
How much of a future does Elon Musk really have in US politics?
Convinced that his vision for the future of artificial intelligence was superior to that of OpenAI head Sam Altman and former Google chief executive Larry Page, Elon Musk cut ties with Page and parted ways with OpenAI, which he helped found in 2015.
That same decisive belief in himself has famously spilled into politics. After spending nearly US$300 million in Donald Trump's 2024 campaign and working unofficially in the White House for months, Musk clashed publicly with the US president over a spending bill, which he called a '
disgusting abomination '.
In the heat of the dispute, he floated the idea earlier this month of forming a third party to fix what he sees as a broken electoral system.
'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?,' he asked his 230 million followers on X, the social media platform he owns. Around 80 per cent of respondents voted yes.
Musk reacted by sharing a potential name: 'the American Party'.
But does the tech titan really have a future in politics? In a 2023 biography by Walter Isaacson, Musk himself admitted that he had a 'habit of biting off more than I can chew'. His younger brother Kimbal, who sits on the boards of Tesla and SpaceX, both Musk companies, described his sibling as a 'drama magnet'.
A leader in industries capable of determining a nation's future economic success, Musk in the past year seemed determined to inject drama into politics, both in the US and abroad.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Standard
an hour ago
- The Standard
Analysis: Strikes on Iran mark Trump's biggest, and riskiest, foreign policy gamble
U.S. President Donald Trump delivers an address to the nation at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S. June 21, 2025, following U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. (Reuters)


South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US attacks on Iran stoke debate over Trump's presidential power: ‘this is not our fight'
US President Donald Trump's bombardment of three sites in Iran quickly sparked debate in Congress over his authority to launch the strikes, with Republicans praising Trump for decisive action even as many Democrats warned he should have sought congressional approval. Advertisement 'Well done, President Trump,' Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina posted on social media. Alabama Senator Katie Britt called the bombings 'strong and surgical'. The Senate Armed Services Committee chairman, Roger Wicker of Mississippi, said Trump 'has made a deliberate – and correct – decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime'. The instant divisions in the US Congress reflected an already swirling debate over the president's ability to conduct such a consequential action without authorisation from the House and Senate on the use of military force. While Trump is hardly the first US president to go it alone, his expansive use of presidential power raised immediate questions about what comes next, and whether he is exceeding the limits of his authority. 'This was a massive gamble by President Trump, and nobody knows yet whether it will pay off,' said Rhode Island Senator Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee. Advertisement Democrats and a few Republicans said the strikes were unconstitutional and demanded more information in a classified setting. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said that he received only a 'perfunctory notification' without any details, according to a spokesperson.

The Standard
3 hours ago
- The Standard
Iran's Atomic Energy Organization says it will not allow nuclear development to stop
Iranian flags are displayed on the National Mall near the U.S. Capitol as part of a demonstration organized by activists who support regime change by the people of Iran, in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 20, 2025. (Reuters)