Should you lock a home equity loan interest rate this June?
There are multiple reasons why homeowners should lock in a home equity loan rate this June.
Getty Images/iStockphoto
When it comes to locking in an interest rate on a borrowing product, the timing can be difficult to get right. Wait too long and you risk having to pay more than you would have at an earlier point. Start too early, however, and you could see yourself getting locked in to a rate that declines right after you close on the loan. Monitoring the interest rate climate closely, then, for opportunities to act (and for times to step back) is critical. And it's even more important for homeowners considering a home equity loan.
Since these funds come directly out of your home, which serves as collateral in the borrowing exchange, you'll want to ensure long-term affordability to offset any risk of foreclosure. That means knowing when to lock a home equity loan interest rate – and when not to. In the unique interest rate climate of June 2025, however, there's a compelling case to be made for locking in a home equity loan rate now. Below, we'll list three reasons why this makes sense for homeowners in need of extra financing.
Start by seeing what home equity loan rate you'd be eligible for here.
Should you lock a home equity loan interest rate this June?
While each homeowner's financial situation is different, many homeowners considering a home equity loan would benefit from locking in a low rate now. Here's why:
Home equity loan rates are stagnating
Home equity loan interest rates steadily declined in 2024 and continued to slowly drop in the early months of 2025. But that progress has been slowed in recent weeks, with rates here dropping from 8.36% on May 14 to 8.23% on May 21 to 8.24% on May 28 and 8.25% on June 4, according to Bankrate data.
While those aren't major differences week-over-week, they do indicate some uncertainty on behalf of lenders as they await new data on inflation, Fed rate cuts and economic policies. Considering that rates are still lower than the approximate 8.80% average from early 2024, those in need of a home equity loan now may want to lock in what's available at the moment – and look to refinance should the market significantly cool in the future.
Get started with a low-rate home equity loan online today.
Rates could stay higher for longer than anticipated
Optimism earlier this year that the Federal Reserve would continue its interest-rate cut campaign in 2025 has waned significantly after the central bank kept rates paused at its January, March and May meetings. And the chances of a rate cut for when the bank meets again in June are also dim. Finally, if rates are eventually cut, either in July or September, it's likely to be just by 25 basis points to start, which will have a muted impact on home equity loan interest rates. Understanding this dynamic, then, and with relatively low home equity loan rates already available, it makes sense to lock in a rate now to limit any additional expenses that could arise from an extended rate pause.
It's still cheaper than many alternatives
The average interest rate on a personal loan? Close to 13% now. And the average credit card rate? Around 21%, just recently down from a record high. Even home equity lines of credit (HELOCs), which were clearly the cheapest borrowing option earlier this year, have become more expensive lately as rates there are up by more than 25 basis points from where they were earlier this spring.
Matched up against these alternatives, then, and with the benefit of a fixed rate in a climate in which rates could easily rise again, proceeding with a home equity loan makes sense now. Not only is it cheaper than a credit card and HELOC – it will remain so as these other two alternatives have variable rates that could rise in response to market conditions while the home equity loan rate secured today will be the same one six months from now (or longer).
The bottom line
It may not always make sense to lock in a rate on a borrowing product, especially if the climate is cooling. But June 2025 isn't necessarily that economic atmosphere. With home equity loan rates low (but stagnant), the chances of higher rates for longer appearing more and more likely and the reality that rates here are still lower than some alternative products with variable rates, homeowners in need of financing may find that locking in a home equity loan rate this June makes the most sense for their needs and long-term goals.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
TD Cowen Maintains Buy Rating on Franklin Resources (BEN), Keeps $27 PT
On June 5, William Katz from TD Cowen maintained a Buy rating on Franklin Resources, Inc. (NYSE:BEN) and kept the price target unchanged at $27. The reiterated Buy rating comes after the company released its preliminary month-end Assets Under Management report. Franklin Resources, Inc. (NYSE:BEN) reported that its preliminary month-end assets under management (AUM) totaled $1.57 trillion, as of May 31. The AUM increased month-over-month from $1.53 trillion as of April 30. Management noted this increase as a reflection of positive market conditions. The company reported net inflows of $1 billion, including the $3 billion outflows at Western Asset Management, a subsidiary. A close-up of an investor making a transaction, with a financial graph reflecting the market trend. Katz noted Franklin Resources, Inc. (NYSE:BEN) exceeded long-term inflows expectations. Katz remains optimistic regarding the company's future performance expecting stronger core flows and a reduction in WAMCO-related run-off. Franklin Resources, Inc. (NYSE:BEN) is a global investment management company serving over 150 countries. The company specializes in equity, fixed-income, and multi-asset solutions for retail, institutional, and high-net-worth investors through its various brands. While we acknowledge the potential of BEN as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Morgan Stanley Raises Sprinklr (CXM) PT to $10, Maintains Equal Weight Rating
On Thursday, Morgan Stanley analyst Elizabeth Porter raised the price target on Sprinklr Inc. (NYSE:CXM) to $10 from $8, while maintaining an Equal Weight rating on the shares. Porter noted that Sprinklr's Q1 2025 report showed progress in the company's transformation, with operational improvements and a stable near-term outlook. A software engineer working on a monitor in a modern office. Morgan Stanley is encouraged by the early stages of what is expected to be an approximately 18-month transformation and believes the shares appropriately reflect a turnaround story. The company's total revenue reached $205.5 million in Q1, which was up 5% year-over-year, and subscription revenue at $184.1 million, which was up 4%. Professional services revenue in particular was $21.4 million. The subscription and revenue-based net dollar expansion rate was 102%, and the company had 146 customers with $1 million or more in subscription revenue, which is up 6%. However, Sprinklr is facing longer sales cycles and increased scrutiny of enterprise spending due to macroeconomic uncertainty. The company is also contending with customer churn and downsell activity, which are impacting its net dollar expansion rate. The company anticipates a negative impact of $10 million on non-GAAP operating expenses due to foreign exchange rate volatility. Sprinklr Inc. (NYSE:CXM) provides global enterprise cloud software products. While we acknowledge the potential of CXM as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The only ‘Made in America' smartphone maker has a message for Apple about manufacturing in the Trump tariff era
Todd Weaver has an important message for Apple as it faces growing demands by President Donald Trump to reshore some of its smartphone production: Don't listen to the conventional wisdom. Experts have long said that manufacturing iPhones in the U.S., rather than Asia, as Apple does, would be logistically impossible and ridiculously expensive. But Weaver argues companies can indeed do it successfully, and at a similar or only slightly higher cost—if given several years to navigate the inevitable complications. Weaver should know: His startup, Purism, is among the few, if not the only business, that assembles smartphones in the U.S. In fact, the U.S. pedigree is the main selling point of his company's Made in America device, the Liberty Phone. 'It is challenging to do this in the U.S.,' Weaver acknowledges. 'It's probably the reason I'm the only one.' And yet, he says his company has managed to make it work and has been profitable for the last two years—a real world example of what's possible on a hot-button topic in which political talking points and vested interests often dominate the debate. President Donald Trump recently put U.S. smartphone production in the spotlight as part of his global trade war. On May 23, he used social network Truth Social to publicly attack Apple for importing iPhones into the U.S., rather than making them domestically, and then threatened the company with a 25% tariff if it continued to do so. Whether any of the import taxes will become permanent is unclear given Trump's whiplash decision-making and court challenges by third parties. Still, Apple has long assembled its iPhones overseas, mainly in China, and has resisted relocating any of that production to the U.S. In April, when Trump announced his tariffs, Apple went so far as to shift the sourcing of most U.S.-bound iPhones to India, which faced lower import taxes. U.S. assembly was never publicly mentioned as a possibility. In the past, Apple CEO Cook explained the reluctance by saying the abundance of skilled labor and top-notch suppliers overseas would be difficult to reproduce at home. Weaver's company, of course, is no Apple, which has sold more than 2 billion iPhones globally since introducing the first models in 2007. The devices unleashed a new era in the tech industry in which mobile devices became the prime focus. Purism, in contrast, has sold just tens of thousands of phones since debuting its first model in 2018, according to Weaver. And the company is barely-known outside the world of tech nerds. Its Liberty Phone, manufactured near San Diego, comes with U.S.-made electronics installed on a metal chassis from China. It retails for $1,999. Another phone, the Librem 5, is mostly the same design, except it's made in China with Chinese parts, and costs $799. The company also produces tablet computers, laptops, and servers. Purism pitches its Made in America device as more secure and privacy friendly than those from major manufactures like Apple. Because all the critical parts and assembly are domestic, it's easy to verify that they haven't been tampered with by a foreign adversary that wants to snoop or stuff them with explosives. The phones also run on a Linux-based open source operating system. Anyone with technical know-how who is worried about the security can review the code—unlike with more popular phones, which come with operating systems that can't be easily inspected. Additionally, Purism's phones come with three kill switches that lets users physically disconnect their device from cell service, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, along with its microphone and camera. When turned on, the switches sever the electrical circuit to the features they control and make it impossible for them to be accessed by hackers, Weaver said. Toggling on Airplane Mode, as users often do on more mainstream phones, is less secure, he said, because it's a purely software feature that doesn't cut power to the device's chips. Customers who are especially security conscious can pay extra to have their devices shipped with 'tamper evident tape' on the packaging, among other options, to flag any monkey business during transit. Purism's biggest customers are government agencies, many of which require high security, and individual consumers. The company's clients, Weaver said, include the FBI and the House Select Committee on Intelligence. Weaver said the cost of manufacturing the Purism's two phones is largely the same, despite one being made overseas and the other domestically. The phone that's made in China costs around $600 for parts, manufacturing, and assembly while the U.S.-made one comes in at $650. 'Producing goods in China vs. the U.S. is the same plus or minus 10%,' said Weaver, based mostly on automation. The difference between what Purism charges customers for its two phones is partly due to the higher profit margin the company collects for its U.S.-made device. People who want stronger security are often willing to pay extra for it, Weaver said. It also covers the extra overhead from some customers wanting to verify that Purism's supply chain is secure and the small additional cost of U.S. manufacturing. Purism's assembly line is in Carlsbad, Calif., where up to a dozen workers put together devices. The area is home to a pool of skilled labor thanks to the local defense industry and manufacturing for other mobile carriers. That relatively modest assembly line is a major contrast to the factories that make iPhones, operated by contract manufacturers, mostly in China. Those facilities can be the size of several football fields and employ over 100,000 people who work around-the-clock shifts. Weaver said the U.S. is at a huge disadvantage to China when it comes to skilled workers, who make up a significant part of the workforce in smartphone factories. The only way to reverse the shortage and lay the groundwork for companies to reshore their production is to encourage more people to learn skills that are useful in the manufacturing process, he said. 'If you go over to China you can find buildings and buildings of thousands of electronics engineers. If you look here, you can find maybe five total,' Weaver said. Apple, for example, would risk a catastrophe if it suddenly, in 2026, needed to ramp up staffing in the U.S. to produce millions of iPhones, he said. Training enough people for such a massive undertaking would take years. Weaver said Purism, founded in 2014, took several years to develop its domestic supply chain. The company's small size means it only needs limited quantities of components, which makes it impossible to achieve the economies of scale that come from producing huge numbers of devices. Manufacturing in the U.S. also comes with higher labor costs than in China. But with the help of automation, those extra costs can be kept to a minimum by reserving human labor for tasks performed after production is complete, such as soldering, assembly, repairs, and testing. Apple, on the other hand, would need vast amounts of components to keep its assembly line humming. While the company would likely be able to cut deals with domestic suppliers for most iPhone parts, some, such as high-quality cameras, may be impossible to quickly source in the U.S. and it would therefore have to import them, Weaver said. One analyst has said iPhones could end up costing $3,500 if made in the U.S., to account for the extra costs and hassles. Weaver agrees that it would cost Apple substantially more to produce iPhones in the U.S., if it had to move production quickly. But given enough time, Apple could substantially reduce the cost after developing a new supply chain, finding enough workers, and by relying on extensive automation. For Apple, opening a domestic manufacturing plant would therefore need to be a years' long process, Weaver said. That's why he criticized Trump's tariffs for taking effect almost immediately. Yes, many of those tariffs have since been delayed. But the takeaway for businesses is that they can't plan ahead. And yet, that's exactly what's required for something as complex as shifting manufacturing to the U.S. Trump's tariffs would be far more effective if phased in over many years, Weaver said. In that scenario, companies would have a clear and increasing incentive to reshore production—without being punished right off the bat. Weaver argues his U.S. manufacturing effort is already paying off and that it will gain momentum over time. He hopes the recent scandal involving U.S. officials using the chat app Signal to discuss a military strike against Yemen, and then accidentally inviting a journalist to join them, will help lift sales by encouraging the federal government to focus more on security. Weaver wouldn't get into the specifics of Purism's financials other than to say it has millions in annual revenue and turned profitable in 2023. The Liberty Phone is its biggest seller. Wayne Lam, an analyst with market research firm TechInsights, gave a mixed take on Purism's prospect. In an email, he said: 'They can be a successful niche player, but the odds of success are lower thanks to the bigger brands. They won't be able to compete in the consumer market but government/enterprise/military are all niche markets they can address.' To fund the expansion of his business, Weaver is trying to raise additional investment after taking in $16 million in funding over the years. Some of that money would go to fixing a shortcoming with his phones. Because they don't use Apple's iOS or Google's Android operating systems, they are incompatible with many of the most popular mobile apps like Uber. To get such apps work on its devices, Purism must make technical tweaks for each one. Purism can at least claim one small advantage over the giant companies that dominate the smartphone industry. If Trump's tariffs become permanent, it won't feel much impact from its U.S.-made phone, while the big players and their foreign-made devices could be hammered. This story was originally featured on
