
India gets breather ahead of trade talks with US; Pakistan's shift to crypto raises concerns; foreign students in US under duress
US court rulings on Trump's tariffs give India some breathing space; Pak's pivot to crypto raises concerns over possible misuse of the digital currency to fund terror; foreign students face uncertainty amid crackdowns on US varsities; Gaza's entire population faces catastrophic hunger as Hamas reviews US proposal for a 60-day ceasefire; Trump says he told Israel to hold off on any strike against Iran, and Russia, Ukraine to hold second direct peace talks – here is weekly roundup of global news.
As India braces to finalise a trade agreement with the US trade negotiators scheduled to arrive here for talks on June 5 and 6, two court rulings this week against Donald Trump's sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs added a twist to the bilateral trade negotiations.
On Wednesday, the US Court of International Trade deemed Trump's sweeping tariffs illegal, determining that he overstepped his authority by invoking the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose these tariffs on goods imported into America from almost every nation.
A day later, an appeals court – the Federal Circuit Court in Washington, DC that has jurisdiction over the trade court – temporarily halted the decision, which means the levies are back for now and the case will probably end up in the Supreme Court.
However, the Trump administration has also slapped other sector-specific tariffs such as on steel, aluminium, cars and car parts under a different statute known as Section 232. There are chances that provisions such as Section 232 would now be used to impose such sector-specific tariffs on countries, especially if the Federal Circuit Court were to also rule against the IEEPA levies.
But until the final word on the matter, India has some breathing room in its ongoing trade talks, particularly with the US's demand seeking access to several sectors that traditionally enjoy high protection, such as agriculture, automobiles, and alcoholic beverages.
Amid concerns over the impact of trade deals with foreign countries on India's agricultural export, import and the surplus, especially with the US and EU seeking greater market access for their agricultural products, data highlights significant trends.
India's agriculture exports increased from $43.3 billion in 2013-14 to $51.9 billion in 2024-25. Meanwhile, imports have shown steadier expansion from $15.5 billion in 2013-14 to an all-time high of $38.5 billion in 2024-25, working out to 148%.
In the meantime, India's goods exports worth at least $775 million to the UK continue to face the risk of higher duties under its Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), despite the conclusion of a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) earlier this month.
UK's CBAM was not part of the FTA, but it will initially target carbon-intensive products such as iron, steel, aluminium, fertilisers, hydrogen, ceramics, glass and cement, with scope to expand the list in future.
That apart, a dramatic element in the unfolding tariff saga was the claim by the Trump administration that the President averted a full-scale war and brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan by offering both nations trading access with the US – a claim categorically denied by India.
The simultaneous revelation of an agreement that Pakistan inked with World Liberty Financial Inc (WLFI), a crypto firm majority-owned by Trump and his family, prompted experts like C Raja Mohan to ask India to reflect on its crypto strategy. The shady deal has raised concerns on various fronts, such as:
— As of May 6, when India launched Operation Sindoor in response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, the WLFI was sitting on a Senate panel's request, seeking details of its dealings with Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif.
— Trump's dual role, as WLFI promoter and the self-proclaimed political broker (in the recent India-Pakistan military conflict), has raised concerns over conflict of interest.
— Although the details of the agreement are yet to emerge, it includes grand plans to use blockchain technology to boost financial inclusion and facilitate remittances for cash-strapped Pakistan, with Bilal bin Saqib, the head of the Pakistan Crypto Council, calling his country and Bitcoin as 'victims of bad PR'.
— As Pakistan turns to cryptocurrency to solve its economic challenges, India is advised to pay close attention amid concerns over the 'possible misuse of these digital currencies not controlled by any central bank to fund terror and launder money across borders'.
All the while, India's multiple delegations are fanning out to carry its anti-terror message worldwide. On Sunday, a team led by senior Congress leader Shashi Tharoor reached the US, where he underlined the need for a 'new normal' in the face of the Pahalgam terror attack. Another team, led by BJP MP Baijayant Panda, arrived in Kuwait, while the delegation led by Sanjay Jha engaged with the Indian diaspora in South Korea.
However, as the Indian delegation landed in the US, concerns were growing over the Trump administration's hardline immigration stance.
Over 3,31,000 Indian students studying in the US are caught in the crosshairs as the Trump administration targeted universities. This week, it directed federal agencies to terminate an estimated $100 million worth of remaining contracts with Harvard by June 6, as part of its broader efforts to reform institutions like Harvard and Columbia.
Foreign students, including Indians, enrolled at Harvard are under duress amid the unfolding crisis as the federal Joint Task Force to Combat Antisemitism warned that if Harvard wishes to continue receiving federal support, it must 'commit to meaningful change'. The university has filed a lawsuit challenging the funding freeze and a related move to revoke its ability to enrol foreign students.
A diplomatic cable issued on Tuesday added to the pressure in which the State Department asked its embassies and consular sections to halt new interviews, which began earlier this month, as it weighs requiring all students to undergo social media vetting as part of their application process. This move comes despite the visa application (DS-160) already requiring applicants to disclose their social media platform and identifiers.
The US Embassy in India also issued a warning to Indian students studying in the US: 'If you drop out, skip classes, or leave your program of study without informing your school, your student visa may be revoked, and you may lose eligibility for future US visas.'
The situation has unsettled international students, who contribute nearly $43.8 billion annually to the US economy, according to NAFSA. These students are often top performers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields.
Hence, the pause, if implemented, will be a significant blow to US universities, whose annual international student intake hovers around the 1 million mark (1.12 million in the 2023-24 academic year).
The ongoing crackdown has begun as a campaign pitch to 'reform' elite universities, including Harvard and Columbia, and has now expanded its scope. The US administration is planning to cancel all remaining contracts with Harvard University, worth about $100 million, while finding 'alternative vendors' for future services. Contracts with around nine federal agencies would be affected, which would also affect researchers at some of India's leading medical colleges and scientific institutions.
In April, the federal government froze more than $2 billion in grants and contracts with Harvard, citing non-compliance with requests to modify hiring and admissions policies, dismantle diversity-equity-inclusion (DEI) programmes, and conduct ideological vetting of international students. Harvard has filed a lawsuit challenging both the funding freeze and the move to revoke its ability to enrol foreign students.
These developments in the US come amid growing global instability, including in Gaza, which the UN has described as the 'hungriest place on Earth'. The war-riven enclave's 2.3 million people are facing 'catastrophic hunger', as Hamas is reviewing a new ceasefire proposal.
As the UN and European countries mounted pressure on Israel to end the war and its 11-week-long blockade on Gaza, a limited amount of aid began entering the besieged enclave under the control of a new NGO backed by Israel and the US – the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF).
However, 20 people were shot by Israeli troops at a GHF aid distribution point on Friday as they desperately tried to get food, Al Jazeera reported, citing sources at Gaza hospitals.
While Arab states rejected the new aid system as illegal, the UN and international aid groups also refused to work with the GHF, saying, according to Reuters, it is not neutral and has a distribution model that forces the displacement of Palestinians.
Meanwhile, Hamas is reviewing a US proposal for a 60-day ceasefire that has reportedly been accepted by Israel. According to Reuters, the ceasefire would see humanitarian aid delivered by the UN, the Red Crescent and other agreed channels; and the release of 28 Israeli hostages – alive and dead – in exchange for the release of 1,236 Palestinian prisoners and the remains of 180 dead Palestinians.
Despite these efforts, hope for peace for the Palestinians remains elusive as Israel blocked a planned meeting of Arab ministers in the Palestinian administrative capital of Ramallah in the occupied West Bank.
Reuters cited an Israeli official as saying that the 'provocative meeting' intended to discuss the establishment of a Palestinian state and that 'such a state would undoubtedly become a terrorist state in the heart of the land of Israel'.
The move comes ahead of an international conference, co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia, due to be held in New York on June 17-20 to discuss the issue of Palestinian statehood. French President Emmanuel Macron said on Friday that recognising a Palestinian state was not only a 'moral duty but a political necessity'.
After several rounds of Iran nuclear talks, US President Trump this week said that he told Israel to hold off on any strike against Tehran as it 'would be inappropriate to do right now because we're very close to a solution'.
'I want it (nuclear agreement) very strong where we can go in with inspectors, we can take whatever we want, we can blow up whatever we want, but nobody getting killed. We can blow up a lab, but nobody is gonna be in a lab, as opposed to everybody being in the lab and blowing it up,' Trump told reporters on Wednesday at the White House.
However, Iran retaliated in equal measure, warning that Trump's threat to destroy its nuclear facilities is a clear red line and will have severe consequences, the semi-official Fars News Agency reported on Friday.
The Islamic Republic said that 'if the US seeks a diplomatic solution, it must abandon the language of threats and sanctions', adding that such threats 'are open hostility against Iran's national interests', Reuters reported, citing an unnamed Iranian official.
Israel has been threatening a bombardment of Iranian nuclear facilities. According to a Reuters report, which cited Gulf sources, Saudi Arabia's defence minister, Prince Khalid bin Salman, visited Tehran in April and delivered a blunt message to Iranian officials: take Trump's offer to negotiate a nuclear agreement seriously because it presents a way to avoid the risk of war with Israel.
Iran and the US have held five rounds of nuclear talks in Oman and Italy, with the last round being described by Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi as 'one of the most professional rounds of negotiations' yet.
Days after the first direct talks between Russia and Ukraine failed to yield a ceasefire, the two sides will resume direct peace talks in Istanbul on Monday, but Kyiv insisted that Moscow provide a promised memorandum on ending the more than three-year war before they sit down to negotiate.
Questioning Russia's commitment to peace, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said, 'For a meeting to be meaningful, its agenda must be clear, and the negotiations must be properly prepared.'
'Unfortunately, Russia is doing everything it can to ensure that the next potential meeting brings no results,' he wrote on X on Friday after hosting Turkey's foreign minister for talks in Kyiv.
Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Wednesday publicly invited Ukraine to hold direct negotiations with Moscow. In a video statement, Lavrov said Russia would use Monday's meeting to deliver an outline of Moscow's position on 'reliably overcoming' what it calls the root causes of the war, The Associated Press reported.
Russia and Ukraine held their first direct peace talks in three years in Istanbul on May 16, which resulted in no significant breakthrough except an agreement on the largest prisoner exchange of the war. It was carried out last weekend and freed 1,000 captives on each side.
Why has a crypto agreement between Pakistan and World Liberty Financial Inc (WLFI), a firm majority-owned by Donald Trump and his family, has alarmed India? Evaluate.
Comment on India's diplomatic push post-Pahalgam attack, with delegations spanning different countries world over to shape narratives on terrorism.
How could the ongoing US crackdown on universities and student visas affect its global standing as a destination for higher education?
In what ways might India need to recalibrate its student and research diplomacy with the US in light of these emerging restrictions?
Why did the UN and other international aid groups refuse to cooperate with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) backed by the US and Israel? Does the GHF's distribution model conflict with international humanitarian principles?
Send your feedback and ideas to ashiya.parveen@indianexpress.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Asian stocks drop, gold rises in risk-off start to week
Asian shares dropped along with US stock-index futures as trade tensions dialed up, prompting investors to hold back on taking risky bets. Gold rose in demand for safe haven assets. Indexes in Japan and Australia opened lower. US equity-index futures slipped 0.3% after President Donald Trump ratcheted up trade tensions saying he would double tariffs on steel and aluminum imports and accusing China of violating an agreement with the US to ease tariffs. Treasuries dropped, with the yield on the 10-year rising 1 basis point. Gold advanced 0.7% after retreating last week. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like War Thunder - Register now for free and play against over 75 Million real Players War Thunder Play Now Undo A gauge of the dollar edged lower after China urged the US to safeguard the consensus reached in the talks with the US in Geneva. The yen strengthened. Crude oil climbed even after OPEC+ agreed to lift output by less than some investors had expected. Tariff headlines are once again dominating markets after a legal back-and-forth last week on the status of Trump's century-high levies, which investors say will push the US into an economic recession. Amid all the uncertainty about the US trade policy and negotiations with countries including China, market participants are also monitoring with a sweeping tax bill that threatens to burgeon US deficit. 'The end of May is a precursor to the larger risks for June and the end of the second quarter,' Bob Savage, head of markets macro strategy at BNY, wrote in a note. 'The shift in mood this month highlights how markets have gone from unpredictable to merely uncertain, as concerns about trade, fiscal spending and monetary policy continue to drive prices.' Live Events Trump said China 'violated a big part of the agreement we made' in Geneva. The dust-up threatened to again upend trade relations between the world's two largest economies, which have been held together by a fragile, weeks-old tariff truce. China responded in a statement urging the US to promote stable trade relations. China will take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights if the US continues to undermine China's interests, it said. Asian steel and aluminum shares mostly declined after Trump said he would hike tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50% from 25%. Traders in Asia will soon shift focus to Hong Kong shares after Chinese factory activity data contracted at a slower pace in May than the month prior. Mainland markets are closed for a holiday. US Treasuries delivered their first monthly loss this year in May, buffeted by renewed tariff uncertainty and growing anxiety over mounting levels of government debt. The 30-year yield rose for a third consecutive month, its longest losing streak since 2023, as Trump wrestles with Congress over a bill that promises to cut taxes. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent at the weekend said the US 'is never going to default' as the deadline for increasing the federal debt ceiling gets closer. 'Shares are at high risk of renewed falls given the ongoing tariff uncertainties, concerns about US debt, likely weaker growth and profits and the risk of a US/Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear capability if diplomacy doesn't work,' Shane Oliver, head of investment strategy and chief economist at AMP Ltd., wrote in a note.


Mint
30 minutes ago
- Mint
Where the trade court's tariff decision went wrong
President Donald Trump announces tariffs in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, April 2. During a national crisis, an advocate of tariffs testified before Congress that 'reciprocal trade agreements" push foreign nations to stop erecting 'excessive economic barriers to trade." Who said this? President Trump? Sen. Reed Smoot or Rep. Willis Hawley? It was President Franklin D. Roosevelt's secretary of state, Cordell Hull, explaining in 1940 how reciprocal tariffs could reverse unfair trade practices targeting the U.S. Mr. Trump's policy of using reciprocal tariffs to advance U.S. interests isn't a new or radical idea, and it's a necessary one. The U.S. Court of International Trade was wrong to rule on Wednesday that the administration had exceeded its authority in imposing these tariffs. The ruling overlooked history, statute, precedent and national interest. It was a misreading of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, and a misinterpretation of America's bipartisan tradition of using trade policy to defend national economic resilience. On Thursday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit stayed the trade court's ruling while it considers an appeal. In a separate case, a district judge in Washington issued an injunction against the tariffs, although he stayed his own order. The issue requires resolution only the Supreme Court can deliver. Americans should hope the justices side with Mr. Trump. In its May 28 decision, V.O.S. Selections v. U.S., the trade court held that IEEPA doesn't authorize the president to impose 'unbounded" tariffs. The opinion misses the mark on legal and historical fronts. It substitutes policy skepticism for statutory interpretation, undermining legitimate executive authority during declared national emergencies. The trade court's reading of IEEPA contradicts the statute's text and history. IEEPA's independent emergency authority allows the president to regulate, prevent or prohibit the importation of property in which foreign countries or nationals have an interest. The language mirrors that of the earlier Trading with the Enemy Act, which President Richard Nixon used to impose a universal 10% tariff in 1971. The courts upheld Nixon's use of that power in U.S. v. Yoshida International (1975), concluding that tariffs were a sensible approach to regulating imports during a declared emergency. Congress enacted IEEPA in 1977 with language directly drawn from the Trading with the Enemy Act. The trade court's description of the tariffs as 'unbounded" also contradicts Mr. Trump's painstakingly specific April 2 executive order, which imposes precise duties, product exemptions and country-specific rates. I should know: I helped coordinate their implementation. Further, the court errs in implicitly inviting itself to review the sufficiency of the president's emergency declaration. IEEPA requires only that the president declare a national emergency 'to deal with an unusual and extraordinary threat" arising outside the U.S., which is exactly what the executive order does. Trade deficits can qualify as emergencies. In the Trade Act of 1974, Congress recognized that 'large and serious" balance-of-payments deficits could justify swift presidential action, including tariffs and quotas. This act's unique procedures didn't preclude similar IEEPA authorities addressing identical threats. Second-guessing presidential responses to emergencies defies precedent. In Dames & Moore v. Regan (1981), the Supreme Court acknowledged the validity of President Jimmy Carter's hostage crisis response, intact to this day, which froze Iranian property in the U.S. Courts have long held that the political branches—not judges—determine how to deal with foreign economic threats that rise to emergency levels. Further, in Field v. Clark (1892), the justices held that 'it is often desirable, if not essential . . . to invest the President with large discretion in matters arising out of the execution of statutes relating to trade and commerce with other nations." While IEEPA gives the president significant latitude, Congress can terminate a national emergency by joint resolution. That Congress hasn't thwarted Mr. Trump's tariffs counsels restraint in questioning his decision. The trade court evidently yearns to restore misguided economic orthodoxy. But frictionless global trade remains a mirage. Even John Maynard Keynes, hardly an economic nationalist, cautioned against the utopian allure of borderless commerce: 'Let goods be homespun whenever it is reasonably and conveniently possible, and, above all, let finance be primarily national." The pursuit of a perfectly undistorted global market ignores American history and legal tradition. Hull's reciprocal-tariff program of the 1930s—the foundation of U.S. multilateral trade—was premised on the imposition of duties on imports from countries that refused to lower theirs. Hull understood that economic resets require leverage. The test of judicial reasoning is whether it honors the text, structure and history of the law it interprets. The Court of International Trade fell short of that test. Mr. Bogden is a fellow at the Steamboat Institute and a former clerk for the U.S. Court of International Trade.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
War Clouds Over Europe as Ukraine Hits Russia
On the eve of peace talks, Ukraine and Russia sharply ramped up the war with one of the biggest drone battles of their conflict, a Russian highway bridge blown up over a passenger train and an ambitious attack on nuclear-capable bombers deep in Siberia. After days of uncertainty over whether or not Ukraine would even attend, President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said Defence Minister Rustem Umerov would sit down with Russian officials at the second round of direct peace talks in Istanbul on Monday. The first round of the talks more than a week ago yielded the biggest prisoner exchange of the war - but no sense of any consensus on how to halt the fighting. Amid talk of peace, though, there was much war. At least seven people were killed and 69 injured when a highway bridge in Russia's Bryansk region, neighbouring Ukraine, was blown up over a passenger train heading to Moscow with 388 people on board. No one has yet claimed responsibility. Ukraine attacked Russian nuclear-capable long-range bombers at a military base deep in Siberia on Sunday, a Ukrainian intelligence official said, the first such attack so far from the front lines more than 4,300 km (2,670 miles) away. The official said the operation involved hiding explosive-laden drones inside the roofs of wooden sheds and loading them onto trucks that were driven to the perimeter of the air bases. A total of 41 Russian warplanes were hit, the official said. RUSSIA ACKNOWLEDGES AIR BASE ATTACKS, SAYS FIRES PUT OUT Ukraine did not tell the Trump administration about the attack in advance, Axios reporter Barak Ravid said on X, citing an unnamed Ukrainian official. Russia's Defence Ministry acknowledged on the Telegram messaging app that Ukraine had launched drone strikes against Russian military airfields across five regions on Sunday. It said the attacks repelled the assaults in all but two regions — Murmansk in the far north and Irkutsk in Siberia - where "the launch of FPV drones from an area in close proximity to airfields resulted in several aircraft catching fire". The fires were extinguished without casualties. Some individuals involved in the attacks had been detained, the ministry said. Russia launched 472 drones at Ukraine overnight, Ukraine's air force said, the highest nightly total of the war so far. Russia had also launched seven missiles, the air force said. Russia said it had advanced deeper into the Sumy region of Ukraine, and open source pro-Ukrainian maps showed Russia took 450 square km of Ukrainian land in May, its fastest monthly advance in at least six months. U.S. President Donald Trump has demanded Russia and Ukraine make peace and he has threatened to walk away if they do not - potentially pushing responsibility for supporting Ukraine onto the shoulders of European powers - which have far less cash and much smaller stocks of weapons than the United States. According to Trump envoy Keith Kellogg, the two sides will in Turkey present their respective documents outlining their ideas for peace terms, though it is clear that after three years of intense war, Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart. Putin ordered tens of thousands of troops to invade Ukraine in February 2022 after eight years of fighting in eastern Ukraine between Russian-backed separatists and Ukrainian troops. The United States says over 1.2 million people have been killed and injured in the war since 2022. Trump has called Putin "crazy" and berated Zelenskiy in public in the Oval Office, but the U.S. president has also said that he thinks peace is achievable and that if Putin delays then he could impose tough sanctions on Russia. In June last year, Putin set out his opening terms for an immediate end to the war: Ukraine must drop its NATO ambitions and withdraw all of its troops from the entirety of the territory of four Ukrainian regions claimed and mostly controlled by Russia. Ukrainian negotiators in Istanbul will present to the Russian side a proposed roadmap for reaching a lasting peace settlement, according to a copy of the document seen by Reuters. According to the document, there will be no restrictions on Ukraine's military strength after a peace deal is struck, no international recognition of Russian sovereignty over parts of Ukraine taken by Moscow's forces, and reparations for Ukraine. The document also stated that the current location of the front line will be the starting point for negotiations about territory. Russia currently controls a little under one fifth of Ukraine, or about 113,100 square km, about the same size as the U.S. state of Ohio.