Washington lawmaker's push to make clergy mandatory reporters, including in confession
Senate Bill 5375 would add clergy members to the list of mandatory reports in the state, joining teachers and law enforcement officers. The law, if passed, would require what clergy hear in settings like confession to be reported as well.
'By keeping the seal of confession, it hasn't made children safer. If anything, it's protected perpetrators and the thing that could change that would be making them mandatory reporters,' said Mary Dispenza in an interview with KIRO.
Dispenza testified to the Senate Human Services Committee Tuesday about her experience as a sexual assault victim. When she was seven years old, she was raped by a priest in her church. She first divulged what happened while in confession.
'The priest perpetrator who harmed me would have been prevented from going on for four more decades raping little girls, had the priest reported the crime,' Dispenza said.
The impact abuse has had was clear in the testimony Tuesday. An impassioned Sen. Frame spoke of her own assault as a child only being revealed when she told a mandatory reporter in the form of a teacher.
'Nothing in this bill clergy-penitent privilege for prosecution, that is not the point of this bill. It is merely so that clergy will go to authorities and ask them to check on that kid and find out if they've been abused or neglected.' Frame said.
Frame herself has brought this bill three times, each time trying to carefully craft it through the opposition of different groups and lawmakers.
'For those I have worked with I am sorry I don't feel like I can make a compromise anymore. I stand by the bill. This bill has been in consideration in some way shape or form for twenty years. I really wonder about all the children who have been abused or neglected and have gone unprotected by the adults in their lives because we didn't have a mandatory reporter law and that we continue to try and protect this in the name of religious freedom.' Noel said.
Noel feels for stories like Dispenza, where disclosure in a religiously sensitive setting could have changed several lives.
The Washington State Catholic Conference, the public policy organization that lobbies for the interests of Catholic churches in the state, worries for the livelihood of its priests—saying breaking the secrecy of confession will lead to ex-communication from the Catholic Church, only reversible by the Pope.
'The bill asks the priest to choose between criminal penalties or giving up his lifelong vocation. And that's the type of activity that the First Amendment is designed to protect against,' said Jean Hill, the executive director of WSCC.
Of the 45 states that already require reporting, just six of them require those requirements extend to confession, and two more are considering adding it. Hill says the requirement may make it easier for abusers to hide.
'If we shut off every avenue for an abuser to try and get help because they're afraid that whoever they talk to is immediately going to go to law enforcement, we're shutting off avenues for them to have that conversation and actually reveal that abuse and try and get help for that abuse,' Hill said.
Hill says priests are psychologically screened, trained, and required to report any abuse they learn about outside of a confessional setting.
For Sharon Huling, a Catholic part of the organization Clergy Accountability Coalition, she wants her faith to put kids first, saying the Pope should change the Church's stance.
'My church would excommunicate a good priest if they report child sexual abuse learned about in confession, but they have excommunicated very, very few pedophile priests.' Huling testified.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
4 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Nagasaki marks 80th A-bomb anniversary as survivors put hopes of nuclear ban in the hands of youth
NAGASAKI, Japan — The southern Japanese city of Nagasaki on Saturday marked 80 years since the U.S. atomic attack that killed tens of thousands and left survivors who hope their harrowing memories can help make their hometown the last place on Earth to be hit by a nuclear bomb. The United States launched the Nagasaki attack on Aug. 9, 1945, killing 70,000 by the end of that year, three days after the bombing of Hiroshima that killed 140,000. Japan surrendered on Aug. 15, 1945, ending World War II and the nearly half-century of aggression by the country across Asia. About 2,600 people, including representatives from more than 90 countries, attended a memorial event at Nagasaki Peace Park, where Mayor Shiro Suzuki and Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba spoke, among other guests. At 11:02 a.m., the exact time when the plutonium bomb exploded above Nagasaki, participants observed a moment of silence as a bell rang. 'Even after the war ended, the atomic bomb brought invisible terror,' 93-year-old survivor Hiroshi Nishioka said in his speech at the memorial, noting that many who had survived without severe wounds started bleeding from gums and losing hair and died. 'Never use nuclear weapons again, or we're finished,' he said. Dozens of doves, a symbol of peace, were released after a speech by Suzuki, whose parents are survivors of the attack. He said that the city's memories of the bombing are 'a common heritage and should be passed down for generations' in and outside Japan. 'The existential crisis of humanity has become imminent to each and every one of us living on Earth,' Suzuki said. 'In order to make Nagasaki the last atomic bombing site now and forever, we will go hand-in-hand with global citizens and devote our utmost efforts toward the abolition of nuclear weapons and the realization of everlasting world peace.' Survivors and their families gathered Saturday in rainy weather at Peace Park and nearby Hypocenter Park, located below the bomb's exact detonation spot, hours before the official ceremony. 'I simply seek a world without war,' said Koichi Kawano, an 85-year-old survivor who laid flowers at the hypocenter monument decorated with colorful origami paper cranes and other offerings. Some others prayed at churches in Nagasaki, home to Catholic converts who went deep underground during centuries of violent persecution in Japan's feudal era. The twin bells at Urakami Cathedral, which was destroyed in the bombing, also rang together again after one of the bells that had gone missing following the attack was restored by volunteers. Despite their pain from wounds, discrimination and illnesses from radiation, survivors have publicly committed to a shared goal of abolishing nuclear weapons. But they worry about the world moving in the opposite direction. Aging survivors and their supporters in Nagasaki now put their hopes of achieving nuclear weapons abolition in the hands of younger people, telling them the attack isn't distant history, but an issue that remains relevant to their future. 'There are only two things I long for: the abolition of nuclear weapons and prohibition of war,' said Fumi Takeshita, an 83-year-old survivor. 'I seek a world where nuclear weapons are never used and everyone can live in peace.' In the hope of passing down the lessons of history to current and future generations, Takeshita visits schools to share her experience with children. 'When you grow up and remember what you learned today, please think what each of you can do to prevent war,' Takeshita told students during a school visit earlier this week. Teruko Yokoyama, an 83-year-old member of a Nagasaki organization supporting survivors, said that she thinks of the growing absence of those she had worked with, and that fuels her desire to document the lives of others who are still alive. The number of survivors has fallen to 99,130, about a quarter of the original number, with their average age exceeding 86. Survivors worry about fading memories, as the youngest of the survivors were too young to clearly recall the attack. 'We must keep records of the atomic bombing damages of the survivors and thier lifetime story,' said Yokoyama, whose two sisters died after suffering illnesses linked to radiation. Her organization has started to digitize the narratives of survivors for viewing on YouTube and other social media platforms with the help of a new generation. 'There are younger people who are beginning to take action,' Yokoyama told The Associated Press on Friday. 'So I think we don't have to get depressed yet.' Nagasaki hosted a 'peace forum' on Friday where survivors shared their stories with more than 300 young people from around the country. Seiichiro Mise, a 90-year-old survivor, said that he's handing seeds of 'flowers of peace' to the younger generation in hopes of seeing them bloom. Survivors are frustrated by a growing nuclear threat and support among international leaders for developing or possessing nuclear weapons for deterrence. They criticize the Japanese government's refusal to sign or even participate in the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons as an observer because Japan, as an American ally, says it needs U.S. nuclear possession as deterrence. In Ishiba's speech, the prime minister reiterated Japan's pursuit of a nuclear-free world, pledging to promote dialogue and cooperation between countries with nuclear weapons and nonnuclear states at the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons review conference scheduled for April and May 2026 in New York. Ishiba didn't mention the nuclear weapons ban treaty. 'Countries must move from words to action by strengthening the global disarmament regime,' with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, or NPT, at the center, complemented by the momentum created by the nuclear weapons ban treaty, said U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres, in his message read by Under-Secretary-General Izumi Nakamitsu in Nagasaki. Nagasaki invited representatives from all countries to attend the ceremony on Saturday. The government in China notably notified the city that it wouldn't be present without providing a reason. The ceremony last year stirred controversy because of the absence of the U.S. ambassador and other Western envoys in response to the Japanese city's refusal to invite officials from Israel.
New York Times
8 hours ago
- New York Times
Can Street Vendors Set Up Right Outside My Building?
Q: I live on the Upper West Side, and any day of the week, weather permitting, a guy comes by with his books and other tchotchkes and sets up shop. He keeps his tables chained to a nearby pole, probably so he doesn't have to lug them back and forth. He brings with him unsavory characters and they leave their trash on the curb. It's been going on for years, and it's a nuisance. Is there any way to stop someone from selling things in front of our building? A: Your neighborhood salesman is selling books, which is a protected activity under the First Amendment. If he is just selling constitutionally protected items, then he can run his business without a license. But that doesn't mean that he can sell his wares wherever he wants. The city has many restrictions on where vendors can set up and how they can operate. Some of these prohibit vendors from being within 10 feet of street corners, subway entrances or exits, and driveways, or within five feet of a bus shelter, a newsstand or a disabled access ramp. They must be 20 feet away from a building entrance or exit, and be next to the curb. And there has to be at least 12 feet of space on a sidewalk available for pedestrians. Vendors' stands and items for sale can't touch buildings, poles, fire hydrants or other structures, and their tables can't be more than eight feet long, three feet deep, or five feet tall. The Department of Sanitation, which enforces these vendor regulations, focuses on dirty conditions and items that are left out overnight, so even if the street vendor is in a legal location, there could be other violations. 'We believe that all New Yorkers, across every neighborhood, in every borough, deserve clean, safe sidewalks,' said Vincent Gragnani, press secretary for the city Department of Sanitation. You and your neighbors can report suspected violations to 311. A friendlier approach could be to talk to the vendor directly and discuss your concerns, perhaps suggesting that he provide a trash bin for his customers. Many vendors want to be good neighbors, said Mohamed Attia, managing director of the Street Vendor Project at the Urban Justice Center, which advocates for street vendors. 'The approach that some people have — 'How can I eliminate this vendor?' — especially if they operate in a legal location, that is not the way to go,' he said.
Gizmodo
21 hours ago
- Gizmodo
FCC Commissioner Slams Paramount's New ‘Truth Arbiter' for the Trump Regime
It's official. The $8 billion merger between Paramount and Skydance was completed Thursday, and the media giants will combine to create something like 'new Paramount,' according to a press release from chairman and CEO David Ellison. But it was a long road to finally seal the deal and many people are concerned about the ways that Paramount capitulated to Donald Trump, going so far as to install a 'truth arbiter' at CBS to make sure nobody is too mean to the president, as FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez is putting it. 'Today marks the final chapter of a dark moment in our nation's history,' Gomez wrote on Bluesky. 'After months of cowardly capitulation, including an unprecedented payout to settle a meritless lawsuit in exchange for regulatory approval, Paramount and Skydance have completed their merger, and 'New Paramount' will be created.' Gomez, a Democrat who voted against the merger, wrote that the new company is 'born in shame' because it was 'trading away fundamental First Amendment principles in pursuit of pure profit.' FCC Chairman Brendan Carr and Commissioner Olivia Trusty (both Republicans) voted in favor. Gomez went on to write that the company has agreed to 'never-before-seen forms of government control over newsroom decisions and editorial judgment-actions that violate both the First Amendment and the law. A government-sanctioned 'truth arbiter' will soon arrive at CBS.' As part of the deal, a so-called ombudsman is being installed at CBS to be a 'bias monitor,' as Carr put it recently. Carr said the ombudsman would report any issues 'directly to the president,' though it's still unclear if he meant President Trump or the head of new Paramount. The written agreement says it will be the president of the new Paramount, but it's still entirely possible that is not the Trump regime's understanding of the issue. Trump has bragged about countless side deals after news breaks about a given institution's capitulation. For example, the CBS settlement with Trump was for $16 million, but Trump wrote on Truth Social that he's gotten an extra $20 million in ads that support the president, according to Variety. It's still not clear what that means either. But whatever is happening, it's bad for journalism and the First Amendment, according to Gomez, who notes this new truth arbiter should be concerning to everyone. 'Their role will be to ensure that journalists at CBS do not criticize this Administration or express views that conflict with its agenda. That should alarm anyone who values the core democratic principle of a free and independent press,' Gomez wrote. 'All of this is being carried out under the guise of combating so-called 'media bias,' a term which, in practice, appears to encompass anything or anyone who disagrees with this Administration,' Gomez continued. 'Never mind that those now feigning concern over media bias are the same individuals who have spent the past decade attacking the press and sowing public distrust in journalism. And even if such bias did exist to the extent they claim, the last entity the American people should entrust with defining or policing it is the federal government.' Everything Gomez is saying would've been obvious to people before the second Trump era. You don't want the federal government deciding what you can see and hear. But that's exactly what's happening as longtime 60 Minutes producer Bill Owens quit in April after threats to his journalistic independence. And CBS recently announced it was cancelling Stephen Colbert. The network denies Trump had anything to do with it, but it couldn't have been clearer that he played a role. Trump has said the other late-night hosts, like Jimmy Kimmel and Jimmy Fallon, are next. Gomez seems to think Trump will keep getting what he wants. 'Sadly, this will not be the end of this Administration's campaign of intervention in media to silence critics, gain favorable coverage, and impose ideological conformity on newsrooms that should remain independent,' Gomez wrote. 'With longstanding institutions like CBS compromised in this way, it will be up to us—as citizens—to hold this Administration accountable for its abuses.' Gomez finished her letter by urging others to 'take notice and find their courage' while pledging to do her own job of calling out 'cowardly corporate capitulation for what it is: a betrayal—not just of journalistic independence, but of the public trust.' But it's not clear what the average person can do in an environment like this. Trump is steamrolling his way through the country, knocking down universities and media outlets as he enacts his far-right policies. 'Because if the First Amendment is to mean anything at all, it must mean that no government—regardless of party—gets to decide what is true, who gets heard, or which voices are silenced.'
