logo
FlySafair denies avoiding CCMA mediation as pilots strike over pay

FlySafair denies avoiding CCMA mediation as pilots strike over pay

IOL News6 days ago
FlySafair on Tuesday said it was operating a reduced schedule,with only two flights cancelled: the 16:45 service from Cape Town to Lanseria and the 19:30 return flight from Lanseria to Cape Town.
Image: Itumeleng English/Independent Newspapers
FlySafair has refuted claims suggesting that it has refused to engage with the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA), asserting that it has actively participated in all required discussions throughout the process.
This comes as FlySafair experienced operational disruptions on Monday as it was forced to cancel 26 flights following the lockout of around 200 pilots who have embarked on industrial action.
The pilots are demanding a 10.5% baseline increase alongside adjustments to flight pay and bonuses for the next financial year, and then 4.5% and 4% respectively for the two years thereafter. They rejected the proposed 5.7% salary increase by FlySafair.
Trade union Solidarity had accused FlySafair of refusing to accept the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) to mediate the dispute in terms of section 150 of the Labour Relations Act but resolving to lock out its pilots for seven days.
However, the CCMA was roped in to mediate the dispute on Monday after FlySafair cancelled 13% of its scheduled flights.
FlySafair on Tuesday said it remained committed to resolving this matter constructively and will be meeting with the CCMA on Wednesday.
The airline said claims that it had refused to participate in the CCMA process were factually incorrect, adding that it has actively engaged with the CCMA throughout the process, as required by law to obtain a protected strike certificate, and continues to participate in CCMA-facilitated discussions in good faith.
In a bid to reassure travellers amid ongoing industrial action involving a segment of its pilot workforce, FlySafair announced that all flights scheduled for Tuesday were departing as planned.
The airline said it was operating a reduced schedule which was proactively implemented last week, with all customers affected by time changes notified via SMS and email using the contact details provided at the time of booking, well in advance of their departures.
It said only two flights were cancelled: the 16:45 service from Cape Town to Lanseria and the 19:30 return flight from Lanseria to Cape Town.
According to FlySafair, these passengers have been directly communicated with, and their preferences respected regarding rebooking and refunds.
Kirby Gordon, chief marketing officer at FlySafair, expressed empathy for affected customers.
'We know that travel disruptions can be incredibly stressful, especially when plans are made well in advance,' Gordon said.
'We're truly sorry for the inconvenience this has caused and want to reassure our customers that we are doing everything in our power to restore full operations as quickly as possible. Our teams are working around the clock to support affected customers, and we remain fully committed to finding a fair and sustainable resolution.'
Meanwhile, Solidarity on Tuesday said the improvement in their quality of life was the main issue for pilots when the mediation process begins on Wednesday.
Solidarity said while the pilots were also seeking a reasonable salary increase – including to restore their compensation to pre-COVID-19 levels – improved working conditions were particularly important.
However, it is the shift in working conditions that has taken centre stage, particularly following the unilateral implementation of a new rostering system by FlySafair.
Solidarity said this change has disrupted established protocols that have governed the pilots' schedules for the past decade, causing a ripple effect on their work-life balance.
The pilots have expressed concerns that the new scheduling system limits adequate rest periods.
"This new schedule impedes adequate rest periods and undermines pilots' family life. As pilots' workdays often start before sunrise and last until late at night, sufficient rest is of utmost importance for the safety and wellbeing of pilots and passengers alike," the union said in a statement.
"In addition, pilots work seven days a week on a rotating schedule, which significantly impacts their family life compared to those who work standard office hours. In the upcoming meeting under the auspices of the CCMA, it is therefore essential for FlySafair to demonstrate a willingness to ensure more flexibility in the scheduling system."
Solidarity has encouraged FlySafair to show a commitment to flexible scheduling. Proposed solutions from the pilots include a guarantee of at least one weekend off within each five-week cycle to allow proper rest and family time, the ability to exchange shifts among colleagues to accommodate personal and family responsibilities, and compensation for any flights undertaken on their days off in subsequent schedule cycles.
BUSINESS REPORT
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Numsa to present alternatives to Macsteel's retrenchment plan amid ongoing negotiations
Numsa to present alternatives to Macsteel's retrenchment plan amid ongoing negotiations

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

Numsa to present alternatives to Macsteel's retrenchment plan amid ongoing negotiations

This plea follows Macsteel's announcement last month that it has taken the difficult decision to enter into a process of restructuring, which may affect a number of its operations and employees. Image: Supplied The National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (Numsa) is set to deliver a formal proposal on Monday that includes a series of alternatives to retrenchments at Macsteel Service Centres South Africa. This initiative aims to establish a voluntary severance framework that respects the dignity of workers while considering the current socio-economic challenges they face. On Saturday, Numsa called on management at Macsteel to abandon its unilateral measures and return to the negotiation table in good faith. This plea follows Macsteel's announcement last month that it has taken the difficult decision to enter into a process of restructuring, which may affect a number of its operations and employees. The company said the global steel and manufacturing sectors have undergone significant changes over the past few years, and neither South Africa nor it have been immune to these challenges. 'Over the past years, the company has implemented a number of measures to address the concerns arising from this global context. However, it is now felt that further action is unavoidable,' Mcsteel said then. 'To this end, we have entered into a process of facilitation, working in collaboration with all concerned parties, including our workforce, union representatives and external stakeholders. Our objective is to be realistic—seeking a way forward that protects both our employees and the future of the company, within the constraints of the current economic climate.' Mcsteel said this process would be conducted as transparently as possible, in full compliance with both the letter and the spirit of the applicable legislation. However, Numsa on Saturday strongly condemned Macsteel for allegedly taking a unilateral decision to offer Voluntary Severance Packages (VSP) to employees outside of the formal consultation process, as prescribed in section 189A of the Labour Relations Act (LRA). Numsa general secretary, Irvin Jim, said this action constituted a direct affront to the consultative principles enshrined in the LRA and undermined the integrity of the facilitated retrenchment process currently underway. 'It is unacceptable that Macsteel has elected to bypass meaningful engagement with Numsa by offering these so-called "packages" without responding to critical questions posed by the union, as these questions are essential to the union's ability to propose viable alternatives to retrenchment,' Jim said. 'Numsa regards this approach as a deliberate attempt to exploit the financial vulnerability and uncertainty of workers facing possible retrenchment. The employer's conduct displays a disregard for the dignity and contributions of its workforce, many of whom have served the company loyally for years. The packages offered are woefully inadequate and do not reflect the socio-economic realities faced by workers or the principles of fairness and equity that should guide any severance process.' Numsa urged all its members employed at Macsteel not to accept these premature and unnegotiated offers, adding that it was actively engaging in the consultation process and is committed to tabling credible alternatives, including a fair and decent VSP framework. The union encouraged workers to await the outcome of these engagements, which are being undertaken in their collective interest. It said the package, which was being offered, was neither the product of collective consultation nor reflective of a genuine effort to cushion workers against the devastating consequences of retrenchment. 'To present such an offer, outside the consultative framework, constitutes bad faith bargaining and renders the process procedurally and substantively flawed,' said the union. Numsa further cautioned all workers to rely solely on communication from their elected union representatives and shop stewards who are actively engaged in the Section 189A consultation process. It said Macsteel's actions reflect a broader pattern of worker exploitation and corporate disregard for labour rights. 'At a time when meaningful consultation is required, the company has instead chosen to act unilaterally and with contempt for its employees' legal rights and livelihoods,' it said. 'Numsa remains resolute in its defence of workers' rights and will not relent in the face of such regressive and exploitative conduct.' BUSINESS REPORT

SA practising damaging politics of the zero-sum game
SA practising damaging politics of the zero-sum game

Daily Maverick

time13 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

SA practising damaging politics of the zero-sum game

While there are many prisms through which you can attempt to understand our politics, one may be to examine whether people see the entire process as a zero-sum game. There may now be mounting evidence that more politicians and voters believe every single issue must be reduced to winners and losers. Anyone with much experience of life will be aware that, as a general rule, when life improves for one person, it often improves for another. This happens in an economy all the time. It is well known that one restaurant in one city block might be popular enough to bring in a certain number of customers. But a group of competing restaurants in the same place are much more likely to bring in a much bigger number. In other words, you are more likely to be successful through sharing space with other restaurants. Growing an economy might well rest on this. One cannot just make a product and sell it on your own. You need to be part of a chain that enables your market and ensures you have both suppliers to help you make your product, and customers to buy it. People who are thinking over the longer term will often make decisions that will cost them in the short run, because they expect to gain in the longer run. Last week, Moneyweb reported that some suppliers to Pick n Pay were actually giving it goods at lower than usual prices. While this costs them in the short run, they don't want a situation where Checkers becomes so dominant they only have one person to sell to. This means that they are helping someone to regain market share. In the case of South Africa, with its incredibly diverse constituencies, and defined by its inequality, the idea of people helping one another might well be more important than in many other places. Winners and losers The nature of our economy requires everyone to be working in the same direction. Instead, what we have is people simply fighting really hard not to be the losers, and others not the winners. Currently, 50 proposals to change the Labour Relations Act are going through Nedlac. While labour analyst Andrew Levy says it's not clear if they really change the balance between workers and managers, several groups and unions have already held a protest against the proposals. They believe that their members might soon lose out, and managers might win. This kind of situation happens all the time in our society. In our politics, the coalition sometimes appears to be reduced to fights between the ANC and the DA that are literally about ensuring one wins and the other loses. Because this is all happening in public, and they are representing constituencies, it can give the impression that those constituencies are really fighting to ensure they are not seen to lose. This transactional approach, and the damage it can cause, is wonderfully, and horrifically, illustrated by the Trump administration's approach to trade. One of the most important dynamics of the past 30 years has been the rise of China as a manufacturer of trade goods. It has made these goods at a cheaper price than many other places, and sold them. This has exported deflation around the world – the price of a cheap bicycle has declined dramatically in real terms since the 1980s. This is largely because companies in different countries have traded with each other. And both parties have become very rich doing so. Trump appears to believe that if one country is getting rich, the other must be losing out. The overwhelming evidence is that this is not the case. Instead, both parties win through these transactions. In some ways, such is the impact of the US, that this example might well be having an impact on our politics. At the same time, another important aspect of how life really works is being lost. In many cases, there is no clear 'winner' and clear 'loser'. Often it is entirely grey, with very little difference in shade. The NHI stand-off In our politics now, it seems that everything must become a life and death situation, that there will be armageddon if someone does not get what they want. Given our inequality, this can sometimes appear as if it is a life-and-death struggle between classes. The NHI might be a useful example: those who support it say the rich are trying to condemn the poor to death, those who oppose it say the rich will lose everything they have. Instead, this is something that should really be negotiated between representatives of constituencies. And there should be a solution that everyone can live with. There are many reasons why we are in this situation. Our racialised inequality must be an important reason. Those who are poor have everything to gain and nothing to lose, while those who are rich have everything to lose and nothing to gain. But this may also be the result of deliberate political strategy. Just as politicians have created abortion as a political issue in the US, by forcing people to take a position, so our leaders often do the same. Both the ANC and the DA benefit from continuing the fight around the NHI. They both get to demonstrate to their constituencies that they are fighting for them. And because the struggle for voters is now so difficult and so intense, the stakes rise each time, and so it is more likely that politicians will behave in this way. All of this feeds an artificial intensity in our politics.

Solidarity CEO urges FlySafair to prioritise pilots' wellbeing in strike standoff
Solidarity CEO urges FlySafair to prioritise pilots' wellbeing in strike standoff

IOL News

time18 hours ago

  • IOL News

Solidarity CEO urges FlySafair to prioritise pilots' wellbeing in strike standoff

Solidarity's CEO Dr Dirk Hermann urges FlySafair to prioritise people over profits, warning that pilot frustration, driven by poor work-life balance and mistrust, could ground the airline's future in a globally competitive market. Image: Supplied Solidarity union Chief Executive Officer Dr Dirk Hermann has called on FlySafair CEO Elmar Conradie to intervene directly in the airline's ongoing pilot strike, warning that the dispute has exposed a deep crisis of trust between the airline and its highly skilled workforce. In an open letter released on Sunday, July, 27, 2025, Hermann addressed Conradie directly, noting that while neither of them is personally involved in the negotiations, the matter has reached a critical point that requires leadership. 'This open letter deliberately does not form part of the negotiations but is a note between the two of us,' he wrote. Hermann highlighted that more than 90% of Solidarity's pilot members voted to continue the strike even after a new offer from FlySafair, an unprecedented move for a professional group that rarely resorts to industrial action. 'Solidarity members only go on strike as a matter of the highest exception... This case is, however, such a highly exceptional one,' he said. He pointed to a 'complete breakdown of trust' between the airline and its pilots and describes their levels of disillusionment as 'toxic.' Drawing on his academic expertise, Hermann added: 'I did my PhD in Labour Relations, and my topic was alienation. I can tell you that the alienation levels of your pilots are toxic.' A core concern is not just remuneration, but the implementation of a new roster system that significantly impacts work-life balance. Pilots, according to Hermann, are not primarily striking over money but over the loss of meaningful, balanced working conditions. ' They are asking for one weekend off a month,' he explains. 'They are looking for balanced jobs and FlySafair has taken that away from them.' Hermann criticised FlySafair's handling of the strike, especially the decision to respond to a one-day action with a full week-long lockout, now extended. 'They wanted to show what is going on in their hearts, but then they got hit in the pocket. They have been threatened and bullied,' he said. He warned that the airline risks an exodus of pilots to international carriers. While FlySafair achieved record profits in 2024 and reportedly paid out R90 million in shares to executives and R1.31 billion to overseas shareholders, many pilots' salaries remain below pre-COVID levels. Hermann argues that the airline's offer has not kept pace with local and global industry standards, especially given the global shortage of pilots. ' There is a pilot shortage, and it is going to get even worse. This shortage is going to rise above inflation, and so too will their salaries. It is a market reality,' he writes. 'My call to you is to intervene in the negotiations. Don't look at the sums, but at the people. Be internationally competitive with a total remuneration package that surpasses salary. If you don't, it will translate into sums, sums you will not like.' 'You must now land this plane that is on strike. Give the pilots what they are asking for and what is good for them, the company and the country,'' he said. Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL News

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store