Karen Read's retrial (live verdict watch): Deliberations resume after judge answers jury questions
Tuesday marks the second full day of jury deliberations in the murder retrial of Karen Read, the woman charged in the death of her Boston police officer boyfriend.
WATCH LIVE: Verdict watch in Karen Read's retrial continues
HAPPENING NOW -- Jurors deliberating Karen Read's fate have asked three questions:
What is the timeframe for the OUI charge, 12:45 a.m. or 5 a.m.?
Are video clips of Karen Read evidence, and how do we consider them?
Does convicting guilty on a sub-charge convict on the overall charge? (In reference to manslaughter OUI charge)
Follow live court updates from Ted Daniel:
The jury was unable to reach a verdict on Monday, the first full day of deliberations in Read's second trial. Jurors got the case on Friday afternoon and deliberated for just under two hours following weeks of testimony and closing arguments.
Each morning of deliberations will begin with Judge Beverly Cannone issuing a formal opening to the jury before being sent off to deliberate, and the afternoons will feature a formal closing.
The jury, which consists of seven women and five men, is allowed back in the courtroom if any questions arise. On Monday, it was radio silence from the jury. Last year, the jury sent three notes to the judge over three days before a mistrial was declared.
The jurors have a lot to consider after hearing from 50 witnesses over 31 days of testimony: Did Read hit O'Keefe? Was there any collision at all? Or is someone else responsible for his death?
They are trying to reach a verdict on three charges that Read faces:
Second-degree murder
Manslaughter while operating under the influence
Leaving the scene of a crash resulting in death
Verdict slips: See the choices jurors in Karen Read's retrial face
When a verdict is ultimately reached, both the prosecution and defense will be notified and called back to court.
The highlight from court on Monday came when Judge Cannone denied a motion from the defense that sought to amend a verdict slip that was provided to jurors.
In the filing in Dedham's Norfolk Superior Court, Read's lawyers argued that the verdict slip on their client's second charge of manslaughter while operating under the influence of liquor is unclear and could confuse the jury.
Read's lawyers asked the court to add a 'not guilty box' on the lesser included charges, since there is only one 'not guilty' option on the slip that applies to all of count two, compared to four guilty options.
'The current jury verdict slip has the real potential to confuse the jury and cause errors,' the defense motion states. 'The form doesn't explain the process the jury should follow while completing it.'
The motion continued, 'This imbalanced presentation visually favors guilty options and risks creating bias toward a guilty verdict in degradation of Ms. Read's rights.'
In denying the motion, Judge Cannone stated that the verdict slip is 'consistent with Massachusetts law' and 'viewed in conjunction with the jury instructions,' which she provided to jurors on Friday.
When asked outside of court about Cannone's ruling, Read said the motion was denied without a proper hearing.
'I think what happened last year with the same verdict form explains it...The jurors said as much, and we just wanted to avoid that again,' Read said. 'Apparently, the court is not concerned, so we'll just move forward and wait on the jury.'
When asked how she feels about the jury, Read said, 'I feel well, I feel strong, and the jury will do the right thing. We choose them.'
Read, 45, of Mansfield, is accused of striking John O'Keefe, 46, with her Lexus SUV and leaving him to die alone in a blizzard outside of a house party in Canton at the home of fellow officer Brian Albert on Jan. 29, 2022, following a night of drinking.
Throughout her second trial, the prosecution's theory of jaded love turned deadly was countered by a defense claim that a cast of tight-knit Boston area law enforcement killed a fellow police officer.
Read's lawyers argued that O'Keefe was beaten, bitten by a dog, then left outside Albert's home in a conspiracy orchestrated by the police that included planting evidence against Read.
Read's first trial ended in a mistrial after five days due to a hung jury on July 1, 2024. Several jurors later came out to say that the panel had unanimously agreed that Read was not guilty of the most serious charge of second-degree murder.
Get caught up with all of the latest in Karen Read's retrial.
Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts.
Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
R. Kelly hospitalized after overdosing on meds given by prison staff, lawyer says
Disgraced R&B artist R. Kelly was rushed to a hospital last week after overdosing on medications allegedly given to him by prison staff, his legal team claimed in a new court filing. The 'I Believe I Can Fly' singer, currently serving a 30-year sentence for racketeering and sex trafficking, claims he overdosed after taking medication he received while being held in isolation. According to a June 17 court filing reviewed by USA Today, the 58-year-old was placed in solitary confinement 'against his will' on June 10 after his lawyers filed an emergency motion requesting that he be moved from federal prison to house arrest claiming three Bureau of Prisons officials were allegedly plotting to have him killed. Later that day, prison staff instructed him to take additional medication alongside the anti-anxiety drugs he regularly uses, according to the filing. Three days later, he woke up feeling 'faint' and 'dizzy.' 'He started to see black spots in his vision. Mr. Kelly tried to get up, but fell to the ground,' the lawyers wrote. 'He crawled to the door of the cell and lost consciousness.' The three-time Grammy winner, real name Robert Sylvester Kelly, was taken to Duke University Hospital in Durham, N.C. He was later forcibly discharged two days later against medical advice, since he was scheduled to undergo surgery to treat an ongoing blood clot issue, according to the filing. Even though he was expected to stay at the hospital for two weeks for the procedure, 'officers with guns came into his hospital room' to take Kelly back to solitary confinement, the complaint alleges. His lawyers said they weren't able to speak with their client until late Monday, after a scheduled call was canceled 'without explanation.' Kelly was sentenced to 30 years in prison in 2022 after being convicted in New York of orchestrating the sexual abuse of young female fans over decades. Earlier this year, a federal appeals court in New York rejected his bid to overturn the conviction. He was also convicted on child pornography charges in his hometown of Chicago and sentenced to 20 years, most of which will be served concurrently. Last week, Kelly's defense team said they were 'in open discussions with people close to President Trump' regarding a potential presidential pardon. 'We believe that President Trump is the only person with the courage to help us,' attorney Beau Brindley told People. Kelly, who maintains his innocence, is serving his sentence at a medium-security prison in Butner, N.C. He'll be eligible for release in 2045, at age 78. _____
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jurors in Karen Read trial raise issue of ‘hung jury' in 4th question to judge
The jury in Karen Read's retrial asked the presiding judge on Tuesday afternoon if they could return a partial verdict on just two of the three counts she faces. The note from the jury came before the judge answered three earlier questions Tuesday, and it asked, 'If we find not guilty on two charges but can't agree on one charge, is it a hung jury on all three charges or just the one charge?' Judge Beverly Cannone said she could not ignore the question, but the law barred her from answering theoretical questions. 'I'm simply going to say, because it's true, it's the law, that this is not a question I can answer,' Cannone said. She also said she'd tell jurors not to be 'concerned with the consequences of their verdict, and that's exactly what they are doing here.' Alan Jackson, one of Read's lawyers, strongly objected and told Cannone 'it would be appropriate' to send a note to jurors asking if they could proceed without any further input by the court. Jackson said the judge should give jurors an answer at a later point if 'the question remains' and that Cannone 'absolutely can answer' their question. 'It's a reporting question. In other words, I don't see it as theoretical,' he said. 'I see it a little bit differently, which is, 'What are our options?' And the options are built in the law, not in theory.' The same issue arose at Read's first trial: multiple jurors, in the wake of Cannone declaring a mistrial, reported to Read's defense that they agreed to acquit her on two of the three counts, but they didn't know they could return a partial verdict. That led to a lengthy appeals fight that was appealed to but not taken up by the U.S. Supreme Court. Cannone said it would be premature to answer the question, and there were other remedies she could offer the jury if a similar question arose down the line. But Jackson said telling the jury the court couldn't answer their question was the 'first step down the wrong path.' He asked Cannone to tell the panel she couldn't answer the question 'at this time.' 'I don't think that's an appropriate answer to a very clear question,' he said. 'If that question remains in their minds, we're gonna end up in the exact same position that we were in last year,' Jackson said Cannone noted the objection and overruled Jackson. She sent a handwritten response to the jury. Read and her lawyers will return to the courtroom at 4 p.m., or sooner if there is a verdict or another question. Read, 45, is charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter while operating under the influence and leaving the scene of an accident causing injury or death. She is accused of ramming her Lexus SUV into O'Keefe outside the Canton home of another Boston Police officer. Read and her lawyers have said she was framed and O'Keefe was beaten to death inside the home. No verdict after 3rd day of deliberations in Karen Read retrial Judge gives Karen Read jurors new verdict slip after jury's 3 questions Jury in Karen Read retrial sends three questions to judge on 3rd day of deliberations Jury in Karen Read retrial resumes deliberations Tuesday morning Karen Read retrial: No verdict reached after 2nd day of deliberations Read the original article on MassLive.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge gives Karen Read jurors new verdict slip after jury's 3 questions
Update: Jurors in Karen Read trial raise issue of 'hung jury' in 4th question to judge The judge in Karen Read's retrial delivered several additional instructions to the jury Tuesday afternoon — including a new, amended verdict slip — after jurors submitted a series of questions. Judge Beverly Cannone handed jurors a new verdict slip after receiving a jury question about convicting Read of the lesser included offense of operating under the influence. The new verdict slip for the charge of manslaughter while operating under the influence included additional language meant to make it easier to follow. She went through the form top to bottom for the jurors. She explained that jurors could acquit or convict Read of the manslaughter OUI charge and all lesser included charges. The jury could also acquit or convict Read of each lesser included offense. She asked if the instructions were clearer, and several jurors nodded affirmatively. Cannone also addressed two other questions. Jurors asked what the 'timeframe' was for Read's operating under the influence charge. 'You folks have all the evidence. It's only you who decide the facts in this case,' Cannone told the jury. The second question asked how they could consider Read's interviews and whether they were evidence. Cannone explained that the videos are evidence, and jurors should 'weigh the defendant's statements in the videos as you would any other evidence. Give them whatever weight you deem appropriate.' The instructions came after brief arguments from Alan Jackson, one of Read's defense attorneys, and Hank Brennan, the special prosecutor. Jackson and Brennan were in agreement on the amended verdict slip. Brennan asked for a specific time to be given to the jury on the OUI charge, but Cannone said she wasn't comfortable doing so since it wasn't included in Read's indictment. After the jury departed, Cannone told lawyers to return to the courtroom at 1:30 p.m. Read, 45, is charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter while operating under the influence and leaving the scene of an accident causing injury or death. She is accused of ramming her Lexus SUV into O'Keefe outside the Canton home of another Boston Police officer. Read and her lawyers have said she was framed and O'Keefe was beaten to death inside the home. No verdict after 3rd day of deliberations in Karen Read retrial Jurors in Karen Read trial raise issue of 'hung jury' in 4th question to judge Jury in Karen Read retrial sends three questions to judge on 3rd day of deliberations Jury in Karen Read retrial resumes deliberations Tuesday morning Karen Read retrial: No verdict reached after 2nd day of deliberations Read the original article on MassLive.
