Security guard, maimed for life with leg amputated, awarded Rs 32.66 lakh compensation by Thane MACT
Image used is for representational purposes only
THANE: A 39-year-old security guard, maimed for life after his left leg was amputated following a road accident in 2013, has been awarded Rs 32.66 lakh in compensation by the
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal
(MACT), Thane.
The compensation was granted to Dinesh Rajmani Chaurasiya, who sustained life-altering injuries when a speeding motorcycle hit him while he was walking along the roadside near Skyhigh Building, Padle, Thane, on October 31, 2013, around 8:45 PM.
The Tribunal, presided over by Chairman S.B. Agrawal, passed the order on May 7, with the judgment becoming available on Thursday.
At the time of the accident, Chaurasiya was employed as a security guard with Bombay Management Services, reportedly earning Rs 15,000 per month.
Due to the severity of the injuries, including damage to his head and other body parts, he was first taken to Kalsekar Hospital in Mumbra and later to Sion Hospital, where his leg had to be amputated below the knee.
In his petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Chaurasiya claimed the accident left him permanently disabled and unemployable. The respondents, motorcycle owner Kushang Gautam Pandit and United India Insurance Co.
Ltd., denied liability, alleging contributory negligence and breach of insurance conditions.
However, the Tribunal concluded—based on FIR records, police panchanama, and the petitioner's testimony—that the accident occurred solely due to the motorcyclist's rash and negligent driving. The court found no breach of insurance terms and held the insurer liable to pay.
While the petitioner sought Rs 7.5 lakh towards medical expenses, only Rs 1 lakh was awarded due to lack of complete documentation. The Tribunal assessed functional disability at 75% and calculated notional income at Rs 12,000/month, with a 50% addition for future prospects. He was also awarded Rs 2.5 lakh for pain, suffering, and loss of amenities.
The case, filed in 2019, took more than five years to conclude.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Pune digital arrest case: Pimpri Chinchwad police arrest two with ‘mule' accounts
Pune: Pimpri Chinchwad police's cyber wing arrested two men from Ahilyanagar district on Monday, in connection with the alleged "digital arrest" of a 47-year-old Pune man who lost Rs 53 lakh to fraudsters. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Police claimed the arrested duo from Bolhegaon in Ahilyanagar district — one's a farmer while the other works at a finance company — allowed their bank accounts to be used as "mule accounts". Stolen money would be wired to their accounts and the duo would then withdraw the cash to hand it over to their handlers, the authorities alleged. "Their handler is also from the same village, but is currently based in Pune. Our investigations show the handler had created at least 20 mule accounts in this village. The details of these accounts were handed over to fraudsters based out of Maharashtra," said assistant inspector Pravin Swami, of Pimpri Chinchwad cyber police. The two men arrested on Monday were identified as Akash Pathare (28) and Avinash Tungar (27). They were held as the police investigate the complaint by a Moshi resident who said that on April 2 he received a "letter" via a messaging app that claimed his bank account was being used to launder money and that he faced arrest. One police official said: "The person at the other end told the Moshi resident he was an 'officer' with the Mumbai crime branch. He told the victim the cops and the bank needed to verify his bank account through a money transfer. The victim was even told the bank would return the money to him immediately after verification. Believing all this, the Moshi man transferred Rs 53 lakh to the three bank account numbers given to him. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He never got the money back." Senior inspector Ravikiran Nale of Pimpri Chinchwad cyber police told TOI that during their investigation, they found Rs 5.4 lakh of the money was transferred to a private bank's account. "So we took the details of this account holder from the bank and found that it was in Ahilyanagar district. We arrested Pathare who revealed three more names. We then arrested Tungar. A search is on for the two others," Nale said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HC drops drug trafficking case against actor's son over unfair merging of charges
Mumbai: Calling it "preposterous", Bombay high court on Monday dismissed a drug trafficking case registered in 2021 against Dhruv Tahil, son of actor Dalip Tahil . The court held the law prohibits a merging of several minor aberrations over 18 months into one charge, a move that led to Tahil "being charged with an offence of a higher magnitude". Holding the Bandra Anti-Narcotic Cell's action as impermissible after analysing sections 218 and 219 of the erstwhile CrPC, the HC said: "Prosecution cannot be permitted to decipher and follow its own procedure for levying of charge of such a serious nature which is impermissible under the provisions of (law)." Pointing out that Tahil was not even arrested in possession of contraband, Justice Milind Jadhav said: "Prima facie when section 218 (of CrPC) is read, such charge by prosecution on the face of record appears to be preposterous… The procedural law does not permit the prosecution to assimilate more than three charges into a singular charge over a period of 18 months to be tried together and invoke a singular precipitative action. " The ANC, Bandra unit, in May 2021 arrested Tahil, then aged 30, after a co-accused, Muzammil Shaikh, held in Bandra (E) with 35 gm of mephedrone (MD), alleged that he had "in the past" supplied to him and various others. Police said it recovered WhatsApp messages between Jul 2019 and Jan 2021, which allegedly pertained to purchase of 1 gm or 2 gm of MD on various occasions, totalling 44 gm from Shaikh worth roughly Rs 25,000, to justify its invocation of serious charges of drug trafficking against Tahil in alleged conspiracy with Shaikh. HC noted that for small quantities, the punishment is less -- maximum 1 year in jail; but for intermediate quantities (less than commercial) invoked against him, it is 10 years. Justice Jadhav said "the prosecution was aware" each single act of alleged procurement was "less than small quantities" and Tahil would get the benefit of doubt, and hence it combined all the alleged transactions without following the tenets of the exception carved under the law. Tahil had challenged a 2023 rejection of his discharge plea by a special NDPS court. Justice Jadhav, after hearing Tahil's counsel Ayaz Khan, who alleged non-application of mind by the police and "mala fide intentions" in invoking the charges, and after hearing prosecutor H Dedhia, said, "From the material available on record and invocations of charge… no case is made out for the applicant to stand trial." HC also said "the alleged WhatsApp chats... in my opinion cannot translate into admissible evidence" during trial. HC said the state failed to comply with CrPC mandate and it led to Tahil "being charged with an offence of a higher magnitude". That too, under a special law like NDPS, which attracts higher punishment and fine and stringent conditions to get bail, HC noted adding, stringent laws require reciprocal duty on police to strictly comply with the law and its aspects that may have a negative impact on the accused.
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Law tribunal official sent to CBI custody for a day in Rs 3-lakh bribery case
A special court in Mumbai on June 10 granted one-day custody of National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Deputy Registrar Charan Pratap Singh to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for further probe in connection with a Rs 3-lakh bribery who was arrested by the CBI on May 29, was initially remanded to judicial custody along with his aide, Karsan Ganesh Ahir. While Singh's lawyer Sak Saxena had moved a bail plea, the CBI sought five days of police custody, citing the need for further the plea, Saxena argued that seeking custody after the accused had been sent to judicial custody amounts to a review of an existing judicial order, which is impermissible under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) or any other applicable law. He contended that unless new compelling evidence had emerged, a renewed plea for police custody was invalid. Saxena further added that any need to confront witnesses could be addressed while the accused remains in judicial custody through court-approved procedures. The special judge, after hearing both sides, observed that the initial police custody was denied on May 29 and since then, new witness statements had emerged indicating Singh's involvement. Citing this, the court ruled that the CBI had presented sufficient grounds to justify a one-day custodial remand for further court directed Shyamal Sawant, Police Inspector of CBI's Anti-Corruption Branch, to take Singh into custody from Central Prison Mumbai on June 10 and produce him before the court again on June 11 at 11.00 was arrested for allegedly demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs 3 lakh from a businessman to help favourably resolve an ownership dispute involving a prominent hotel in Mumbai. According to the CBI, Singh had handed over Rs 50,000 to Pradeep Kumar Nagarale, Court Officer at NCLT Mumbai, on May 16 as part of the bribe meant to influence an NCLT Board agency further alleged that incriminating WhatsApp conversations between Singh and Nagarale were deleted from both their phones, which it is currently attempting to retrieve as part of the Watch
