logo
New state law means some Treasure Coast high schools likely to continue early start times

New state law means some Treasure Coast high schools likely to continue early start times

Yahoo18-07-2025
Indian River and St. Lucie teens hoping for extra morning sleep next school year will have to wait for school holidays. A new state law essentially eliminated a 2023 mandate for later middle and high school start times.
The 2023 state law required middle schools to begin no earlier than 8 a.m., and high schools no earlier than 8:30 a.m., citing studies that showed teens perform better with a later start to their school day. On the Treasure Coast, Indian River County high schools begin at 7:05 a.m. and St. Lucie County's start at 7:33 a.m. Only Martin County high schools begin at 8:30 a.m.
After school districts complained that changing school start times would cost millions to alter school bus routes, state lawmakers considered alternatives.
SB 296, which was signed into law in June by Gov. Ron DeSantis, now allows school districts to be in compliance if they report their school start times and detail steps they've taken to implement later start times at middle and high schools. The report must describe the impact later start times would have on the district and any unintended consequences to the school district, students and the community.
That new law, signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis in June, was effective July 1.
St. Lucie middle schools already comply with 2023 law
With the change in law, no schedule adjustments are planned to school start times in St. Lucie County schools, said spokeswoman Lydia Martin in a statement. St. Lucie County had estimated the change would cost about $30 million because of needed changes to bus routes, Martin said. That included $20 million for additional buses and $24 million in staffing, she said.
The district's middle schools already are in compliance, beginning at 9:30 a.m. and 9:40 a.m., Martin said.
What to know about Florida's later school start times after SB 296 passed in the House
Indian River schools planning no changes
Indian River County middle and high school students will see no changes in start times to the 2025-2026 school year, officials said.
But the district still might survey parents to gauge interest in changing the start times, said School Board member Peggy Jones.
"We will decide as a community if we need to change anything," Jones said. "We are going to have to discuss as a community to see what works."
Changing bus routes could be costly, Jones said. In addition, working parents often need older students home for after-school childcare.
"That's huge for a lot of parents," Jones said. "We'll see what works, (and) see what doesn't."
Martin County schools already later
Martin County plans no changes for the 2025-2026 school year. The School Board is scheduled to vote on the new year's start times at its July 15 meeting.
In 2024, the district adjusted its start times slightly to be one of the first to comply with the 2023 law. The state provided a monetary incentive to districts that complied early.
Colleen Wixon is the education reporter for TCPalm and Treasure Coast Newspapers. She covers school districts in Indian Rier, Martin and St. Lucie counties.
This article originally appeared on Treasure Coast Newspapers: New Florida law on school start times could impact the Treasure Coast
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump gives Starmer the green light to recognise a Palestinian state
Trump gives Starmer the green light to recognise a Palestinian state

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump gives Starmer the green light to recognise a Palestinian state

Donald Trump has given Keir Starmer the green light to go ahead and recognise the state of Palestine. It came as the prime minister met with the US president at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland for crucial talks on the Middle East crisis, trade and Ukraine. Speaking to journalists ahead of their meeting in Scotland, the US president took a very different tone to his secretary of state Marco Rubio who last Friday condemned French president Emmanuel Macron for going ahead in recognising Palestine. President Trump and Sir Keir appeared to be on the same page in wanting to end the hunger in the besieged territory, with the UK set to lead a new peace process with American support. On the political issue vexing Sir Keir Starmer over recognising Palestine as a state, Mr Trump said: 'I'm not going to take a position. I don't mind him [Sir Keir] taking a position. I'm looking to getting people fed right now. That's the number one position, because you have a lot of starving people.' He also made it very clear that he does not agree with Benjamin Netanyahu, after the Israeli PM claimed 'nobody is starving in Gaza'. He said: 'Based on television I would say [on agreeing with Netanyahu] 'not particularly', because those children look pretty hungry to me.' He also was not enthused about Israel's tactics saying that nobody was coming out of the crisis well. 'It's a real mess,' he added. But the US president warned that Hamas will not release its final 20 hostages and that was now the sticking point. The issue of recognising Palestine has moved up Sir Keir's agenda in the last week with the issue set to dominate a cabinet meeting this week with ministers deeply divided over what to do. But with a threat on his left flank from Jeremy Corbyn's new party and its support from so-called 'Gaza independents' and more than 250 MPs from nine political parties signing a letter calling for recognition, the prime minister is under pressure to act. Sir Keir made a point of thanking President Trump over his efforts in the Middle East. The prime minister appears to be putting together a plan for peace there following his talks over the weekend with Macron and German chancellor Friedrich Merz in the E3 group of leaders. The prime minister told journalists: 'It's an absolute catastrophe [in Gaza]. Nobody wants to see that. And I think people in Britain are revolted at seeing what they're seeing on their screen. So we've got to get to that ceasefire. Turning to Mr Trump, he added: 'Thank you, Mr President, for leading on that, and also to just get more and more aid in. And again, America has done a lot on this.' The two were also set to discuss the war in Ukraine, with President Trump again emphasising that he is losing patience with Russian president Vladimir Putin. He said: 'We thought we had that settled numerous times, and then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kiev and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever, you have bodies lying all over the street. And I say that's not the way to do it. So we'll see what happens with that. I'm very disappointed.'

Politicians Don't Understand Young Workers
Politicians Don't Understand Young Workers

Wall Street Journal

time20 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Politicians Don't Understand Young Workers

Regarding 'Democrats Attack Gig-Worker Benefits' (Review & Outlook, July 23): Expanding benefits to more people isn't partisan—it's common sense. A poll conducted last year found that a majority of Americans, including 71% of Democrats, supported companies like DoorDash providing benefits for independent workers and keeping independent contractor status. Now members of Congress from both parties can deliver just that. Sen. Bill Cassidy's (R., La.) legislation is an important step toward making it easier to expand portable benefits. The bill generated thoughtful discussion at a recent Senate hearing, not only from Republicans on the committee but also from Democrats such as Sens. Tim Kaine (D., Va.), John Hickenlooper (D., Colo.), Andy Kim (D., N.J.) and Lisa Blunt Rochester (D., Del.).

GOP lawmakers clash over strategy to avert government shutdown crisis
GOP lawmakers clash over strategy to avert government shutdown crisis

Fox News

time20 minutes ago

  • Fox News

GOP lawmakers clash over strategy to avert government shutdown crisis

An intra-GOP battle is already brewing over how to avert a government shutdown before the next fiscal year begins on Oct. 1. House and Senate lawmakers will need to strike a deal on funding the federal government by then – and while that deadline is still weeks away, Congress' August recess means that they have just 14 legislative days with both chambers in session to come to an agreement. That will be no easy feat, considering both House and Senate Republicans are working with three-seat majorities. Meanwhile, there's already divisions being sown over the viability of a short-term extension of fiscal year 2025 (FY2025) government funding levels, known as a continuing resolution (CR). Some fiscal conservatives in the House have suggested they could get behind a full-year CR, an idea that mainstream Republicans and defense hawks have balked at. "I think we ought to start planning for a full-year CR," House Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Harris, R-Md., told reporters last week. "A funding freeze in a setting of 2.7% inflation actually is a real cut in the size of the scope of government." Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Mo., a member of the conservative group, told Fox News Digital, "I would be open to that." He added, however, "But really, a CR is kind of a surrender." Others, like Rep. Eli Crane, R-Ariz., said, "I never like CRs, but we'll see how it plays out." But one House GOP lawmaker who spoke with Fox News Digital under the condition of anonymity argued it could have dangerous effects on military funding. "It's absolutely ridiculous," the lawmaker said. "That destroys our defense. I mean, if it's a CR encompassing everything, that's…contrary to everything they've ever said before. But when has that stopped the Freedom Caucus?" The idea of extending the previous year's government funding levels has traditionally been anathema to Republicans, particularly in the House, where lawmakers have tried for several years to pass 12 individual, single-subject spending bills. It's not something that's been accomplished in years, however. And with Republicans having spent months working on President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful" policy bill, GOP lawmakers have acknowledged they've been left with precious little time. Many of those lawmakers suggested some sort of short-term CR could be likely to give appropriators more time to reach a deal while avoiding a temporary shutdown. "I mean, we seem to be having trouble getting the appropriations bills moved through, and so we're going to have to do something," Rep. Lloyd Smucker, R-Pa., told Fox News Digital. "And I think if we're doing a CR that keeps funding levels close to where they are now, a lot of members of the conference would support that." One source close to the House Appropriations Committee told Fox News Digital they believe a short-term CR is a likely scenario, but did not mention the prospects of a year. "I don't know that we're there yet, but if that's the option available, we certainly can't afford any type of government shutdown – especially under full control by Republicans," another member, Rep. Scott Fitzgerald, R-Wis., told Fox News Digital. Meanwhile, a small group of conservatives is warning they're dedicated to opposing any form of CR. "I'm not voting for a September 30th CR. That is totally unacceptable," Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., wrote on X last week. "I'm giving everyone adequate notice." Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., pointed out FY2025 levels were set under the Biden administration. "Why would we want to do the Biden policies and budget?" Biggs asked. And many Senate Republicans scoffed at the idea of doing another government funding extension, let alone a year-long CR. Most want to actually give the appropriations process a shot rather than continue the status quo of last-minute government funding. "I have no interest in a year-long CR," Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., told Fox News Digital. "I think Congress needs to actually take the responsibility for looking at spending. I don't think having a CR, which is basically a continuation of a Biden era, is appropriate." Rounds and other appropriators want to see the process through, something that hasn't been accomplished since the late 1990s. But time is running thin for lawmakers, given that the House is already on recess and the upper chamber may stick around for a portion of August. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, argued that the appropriations process, which has been largely sidelined for years because of CRs, could still work, but warned that it could be undermined by another government funding extension or more rescissions packages from the White House. "We're going to have an opportunity to be on the floor with an appropriations bill before we go on break for August," she said. "So I refuse to say appropriations is 'pretty broken.'" So far, the Senate Appropriations Committee has finished work on six funding bills, and moved through a key hurdle for the House's funding bill for military construction and the VA last week. The House of Representatives has passed two of 12 individual appropriations bills, though the two already make up roughly half the discretionary funding Congress must lay out. Other Republicans similarly do not want to see another funding extension, and would rather focus on passing Trump's roughly $1.7 trillion budget that he submitted to lawmakers earlier this year. "Hopefully we don't have to go get to a CR, but if we get to a CR, what I don't want is, I don't want some blowout spending bill, which is what we have done since I've been here," Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fl., told Fox News Digital. Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., also preferred to tackle Trump's budget, but believed that lawmakers were already "late to the ball." "I would like to go through a regular order where we consider all 12 of these buckets within the appropriations bill, all 2,400 line items, piece by piece on the floor, and make everybody defend their bridges to nowhere," Marshall said. "I think that'll cut out a lot of the nonsense."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store