logo
Common household spice may interfere with medicines, study suggests

Common household spice may interfere with medicines, study suggests

Fox News12-05-2025
Cinnamon is a popular spice used in food and drinks. It's also used as a supplement for its claims of helping to reduce inflammation and manage blood sugar and cardiovascular health.
Despite its flavorful and potential health benefits, a recent study suggested cinnamon may pose a health risk in some individuals taking certain medications, according to a report in Food Chemistry: Molecular Sciences.
"Controlled ingestion of cinnamon-containing foods or supplements may have beneficial effects, but overconsumption could induce PXR (pregnane X receptor) or AhR-dependent (aryl hydrocarbon receptor) herb-drug interactions, which can bring deleterious effects on human health, particularly in individuals with chronic health conditions," University of Mississippi researchers said in the study.
The main component of cinnamon – called cinnamaldehyde – activates receptors in the body that metabolize medication, the authors said.
But consuming it in large quantities may reduce the effectiveness of some medicines.
"Overconsumption of supplements could lead to a rapid clearance of the prescription medicine from the body, and that could result in making the medicine less effective," said Shabana Khan, one of the study authors from the National Center for Natural Products Research in Mississippi.
The health risk may depend on the type of cinnamon ingested.
Cinnamon bark, especially cassia cinnamon, contains a high level of a blood thinner called coumarin, the report said.
"Coumarin's anticoagulant properties can be hazardous for individuals on blood thinners," said Amar Chittiboyina, the center's associate director and one of the study authors.
"In contrast, true cinnamon from Sri Lanka carries a lower risk due to its reduced coumarin content."
Elaena Quattrocchi, a pharmacist and associate professor of pharmacy practice at Long Island University in New York, told Fox News Digital that "consuming half to 1 teaspoon of cassia cinnamon powder or 2.5 teaspoons of eylon cinnamon daily is considered safe for most adults."
But Quattrocchi, who was not affiliated with the study, warned that coumarin can cause liver damage with excessive use.
People with pre-existing liver conditions should speak with their healthcare providers before consuming cinnamon.
Cinnamon oil, used in food and drinks and topically as an antifungal or antibacterial, presents almost "no risk of herb-drug interactions," Chittiboyina said, according to the report.
Individuals with chronic illnesses such as hypertension, diabetes, arthritis, asthma, cancer, HIV/AIDS, obesity or depression "should be cautious when using cinnamon or any other supplements," said Khan.
Although sprinkling cinnamon on your coffee is "unlikely to cause an issue, using highly concentrated cinnamon as a dietary supplement might," the study said.
Researchers acknowledged that more analysis is needed to investigate herb-drug interactions with cinnamon and its role in the human body.
For more Lifestyle articles, visit foxnews.com/lifestyle
"We know there's a potential for cinnamaldehyde to activate these receptors that can pose a risk for drug interactions … but we won't know exactly what will happen until we do a clinical study," co-author Bill Gurley said in the release.
Khan said before using any supplements with prescribed medication, people should talk to their healthcare providers.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AAHI Partners with Quratis to Strengthen Global Vaccine Manufacturing and Accelerate Access to Lifesaving Vaccines
AAHI Partners with Quratis to Strengthen Global Vaccine Manufacturing and Accelerate Access to Lifesaving Vaccines

Business Wire

time2 hours ago

  • Business Wire

AAHI Partners with Quratis to Strengthen Global Vaccine Manufacturing and Accelerate Access to Lifesaving Vaccines

SEATTLE--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Access to Advanced Health Institute (AAHI), a global leader in translating high-impact science into scalable, field-ready vaccine solutions, today announced an exciting new partnership with Quratis, a premier biotechnology company and advanced Contract Development and Manufacturing Organization (CDMO). This collaboration marks a pivotal step forward in breaking through barriers in global health equity around the world. Under this strategic alliance, Quratis has been selected as AAHI's preferred manufacturer for high-quality pre-clinical and clinical vaccine supplies, with the capacity to expand into commercial-scale production for global markets. This collaboration will accelerate the development of AAHI's innovative vaccine candidates targeting deadly diseases such as tuberculosis, and of vaccines that rely on AAHI's vaccine adjuvants to provide protection against malaria, HIV, and other global health threats. Quratis brings a world-class GMP-certified bioplant and cutting-edge CDMO expertise in biopharmaceutical raw material development, process optimization, and finished pharmaceutical manufacturing. By designating Quratis as preferred partner, AAHI strengthens both its scientific capabilities and access to scalable, cost-effective production of its groundbreaking vaccine formulations—including dry vaccines that eliminate cold chain dependencies and needle-free delivery systems for superior respiratory protection. The partnership ensures a seamless supply chain platform, enabling swift clinical development and broader deployment to the world's most vulnerable populations. "Partnering with Quratis is a very important step in AAHI's strategy to advance practical, life-saving vaccines, that can be deployed at scale where they're needed most,' said Keeley Foley, CEO of AAHI. 'Quartis' innovative cutting edge, safe, world-class CDMO capabilities makes it possible for AAHI to deliver on our mission – and helps ensure our efforts to combat infectious diseases and foster health autonomy worldwide. Together, we're not just manufacturing vaccines—we're delivering an important mission to revolutionize global health." Quratis, renowned for its global innovation in healthcare, brings unparalleled expertise in vaccine development and manufacturing to the table. With a track record of success in TB and COVID-19 vaccines like QTP101 and QTP104, Quratis' advanced processes will enhance AAHI's pipeline, ensuring high-quality, efficient production from pre-clinical stages through clinical trials. "We are honored and thrilled to join forces with AAHI, a pioneer in immune-enhancing technologies and sustainable vaccine solutions," said Soung Joon Kim, CEO of Quratis. "This partnership aligns perfectly with our vision of making people happy and healthy through borderless healthcare innovations. By supporting AAHI's pipeline, we expect to create value not only for global health, but also for our shareholders through long-term growth opportunities.' The partnership builds on existing collaborations, including the co-development of the ID93+GLA-SE tuberculosis vaccine candidate (QTP101), and underscores a shared commitment to strengthening international vaccine supply chains, advancing equitable access, and fostering worldwide manufacturing capacity for sustainable program deployment. For more information about this partnership or to explore collaboration opportunities, and order pre clinical materials please contact info@ About Access to Advanced Health Institute (AAHI) Access to Advanced Health Institute (AAHI) is a global leader in developing practical, cost-effective vaccines to combat deadly diseases such as tuberculosis, malaria, and HIV. With a mission to translate high-impact science into scalable, field-ready solutions, AAHI breaks through barriers in global health by creating innovative vaccine formulations, building worldwide manufacturing capacity, and fostering partnerships to ensure sustainable, equitable health outcomes. For more information, visit or contact us at info@ About Quratis Quratis Inc. is a leading biopharmaceutical company specializing in innovative vaccine development and advanced biologics manufacturing. With a state-of-the-art GMP facility and strong global partnerships, Quratis is at the forefront of developing next-generation vaccines against infectious diseases, including tuberculosis, COVID-19, schistosomiasis, and neglected tropical diseases. In addition to its core vaccine pipeline, Quratis offers superior CDMO capabilities, including expertise in mRNA–LNP drug delivery platforms that provide seamless bench-to-field support from research through commercial production. By combining cutting-edge R&D with scalable manufacturing, Quratis is committed to delivering high-quality, accessible, and life-saving solutions to patients worldwide. For more information, visit

Supreme Court lets Trump admin cut off health grants it says advance DEI or ‘gender ideology extremism'
Supreme Court lets Trump admin cut off health grants it says advance DEI or ‘gender ideology extremism'

Politico

time2 hours ago

  • Politico

Supreme Court lets Trump admin cut off health grants it says advance DEI or ‘gender ideology extremism'

Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court's liberals in dissent from the court's decision to permit the funding halt. The Supreme Court is allowing the Trump administration to cut off health research grants it contends advance diversity, equity and inclusion efforts or promote 'gender ideology extremism.' By a 5-4 vote, the justices lifted an order a federal court judge in Boston issued forcing the National Institutes of Health to restore funding for more than 1,700 grants focused on heart disease, HIV/AIDS, Alzheimer's disease, alcohol and substance abuse and mental health issues. Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court's liberals in dissent from the court's decision to permit the funding halt.

Supreme Court allows Trump's cuts to health research grants over DEI policies
Supreme Court allows Trump's cuts to health research grants over DEI policies

CNBC

time2 hours ago

  • CNBC

Supreme Court allows Trump's cuts to health research grants over DEI policies

The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed Trump administration broad cuts to National Institutes of Health grants as part of the federal government's campaign against diversity, equity and inclusion policies. But in a mixed decision the court left in place a different part of the lower court judge's ruling that threw out the administration's guidance document that introduced the policy, raising questions about whether it can be applied moving forward. The justices, on a 5-4 vote, granted in part an emergency request filed by the administration seeking to put a Massachusetts-based federal judge's ruling on hold. The court did not fully explain its reasoning, but the majority indicated that groups seeking to challenge the funding cuts have to file separate lawsuits in a different federal venue — the Court of Federal Claims. Conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett was the deciding vote in crafting the decision. Four justices, all conservatives, said they would have granted the Trump administration's application in full, while four others — conservative Chief Justice John Roberts and the court's three liberals — would have denied it in full. "As today's order states, the District Court likely lacked jurisdiction to hear challenges to the grant terminations, which belong in the Court of Federal Claims," Barrett wrote in a concurring opinion. But, she added, "the Government is not entitled to a stay of the judgments insofar as they vacate the guidance documents." The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is a collection of agencies within the Department of Health and Human Services that receives billions of dollars from Congress to fund medical research at universities, hospitals and other institutions. When President Donald Trump took office in January, he vowed to end so-called diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, policies, saying that rather than fostering equality as intended, they are a form of discrimination, primarily against white people. He has also taken aim at policies recognizing transgender rights, including access to gender transition care. The NIH then conducted a review of grants and determined that more than 1,700 of them were not consistent with Trump's directives and terminated them, including studies into HIV prevention and gender identity among teens. The moves were challenged by 16 states led by Massachusetts and the American Public Health Association, among others. After a trial, U.S. District Judge William Young in Massachusetts ruled that the government had failed to follow correct legal processes in implementing the policy, in violation of a law called the Administrative Procedure Act. In rushing to implement Trump's agenda, NIH "simply moved too fast and broke things, including the law," Young wrote. He also said that DEI was "an undefined enemy," noting that government lawyers had not been able to explain exactly what it meant. Young found that there was "pervasive racial discrimination" and "extensive discrimination" against gay, lesbian and transgender people in how grants were selected for termination. He also found "an unmistakable pattern of discrimination against women's health issues." Young declined to put his ruling on hold, as did the Boston-based 1st U.S Circuit Court of Appeals, which also kept the grants intact. In asking the Supreme Court to intervene on behalf of the Trump administration, Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued that the case is similar to another that arose in Massachusetts in which a judge blocked Trump administration plans to terminate teacher training grants on anti-DEI grounds. The Supreme Court in April blocked that ruling on a 5-4 vote. "This application presents a particularly clear case for this court to intervene and stop errant district courts from continuing to disregard this court's rulings," Sauer wrote. Lawyers for the states pushed back on Sauer's narrative, saying it "bears little resemblance to reality, with Young's ruling a "run-of-the mill" example of a court intervening when the government violates the law. The justices Thursday disagreed over whether the April decision governed the outcome in the latest case. In a brief opinion, Roberts, who dissented in the earlier case, said it was different, with Young's findings "well within the scope of the district court's jurisdiction." But conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch, in his own separate opinion, criticized Young for failing to abide by the April decision. "Lower court judges may sometimes disagree with this court's decisions, but they are never free to defy them," he wrote. The Trump administration has regularly turned to the Supreme Court when its broad use of executive power is challenged in court and has prevailed in the majority of cases. Trump and his allies have also harshly criticized judges who have ruled against him.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store