US attacks on Iran stoke debate over Trump's presidential power: ‘this is not our fight'
US President Donald Trump's bombardment of
three sites in Iran quickly sparked debate in Congress over his authority to launch the strikes, with Republicans praising Trump for decisive action even as many Democrats warned he should have sought congressional approval.
Advertisement
'Well done, President Trump,' Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina posted on social media. Alabama Senator Katie Britt called the bombings 'strong and surgical'.
The Senate Armed Services Committee chairman, Roger Wicker of Mississippi, said Trump 'has made a deliberate – and correct – decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime'.
The instant divisions in the US Congress reflected an already swirling debate over the president's ability to conduct such a consequential action without authorisation from the House and Senate on the use of military force. While Trump is hardly the first US president to go it alone, his expansive use of presidential power raised immediate questions about what comes next, and whether he is exceeding the limits of his authority.
'This was a massive gamble by President Trump, and nobody knows yet whether it will pay off,' said Rhode Island Senator Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Advertisement
Democrats and a few Republicans said the strikes were unconstitutional and demanded more information in a classified setting. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said that he received only a 'perfunctory notification' without any details, according to a spokesperson.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Israel faces new reality after US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites
Israelis woke up to a new reality on Sunday after President Donald Trump confirmed that the US bombed Iran's three main nuclear sites , diminishing a threat they have considered existential for decades. The US attack was embraced across the Israeli political spectrum, lauded on hastily assembled TV panels as a historic symbol of unprecedented US-Israeli cooperation at a time when the mainly Jewish state has been shunned by others for its war in Gaza. But commentators and officials were quick to acknowledge that what comes next is far from clear, including Iran's potential responses. They expressed concern that Iran might attack US bases in the region or Israel's own nuclear research centre near the desert town of Dimona, or escalate its own nuclear programme. Iran's atomic energy agency described the US strikes as a 'savage assault' but pledged not to abandon its nuclear industry. The agency did not confirm whether the sites of Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan had been 'completely and totally obliterated', as Trump said they were in a speech. Iranian lawmaker Mannan Raisi was cited by the semi-official Tasnim News Agency as saying that any material at Fordow that could pose a potential risk to the public 'had already been removed'. The Israeli home command returned the country to a state of emergency, telling citizens to stay close to bomb shelters and safe rooms; banning gatherings; and keeping schools, workplaces and the airport shut. It had eased some of those restrictions in recent days. Still, a sense of victory was palpable. The US strike is something Israelis have been seeking for years and it grants them the sense of being under US protection. It is also a personal victory for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whose political fortunes have fallen since the October 2023 assault on Israel by Hamas that triggered the Gaza war.
The Standard
2 hours ago
- The Standard
Analysis: Strikes on Iran mark Trump's biggest, and riskiest, foreign policy gamble
U.S. President Donald Trump delivers an address to the nation at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S. June 21, 2025, following U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. (Reuters)
South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US attacks on Iran stoke debate over Trump's presidential power: ‘this is not our fight'
US President Donald Trump's bombardment of three sites in Iran quickly sparked debate in Congress over his authority to launch the strikes, with Republicans praising Trump for decisive action even as many Democrats warned he should have sought congressional approval. Advertisement 'Well done, President Trump,' Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina posted on social media. Alabama Senator Katie Britt called the bombings 'strong and surgical'. The Senate Armed Services Committee chairman, Roger Wicker of Mississippi, said Trump 'has made a deliberate – and correct – decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime'. The instant divisions in the US Congress reflected an already swirling debate over the president's ability to conduct such a consequential action without authorisation from the House and Senate on the use of military force. While Trump is hardly the first US president to go it alone, his expansive use of presidential power raised immediate questions about what comes next, and whether he is exceeding the limits of his authority. 'This was a massive gamble by President Trump, and nobody knows yet whether it will pay off,' said Rhode Island Senator Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee. Advertisement Democrats and a few Republicans said the strikes were unconstitutional and demanded more information in a classified setting. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said that he received only a 'perfunctory notification' without any details, according to a spokesperson.
