Tense scene at Weinstein trial as alleged perv appears to have medical episode after accuser's defiant gesture
Harvey Weinstein's Manhattan sex crimes retrial took a dramatic turn Tuesday when the accused serial perv apparently suffered a medical episode — sparking a frenzy of court officers to tend to him.
The bizarre moment came after a former actress who accused Weinstein, 73, of raping her defiantly stared down the disgraced Hollywood producer after leaving the witness stand and pointed a finger at her eye, demanding that he look at her.
The startling 'look at me' gesture by Jessica Mann, 38, prompted Weinstein's high-powered defense attorney Arthur Aidala to argue for a mistrial to Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Curtis Farber.
As Aidala contended that the trial should be tossed, Weinstein bizarrely made gurgling sounds — and two court officers quickly surrounded him.
The wheelchair-bound Weinstein took a sip of water, bringing the brief episode to an end.
Asked later if Weinstein had a medical episode, Aidala told The Post that the Miramax founder's already-poor health has been getting worse.
'The short answer is yes, but it was alleviated,' the attorney said.
'He's not doing well. The last two weeks there has been a marked difference in his physical appearance and his stamina. I don't know if its the cancer kicking in, but he's definitely suffering.'
Mann's daring gesture came after she wrenchingly detailed to jurors, between sobs, an alleged rape by Weinstein at a Beverly Hills hotel.
But the convicted sex pest could only shake his head in response, before he descended into gurgling.
'That's absolutely inappropriate behavior by her,' Aidala wailed to the judge.
Prosecutors argued Mann's reaction didn't even come close to grounds for a mistrial — and Farber agreed, denying Aidala's bid.
Mann later returned to the stand and continued to recount the alleged California hotel rape, which took place around the beginning of 2014, recounting for jurors how she had taken an hours-long shower afterward.
'I'm going to bury this so deep and I'm going to forget about this and move on with my life,' she said she told herself.
Mann testified that she decided to 'keep going' to pursue her Hollywood dreams – and continued to have contact with the powerful Weinstein, which led to a consensual sexual relationship.
She recounted that she faked orgasms to end uncomfortable sexual encounters with Weinstein.
'I'm not saying I performed her performance but I made noises,' she said, comparing her fake orgasms to that of Meg Ryan's character in an infamous scene from the 1989 romantic comedy 'When Harry Met Sally.'
'It was definitely not the best I ever had,' she added when Aidala asked if it was a lie.
Mann's first day of testimony Monday saw her tearfully detail another alleged rape by Weinstein in a Midtown hotel.
She testified that after the attack, she found an erection-inducing drug needle apparently used by Weinstein in a hotel room's garbage can with a puzzling label.
'I found on Google that it basically meant 'dead penis,' and you inject it and it can only be used a certain amount of times back to back over a certain time,' she told jurors.
Weinstein is only charged in the Midtown alleged rape. He has pleaded not guilty to charges in his sex crimes retrial.
Weinstein in 2022 was found guilty of one count of rape and two counts of sexual assault at a Los Angeles trial.
He has appealed the conviction.
Originally published as Tense scene at Weinstein trial as alleged perv appears to have medical episode after accuser's defiant gesture
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Experts flag increasing sexual violence in conflicts
Sexual violence is becoming more prevalent in conflicts and experts are calling on Australia to hold state and non-state perpetrators accountable. For the first time, Australia is hosting an international conference on the topic of conflict-related sexual violence, seeking to draw attention to the issue particularly in the Indo-Pacific region. Experts, advocates, researchers and survivors will discuss patterns of violence in conflict and why so many perpetrators go unpunished at the Justice Denied conference. Speakers include Australian Ambassador for Gender Equality Stephanie Copus Campbell, Victorian Supreme Court Justice Lesley Taylor and Papua New Guinea social anthropologist Fiona Hukula. Keynote speaker Jacqui True is director of the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for the Elimination of Violence against Women and an expert on gender, peace, security and violence against women. There had been an uptick in the use of violence against women in conflicts since 2014, often as a way of oppressing communities, she said. "In many cultures, the stigma attaches to the victim not the perpetrator," Professor True said. "We want to seek accountability to prosecute these crimes and hold state and non-state actors accountable. "This should not be a type of violence used in war and there should be support for redress to ensure the safety and recovery of survivors." The conference, being held over two days in Melbourne, aimed to bridge the gap between research, practice and policy making. Of particular focus would be increasing violence in the Indo-Pacific region, where there are some of the highest rates of conflict as a result of growing economic instability and tribal rivalries. "Papua New Guinea particularly is highlighted as we've seen a diffusion of conflict-related sexual violence there in a way that was never present before," Prof True said. "Australia has a really important role to bring attention and support local actors in these sensitive situations to respond to survivors and to drive changes in communities." 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Experts flag increasing sexual violence in conflicts
Sexual violence is becoming more prevalent in conflicts and experts are calling on Australia to hold state and non-state perpetrators accountable. For the first time, Australia is hosting an international conference on the topic of conflict-related sexual violence, seeking to draw attention to the issue particularly in the Indo-Pacific region. Experts, advocates, researchers and survivors will discuss patterns of violence in conflict and why so many perpetrators go unpunished at the Justice Denied conference. Speakers include Australian Ambassador for Gender Equality Stephanie Copus Campbell, Victorian Supreme Court Justice Lesley Taylor and Papua New Guinea social anthropologist Fiona Hukula. Keynote speaker Jacqui True is director of the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for the Elimination of Violence against Women and an expert on gender, peace, security and violence against women. There had been an uptick in the use of violence against women in conflicts since 2014, often as a way of oppressing communities, she said. "In many cultures, the stigma attaches to the victim not the perpetrator," Professor True said. "We want to seek accountability to prosecute these crimes and hold state and non-state actors accountable. "This should not be a type of violence used in war and there should be support for redress to ensure the safety and recovery of survivors." The conference, being held over two days in Melbourne, aimed to bridge the gap between research, practice and policy making. Of particular focus would be increasing violence in the Indo-Pacific region, where there are some of the highest rates of conflict as a result of growing economic instability and tribal rivalries. "Papua New Guinea particularly is highlighted as we've seen a diffusion of conflict-related sexual violence there in a way that was never present before," Prof True said. "Australia has a really important role to bring attention and support local actors in these sensitive situations to respond to survivors and to drive changes in communities." 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
What happens to men who have caused harm to women?
A number of prominent Australian men – including Supreme Court judges – attended a recent launch of a book by supposedly 'disgraced' former High Court judge Dyson Heydon. In 2020, Heydon was found by an independent High Court inquiry to have sexually harassed six young female associates. Heydon maintains his innocence. None of this is any surprise. Donald Trump has been found guilty in a civil court of sexual misconduct, and was subsequently returned to the White House by voters. The longstanding myth that being accused of (or even found to have committed) sexual harassment ruins your career and life forever is being publicly and repeatedly debunked. This is a reminder that the people who subject others to sexual harassment or perpetrate sexual assault are often normal people embedded in and atop the fabric of our society, not outcast from it. So, what do we actually want from men who have been found to have caused harm? Is it punishment, rehabilitation, or both? How do we measure what level of social ostracism it would take for them to not harm again? Should victim satisfaction or future behaviour be the focal point of these reflections? Power and entitlement are the bedrock of all forms of sexual harassment and assault. Powerful people have access to subordinates and have seen institutions or circles they are part of routinely protect their own kind, while silencing victims. This creates a sense of legal and reputational immunity (one that is often proven correct), and contributes to levels of entitlement that manifest as their prerogative to the bodies of others. One of the criminal justice system's greatest failings in addressing sexual harm is its all-or-nothing approach – unable to reckon with the complexity of human experience and interpersonal harm. The criminal system was designed by men, for men, when sexual harm was an act of 'damaging' another man's 'property'. We still lack a socially acceptable form of accountability outside the criminal system, a system many victims avoid, not just because of its traumatising process or the slim chance of a conviction, but because many do not want their perpetrators jailed, especially when they are friends, mentors or colleagues. The problem here is that each victim will have their own threshold for what constitutes justice. Loading Some perpetrators face social consequences for their actions – terminated or forced resignations from positions, exclusion from parties, or reputational damage – but when you're close to the harm, it feels irrelevant compared with the gravity of consequences for the victim. Both things can be true: accountability can exist in public form (generally, men fear this), and yet this can feel painfully insufficient to those who bore the impact (generally, women resent this). However, it must not be forgotten that the question of accountability is only being explored at all because Heydon was found by a High Court inquiry to have committed the actions he was accused of. I wonder whether, had the standard of proof in this inquiry been 'beyond reasonable doubt', the women who spoke up would be branded as 'attention-seeking liars'. The reality was the same, regardless, but the finding is what has shaped the public narrative.
