Fox News host hypes ‘free speech' college as place where ‘protests are essentially not allowed'
Kilmeade brought up the University of Austin, which was first announced in 2021 by The Free Press' Bari Weiss and started classes last fall, while his show discussed the ongoing pro-Palestinian protests at Barnard College. Demonstrations have unfolded this week at the independent women's school after the college expelled two Barnard students who allegedly disrupted a Columbia University class on Israeli history.
After the Fox & Friends crew spent several minutes raging against the protesters and blasting the New York governor for 'capitulating to the goons' and 'legitimizing' the demonstrators, Kilmeade introduced a short video package he had prepared on the University of Austin, which is still unaccredited.
'This is one of the reasons why the University of Austin was launched last year,' Kilmeade declared. 'And it was put together by Bari Weiss – people like Niall Ferguson, conservatives, libertarians, Joe Lonsdale. A lot of big-time supporters! They want to revamp upper-education and higher education, and they want to make it tuition-free.'
Kilmeade noted that the first endowed professor at the college is anti-woke author Michael Shellenberger, adding that he recently spoke to Shellenberger for an interview that will be aired on Sunday night. In a preview clip that Kilmeade shared, Shellenberger — who was one of Elon Musk's handpicked 'Twitter Files' disseminators — characterized the school as a 'sanctuary of truth-seeking and truth-telling.'
Claiming that the majority of American universities have become 'the exact opposite of that' and merely havens of 'censorship' and 'cancel culture,' Shellenberger told the Fox News host that he was interested in creating a college that would be a 'place of free thought.'
After airing the clip, Kilmeade offered up some more details about the school's principles and teaching methods before curiously lauding it for apparently banning an activity that runs contrary to the First Amendment.
'That's what they want. They teach the classics. They don't tell you what to think. They present it all. Protests are essentially not allowed,' he proudly asserted.
The University of Austin, described by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression as 'a new university devoted to free speech,' states on its website that it stands for 'the fearless pursuit of truth' and 'freedom of inquiry.' In a recent article claiming that UATX was 'founded on free speech,' the school's chief of staff, Mike Shires, insisted that the college was created to show how 'discourse and civil discourse can happen in a university environment.'
Meanwhile, the First Amendment explicitly states that Congress shall make no law 'abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble.'
The university did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether Kilmeade's description of the school's policies was accurate and, if so, how they align with the college's commitment to free speech absolutism.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
5 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Pete Hegseth's macho approach to the military threatens our national security
Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Hegseth's rationale for banning 'gender ideology' from military academies, which train officers, is that it inhibits the unity and meritocracy required for military readiness among service members. As Hegseth's order states, 'The strength of the DoD comes from our unity and our shared purpose. We will focus on lethality, meritocracy, accountability, standards, and readiness.' Advertisement This is deeply ironic because no one is doing more to make explicit the deep cultural connection between war and masculinity than Pete Hegseth. He's revealing something that's always simmered beneath the surface of military culture: that war is the sole province of men. Advertisement And the way Hegseth thinks about gender in the military and the whole point of fighting wars is fundamentally flawed — not to mention detrimental to the armed forces and our national security. Out of the shadows I used to have to make the argument that the military's culture was affected by ideas and beliefs about masculinity in mostly subtle ways. The only people who came right out and said war is about achieving manhood were centuries-old thinkers and a few contemporary military leaders or obscure far-right commentators. But now the sitting secretary of defense is unabashedly advancing this view and basing military policy on it. If you want to see how ideas about masculinity warp those about war and the military, look no further than Hegseth's last book, published in 2024, 'The War on Warriors: Behind the Betrayal of the Men Who Keep Us Free.' Hegseth asserts that the military exists to allow men to find their natural purpose as warriors. The military is the institution for turning undisciplined boys into real men. As he says, 'The military has always been about social engineering … It takes average American boys, breaks down their body and mind, and builds them back up into members of a warfighting team.' This point is brought home in a chapter titled 'Men Need Purpose, Not Inclusion.' Here, Hegseth provides a macho, first-person narrative of his experience in Iraq in 2006. As an important part of a team of warrior men engaged in killing the enemy, he says he found his calling as a man. His operation 'was all man, all merit, all mission.' He and his teammates were 'tough, manly, and unapologetically lethal.' He discovers that 'feeding a well-oiled killing machine' is his 'jam.' He closes the chapter with the hope that the military continues to provide this purpose to other men. Advertisement The clichéd, gendered language he uses throughout the book to describe good soldiers is staggering. Proper warriors are 'red-blooded American men,' 'strong men,' 'fighting men,' 'courageous men,' 'rock-ribbed men,' 'masculine men,' 'tough' men, 'normal dudes,' men who do 'PT' and wear 'Carhartt jackets,' 'cowboys,' and 'alpha males.' He compares them to the fictional characters John McClain from the movie 'Die Hard' and the superassassin John Wick, And he goes on to describe the men who question the value of this type or hinder their unapologetic violence as 'candy-asses,' 'pussies,' 'whores to wokesters,' 'effeminate,' those who 'suppress natural masculine instincts for honor,' 'beta-male[s],' and 'so-called men' who would 'neuter' the military. For Hegseth, a good man is a disciplined killer and protector of the weak. By nature, men are 'life-takers.' Their societal role is to use violence to protect their communities. Women, according to him, have a different nature. Women are 'life-givers' whose biology prescribes caregiving and nurturing. Their job is to reproduce and raise future generations as well as provide succor to warrior men. This is why he thinks women should not serve in combat. For Hegseth, including women in war upsets the natural gender order. Making women into warriors separates them from 'the natural purposes of their core instincts.' And it undermines men's 'instincts' to treat women gently. Advertisement There is also reason to wonder if Hegseth believes women should be full citizens. This all has had devastating impacts on women and gender nonconforming people in the military. Hegseth has overseen the But the effect of Hegseth's gender crusade extends well beyond the culture of the military. It has a dangerous impact on the way we fight wars. There is a direct relationship between treating men in the military as killing machines and a misguided way of thinking about war. Hegseth argues that the masculine nature of military service is linked to the nature of war. War is really a contest of masculine violence. If you outkill your opponent, you will win the war. Lethality is all that matters from a strategic point of view. He claims, 'Land warfare … is defined by how many people you can slaughter in one space, at one time — limiting the will and capacity of your enemy to fight.' Advertisement The problem with this is that it reduces winning wars to winning battles. But at least as far back as Carl von Clausewitz, an early 19th-century Prussian general and military theorist, strategists have understood that there is much more to winning wars than winning battles. The point of war is to achieve a nonmilitary political good like sovereignty or a just peace. There is not always a connection between winning battles and achieving these goals. In fact, you can win every battle yet lose the war — as the United States did in both Iraq and Afghanistan. The United States entered these wars with The United States does not have a problem with lethality on the battlefield. We have a problem understanding how our lethality affects the world and a tendency to think martial violence can solve complex problems. We need to be better thinkers, not better killers. We need more historical and cultural understanding, not better tactical skills. Hegseth doesn't see it this way. According to him, the United States lost the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan because we didn't kill enough. If it weren't for the lawyers — or 'jag-offs,' as he calls them — restraining military tactics out of concern for noncombatant casualties and detainee abuse, we could have ended the wars sooner and won. The wars dragged on because we lacked the warrior impulse to do what was required to win. He says, 'The fact that we don't do what is necessary is the reason wars become endless. Modern wars never end, because we won't finish them.' Advertisement In Hegseth's worldview, wars are contests in killing because wars are contests of warrior masculinity. The side with the real men is the winner. If we lose a war, it must be because we lack real men. Whereas America failed in Iraq and Afghanistan because of a misguided faith in war, Hegseth is overseeing 'reforms' of the US military to emphasize battlefield fighting that simply double down on this faith. This may make the military more 'lethal,' but it makes us less ready to use the military for good. I fear we are now even more likely to engage in ill-conceived war than we were 20 years ago. So, in a sense, Hegseth is right: 'gender ideology' is a threat to national security. But it's his ideology that we should be worried about.
UPI
6 minutes ago
- UPI
On This Day, Aug. 13: Israel, UAE agree to normalize relations
1 of 5 | U.S. President Donald Trump (2nd-L), Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (L), United Arab Emirates' Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan (R) and Bahrain Foreign Minister Abdullatif bin Rashid Al Zayani stand together during the signing ceremony for the Abraham Accords, where the countries of Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates recognize Israel, at the White House in Washington, D.C., on September 15, 2020. File Photo by Yuri Gripas/UPI | License Photo Aug. 13 (UPI) -- On this date in history: In 1889, William Gray patented the coin-operated telephone. In 1918, women were allowed to join the U.S. Marines for the first time. Sgt. Opha May Johnson, a 40-year-old civil servant, was the first to enlist. In 1961, East Germany closed the Brandenburg Gate and prepared to start building the Berlin Wall. In 1980, U.S. President Jimmy Carter was nominated for a second term by the Democratic National Convention in New York. He lost in November to Ronald Reagan. File Photo by Don Rypka/UPI In 1990, singer/songwriter Curtis Mayfield was left paralyzed when he was hit by a wind-blown lighting rig on an outdoor stage in New York. He died in 1999. In 1993, the multi-story Royal Plaza Hotel in eastern Thailand collapsed into a heap of rubble, leaving 137 people dead. In 2008, Bill Gwatney, chairman of the Arkansas Democratic Party and a former legislator, was shot to death in his Little Rock office. After a 30-mile chase, a suspect was killed by police in an exchange of gunfire. A motive for Gwatney's killing was never determined. In 2013, Israel released 26 Palestinian prisoners as part of a deal to resume peace talks. File Photo by Ismael Mohamad/UPI In 2014, Brazilian presidential candidate Eduardo Campos was among seven people killed in a plane crash southeast of Sao Paulo. In 2016, Michael Phelps won his 23rd Olympic gold medal to finish his swimming career as the world's most decorated Olympian. In 2019, media companies CBS and Viacom agreed to a merger, combining their entertainment assets in an all-stock merger. The new company was known as ViacomCBS. In 2020, Israel and the United Arab Emirates agreed to full normalization of relations. File Photo by Abir Sultan/UPI
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Tennessee town approves deals to turn closed prison into immigration detention facility
Advertisement The first vote of the meeting resulted in approval for a contract with CoreCivic to resume operating the facility, which was closed in 2021 after President Joe Biden ordered the Department of Justice to stop renewing contracts with private detention facilities. Trump reversed that order in January. The second vote, to approve an agreement with ICE, also passed. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up It is not immediately known when the facility will reopen. Mayor points to job-generating potential Noeman said he wanted to reopen the shuttered prison to bring jobs and economic development to the town, which has struggled with financial problems and needs infrastructure improvements. With a population of about 1,300, Mason is located about 40 miles (60 kilometers) northeast of Memphis. When it was open, the prison was the town's largest employer and an important economic engine. Advertisement Noeman, an Egyptian-American immigrant and a longtime business owner in the town, called turning the closed prison over to CoreCivic and ICE a 'win-win situation,' which led to a cascade of loud boos. 'It's nothing personal about any immigrant,' Noeman said, adding moments later that 'to give jobs to the people is what I'm looking for.' At times, Noeman argued with attendees, questioning whether they actually live in Mason and telling them 'you don't know what you're talking about.' Before the meeting, board member Virginia Rivers told The Associated Press that she does not support turning the prison into an ICE facility because 'I don't like what ICE stands for, how they treat the people.' During the meeting, she noted that some immigrants without criminal records are being swept up by immigration agents and separated from their families. She said approving the contracts would make Mason 'complicit in the abusive treatment of immigrants.' 'We as officials of the town of Mason that were elected by the citizens should consider the consequences and the hurt that this would cause our local community, our neighbors, Tennessee schools and many families,' Rivers said. CoreCivic said in a statement that the ICE facility would create nearly 240 new jobs, and it is currently advertising openings for detention officers at a pay rate of $26.50 per hour. The facility would also generate about $325,000 in annual property tax revenue and $200,000 for Mason that could be used for schools, infrastructure improvements and other projects, the company said. 'The services we provide help the government solve problems in ways it could not do alone — to help create safer communities by assisting with the current immigration challenges, dramatically improve the standard of care for vulnerable people, and meet other critical needs efficiently and innovatively,' CoreCivic said. Advertisement CoreCivic has faced dozens of lawsuits in Tennessee In 2022, Mason reached a deal with the state of Tennessee after it attempted to take over the city's finances following years of alleged mismanagement. Some members of the public who spoke at the meeting said Mason is a majority-Black town with a history of being ignored and treated with disrespect. One of the speakers, Charles Watkins, noted that CoreCivic was the operator of the prison under its previous name, Corrections Corporation of America. 'How is it that we can consistently let these organizations come into Black communities and then just somehow overwhelm us with the few dollars that they throw on the table as crumbs while they take the majority of the take back to wherever they came from?' Watkins said. Tennessee's corrections agency has fined CoreCivic $44.7 million across four prisons from 2022 through February, including for understaffing violations. Records obtained by AP also show the company has spent more than $4.4 million to settle about 80 lawsuits and out-of-court complaints alleging mistreatment — including at least 22 inmate deaths — at four Tennessee prisons and two jails from 2016 through September 2024. The state comptroller released scathing audits in 2017, 2020 and 2023. The Brentwood, Tennessee-based company has defended itself by pointing to industrywide problems with hiring and keeping workers. Associated Press writer Jonathan Mattise contributed from Nashville, Tennessee.
