Vital routes to be protected as part of buses overhaul
This is aimed at services to locations such as hospitals and schools.
The measure is part of the Government's Bus Services Bill, which reached its second reading in the House of Commons on Monday.
This will lead to an overhaul of buses, such as by giving all local transport authorities new powers to run their own services.
The Government will also reduce some of the red tape involved in bus franchising, including reducing the minimum period between local areas taking control of services and being allowed to start operations.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'We're committed to giving local leaders the power to shape the bus services their communities rely on.
'Our Bus Services Bill is a big step forward, protecting vital services that people depend on to get to work, school or essential appointments.
'We have taken a decisive step towards better buses, building on our £1 billion investment to improve and maintain bus services, keeping people connected, driving up living standards and growing the economy.'
Ben Plowden, of lobby group the Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Buses are the most-used form of public transport.
'Preserving vital bus services has long been central to our campaigning, so the new protections in the Bus Services Bill are very welcome indeed.
'Protecting existing services, and identifying and filling gaps in the network, is the way to ensure everyone can access opportunities and stay connected.'
Conservative shadow transport secretary Gareth Bacon attacked the Bus Services Bill as 'an ideological move that threatens essential services'.
He said: 'They scrapped the £2 fare cap, slashed support for routes, and now want to strip away safeguards so councils can seize control of networks they aren't capable of operating.
'This is about Labour clinging to a fantasy of municipal socialism, whatever the cost to those who rely on local transport. Without the requirement to prove any benefit to passengers, Labour-run councils will be free to run yet another public service into the ground.
'We're not opposed to local decision-making. But this Bill offers no real investment, no credible delivery model, and no route to better services.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
24 minutes ago
- ITV News
Majority of public back housing and developments in their area
A majority of people back the idea of new housing or developments where they live, new data has indicated. The poll of 2,005 people conducted by Public First in July found that 55% of respondents would 'generally support new buildings or developments or buildings being built in my local area'. The research found that Labour backers (72%) and young people aged 25-34 (67%) were most likely to be 'Yimby' (yes in my backyard). Reform backers (44%) and people in the East of England (44%) were the most likely groups to say that they generally oppose development in their locality, the poll found. Overall, 33% of people said that they would generally oppose development. Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to put 'builders not blockers first' and 'overhaul the broken planning system'. In December, the Prime Minister announced new mandatory targets for councils when it comes to housebuilding. He said at the time: 'Our plan for change will put builders not blockers first, overhaul the broken planning system and put roofs over the heads of working families and drive the growth that will put more money in people's pockets.' In its report, The Quiet Yes, released on Thursday, Public First argued that a 'more representative planning system' is needed. The policy research organisation recommended that councils bring in changes to surveys and research on public opinion on building plans and questions about how residents would want councils to spend certain money earmarked for development. Jack Airey, director of housing and infrastructure at Public First, said: 'Most people instinctively support new development, yet their voices go unheard. 'Our research finds the public understand the housing shortage and back new homes, but the planning system doesn't reflect that reality. 'Councils and Government should build on this majority view, creating a representative planning system that unlocks support for new homes and the infrastructure communities need.' Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner has said that Labour are 'overhauling the broken planning system'. She said: 'With investment and reform, Labour is delivering the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation, unleashing a social rent revolution, and embarking on a decade of renewal for social and affordable housing in this country.'
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The public is sick of the Government's failure to tackle illegal migration
SIR – The Home Office is said to be furious that migrants can no longer be housed at the Bell Hotel in Eppi ng (report, August 20), after the council was granted a temporary injunction by the High Court. This fury is hardly surprising, as it means that the Home Office will have to come up with an idea to stop the boats that actually works. At the very least, it will have to speed up deportation proceedings. This will probably be a complete and utter surprise to the Government, but the British public is heartily sick of its inertia and reluctance to stop illegal immigration. Charles Penfold Ulverston, Cumbria SIR – Local councillors are acting in the interests of the people they represent and in the na tional interest ('Other councils expected to submit their own legal challenges ', report, August 20). Government ministers should try it. Gary F S Knight Colchester, Essex SIR – Not taking effective action, with or without good reason, seems to be the stock in trade of the Home Office. In July, you reported on the progress of a dinghy escorted by the French Navy to the point in mid-Channel where our Border Force 'taxi' was waiting. The French even demanded the return of the life jackets loaned to the illegal migrants, so that they might be reused. If the Home Office has a policy, it is clearly not 'to smash' these gangs. Wilfred Attenborough Lincoln SIR – With 50,000 illegal migrants needing to be accommodated somewhere in the UK, Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, must now be back at square one. She might look at sites like RAF Scampton in Lincolnshire, which was decked out at great expense under the Tories and then closed before housing anyone. Put simply, the 'one in, one out' scheme doesn't reduce the numbers coming to our shores. This Government, already short of ideas, has run out of road. Immediate deportation of illegal migrants back to the country they first arrived at is now the only option. Jonathan Williams Pickworth, Lincolnshire SIR – Last Sunday, hundreds of citizens gathered in Ashington, Northumberland, to protest against housing illegal immigrants in the area. In a statement posted on Facebook, Ian Lavery, the Labour MP for Blyth and Ashington, admitted that public services are crumbling, and ended by saying: 'But let's be clear: the people responsible for this decline are not those fleeing war or persecution. They are not the vulnerable seeking sanctuary.' Would that be sanctuary from war-torn France, perhaps? Ian Burns Storrington, West Sussex
The Herald Scotland
39 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Majority of public back housing and developments in their area
The research found that Labour backers (72%) and young people aged 25-34 (67%) were most likely to be 'Yimby' (yes in my backyard). Reform backers (44%) and people in the East of England (44%) were the most likely groups to say that they generally oppose development in their locality, the poll found. Overall, 33% of people said that they would generally oppose development. Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to put 'builders not blockers first' and 'overhaul the broken planning system'. In December, the Prime Minister announced new mandatory targets for councils when it comes to housebuilding. He said at the time: 'Our plan for change will put builders not blockers first, overhaul the broken planning system and put roofs over the heads of working families and drive the growth that will put more money in people's pockets.' In its report, The Quiet Yes, released on Thursday, Public First argued that a 'more representative planning system' is needed. The policy research organisation recommended that councils bring in changes to surveys and research on public opinion on building plans and questions about how residents would want councils to spend certain money earmarked for development. Jack Airey, director of housing and infrastructure at Public First, said: 'Most people instinctively support new development, yet their voices go unheard. 'Our research finds the public understand the housing shortage and back new homes, but the planning system doesn't reflect that reality. 'Councils and Government should build on this majority view, creating a representative planning system that unlocks support for new homes and the infrastructure communities need.' Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner has said that Labour are 'overhauling the broken planning system'. She said: 'With investment and reform, Labour is delivering the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation, unleashing a social rent revolution, and embarking on a decade of renewal for social and affordable housing in this country.'
