logo
Ukraine struck Russian warplanes at a base its fighter-bombers flee to when other airfields are in danger, intel says

Ukraine struck Russian warplanes at a base its fighter-bombers flee to when other airfields are in danger, intel says

Yahoo01-07-2025
Ukrainian drones struck a Russian airbase on Friday, destroying two Su-34 fighter-bomber planes.
The airbase is used as a staging point for fighter jets dispersed from more vulnerable locations.
Britain's defense ministry said that, despite these efforts, Russian planes are still under threat.
Ukrainian forces launched an attack on a Russian airbase that's used as a fallback spot for fighter jets pulled from more vulnerable locations, a new Western intelligence assessment said.
Ukraine used long-range drones on Friday to strike the Marinovka airbase in Russia's Volgograd region, over 270 miles from the front lines, destroying at least two Su-34 fighter-bomber aircraft.
Russia uses Marinovka for its daily combat operations, but it has also functioned as a haven for dispersed aircraft taken from other threatened airbases, Britain's defense ministry said in a Tuesday intel update that confirmed some details of the attack.
Su-34 fighter-bomber aircraft were relocated to Marinovka from Morozovsk airbase, which is closer to the front lines, after it was hit by Ukrainian drones in August 2024. However, "despite these dispersal efforts to protect their aircraft, Russian aviation remains vulnerable" to Kyiv's attacks, the defense ministry said.
The attack on Marinovka on Friday was a joint operation carried out by Ukraine's SBU internal security agency, its Special Operations Forces, and other elements of the military.
The SBU said that the attack destroyed two Su-34 and damaged two other aircraft, while the military said all four planes were destroyed. Ukraine also noted that the drone attacks caused a fire in the maintenance and repair areas of the airbase. Business Insider could not immediately confirm the details of the operation.
The Su-34 "Fullback" fleet has been a serious problem for Ukraine, as Russia arms these aircraft with its highly destructive glide bombs and employs them to devastating effect.
Glide bombs are unguided dumb bombs fitted with special kits that turn them into precision-guided munitions. With short flight times, small radar signatures, and non-ballistic trajectories, they are incredibly difficult to intercept and have been used in deadly strikes on Ukrainian cities.
Russia's defense industry produces glide bombs in a range of different sizes. Among the larger munitions is one that weighs more than 6,000 pounds, which is very destructive on impact.
Britain's defense ministry said Russia relies on its Su-34 fleet to execute "huge amounts of daily sorties launching glide bombs" across the front lines. It further added that Moscow has now lost more than 30 of these aircraft since its full-scale invasion began in February 2022.
Ukraine has made it a priority to curb the glide bomb threat and has carried out a number of deep strikes over the past year aimed at Su-34 aircraft, the airfields they're based at, and storage sites for these munitions.
The glide bombs continue to be a major challenge for Kyiv. On Sunday, for instance, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Russian warplanes had launched nearly 1,100 of these munitions over the previous week.
The Marinovka attack comes amid Ukraine's relentless efforts to degrade Russian aviation capabilities. Over the weekend, Kyiv carried out another drone strike that targeted helicopter operations at a base in the occupied Crimean peninsula.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

From Triumph in Iran to Starvation in Gaza: Netanyahu Squanders His Moment to Halt the War
From Triumph in Iran to Starvation in Gaza: Netanyahu Squanders His Moment to Halt the War

New York Times

time12 minutes ago

  • New York Times

From Triumph in Iran to Starvation in Gaza: Netanyahu Squanders His Moment to Halt the War

When Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, led the country to a military victory over Iran in June, both his allies and rivals portrayed it as his finest achievement. Flush with newfound confidence and authority, Mr. Netanyahu seemed finally to have gained the political capital he needed to override opposition from his far-right government allies to a truce in Gaza. Six weeks later, the prime minister has squandered that moment. The talks between Hamas and Israel are, once again, stuck. Israel is now pushing for a deal to end the war in one go, instead of in phases. But like Hamas, Mr. Netanyahu has refused to make the compromises needed for such a deal to work — and the credit that he accrued in June has evaporated, both domestically and overseas. International condemnation of the growing starvation in Gaza, which aid agencies and many foreign government have largely blamed on Israel's 11-week blockade on the territory this year, is at its peak. Partly to protest Israel's responsibility for that situation, several longstanding allies of Israel have recognize a Palestinian state, or pledged to do so in the near future. Domestic opposition to the Gaza war is at an all-time high, and calls are growing for the remaining hostages held by Hamas to be returned through a diplomatic deal. Israel's ability to sustain the war, amid growing fatigue among its military reservists, is increasingly under question. After a rise in death by suicide by reserve soldiers, the military has set up a committee to investigate how to better support those leaving service. 'Israel is in the tightest spot it has been in at any point in the war,' said Michael Koplow, an analyst at Israel Policy Forum, a New York-based research group. 'It is dealing with a societal crisis over the continued war and plight of the hostages, a military crisis over the lack of clear aims and reservist fatigue, a diplomatic crisis over its close European allies lining up to unilaterally recognize Palestinian statehood, and an existential crisis over its eroding standing in the U.S.,' Mr. Koplow said. The protraction of the Gaza conflict also reflects President Trump's failure to capitalize on the leverage he accrued during the war with Iran. By joining Mr. Netanyahu's attacks, Mr. Trump gave Israel a symbolic victory. At the time, analysts expected him to demand that Mr. Netanyahu repay the favor by drawing the Gaza war to a close. 'He had all the leverage in the world to say to Netanyahu: 'Now we need to end this,'' said Daniel B. Shapiro, a fellow at the Atlantic Council, a Washington-based research group, and a former U.S. ambassador to Israel. 'Instead, Netanyahu seemed to persuade Trump to give him more time,' said Mr. Shapiro. 'Now, things are just dragging and dragging.'

U.S.-India Relations Strain Over Russian Oil
U.S.-India Relations Strain Over Russian Oil

Time​ Magazine

timean hour ago

  • Time​ Magazine

U.S.-India Relations Strain Over Russian Oil

President Donald Trump seems unafraid to burn India, a longtime friend of the U.S., over its Russian oil purchases. 'He wants a tremendous relationship and has had always a tremendous relationship with India and the Prime Minister [Narendra Modi],' White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller said on Fox News over the weekend. 'But we need to get real about dealing with the financing of this war.' The war Miller was referring to is Russia's with Ukraine, which has been ongoing for three and a half years. The Trump Administration has recently shifted from the President's earlier friendly tone towards Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump, who said repeatedly during his presidential campaign that he would end the war 'in 24 hours,' has apparently grown fed up with Putin, issuing sharp criticisms of the Russian President as well as of former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. Last month, Trump announced that the U.S. would continue to supply Ukraine militarily (after earlier announcing a pause), and he threatened tariffs and other measures on Russia if it does not reach a peace deal with Ukraine by Aug. 8. But Trump is also shifting his approach toward India, which has long served as a regional buffer against China and whose leader has had a close relationship with Trump. 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care,' Trump posted on Truth Social on July 31. 'India portrays itself as being one of our closest friends in the world, but they don't accept our products, they impose massive tariffs on us, … and of course we see again the purchasing of [Russian] oil.' Miller said on Fox News, adding that 'all options are on the table' for Trump to end the Russia-Ukraine war. India's ties to Russia India and Russia have a track record of supporting each other that goes back decades. When former U.S. President Richard Nixon sent a warship to intimidate India during the 1971 India-Pakistan War, Russia sent its navy to the Indian Ocean. In December 2021, Modi and Putin signed a number of trade and arms deals, while Russian oil producer Rosneft is expanding its investment in India. India has also repeatedly abstained from voting on United Nations resolutions to condemn Russia's invasion of Ukraine. 'People will be shocked to learn that India is basically tied with China in purchasing Russian oil. That's an astonishing fact,' Miller said. India imports around two million barrels of crude oil per day from Russia, making it the second largest purchaser of Russian oil after China, according to the New York Times. Russia's share of Indian oil imports has increased from less than 1% before the war to more than a third. Russia has for years also been India's top arms supplier. While the war in Ukraine lowered Russia's arms exports due in part to the need for weapons on its own battlefield, India was still Russia's top arms buyer between 2020 and 2024, purchasing 38% of Russian arms exports, according to a 2024 report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Trump's short-term shifts After months of trade talks between the U.S. and India, which Trump had hinted came very close to a deal, Trump imposed a 25% tariff on the South Asian country. In a July 30 post announcing the new rate, Trump griped about India's 'strenuous and obnoxious' trade barriers and the country's financial ties to Russia: 'Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE — ALL THINGS NOT GOOD!' In addition to the 25% tariff, Trump said India would pay a 'penalty' for its Russia ties. Trump has separately threatened a 100% tariff on imports from countries that buy Russian oil, unless Russia and Ukraine reach a peace deal. India has also come under Trump's fire as a member of intergovernmental grouping BRICS, which is led by U.S.-sanctioned countries Russia, China and Iran, as well as Brazil and South Africa. Trump threatened an additional 10% tariff on BRICS members, which he said were aligning themselves against the U.S. Meanwhile, Trump has moved closer to Pakistan, with which India has hostile relations and the U.S. has historically had a complex and sometimes tense relationship, especially as Pakistan has grown closer to and is primarily armed by China. Earlier this year, India and Pakistan were on the brink of war after a terrorist attack in Indian-administered Kashmir prompted an Indian missile strike on Pakistan-administered Kashmir and Pakistan's eastern Punjab province. India accused the Pakistani government of being involved in the attack, which Pakistan denied. After days of the escalating conflict, Trump announced a cease-fire between the two neighbors—a development that Trump has repeatedly taken credit for since. Pakistan thanked Trump for his part in brokering the peace, going so far as to nominate him for a Nobel Peace Prize. India, on the other hand, has rejected Trump's claim as 'baseless and entirely incorrect' that India called off its military campaign under U.S. pressure. Hours after announcing the 25% tariff on India, Trump said the U.S. 'concluded' a trade deal with Pakistan, which would involve an oil partnership, quipping that, 'Who knows, maybe they'll be selling Oil to India some day!' Experts have said that the Trump Administration's more transactional approach to international diplomacy has meant that longtime friends can abruptly be bucked in favor of short-term U.S. interests. 'The U.S. administration has tended to focus on its immediate concerns, and Pakistan has been quick to respond to these. India seeks to convince the U.S. to take a longer-term view and make decisions accordingly,' retired American diplomat Jon Danilowicz told the South China Morning Post. 'For the present, it seems that New Delhi is holding the short end of the stick.' India doubles down 'I understand that India is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia,' Trump told reporters last week. 'That's what I heard. I don't know if that's right or not. That is a good step. We will see what happens.' It seems, at least for now, that Trump heard wrong. 'Our ties with any country or all the ties that we have with various countries, they have, they stand on their own merit and they should not be seen from the prism of a third country,' India's foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said at a news conference on Aug. 1 without directly addressing Trump's comments. 'As far as India-Russia relations are concerned, we have a steady and time-tested partnership.' Bloomberg reported last week that the Indian government had told state-owned oil refiners to prepare alternatives to Russian crude, although one person familiar with the matter told the outlet that the instruction was meant as scenario planning in the event that Russian crude oil becomes unavailable. Other sources told Bloomberg that the Indian government is still assessing its position. Two senior Indian officials told the Times on Saturday that there has been no change in policy and that India would continue purchasing oil from Russia. Modi also struck a critical tone of Trump's tariffs, after months of Indian officials seeming to cast the policy in a more cautiously optimistic light. 'The world economy is going through many apprehensions, there is an atmosphere of instability,' Modi said at a rally in Uttar Pradesh on Saturday. 'In such a situation, the countries of the world are focusing on their respective interests. They are focusing on the interests of their respective countries,' he added, referencing how the government believes India is on track to become the third largest economy in the world, behind the U.S. and China. 'Therefore, India also has to be vigilant about its economic interests.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store