
WFH push is a ‘stunt', claims opposition
On Saturday, the premier announced it would introduce legislation next year to allow residents to work from home – in the private and public sector – for at least two days a week.
'Work from home works for families and it's good for the economy,' she said.
'Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit.
'If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right – because we're on your side.' Jacinta Allan is pushing to make working from home a legal right for the private and public sector. NewsWire / Nadir Kinani Credit: News Corp Australia
However, the plan was criticised by opposition industrial relations minister Tim Wilson on Sky News, who argued the move was 'stunt over substance' and accused the premier of 'gaslighting' the Victorian people.
'I support fundamentally working from home arrangements as part of what works for people,' he said.
'But what the state government is doing is going stunt over substance.'
He argued the legislation would not apply for all Victorians, especially those who work in retail, hospitality and on the front line.
'What is obvious to everybody is that teachers, nurses, tradies, retail workers, they're not going to get the benefit from it,' he said.
'So what we have is the Premier gaslighting Victorian employees, but in the process, putting serious risk at jobs in Victoria.' Opposition industrial relations minister Tim Wilson caused the premier of 'gaslighting' the Victorian public. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia
On Monday, the Victorian Chamber of Commerce raised concerns over the proposed law and how it could affect productivity levels.
The body's chief executive Paul Guerra said the move was 'perplexing' given the Federal Government's focus on boosting productivity levels in the Economic Reform Roundtable, and argued if the state moved away from the national system, there's a risk 'businesses will move interstate and jobs will be lost'. He said the government was doing a 'stunt over substance'. NewsWire/ David Crosling Credit: News Corp Australia
The Chamber has also raised concerns that the proposal may be unconstitutional if enterprise bargaining agreements are already in place, as they operate under the federal jurisdiction.
However, Ms Allan said the state government would undertake consultation with the Department of Premier and Cabinet, where they will 'focus on ensuring the law reflects the real-world experience of working from home'.
'This consultation process won't determine whether working from home should be a right,' Ms Allan said.
'We're already clear on that: it should be. We just need the appropriate laws to reflect it.'
Speaking to Sky News, Mr Wilson said the proposed law was not possible for private sector workers.
'(The Victorian Government) made an announcement that they were going to essentially try and guarantee an outcome,' he told Sky News.
'Since then, lawyers have said, actually, you can't do that for private sector workers. That's covered by federal law.'
Ms Allan has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Perth Now
24 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Albo won't consult Trump on Palestine issue
Anthony Albanese has indicated he will not consult Donald Trump ahead of deciding whether Australia will stand with western allies to recognise Palestinian statehood. The decision could occur as soon as September when the Prime Minister attends the United Nations General Assembly, with the United Kingdom, France and Canada publicly stating their intention formally recognise Palestine there. Speaking from Melbourne, the Mr Albanese was asked whether he would 'talk to Donald Trump before (making) the decision about Palestinian recognition'. In response, Mr Albanese said: 'We're a sovereign government, and Australia makes decisions on behalf of the Australian government'. It was the same answer he gave when asked whether he feared Australia recognising a Palestinian State, a view not held by the US, would 'complicate an already complicated relationship' with the US President. Anthony Albanese said Australia will make its own decision as to whether it will recognise Palestinian statehood. NewsWire / Valeriu Campan Credit: News Corp Australia As it stands, Mr Albanese has yet to confirm whether Australia will join UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney in officially recognising Palestinian statehood, following growing international condemnation of Israel for blocking aid and food shipments to Gazan civilians. Mr Albanese's comments rejecting a call with Mr Trump on Palestinian statehood also follows calls with Mr Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron. Mr Albanese says Australia would only move to recognise Palestine in order to progress the two-state solution, which would require a ceasefire, the surrendering of Hamas and the release of Israeli hostages captured on October 7, 2023. First reported on Sunday, Mr Albanese is also currently seeking a call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, with Foreign Minister Penny Wong saying it was 'important for us to put our view very clearly at the most senior levels of the government'. This comes as Mr Albanese spoke to Palestinian National Authority President Mahmoud Abbas overnight on Tuesday, where they discussed Australia's desires for an immediate ceasefire and the release of hostages. 'Prime Minister Albanese also reinforced Australia's commitment to a two-state solution because a just and lasting peace depends upon it,' read a statement from the Prime Minister's office. 'The leaders discussed deepening co-operation across a range of areas, and agreed to meet on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly.'

Sky News AU
37 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Melbourne's CBD grapples with near-record office vacancies as state government defends controversial work from home mandate
Melbourne's CBD continues to suffer from the the economic strain of post-pandemic shifts in workplace habits, with fresh data revealing almost 18 per cent of city office spaces remain vacant - the highest of any major city across the country. The figure, released in the Property Council of Australia's latest Office Market Report, shows Melbourne's CBD vacancy rate had ticked down marginally from 18 per cent to 17.9 per cent. However, the slight dip offers little relief as concerns mount over Premier Jacinta Allan's plan to enshrine the right to work from home into state law. The legislation, set to be introduced ahead of next year's election, would grant public and private sector employees the right to work remotely for two days a week, where reasonable. The move has drawn sharp criticism from business leaders who fear it will further erode demand for city office space and deter new investment. 'The reality is that investment to drive jobs, upgrade our office assets, and keep our city vibrant will be deterred from Melbourne if this latest policy comes into effect,' said Property Council Victoria executive director Cath Evans. The policy comes as the national office vacancy rate rises to 15.2 per cent, its highest level in three decades, fuelled by weak demand and a glut of new buildings still coming online after being approved during the low-interest rate boom. In Melbourne, the city is still adjusting to a major shift in workplace culture, with data from CBRE showing just 63 per cent of Victorian workers are returning to the office, well below the national average of 74.7 per cent. In Sydney, office attendance is even higher at 82 per cent. Before the pandemic, Melbourne boasted the lowest vacancy rate in Australia at just 3.4 per cent. But the landscape has drastically changed. By early 2022, vacancy had surged to 13.1 per cent before peaking at 18 per cent, where it remained for a full year. Deputy Premier Ben Carroll defended the government's proposed work from home mandate, saying, 'this really helps all people in all types of industries'. However, Dani Matthews, co-founder of corporate advocacy group Abundium, said the policy would place unnecessary burdens on businesses. 'Our members say it adds unnecessary cost and compliance burden, and for some, it will force a reconsideration of their future footprint in the state,' she told the Herald Sun. Suburban markets are also struggling, with Melbourne's St Kilda Road precinct and Sydney's north shore - areas like Crows Nest - reporting vacancy levels nearing 30 per cent. North Sydney, Macquarie Park, Parramatta and Chatswood are also battling vacancies above 20 per cent. Major new developments in Melbourne, such as Mirvac's 7 Spencer Street and Cbus Property's 435 Bourke Street, anchored by Commonwealth Bank, are expected to test the resilience of the market further as they hit completion in the next three years. Despite the gloom, with the growing market in Melbourne, some remain optimistic. 'There's no doubt that Melbourne is key to the future success of Australia's evolving office market,' Ms Evans said. 'At a time when many other major cities are recording increases in office vacancy, it's encouraging to see that Melbourne's office market is showing green shoots.' The Allan government now faces mounting pressure to reconsider its approach or risk making Melbourne even less competitive on the national stage.


Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Big call as Aussie artists sound AI alarm
Australia alone cannot protect the country's content makers from data-ravenous artificial intelligence and must work with other countries, opposition finance spokesman James Paterson says. The warning comes as artists sound the alarm over AI models feeding off their works to continue advancing. AI itself cannot produce original content, so it must be trained using whatever humans have created. It also scrapes as much data from as many sources as it can to answer queries, including news organisations. The models are usually monetised by their big tech backers, such as OpenAI, Google and Meta, without compensation to people doing the heavy lifting. Echoing Productivity Commission recommendations, Senator Paterson said on Thursday the answer was not more regulation. Opposition finance spokesman James Paterson says Australia should work with other countries to protect content makers' copyright. David Crosling / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia 'I think we need to be mindful of the fact that Australia is a medium power, that we're not the main source of innovation and development in this industry, that most of these companies are headquartered overseas, either in Silicon Valley, or indeed in China, or elsewhere in the world, and our ability to regulate them is limited,' Senator Paterson told Sky News. 'I think it would be far better if we work with governments of aligned thinking to work on this collectively in a way that is enforceable against these companies, which are enormous and which have their own intellectual property which they can quickly move from jurisdiction to jurisdiction to find the most attractive settings and the most attractive policy settings that allow them to flourish and to innovate. 'And if Australia just becomes a hostile jurisdiction to that, then we don't win from that, we only lose from it.' Australian rock legend Peter Garrett is among the most vocal Australian artists pushing for tighter rules on AI. He said the idea of tech firms using his music to train AI without his consent was 'horrifying' and called it a 'massive breach of copyright'. Garrett has also advocated for 'robust laws to ensure copyright holders are adequately remunerated, licenses applied and transparency around the actual processes used when a creator's work is exploited'. Australian rock legend Peter Garrett says training artificial intelligence on music without artists' consent is a 'massive breach of copyright'. Dean Sewell / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia Australia has managed to strike deals with American tech titans to compensate media companies for content shared on their social media platforms, so there is precedent. But AI is still very much an emerging technology and most governments and businesses have not worked out an economic road map for it. To make matters more complex, non-Western countries have proven capable of producing competitive alternatives, such as China's DeepSeek. China is a notoriously difficult country to enforce copyright. In a report released this week, the Productivity Commission warned against taking a 'heavy-handed' approach to AI regulation, saying to do so could stifle innovation and cause Australia to fall behind other countries. Instead, it recommended making existing regulations fit-for-purpose. That included plugging gaps around consumer protection, privacy, and copyright. The commission said AI-specific regulation should only be considered as a 'last resort' for specific use cases where existing laws were clearly insufficient to mitigate harms. It also called for a pause on mandatory 'guardrails' for high-risk AI until the reviews of existing regulations were complete.