First home buyers baulk as average home in Australia passes $1 million
As the average price of a house in Australia passed $1 million, 37-year-old Nick Muldoon could only sigh.
He moved from Melbourne to Perth last year to stay with his partner's family to save for a deposit for their first home — but he feels like the goal posts keep shifting.
"It is also just exhausting, hearing that the prices are going that high is like it makes you feel a little bit sad. Like it, you know that dream is almost like out of reach," Mr Muldoon told the ABC.
"You almost feel like you're disenfranchised a little bit, because especially, you know, everyone was sort of told that they could achieve [home ownership].
According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics the average dwelling in the country has reached $1,002,500 in the March quarter.
That's the first time the average house price in Australia has surpassed $1 million, rising by about 0.7 per cent.
The bureau said that Western Australia, South Australia and Queensland were the key drivers of the rise.
Queensland has now reached the second highest mean price in Australia, behind New South Wales.
The total value of residential dwellings in the country rose by $130.7 billion, about 1.2 per cent, to $11.4 trillion in the March quarter.
Dr Michael Fotheringham from the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI) said this new milestone, while compelling, was just another small shift in what has been a continuing trend of higher house prices in the country.
"It's not a sort of dramatic shift in circumstance … [but] it's sobering to look at that number," Dr Fotheringham told the ABC.
"And when you think about average wages, average household incomes, and compare it to that figure, it does give a real sense of the scale of the challenge we have."
Australia's housing crisis did not spring out of nowhere, Dr Fotheringham said.
Decades of neglect by both sides of politics and governments at all levels was a major factor.
However, he believed the Commonwealth was engaging in housing supply for the first time in long time.
The federal government has targeted to deliver 1.2 million new homes by mid-2029.
Some of the housing policies the Commonwealth pledged at the last election included allowing first home buyers to get into the property market with just a 5 per cent deposit without having to pay lender's mortgage insurance.
The Commonwealth extended their first term policy "Help to Buy" to allow homebuyers to co-buy property with the government.
It also committed $10 billion to facilitate the construction of 100,000 new homes for first home buyers. The policy, Dr Fotheringham said, was the first example of the government getting directly involved in housing supply.
"It takes several years for these programs to really bear fruit. So we won't have huge amounts of new supply suddenly generated between now and Christmas. It's going to take time," he said.
"The good news is that federal and state governments are treating housing as a top order issue these days. It's right up there with health, education and the environment.
With the rise of house prices, some experts such as the Grattan Institute's Matthew Bowes fear inequality will likely continue to grow because housing represents most of the wealth held by Australians.
Home ownership rates have been decreasing for those on the lowest incomes over the last few decades, and that was now increasingly also impacting middle income earners too, Mr Bowes said.
"The main reason that is a problem is because of the role that home ownership plays, both in housing security, because renting is very insecure in Australia, and in wealth creation," Mr Bowes told the ABC.
Mr Bowes said when low to middle income earners were locked out of home ownership, governments at all levels should be ensuring the rental market was both more affordable and secure.
He said those on low incomes were struggling the most with housing costs.
"They're the people who have faced the most dire consequences," he said.
"So I think that focus on the people who are struggling most in the short-term is something that could be brought to Australian housing policy better."
The Australian Bureau of Statistics highlighted Western Australia, South Australia and Queensland as the main drivers of the rise in the average house price in the country.
Dr Fotheringham explained Australia had many housing markets, not one.
Different markets even existed within each state and across a city.
But the consistent pattern across the country was that housing was getting more expensive, and wages were not keeping up.
"For a long time, Sydney has had the most unaffordable housing in the country, and amongst the most unaffordable housing in the world relative to incomes," he said.
Data from Cotality (formerly CoreLogic) for the month of May found that Melbourne, once the second most expensive capital to buy a home, has a median house price lower than every capital city except for Darwin and Hobart.
Aspirational first home buyer Nick Muldoon escaped "the rental trap" in Melbourne in exchange for Perth to save for a deposit with his partner.
He pays about $600 a month for board at his partner's parents' home in Perth.
But Mr Muldoon despairs when he reads that Perth is among the capital cities with the highest growth in prices.
The couple have put off having children until they manage to buy a home.
"We would want to build a family in a house that's our own, that we could build together," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
High school ‘Tradwife' debate topic divides
A hot button topic put forward for Year 9 students to discuss during a statewide debate competition has caused a stir online. Debating SA, a non-profit organisation that runs debating competitions in South Australia, revealed its latest topics ahead of next week's debates. However, it was the topic for round three — 'The 'Trad Wife' movement is good for women' — that has raised eyebrows and sparked fierce discussion. The 'Trad Wife' movement has been popularised by the likes of influencer Hannah Neeleman, also known as Ballerina Farm, who has more than 10 million followers on Instagram, and Nara Smith, a US-based model and influencer with nearly 5 million followers. The movement is often rooted in 'traditional' values, based on the idea of a woman looking after the home and children while the woman's husband goes off to work and earn money. Typically, it is associated with conservative values where the woman is seen as submissive, however defenders say those who follow it, do so as a matter of personal choice. Debating SA's topic choice left many questioning whether it was appropriate for Year 9 students to research and discuss, let alone be aware of the phrase 'Trad Wife'. 'Personally I think being able to debate around a topic even one that is clearly terrible is still an important skill,' one social media user said. 'But the point of contention is that tradwife stuff promotes not only staying at home, but actual straight up misogyny. And it would always be controversial to debate 'is it okay to hate women?'.' Another said: 'This is a huge misstep by the debating orgs (and I'm saying this as a former high school debater and coach).' 'Sounds like those who champion 'critical thinking, cultural nous and debate' to set this topic have NFI of the current cultural implications of the 'tradwife' movement online, especially its direct pipeline to white supremacy and misogyny,' another added. But others argued there was no real issue. 'I thought one of the points of debating was arguing for a side you don't necessarily agree with. My son recently was involved with a school debate where the topic was 'Is the current climate change man made?'. I don't see a trad wife debate being much different,' one parent wrote. Another weighed in: 'Honestly, if the goal is to teach kids how to think critically about the content they're bombarded with online, this isn't the worst topic to explore. 'The tradwife movement is something they'll run into on TikTok or YouTube eventually, so better to unpack it in a guided, moderated classroom than leave them to figure it out through algorithm-fed echo chambers. Context and intent matter. If this was framed as a critical discussion — not an endorsement — then it's literally education doing its job.' Following the outrage, Debating SA sent a clarification to schools, saying that students 'must look critically at sources'. 'It goes without saying that any websites that denigrate women (or any person) are not a good source of information and are not relevant to the topic,' the clarification, which also appeared on its website, said. 'To avoid any confusion about the topic, the following definitions for the purpose of the debate apply: 'Tradwife is a portmanteau for 'traditional wife', a woman who embraces traditional gender roles, primarily focusing on home making and family care, while her husband is the primary breadwinner. This can include cooking, cleaning, child-rearing, and maintaining the home. 'This term is intended to be synonymous with the idea of a stay at home parent.' 'The tradwife movement is therefore a group of people who support a lifestyle such as the above. Note that this does not include any concept of 'submission' as some sources may define. 'Good for women generally refers to something that has a positive impact on women's lives and wellbeing. Note specifically that the definition does not infer 'all women'.' In a further email provided to Sonja Lowen, the chairman of Debating SA, said: 'The positive response to the topic and our organisation [has] been well expressed by a number of people in the mainstream media. 'The negative response from some of the public has been very illuminating in the way in which they chose to express not only their views. but also the idea that there can be no debate about this subject. It seems that thinking about a subject that they don't agree with has become a radical act. Shutting down discussion is not a good idea and is the antithesis of a free society.' Ms Lowen said it made her realise debate provides a regulated forum for students to be able to present a case in a measured way, 'something some of the public would do well to emulate'. 'We expect our debaters to present their case with evidence and reasoning. It is very necessary for young people to be able to develop the skills to navigate their way in what is now a very complicated social landscape and those skills are perfected and refined by debating,' she said. 'Debating is an intellectual and academic discipline that allows the participants to examine both sides of a topic regardless of their own personal beliefs. This ability to explore both sides makes us tolerant of other views. Thinking is hard work and we should not surrender our intellectual independence because a topic may be difficult or in this case deemed unacceptable by some of the public.' But some were not satisfied with the reasoning from Debating SA. 'This isn't moderated in class discussion, it's a discussion topic for a Debating Competition, and the organisers have said that they used trad-wife as a synonym for 'stay at home parent',' one said. 'Honestly, their excuse sounds pretty pathetic – trad-wife is not a synonym for stay at home parent, it's a controversial social movement with significant connections to right-wing politics and influencers.' Another added: 'They're engaged enough to know the term, but not the context. 'Tradwife' is absolutely not a synonym for 'stay at home parent'. They've gone awry from the outset.' 'The issue is them conflating SAHM with Trad Wife. Trad wife is a social movement. They are vastly not the same thing. And the Trad Wife may not necessarily have children,' another said.

News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Not an easy path': Specialist outlines steps to enter Australian defence industry
Defence industry specialist Brent Clark breaks down the steps for breaking into the Australian defence industry as a supplier with government contracts. 'These things are always complex,' Mr Clark told Sky News host Ed Boyd. 'It is not an easy path to tread to become a supplier into defence, but in many ways, nor should it be. 'Defence has cutting-edge equipment and very complex projects that it's trying to undertake. 'The reality, of course, is that you need to be diverse, you need to ensure that you have the best capability possible, and you need to make sure you are ready to take on a defence contract.'

News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Three-pronged attack': Australia's commercial defence future analysed
Defence industry specialist Brent Clark discusses Australia's national defence future. 'Obviously, the Australian government has a three-pronged attack on this,' Mr Clark told Sky News host Ed Boyd. 'There are a variety of steps that each company must do to each of those elements, if you're a supplier that is different to being a company that wishes to be a builder, as such. 'I would suggest quite heavily that Australian companies are investing in infrastructure, skills, capabilities.'