worry about market fluctuations. For couples, it could provide a strong foundation to build the rest of their retirement income plan around. Here's when a $750,000 annuity might be worth it: When you're focused on stability : If your top concern is making sure your basic needs are met no matter what, locking in monthly payments may give you peace of mind. : If your top concern is making sure your basic needs are met no matter what, locking in monthly payments may give you peace of mind. When you don't have a pension : Annuities can function like a do-it-yourself pension for people who don't have one through work. : Annuities can function like a do-it-yourself pension for people who don't have one through work. When you're concerned about outliving your money: Lifetime annuities are one of the few products that protect against longevity risk, or the risk of running out of money in your 80s or 90s. That said, there are also trade-offs to consider. Once you purchase an annuity, your money is mostly locked up. While some contracts allow for limited withdrawals or return-of-premium options, most don't offer the same liquidity you'd get with a traditional investment account. There's also the tax angle: If you buy the annuity with pre-tax dollars (like from a traditional individual retirement account or 401(k)), your monthly payments will be taxed as regular income. If you use after-tax money, a portion of your monthly check will be considered a return of principal and not taxed, but the rest will be. And keep in mind that not all annuities are created equal. Fees, terms and flexibility can vary widely, so it's essential to compare products and consult with a financial advisor before committing. The bottom line A $750,000 annuity can generate between $4,300 and $7,800 per month depending on your age, gender and annuity structure. For retirees who want guaranteed income they can count on, that means this type of annuity is a powerful tool for creating financial security and reducing stress during retirement. But while the payouts can be generous, annuities aren't for everyone. The trade-offs — especially around liquidity and contract terms — mean they should be just one part of a broader retirement strategy. Before buying, take a close look at your full financial picture, including your need for flexibility, your risk tolerance and your other sources of retirement income. In the right situation, though, a $750,000 annuity can offer something the stock market simply can't: steady, worry-free income for the rest of your life.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store