logo
GOP Rep.: The Truth About the One Big Beautiful Bill—and What Democrats Don't Want You to Know

GOP Rep.: The Truth About the One Big Beautiful Bill—and What Democrats Don't Want You to Know

Newsweek2 days ago

Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Democrats have spent weeks fearmongering about so-called cuts to Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security in the One Big Beautiful Bill. Let's be clear: those talking points are false, and they know it.
What this bill actually does is protect and preserve these critical safety net programs for the people they were designed to serve—pregnant women, children, individuals with disabilities, and seniors. It does so by taking on the real problem: waste, fraud, and abuse that have run rampant in our federal health programs for decades.
The fact is, we are not cutting benefits for people who truly need them. We are ensuring that only those who are legal, eligible, and truly unable to work are receiving taxpayer-funded assistance. It is not compassionate to keep a broken system running. It is irresponsible and unsustainable.
United States Capitol complex is pictured.
United States Capitol complex is pictured.
Getty Images
Consider this: over 1.4 million illegal immigrants are receiving taxpayer-funded Medicaid benefits. That's not just wrong—it's dangerous. In some cases, these individuals are even on federal terror watch lists. Illegal immigrants with serious criminal records and links to terrorism have been receiving Medicaid. The One Big Beautiful Bill puts a stop to that.
In addition to that, another 1.2 million people are enrolled in Medicaid despite being ineligible, and 4.8 million able-bodied adults without dependents are receiving full benefits with no requirement to work, volunteer, or pursue education or job training. Meanwhile, we hear from struggling families who actually qualify—disabled individuals, children, low-income seniors, pregnant women—who face delays and denials because Medicaid is being flooded by those who shouldn't be on it.
Let's be honest: if you're fighting to protect benefits for people who are illegal, ineligible, or able to work and simply choose not to, you're not fighting for the vulnerable—you're fighting to protect the status quo of waste, fraud, and abuse.
This bill restores common sense. It requires able-bodied adults to engage in 20 hours of work, job training, volunteering, or education each week in order to remain eligible for Medicaid. That's not radical—that's responsible. We also reduce federal funds to states that knowingly use Medicaid to cover illegal immigrants, like California, which plans to spend nearly $10 billion subsidizing health care for undocumented individuals using federal dollars.
The One Big Beautiful Bill ends payments made for dead people and duplicate enrollees. One audit found over $4.3 billion in duplicate payments made to health insurers for just these cases.
It also rolls back Biden-era rules that blocked states from removing ineligible individuals from their Medicaid rolls and imposed unrealistic mandates on nursing homes—mandates that would've forced 80 percent of facilities nationwide to shut down due to staffing requirements they simply cannot meet.
The bill also improves access to care by increasing transparency in pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and cracking down on spread pricing schemes that, according to the FTC, cost Americans $7.3 billion in excess revenue in 2024 alone. This means lower drug prices and better access to medications, especially for seniors.
We are bringing back accountability. We are making sure resources go to those who truly need them—not to those exploiting the system. The One Big Beautiful Bill is not about taking care—it's about fixing a broken system and saving it for the next generation.
Democrats can keep shouting their talking points, but the facts are on our side. This is a bill that puts the American people first—one that prioritizes working families, protects the most vulnerable, and stops Washington from wasting your money.
That's not extreme. That's leadership.
Congresswoman Erin Houchin represents Indiana's 9th District and serves on the House Rules, Budget, and Energy & Commerce Committees.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Castro to seek reelection to state Senate rather than make U.S. House bid
Castro to seek reelection to state Senate rather than make U.S. House bid

Chicago Tribune

time6 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Castro to seek reelection to state Senate rather than make U.S. House bid

State Sen. Cristina Castro, D-Elgin, has announced she will seek reelection to her District 22 post rather than make a bid next year for the Congressional seat being vacated by U.S. Rep. Raja Krisnamoorthi. 'When I first entered public service, it was with a singular goal: to deliver for my community and make life better for the people of the 22nd District, who I've been lucky to call my neighbors for my entire life,' Castro said in a news release. 'Over the past eight years as state senator, I'm proud to have stayed true to that mission — delivering real results and championing the working families of my district. As I think about the future and how I can continue to make the biggest impact, that goal remains my North Star.' In addition to Elgin, Castro's district encompasses all or part of 10 communities in Cook and Kane counties. Her statement came the same week that state Rep. Anna Moeller, D-Elgin, also announced she also would seek reelection to the House instead of making a bid for Congress. Krishnamoorthi, who represents the 8th District in the U.S. House, has announced plans to run in the primary for the seat currently held by U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, who plans to retire. Both he and Durbin are Democrats, as are two other candidates who have announced they're running for the job: Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton and U.S. Rep. Robin Kelly, D-Matteson. Castro, elected to the state Senate in 2016, is the majority caucus whip for the 103rd General Assembly, chair of the Senate Executive Committee, and a member of the Latino Caucus, according to her website biography. She serves on the Appropriations, Energy and Public Utilities, Insurance, Labor and Revenue committees. Prior to being elected to the state Senate, she served on the Kane County Board from 2008 to 2016. Castro holds an associate degree from Elgin Community College and bachelor's and master's degree in business administration from Northern Illinois University.

Trump Responds To Elon Musk's Comments About A 'New Political Party'
Trump Responds To Elon Musk's Comments About A 'New Political Party'

Newsweek

time10 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Trump Responds To Elon Musk's Comments About A 'New Political Party'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump weighed in Friday on billionaire Elon Musk's threat to form a new political party to challenge Democrats and Republicans. The Context Trump and Musk had a high-profile alliance during the 2024 campaign and during the first few months of Trump's second term, with Musk spending millions of dollars to help Trump get elected in November and Trump later tapping him to lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But their relationship has devolved in the last several days, as Musk excoriated the Trump-backed "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" as "outrageous" and "pork-filled," adding that it's a "disgusting abomination." Trump hit back at his onetime close ally, saying Musk has gone "crazy," accusing him of having "Trump derangement syndrome" and threatening the cancel government contracts with Musk's companies. What To Know The SpaceX CEO on Thursday floated the idea of forming a "new political party in America that "actually represents the 80% in the middle." Fox News reported on Friday that Trump responded to Musk's comments in a phone call with Fox News host Bret Baier, saying he's not worried about the threat. "Trump is not interested in talking to Elon," Fox News host and Trump's former press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said on the network while summarizing the phone call. "Trump is not worried about threats of a third party ... President Trump also pointed to his favorable polls and his strong support among Capitol Hill Republicans." Fox is reporting that Bret Baier just spoke with Trump and Trump said he is not interested in speaking with Elon Musk. Trump also said: Elon Musk has totally lost it — Acyn (@Acyn) June 6, 2025 The White House confirmed Friday that Trump has no plans to contact Musk. Trump also plans to sell the Tesla he bought earlier this year, which was once showcased on the White House lawn as a symbol of the president's alignment with Musk. This story is developing and will be updated as more information becomes available.

Should you lock a home equity loan interest rate this June?
Should you lock a home equity loan interest rate this June?

CBS News

time18 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Should you lock a home equity loan interest rate this June?

There are multiple reasons why homeowners should lock in a home equity loan rate this June. Getty Images/iStockphoto When it comes to locking in an interest rate on a borrowing product, the timing can be difficult to get right. Wait too long and you risk having to pay more than you would have at an earlier point. Start too early, however, and you could see yourself getting locked in to a rate that declines right after you close on the loan. Monitoring the interest rate climate closely, then, for opportunities to act (and for times to step back) is critical. And it's even more important for homeowners considering a home equity loan. Since these funds come directly out of your home, which serves as collateral in the borrowing exchange, you'll want to ensure long-term affordability to offset any risk of foreclosure. That means knowing when to lock a home equity loan interest rate – and when not to. In the unique interest rate climate of June 2025, however, there's a compelling case to be made for locking in a home equity loan rate now. Below, we'll list three reasons why this makes sense for homeowners in need of extra financing. Start by seeing what home equity loan rate you'd be eligible for here. Should you lock a home equity loan interest rate this June? While each homeowner's financial situation is different, many homeowners considering a home equity loan would benefit from locking in a low rate now. Here's why: Home equity loan rates are stagnating Home equity loan interest rates steadily declined in 2024 and continued to slowly drop in the early months of 2025. But that progress has been slowed in recent weeks, with rates here dropping from 8.36% on May 14 to 8.23% on May 21 to 8.24% on May 28 and 8.25% on June 4, according to Bankrate data. While those aren't major differences week-over-week, they do indicate some uncertainty on behalf of lenders as they await new data on inflation, Fed rate cuts and economic policies. Considering that rates are still lower than the approximate 8.80% average from early 2024, those in need of a home equity loan now may want to lock in what's available at the moment – and look to refinance should the market significantly cool in the future. Get started with a low-rate home equity loan online today. Rates could stay higher for longer than anticipated Optimism earlier this year that the Federal Reserve would continue its interest-rate cut campaign in 2025 has waned significantly after the central bank kept rates paused at its January, March and May meetings. And the chances of a rate cut for when the bank meets again in June are also dim. Finally, if rates are eventually cut, either in July or September, it's likely to be just by 25 basis points to start, which will have a muted impact on home equity loan interest rates. Understanding this dynamic, then, and with relatively low home equity loan rates already available, it makes sense to lock in a rate now to limit any additional expenses that could arise from an extended rate pause. It's still cheaper than many alternatives The average interest rate on a personal loan? Close to 13% now. And the average credit card rate? Around 21%, just recently down from a record high. Even home equity lines of credit (HELOCs), which were clearly the cheapest borrowing option earlier this year, have become more expensive lately as rates there are up by more than 25 basis points from where they were earlier this spring. Matched up against these alternatives, then, and with the benefit of a fixed rate in a climate in which rates could easily rise again, proceeding with a home equity loan makes sense now. Not only is it cheaper than a credit card and HELOC – it will remain so as these other two alternatives have variable rates that could rise in response to market conditions while the home equity loan rate secured today will be the same one six months from now (or longer). The bottom line It may not always make sense to lock in a rate on a borrowing product, especially if the climate is cooling. But June 2025 isn't necessarily that economic atmosphere. With home equity loan rates low (but stagnant), the chances of higher rates for longer appearing more and more likely and the reality that rates here are still lower than some alternative products with variable rates, homeowners in need of financing may find that locking in a home equity loan rate this June makes the most sense for their needs and long-term goals.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store