Morning workouts can boost weight loss if one key habit is followed, experts claim
In terms of weight loss, previous research suggests that early morning may be the best time to exercise, according to the CDC's National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Advertisement
The research, published in the journal Obesity, recorded the activity levels of 5,285 participants, taking into consideration the time of day they exercised.
Those who consistently engaged in morning activity, between 7 a.m. and 9 a.m., were found to have a lower risk of obesity than those who were most active in the midday or evening.
The morning exercisers also had a lower average BMI (body mass index) and waist size.
Certified fitness trainer Alissa Mosca with Planet Fitness in New York agreed that morning workouts are a 'great way' to start the day.
Advertisement
'When the day begins with a morning workout routine, the body releases multiple different chemicals, which aid in our overall functionality,' she told Fox News Digital.
'This includes chemicals like endorphins and dopamine, which are the chemicals that make us feel good and help us move forward with positive energy. Additionally, we wake up our muscles, stimulate the brain, and prepare to take on the day.'
4 Exercising first thing in the morning can be beneficial for mental and physical health.
Jacob Lund – stock.adobe.com
The sleep-exercise balance
Sleep and wellness expert Todd Anderson, co-founder of Dream Performance & Recovery in Nashville, Tennessee, emphasized the importance of striking a healthy balance between exercise and rest.
Advertisement
The first couple of hours of exercise in a week are 'insanely impactful,' Anderson said — and it doesn't have to be a strenuous activity.
'Our bodies are meant to move,' he said. 'Getting two hours of movement or exercise in a week should be very high on the priority list.'
4 In terms of weight loss, previous research suggests that early morning may be the best time to exercise, according to the CDC's National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Antonioguillem – stock.adobe.com
While it might seem that morning exercise is cutting into sleep time, Anderson pointed out that regular exercise could actually result in a higher quality of slumber.
Advertisement
'The sleep you're getting will be more impactful,' he said.
But for people who hit the gym daily and don't get sufficient shuteye, Anderson said he considers it a 'no-brainer' to opt for adequate sleep over an early-morning workout.
'When it comes down to body composition and weight loss or just fitness in general, you'll probably have a better outcome from that hour of sleep when you're already at a pretty decent level of activity,' he said.
'When you sleep, it allows you to respond effectively to the stress from the workouts.'
Mosca agreed that proper rest and recovery require seven to eight hours of sleep, which allows the muscles to have the greatest amount of repair and growth.
'If someone is going to bed at 12 a.m. to 1 a.m. nightly and then trying to wake up for a 6 a.m. workout, the progress will stall and the effects of the hard work that is put in will take that much longer to come to light,' she told Fox News Digital.
'Getting on a regular sleep schedule, unwinding earlier, putting the electronics down, and focusing on calming the mind will allow someone to recover faster, have more energy in the morning, and release those happy brain chemicals that make us feel accomplished.'
Advertisement
The trainer stressed that morning workouts are not for everyone, and there are certain factors that can prevent success.
For those considering a morning workout, Mosca recommends that they ask themselves the following questions.
'Did I get enough sleep the night before?'
4 While it might seem that morning exercise is cutting into sleep time, regular exercise could actually result in a higher quality of slumber, according to sleep and wellness expert Todd Anderson.
Andrey Popov – stock.adobe.com
Advertisement
'How was my nutritional intake?'
'Am I overly stressed?'
'Do I keep hitting snooze when the alarm goes off?'
Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here!
Advertisement
'If we find that the answers to those questions [aren't] on the positive side, consider an afternoon mini-workout: 15 to 20 minutes after work or on break, to get the muscles moving and stimulated,' Mosca suggested as an alternative.
4 But for people who hit the gym daily and don't get sufficient shuteye, Anderson said he considers it a 'no-brainer' to opt for adequate sleep over an early-morning workout.
New Africa – stock.adobe.com
'The body adjusts the more that it moves and the more it is in a consistent routine. Taking the right steps to change the routine is crucial, so we don't overload the body all at once.'
Advertisement
Mosca reiterated that sleep and recovery play a 'crucial role' in fitness journey success.
'If we shorten the timeframe for our bodies to recover, they will constantly be trying to play catch-up, but never reaching that finish line,' she said. 'We want to set clear goals and reasonable expectations.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
Disease Outbreak Among Sea Lions Could Spread to Pets
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Sea lions off the coast in California are contracting a kidney disease that has arrived earlier than expected, raising concerns about transmission to humans and pets. Newsweek has reached out to the Marine Mammal Center (MMC) for comment via email on Sunday. Why It Matters Leptospirosis, a bacterial infection that attacks the kidneys, can cause severe illness or death in animals. Infected sea lions are often spotted drinking water, a rare behavior since they normally get hydration from food, signaling their kidneys are not functioning properly, according to the MMC. It's not rare for sea lions to contract it, often appearing in about four-year cycles. Humans and other animals can also contract it, with untreated cases leading to kidney damage, meningitis, liver failure, trouble breathing, and death, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). What To Know Sea lions across California's coast have contracted Leptospirosis in recent days, with at least 100 infected this month, per the MMC. According to ABC 7, the outbreak began along the California Central Coast and has appeared in more northern counties. The disease most oftenspreads through urine of infected animals. "This is a zoonotic disease. So, it can be spread to humans and dogs. We are especially concerned in this area of spread to your pet," Giancarlo Rulli, associate director of public relations for the MMC, told ABC 7 on Friday. The CDC estimates there are around 1 million annual Leptospirosis cases in humans around the world, resulting in about 60,000 deaths. Sea lions diagnosed with leptospirosis are recommended to be treated with antibiotics. However, even with treatment, around two-thirds of them with acute leptospirosis do not survive, according to the MMC. Sea lions crowd onto rafts along Pier 39 on May 23, 2024, in San Francisco. Sea lions crowd onto rafts along Pier 39 on May 23, 2024, in San Francisco. Liu Guanguan/China News Service/VCG via AP What People Are Saying Giancarlo Rulli, associate director of public relations for the MMC, said on Friday: "To have basically very large outbreak with right now with no end in sight, beginning six-to-eight weeks plus earlier than what we are historically used to, is something that has our collective attention right now." The MMC wrote in an August 13 X post: "Since July, we've rescued an unprecedented number of sea lions suffering from #leptospirosis. This potentially deadly kidney infection can transmit easily between these animals and dog." What Happens Next? The disease is expected to continue spreading among sea lions, with ongoing concern it could infecthumans or pets. Health experts advise people taking their dogs and pets to the beach to keep them on leashes, to prevent them from getting too close to marine life.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Reason Why Everyone's Confused About UPFs – and What the Current Science Actually Says
The term 'ultra-processed food' (or UPF, for short) has launched into the nutritional spotlight in recent years, with study after study linking the food group to obesity, heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and a multitude of other chronic conditions. And in the UK, we eat a lot of ultra-processed foods. A recent landmark study showed that UPFs made up a whopping 53% of people's energy intake in the UK, coming second only to the US, where UPFs comprised 55%. This trend has led some researchers to claim that ultra-processed foods are 'a primary causal driver of the obesity pandemic'. But is the study of ultra-processed food actually a genuine scientific breakthrough in understanding diet and disease? Or is it just a fancy new label for foods we already knew were unhealthy? What we know now is there's a lack of a clear definition for ultra-processed foods – and we could sure use one. What Are Ultra-processed Foods? The definition of ultra-processed foods has shifted a bit since the term was first coined by Brazilian researchers in 2009, but now the term basically involves a food product meeting two specific criteria. The first is that the main components of the food are a result of multiple stages of industrial processing. Examples: white sugar, white flour, vegetable oil. The second is that the food has additives not commonly used in at-home cooking. This includes preservatives like BHT, emulsifiers like soy lecithin, stabilising agents like modified corn starch, food dyes, thickening agents, and the ever mysterious 'artificial flavours'. That's a tough definition for the average person to remember, understand, and apply to their food choices. Research actually bears this out. Even people who claim to know what ultra-processed foods are often misidentify which foods are actually ultra-processed. To make things even more confusing, some foods fall into an ultra-processed grey area. Let's take bacon, for example. While bacon certainly has additives thanks to its preservatives, whether it undergoes multiple stages of industrial processing is more nebulous. As a result, bacon has been classified as ultra-processed in some scientific papers, but not ultra-processed in others. Whole-grain bread, certain aged cheeses, and tomato sauce – healthy by most definitions – have also been slapped with an ultra-processed label, only adding to consumer confusion. The (New) Science for Ultra-processed Foods Not only is the definition of ultra-processing a bit fuzzy, there's also some debate as to why ultra-processed foods promote worse health outcomes in the first place. Because not all ultra-processed foods are harmful (see whole-grain bread and tomato sauce, but also yoghurt and dark chocolate), researchers have tried to explain why only some foods categorised as ultra-processed are linked to disease. One hypothesis is that (of all things) eating speed is a central factor. Due to their processing, ultra-processed foods are often softer and easier to chew (think peanut butter vs. peanuts), which makes people eat them faster. Rapid consumption may outpace the brain's ability to signal fullness, causing people to overeat, which may eventually lead to obesity and its associated diseases. But this is only a guess. The science that has been done on eating speed as a major factor in overeating tends to be underwhelming. Another hypothesis is that food additives are the key. Some research suggests that emulsifiers commonly found in UPFs (including polysorbate 80 and carboxymethylcellulose) might harm gut health and set off a cascade of inflammation leading to disease, or that taste enhancers, like MSG and added flavours, might override satiety signals and promote overeating. But the existing evidence for these claims is weak. Plus, given that there are hundreds (if not thousands) of food additives in use, studying the long-term effects of individual additives is challenging. But here's another take: The problem with ultra-processed foods might not be due to ultra-processing at all. The (Old) Science Behind Ultra-processing and Health Before ultra-processed food was ever a buzzword, research had established that certain processed foods were low in beneficial nutrients (fibre, potassium) and high in other not-so-great-for-you things like saturated fat, sugar, and salt. This nutritional imbalance alone could explain why ultra-processed foods are dangerous for our health – with no need to bring processing into the discussion. In fact, when studies have actually analysed ultra-processed foods separately, the biggest offenders for health tend to be soda, processed meat products like hot dogs, take-out style foods like pizza and french fries, and refined grains. These are foods that most dietary guidelines and health professionals have long recommend limiting. Given this, perhaps avoiding ultra-processed foods is just a modern repackaging of the same dietary advice we've heard a million times before. So where does that leave us now –and for the future? The Path Forward for Ultra-processed Food There's a real concern over the lack of clear definition for 'ultra-processed foods'. We've seen it before with health buzzwords like 'healthy', 'all-natural', and 'plant-based'. If ultra-processed food means many different things, does it mean anything at all? After decades of fixating on individual nutrients – from fat and cholesterol to carbohydrates and gluten – it's certainly refreshing that the discussion around ultra-processed foods is a more top-down approach to figuring out what makes us sick. But it's far from perfect right now. You Might Also Like The 23 Best Foods to Build Muscle 10 of the Best Waterproof Boots to Buy in 2019 6 Ways to Improve Your Mental Health
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) Delivers 18% Sales Growth in H1 2025
Novo Nordisk A/S (NYSE:NVO) is one of the Reddit Stocks with the Highest Upside Potential. On August 6, the company stated that it delivered 18% sales growth in H1 2025. The company has lowered its full-year outlook because of lower growth expectations for its GLP-1 treatments in H2 2025. Therefore, it has been taking measures to sharpen its commercial execution further, and ensure efficiencies in its cost base while continuing to make investments in future growth. With over 1 billion people living with obesity globally, which includes over 100 million living in the US, and only a few million on treatment, Novo Nordisk A/S (NYSE:NVO) expects to maximise the strong growth opportunities, thanks to the healthy product portfolio and future pipeline. A closeup shot of a laboratory technician handling a medical device used for fertility treatments. Novo Nordisk A/S (NYSE:NVO) highlighted that the sales within Diabetes and Obesity care rose 16% in Danish kroner to DKK 145.4 billion (and 18% at CER), mainly due to the Obesity care growth of 56% in Danish kroner to DKK 38.8 billion (and 58% at CER) and GLP-1 diabetes sales increasing 8% in Danish kroner (10% at CER). Within R&D, Novo Nordisk A/S (NYSE:NVO) plans to advance subcutaneous and oral amycretin into phase 3 development in weight management on the basis of completed clinical studies during Q1 2025. For FY 2025, the sales growth is anticipated to be 8% – 14% at CER, and operating profit growth is projected to be 10% – 16% at CER. ClearBridge Investments, an investment management company, released its Q1 2025 investor letter. Here is what the fund said: 'We initiated a new position in Novo Nordisk A/S (NYSE:NVO), the global leader in diabetes care and one of two dominant players in the fast-growing GLP-1 diabetes and obesity drug market. A slowdown in prescriptions for Novo's GLP-1 drugs, combined with confusion surrounding a clinical trial of its next-generation candidate, CagriSema, caused a significant pullback in the stock. We saw this as a buying opportunity. We believe the GLP-1 market remains vast and that Novo (alongside Eli Lilly) is well-positioned to maintain a duopolistic structure for years to come, given the complexity of manufacturing, differentiated intellectual property and brand strength. We also expect growth to reaccelerate as supply ramps up following its acquisition of Catalent and as regulators crack down on unlicensed compounders.' While we acknowledge the potential of NVO as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 13 Cheap AI Stocks to Buy According to Analysts and 11 Unstoppable Growth Stocks to Invest in Now Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
