
‘Show us it's not just words': 5 takeaways from Harvard's reports on antisemitism and Islamophobia
The two reports — titled the "
Here are five takeaways from the reports.
Advertisement
1. Commonalities between the two reports
Both groups found the administration failed to protect students. Both spoke of living amid a climate of fear on campus and online. Both felt targeted for their identities, with some going so far as to conceal physical markers.
'I don't wear the keffiyeh because I feel like I will be targeted,' said one staff member. 'I already wear a hijab and have faced verbal abuse just because of that before.'
Advertisement
In the antisemitism report, an undergraduate student reflected on the 'horrible' experiences post-Oct. 7 of friends who are 'more outwardly' Jewish and Israeli, saying, 'I feel lucky I don't look Jewish. I know if I do the 'wrong thing' I might get the antisemitism. So, put your headphones in, make sure you're not outwardly Jewish, and just walk to class.'
Both groups cited a need for more educational offerings and inquiries around Israel-Palestine.
2. Campus shunning and external harassment
Many Jewish and Israeli students described social shunning by their peers on campus, whereas the anti-Muslim/Arab/Palestinian bias report highlighted examples of outside harassment, especially doxxing.
'There's a good-Jew, bad-Jew dynamic,' particularly in progressive circles, one student told the antisemitism task force. 'A Jew who doesn't renounce Zionism and who is gay can't feel comfortable in a gay students' association,' noted an undergraduate.
Others expressed concerns about the 'perceived indifference' toward Jewish students by Harvard's Office For Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging. 'Jews are the only minority [against whom] people speak [but] enjoy maximalist First Amendment protections,' said one graduate student. 'Every other minority group is defended by the administration against hate speech. There's absolute freedom for antisemitic speech. I agree with the Supreme Court case about the neo-Nazi march in Skokie. It's right for the country but not for Harvard.'
Participants in the anti-Muslim/Arab/Palestinian bias report recounted external threats and harassment.
'One student had their face put on a doxxing truck and their phone number and other details doxxed online. They received calls with death and rape threats,' reported a faculty member, who noted the incident was not isolated.
Advertisement
Pro-Palestinian advocates spoke of turning to each other when they should have had access to trained experts and institutional support. 'I felt like a student hotline, tasked with supporting my fellow students,' said one student. 'Where were the administrators? Where was our support system? I am 20 years old.' A faculty member described 'a profound failure of this institution to protect students at all levels.'
Related
:
3. The anti-Muslim, anti-Arab, and anti-Palestinian bias report includes a range of allies . . .
And not just those whose identities match the title. As a result, the report surfaces accounts of everyday racism against people of color more generally, along with a broader sense of anger and alienation.
'I hate this place. I hate being here,' said one student. 'The reason for that has been the administration — a complete erasure of Palestinian, brown students.'
A major theme in this report is the erasure of the Palestinians, down to their name as a people. Some faculty 'hide their syllabi with references to Palestine because they're worried about not getting tenure,' reported one student, while a faculty member said, 'The Palestine exception is clear to us.'
Some pro-Palestinian campus community members were so skeptical of the Harvard administration they felt the very creation of the task force — which originally focused explicitly on anti-Muslim and anti-Arab bias and didn't reflect Palestinians in its name — was nothing more than a performative gesture, a check in the box 'so Harvard can say it's doing something,' as one student said, urging the task force to 'prove us wrong.
'Show us it's not just words.'
Related
:
4. Many students and faculty were still hesitant to voice their views on campus
An untenured Jewish faculty member spoke of being 'afraid' to publicly express support for a ceasefire and Palestinian human rights, while the antisemitism report noted that 'many Jewish students who identified as anti-Zionist reported to us that they felt the main source of hostile behavior against them was other Jewish students.'
Advertisement
'I feel uncomfortable sharing any views that are not pro-Israel due to the caving to donors that [Harvard has] done over the past year,' wrote a survey respondent. 'I do not think [former] President [Claudine] Gay should have been forced out and if that happened to the most powerful position how can anyone else feel comfortable knowing their job could be on the line?'
While one student pointed to Gay as a specific example of the 'avoidance of difficult conversations,' another in the antisemitism report drew attention to a larger problem.
'One of my suitemates knew nothing about the Israel/Palestine conflict and the student tried to talk about it without going too deep, because they didn't feel comfortable talking about it with non-Jews,' they said. 'There's a fear of having conversations about anything related to Israel/Palestine because people don't know enough to participate and don't want to say the wrong thing. But they can listen.'
5. Others fear potential repercussions beyond
'Abandoned and silenced. These two words go a long way towards capturing what many Muslim, Arab, Palestinian, and pro-Palestinian members of the Harvard community reported experiencing in the 2023-24 academic year, and what many continue to feel,' the authors of that report wrote.
They note that 92% of Muslim respondents believed they were likely to encounter academic or professional consequences for voicing their opinions, and that 'freedom of expression is one of the most critical issues facing the entire Harvard campus community.'
Brooke Hauser can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
17 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Riot police scuffle with demonstrators on Greek island during visit by Israeli cruise ship
ATHENS, Greece — Scuffles broke out between riot police and demonstrators on the Greek island of Rhodes during a protest Monday against the war in Gaza while an Israeli cruise ship was docked at the island, local media reported. Television footage showed a small number of protesters chanting 'Freedom for Palestine' near the port, with riot police pushing them back and minor scuffles breaking out. The cruise ship passengers disembarked in Rhodes without incident, Greek media said. Anti-war activists had called for demonstrations on the island during a scheduled stop by the Israeli cruise ship, the Crown Iris, which was reportedly carrying more than 600 tourists. But representatives of local businesses on the island had opposed the protest. Last week, the Crown Iris left another Greek island, Syros, early without its passengers disembarking after more than 150 protesters demonstrated at that island's port. The demonstrators unfurled Palestinian flags and called for an end to the war in Gaza. There were no reports of any violence in Syros. Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar contacted his Greek counterpart, George Gerapetritis, over the Syros incident.


Boston Globe
17 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
‘Revenge is not a policy': Israelis voice dissent against the war in the Gaza Strip
Despite that, a majority of Israelis have long wanted a deal that would end the war in exchange of the release of all the hostages still held in Gaza and relieve soldiers exhausted by months of deadly conflict, according to the polls. But in recent months, a small but increasingly vocal minority has made anguished calls to end the war on moral grounds, even if many Israelis aren't even aware such protests are even happening. Many of the protesters may have supported Israel's right to self-defense after the Hamas attack, but many now say it has gone way too far and contravenes their values. Advertisement 'We are on the edge of the abyss,' said Tamar Parush, 56, a lecturer in sociology at Sapir College in southern Israel, speaking at a recent anti-war protest attended by hundreds of Israelis at the busy Shaar Hanegev junction near the border with Gaza. Advertisement 'Revenge is not a policy,' she said, adding: 'We could have fought a smarter war.' At first, such voices of internal dissent were raised only on the fringes of Israeli society. About 1,200 people, mostly civilians, were killed by Palestinian assailants during the October attack, making it the deadliest day in Israel's history, and about 250 others were taken hostage. Many Israelis held Hamas solely responsible for the subsequent suffering in Gaza and said they felt little sympathy for civilians there. About 60,000 Palestinians have since been killed in the war, according to Gaza health officials, whose tally does not distinguish between combatants and civilians, but includes more than 10,000 children. The war has displaced most of the 2 million residents of Gaza several times and brought the territory to the brink of famine. More than 80 children have died from starvation and malnutrition, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. Despite the desperate humanitarian crisis, a survey conducted in May by the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University found that 64.5% of the Israeli public was not at all, or not very, concerned about the humanitarian situation in Gaza. About three-quarters of Israeli Jews thought that Israel's military planning should not take into account the suffering of the Palestinian civilian population in Gaza, or should do so only minimally, according to another recent survey by the Israel Democracy Institute, a nonpartisan research group in Jerusalem. But the institute said that over time it had found a slight increase in the share of Israeli Jews who thought the suffering should be taken into account to a large extent, and a mirroring moderate decline in those who said they were unconcerned. Advertisement That increase is reflected in the growing discomfort and activism in Israel's liberal camp. 'There has been a discernible shift in the discourse,' said Lee Mordechai, a historian at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem who has been documenting the war and believes that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza -- an accusation vehemently rejected by the Israeli government. 'There is still a crisis in the peace camp over what can and can't be said, but people are speaking out more,' Mordechai added. He was speaking at the Hebrew University campus in late May where dozens of students and faculty members held a half-hour silent vigil carrying portraits of children killed in Gaza. Simultaneous protests were taking place at Tel Aviv University and other campuses. Some prominent Israelis have also raised alarms. Ehud Olmert, a former prime minister, decried what he called the 'cruel and criminal killing of civilians' and the starvation of Gaza as a government policy. Moshe Yaalon, a former military chief and defense minister, has warned for months of ethnic cleansing. Yair Golan, a former deputy chief of the military and leader of the Democrats, a left-leaning opposition party, caused a furor when he said the government was killing babies 'as a hobby.' The Israeli government denies committing war crimes in Gaza, though the International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister, Yoav Gallant. Israel's military insists that it acts in line with international law, saying it takes steps to minimize civilian casualties and is fighting a complex campaign against an enemy that hides among the population and exploits civilian infrastructure. Advertisement One inflection point came about a year into the war, Mordechai said, when reports emerged of an Israeli plan to move all the residents of northern Gaza to the south. The government did not officially adopt the plan, proposed by commanders in the reserves, but critics said that elements of it were quietly underway. Then this year, in mid-March, Israel ended a two-month ceasefire and resumed fighting in a decision that many Israelis believed was primarily politically motivated, to help Netanyahu keep his far-right coalition partners from bringing down his government. A New York Times investigation found that Netanyahu had acted to prolong and expand the war, allowing Israel to defeat and weaken more of its enemies but also deferring an internal political reckoning. Hundreds of reservists and retired officers in Israel's air force signed an open letter in April urging the Israeli government to agree to a deal with Hamas to return hostages. 'The continuation of the war doesn't advance any of the declared goals of the war, and will bring about the deaths of the hostages, of I.D.F. soldiers and innocent civilians,' the letter stated, using an abbreviation to refer to the Israeli military. Hundreds of Israeli soldiers have been killed in Gaza. About 140,000 Israelis from various professional fields have signed similar letters, according to Standing Together, a grassroots organization of Jewish and Arab Israelis that has spearheaded anti-war protests and advocates peace and equality. Thousands of Israelis packed the main conference center in Jerusalem in May for a 'People's Peace Summit' organized by a coalition of more than 50 local peace and social justice organizations. It began with a minute's silence for all the victims of the war -- Palestinians and Israelis, civilians and soldiers. Advertisement Since then, more than 1,300 university faculty members have signed an open letter decrying what they called a 'horrible litany of war crimes and even crimes against humanity, all of our own doing.' 'We have been silent for too long,' the letter stated, adding, 'It is our duty to stop the slaughter.' Bestselling Israeli authors David Grossman, Zeruya Shalev and Dorit Rabinyan were among scores of writers who signed another letter expressing 'shock' over Israel's actions in Gaza. In the days after the October 2023 attack, Rabinyan had said that her compassion for the suffering on the other side was 'paralyzed.' The mainstream domestic news media has rarely provided vivid coverage of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. While the left-wing Haaretz newspaper has covered the suffering, a popular right-wing television station, Channel 14, regularly provides a platform for people calling for even harsher action against Gaza's civilians. In July, Standing Together activists have been demonstrating outside the studios of the main Israeli television channels to press local journalists to report on the dire hunger situation in Gaza. 'People debate starving or deporting Gaza's residents on television as if these are legitimate options,' said Michael Sfard, an Israeli human rights lawyer. 'But a different voice is trying to penetrate the almost unified public discourse,' he added. Criticizing soldiers' conduct is a sensitive matter in a country where most Jewish 18-year-olds are conscripted and many Israelis are loath to accuse an army made up of their own relatives or friends of war crimes. Itamar Avneri, a Tel Aviv City Council member and a founder of Standing Together, said for that reason the group was careful to criticize the government, not the soldiers. Advertisement 'This is a war of destruction,' he said at the protest near the Gaza border, adding, 'The Gazans are our neighbors.' This article originally appeared in


Hamilton Spectator
17 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
‘Starved, bombed, killed, displaced': Hamilton man pleads with feds to help his family leave Gaza
Rani Hemaid' s 12-year-old nephew fell twice last week, weak from malnutrition. Displaced from their home, the Palestinian Canadian's sister, brother-in-law and their five children live in a building in the north of Gaza in 'unimaginable' conditions and constant fear. 'Every day they wake up, they are just looking how to survive this day,' the Hamilton man said. Sometimes they wish for the quick death of a bomb over starvation, he said. It's been more than 18 months since the federal government announced special measures to help displaced Palestinians, including temporary resident permits for Gazans with relatives in Canada. Hemaid's family applied soon after, and consented to Canada enlisting another country's help to facilitate evacuation. Hamilton's Rani Hemaid speaking at a news conference on Parliament Hill on Dec. 4, 2023, urging the federal government to expand the eligibility of extended family members of Canadian citizens who can be evacuated from war-torn Gaza. But his family is still in Gaza, fighting for their lives, he said. 'It's just continuous, continuous bombing,' Hemaid said. 'No Canadian and no human being should be hanging waiting for a text message or news to know that their families are dead.' Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) said it's 'deeply concerned' about the situation in Gaza. Gazans applying for visas under the special measures must meet requirements, including security screening, which are conducted once people leave, spokesperson Jeffrey MacDonald said in an email. Rani Hemaid's family in Gaza. Screenings are conducted by external agencies and processing times vary, he said. 'Movement out of Gaza remains the biggest challenge affecting how quickly we can help Gazans reunite with their family in Canada,' MacDonald wrote. As of July 8, more than 1,750 people have passed security screenings and 864 have arrived in Canada. The government reached the 5,000-application cap on March 6, and have closed intake, he said. The IRCC says it can't comment on individual cases, citing privacy legislation. 'We continue working closely with local authorities — at every level — to advocate for the exit of people in Gaza, however we do not ultimately decide who can leave,' MacDonald wrote. At a mid-July protest in front of the Sir Isaac Brock federal building on Bay Street North, Hemaid stood in a crowd of about 35 people holding a photo of his sister's family and a message condemning the government's 'broken promise.' Rani Hemaid family on vacation. He is among those across the country asking Canada to expedite visas. Meanwhile, Hemaid's parents' one-year visa has expired, and they've since travelled to Cairo to see his sick grandfather. Their visa was single entry, so they can't return to Canada, he said. In war, time is of the essence. Food and medical supplies are scarce and hospitals have been bombed and burned . Hemaid said his youngest niece was treated for burns without anesthesia and, earlier in the war, his 11-year-old nephew's broken leg was stabilized with only a piece of wood and tape. He slipped and fell while out looking for wood to burn for cooking. When Hemaid spoke with his sister on Friday morning, they'd been five days without water to cook or wash. The World Health Organization (WHO) warned on Sunday of 'alarming' rates of malnutrition. Rani Hemaid with his daughter Alma, 3, and wife Cynthia Wang in 2021. Of the 74 malnutrition-related deaths this year, 63 were in July, the health agency said in a release. Twenty-five were children. 'Our families are being starved, bombed, killed, displaced with everything unimaginable happening to them,' Hemaid said. 'It's frustrating, it's upsetting, we are angry.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .