logo
A political blame game over HS2 failures – but who is right?

A political blame game over HS2 failures – but who is right?

Independent18-06-2025
Heidi Alexander, the transport secretary, was determined to blame the Conservatives when she announced that what is left of the High Speed Two rail project will be delayed again.
'I have to be honest,' she told the Commons on Wednesday, 'this is an appalling mess.' She demanded that Gareth Bacon, her mild-mannered Conservative shadow, apologise, saying that his party had promised people 'the Moon on a stick' but had left a 'shambles' for Labour to sort out.
She said: 'Years of mismanagement and neglect have turned HS2 into a shadow of that vision put forward 15 years ago, but this government were elected on a mandate to restore trust to our politics, and that is why we will not shirk away from this challenge and why today we turn the page on infrastructure failures.'
Was this foreseeable from the start?
I remember being in Andrew Adonis 's office when he was secretary of state for transport in 2009. He was his usual hyper-enthusiastic self as he showed me a map on the wall of his plan for a second high-speed railway in Britain. He was so excited about it, and only briefly crestfallen when I said that I thought it was a bad idea.
I asked why it would not simply increase the gravitational pull of London, and add to economic bias to the South East. He brushed aside such concerns, declaring that, on the contrary, HS2 would push economic development outwards from the capital and spread the benefits to the whole country – a full decade before Boris Johnson popularised the term 'levelling up'.
What I should have said, I now realise, is that it was bound to cost much more than he expected, because he would be trying to put the first new rail route through England since the population had achieved modern levels of density and modern levels of litigiousness.
But did it have to be mismanaged so badly?
It could have been managed better. If only Adonis had remained in charge of it, I think it would have been managed better, despite being, in my view, fundamentally misconceived.
I am in awe of Adonis's achievement. He was transport secretary for just 23 months at the end of a dying government, yet he managed to launch HS2 in that time with such momentum that the coalition government carried on with it.
But it never had a messianic delivery leader after the change of government, so it trundled along like a late-running stopper under the default structures of the British constitution. There were seven transport secretaries in the 14 years of Conservative-led government, while the civil service contracted out the management to HS2 Ltd, which was responsible for cost overruns, delays and even fraud.
Does anyone emerge with credit?
It could be argued that Rishi Sunak did the right thing, rather late in the day, to try to curtail the excess and waste. He looked at the plans in some detail, concluded that the case for the line didn't add up, and took the difficult decision to cut losses and cancel the northern leg.
According to the House of Commons Library, the costs for the first phase, from London to Birmingham, had already risen from an estimate in 2012 of £20.5bn (in 2019 prices) to an estimate at the beginning of last year of £56bn (still in 2019 prices).
The library commented drily: 'Cost increases have been driven by high inflation, as well as scope changes, worse ground conditions than expected, and optimism bias.' It didn't even mention bat tunnels.
Is the project under control now?
Of course not, although if the delay to completion of Phase 1 is only from 2033 to 2035 that would not be too bad – 2033 was the target completion date when Adonis launched the project in 2010.
But the final part of the route in London, to Euston station, which is important to the success of the line, has not been decided yet, and will depend on private-sector investment in the property above and around the route.
One of the possible hopeful signs, however, is that Alexander has relevant experience as deputy mayor of London responsible for transport. She has worked with Mark Wild and Mike Brown, the new chief executive and chair of HS2. 'Mark and Mike were part of the team, with me, that turned Crossrail into the Elizabeth line; we have done it before and we will do it again,' she told MPs.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Treasury ‘looking at' new property taxes to replace stamp duty
Treasury ‘looking at' new property taxes to replace stamp duty

The Independent

time9 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Treasury ‘looking at' new property taxes to replace stamp duty

The Treasury is considering plans to raise money from a tax on the sale of homes worth more than £500,000, according to reports. Government officials are looking at a potential national property tax, which would replace stamp duty on owner-occupied homes, The Guardian reported. No final decision has been made, but it is thought this national tax could help build a model for local levies to replace council tax in the medium term. Buyers pay stamp duty under the existing framework, if they purchase property worth more than £125,000. The new levy would be paid by owner-occupiers on houses worth more than £500,000 when they sell their home, with the amount due determined by the value of the property and a rate set by the Government. A Treasury spokesperson said: 'As set out in the plan for change, the best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy – which is our focus. 'Changes to tax and spend policy are not the only ways of doing this, as seen with our planning reforms, which are expected to grow the economy by £6.8 billion and cut borrowing by £3.4 billion. 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last autumn's budget, we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance, or VAT.' Chancellor Rachel Reeves will unveil any changes to the Government's tax policy at a fiscal event, such as a budget. Former government adviser Tim Leunig has previously suggested replacing stamp duty land tax with a 'national proportional property tax' levied on house values greater than £500,000, in a paper published by the think tank Onward. At a rate of 0.54%, with a 0.278% supplement on values over £1 million, the levy 'would raise the same amount as stamp duty'. Sir Mel Stride, Conservative shadow chancellor, said: 'The Conservatives have warned that more taxes are coming and now reports are emerging that the family home is next in the firing line. 'This tax grab would punish families for aspiring to own their own home. 'Under Labour nothing is safe. Your home, your job, your pension – the Chancellor has all of it in her sights. 'Rachel Reeves will tax your future to pay for her failure.'

Reeves considering new property tax on houses worth more than £500,000
Reeves considering new property tax on houses worth more than £500,000

The Independent

time9 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Reeves considering new property tax on houses worth more than £500,000

The Treasury is examining plans for a new tax on the sale of homes worth more than £500,000 as part of a shake-up of stamp duty and council tax. Chancellor Rachel Reeves has asked officials to study how a new 'proportional' property tax could be introduced and to model its impact ahead of this autumn's budget. Ministers have already been briefed on the proposals, which could be rolled out during this parliament, The Guardian reports. Under one option, a national property levy would replace stamp duty on owner occupied homes. In the medium term, a second stage could see a local property tax replace council tax, a move designed to repair the finances of struggling local authorities. No final decisions have been made. Treasury sources stressed that while a national levy could be implemented in the coming years, reform of council tax would take longer and would likely depend on Labour winning a second term. The review reflects growing pressure on the chancellor to introduce more wealth based taxes. Labour's deputy leader, Angela Rayner, has urged Ms Reeves to consider measures that target property wealth. Ms Reeves is also under pressure to raise additional revenue without breaking Labour's pledge not to increase taxes on working people. If adopted, the new levy would be paid by owner occupiers when they sell a home worth more than £500,000. The amount would be based on the value of the property, with the rate set centrally and collected by HM Revenue and Customs. It would not replace stamp duty on second homes. The average house price in the UK stood at £272,664 in July, according to Nationwide. Current stamp duty receipts from primary residences vary significantly depending on the housing market, raising £11.6 billion last year. Treasury officials believe a national property tax would be a more stable source of income and would eventually raise a similar amount. Unlike stamp duty, which currently applies to around 60 per cent of home sales and is paid by buyers, the new levy would affect only about a fifth of transactions. The proposals are informed by a 48 page report published last year by the centre right think tank Onward. Written by Dr Tim Leunig, a former government adviser who helped devise the furlough scheme during the Covid pandemic, it set out a dual national and local 'proportional property tax' based on property values. Dr Leunig wrote: 'These proposals would make it easier and cheaper to move house, for a better job, or to be near family, as well as being fairer. It should not be the case that a terrace house in Burnley pays more than a mansion in Kensington – and it wouldn't be under these proposals.'

Worried children ‘warned to avoid migrants while walking home from school' through hotspot areas
Worried children ‘warned to avoid migrants while walking home from school' through hotspot areas

The Sun

time10 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Worried children ‘warned to avoid migrants while walking home from school' through hotspot areas

CHILDREN have been told to 'avoid migrant hot-spots' on their way home from school, senior Tory Robert Jenrick has claimed. He said mums told him that schools warned pupils to steer clear of certain areas — with the kids saying men at the hotels make them feel unsafe. The Shadow Justice Secretary spoke after visiting Epping, Essex — where protests flared in July when an Ethiopian asylum seeker was charged with sexually assaulting a schoolgirl just days after arriving in Britain. Writing in The Sun, Mr Jenrick said: 'I spoke to teens, parents and grandparents — all rightly concerned about the safety of their community. 'These weren't racists or far-right thugs — they were mums in pink T-shirts with Union Jack bunting. "One mother told me how her daughter's school had written to her suggesting children avoid certain parts of town on their walk home. 'Her young daughter told me that men from the hotels loiter outside certain spots 'where they look at us'.' But Mr Jenrick faced questions himself after being pictured alongside Eddy Butler, a founder of the banned neo- Nazi terror group Combat 18. A Labour spokesman said: 'Robert Jenrick is a disgrace. Standing alongside someone with a long history of involvement with neo-Nazi terror groups, at a protest organised by a far-right party, shows just how far he and the Tories have sunk.' Asked about Eddy Butler, a source close to Mr Jenrick hit back: 'No idea who this guy is and Rob didn't speak to him. 'Rob just spoke with peaceful protesters.' Supermarket worker Dean Smith, 51, of Epping, Essex, has been warned he faces jail after admitting violent disorder outside a migrant hotel in the town. Mums & children dressed in pink peacefully protest outside controversial migrant hotel before yobs clash with cops 1 Asylum site vow DOWNING Street yesterday said small boat migrants should not be housed in the middle of towns and cities. It came after we told how Labour councillors in Havant, Hants, want them placed near shops, schools and GPs so they can 'integrate'. No10 agreed the asylum system was 'unfair on working people'. Protest marches against migrant hotels have included one in Canary Wharf, East London.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store