logo
Why anger has shifted from Trump's overreach to the Democrats' disunity and apathy

Why anger has shifted from Trump's overreach to the Democrats' disunity and apathy

Yahoo24-03-2025

Ever since the stopgap funding bill debacle, I seem to get more and more questions, not about how do we stop Donald Trump, but how do we press 'go' for the Democratic party.
Keep up with the latest in + news and politics.
I went out to dinner the other night with politically astute friends that I haven't seen in a while, and I girded myself for questions about everything Trump has been doing to make our lives miserable. Instead, the first question was Trump's miserable opponents, 'WTF is wrong with the Democrats.'
While I was prepared to answer a bevy of questions about how our constitution is being shredded, I was at a loss at how best to answer that question, and it dawned on me that the reason I was grappling for answers was that there's so much wrong with the Democratic Party, it's hard to figure out where to start.
Shockingly, in recent months, Democrats have found themselves grappling with the same question that I was charged with answering. They seem saddled with a profound sense of frustration, while disillusionment toward them is on the rise from Democratic voters. It seems everywhere you turn now, online chatter and headlines are screaming about the do-nothing, impotent Democrats, and it's causing some serious problems for the party.
Late last week, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, and New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez drew over 30,000 people at their 'Fight the Oligarchy" tour at a stop in Denver. The anger and exasperation from the crowd was palpable. Sanders, who twice campaigned for the presidency, said it was the largest crowd he'd ever addressed.
This sentiment of frustration — actually, it's more like anger — is not unfounded. There's been a confluence of lackluster poll numbers, tepid responses to pressing challenges, and internal disarray among the party and its leaders that has left many of us questioning the party's direction and resolve.
On Friday, Politico revealed a striking downturn in approval ratings for congressional Democrats among their base, with the subhead of their story 'Democratic voters are even angrier than you think.' Only 40 percent of Democrats approve of their performance, while 49 percent disapprove, which is in stark contrast to the 75 percent approval rating just a year prior.
How did things go from smooth sailing to shrinking ships in less than a year?
The Democratic Party's response to Trump's actions, which many view as threats to the Constitution, has been perceived as disjointed and feeble, and that's putting it mildly. From attempts to undermine democratic institutions to controversial policy decisions affecting public health and education, Trump's agenda has been met with what many see as a lackluster opposition.
The party's inability to present a unified and vigorous counter-narrative has only deepened the frustration among its supporters. I've been dumbfounded, and frankly pissed off, about how easy it has been for Trump to roll over them.
Take the Democratic response to Trump's addresses to Congress. It lacked cohesion and impact. While some members like Rep. Al Green took bold stands by vocally challenging the president, the broader party response was criticized - by me, and many others - for its lack of unity and assertiveness. I, for one, wished more members of the House Democrats would have acted like Green. He was criticized, but why? At least he reflected the anger of the party.
The recent horrific handling of the stopgap budget vote further exemplifies internal party discord. While House Democrats largely opposed the Republican-crafted bill, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and eight other Senate Democrats inexplicably shifted their stance, allowing the bill to pass without securing concessions.
This uncoordinated approach not only undermined the party's negotiating position but also conveyed a troubling image of inconsistency and lack of strategy. At first, I thought, 'Maybe Schumer has a point.' But then I thought, 'Whether the government is open or closed, Trump is going to do whatever the hell he wants.' This was validated by my recent conversation with Maryland Rep. Jamie Raskin.
Internal debates have also surfaced regarding the party's strategic direction. Figures like James Carville have suggested a passive approach, advocating for patience in anticipation of Trump's potential self-destruction. However, this strategy is contentious, as it risks portraying the party as complacent and reactive rather than proactive in addressing the nation's challenges.
Compounding these issues is the recent revelation that former President Joe Biden and his wife want to start to help rebuild and raise money for the party. This is a giant step backward. Given Biden's record low approval ratings upon leaving office, the party should focus, instead, on cultivating new leadership and innovative strategies rather than reverting to former figures.
Highlighting the Bidens would send exactly the wrong message. Love you Joe, but it's time to go.
Conversely, during the last couple of weeks, I've spoken to emerging party leaders like Sen. Chris Murphy, Reps. Raskin, Ro Khanna, and Maxwell Frost, and even former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, all emphasize the necessity of a more confrontational approach. They have all been vocal about the imperative to actively oppose detrimental policies, energize the base, and seize the message from Trump.
With the midterm elections looming, the Democratic Party faces a critical juncture. The current trajectory, marked by internal strife and perceived passivity, threatens to further alienate the base and diminish electoral prospects. To reverse this trend, the party must coalesce around a clear, assertive agenda that not only counters the opposition but also inspires and mobilizes supporters.
Here's the deal. Voters live vicariously through their elected representatives. If voters are angry, then they expect their elected representatives to be angry too, and when they're not, it further infuriates their constituencies.
This palpable anger among Democratic voters is both a warning and an opportunity. It signals a demand for leadership that is bold, unified, and unafraid to challenge threats to democratic principles and societal well-being that Trump is threatening.
The clock is ticking, and without a decisive course correction, the party risks not only electoral defeats but also the erosion of the foundational values it seeks to uphold, particularly among the working class.
A message to the Democratic leadership: the time to get angry, and fight back hard, is now!
Voices is dedicated to featuring a wide range of inspiring personal stories and impactful opinions from the LGBTQ+ community and its allies. Visit Advocate.com/submit to learn more about submission guidelines. Views expressed in Voices stories are those of the guest writers, columnists, and editors, and do not directly represent the views of The Advocate or our parent company, equalpride.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Braveboy wins special election for new Prince George's County Executive
Braveboy wins special election for new Prince George's County Executive

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Braveboy wins special election for new Prince George's County Executive

The Brief A special election is being held in Prince George's County Tuesday as residents decide on the next county executive. The election was triggered by the departure of former County Executive Angela Alsobrooks, who was elected to the U.S. Senate in November. Voters are choosing between two candidates: Democratic State's Attorney Aisha Braveboy and Republican Jonathan White. PRINCE GEORGE'S CO., Md. - Voters headed to the polls in Prince George's County on Tuesday for a special election to choose a new county executive. The race was between two candidates: Democratic State's Attorney Aisha Braveboy and Republican Jonathan White. Polls closed at 8 p.m. Just before 9 p.m., it was announced that Braveboy had won the election and she delivered a victory speech. READ MORE:Prince George's County Election Day: Voters to elect new County Executive Big picture view The election was triggered by the departure of former County Executive Angela Alsobrooks, whose move to a higher office — in the U.S. Senate — set off a chain reaction of vacancies and resignations across local government. The winner of the election will serve the remaining two years of Alsobrooks' term. Whoever wins will inherit a series of major challenges. This year alone, Prince George's County has seen the Washington Commanders announce plans to return to D.C., the cancellation of the new FBI headquarters project and confirmation that Six Flags will close at the end of the year. Braveboy previously told FOX 5 that she views these issues as opportunities and is especially concerned about the impact on federal employees in the county. "I recognize how critical the federal government has been to the success of Prince George's County," she said. "But that is not our only success. What we have to do now is shift. We have to pivot, and we have to grow our commercial tax base and bring more industry into Prince George's County." "It affects everything," she added. "It affects also our tax base, because a lot of these federal government employees are also homeowners. They own property here in Prince George's County, so we are very concerned about our federal employees." Like Alsobrooks, Braveboy currently serves as Prince George's County State's Attorney. However, Alsobrooks did not endorse her, instead backing another candidate in the Democratic primary. What they're saying Election officials say they have seen strong turnout through early voting and mail-in ballots. Still, turnout in special elections—especially in June—can be a challenge. But many voters say they believe showing up to the polls is part of their civic duty. "I care about who is going to be our county executive, so it's important as taxpayers as we move along," one voter said. "We have to support our candidates. We have to make sure voting counts. It's a privilege to make sure we do it every year," another voter added. "Democracy. Representation. And in order to have representation, you have to participate," another told FOX 5. Some voters stressed that local elections matter just as much as national ones. "Local elections, in my opinion, are almost more important—or just as important—as voting in national elections," one resident said. "I teach my kids about the election to understand it's our right to vote. It's given to us," said one parent. What's next Braveboy was considered the front-runner in the race and held her rally in Lanham Tuesday night. FOX 5 reached out to Republican Jonathan White, who responded by email that he was not available for an interview.

Oil prices slip as rising OPEC+ output, tariff fears weigh on outlook
Oil prices slip as rising OPEC+ output, tariff fears weigh on outlook

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Oil prices slip as rising OPEC+ output, tariff fears weigh on outlook

By Yuka Obayashi TOKYO (Reuters) - Oil prices edged lower in early Asian trade on Wednesday, weighed down by a loosening supply-demand balance following increasing OPEC+ output and lingering concerns over the global economic outlook due to tariff tensions. Brent crude futures dipped 5 cents, or 0.1%, to $65.58 a barrel by 0040 GMT while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was at $63.32 a barrel, down 9 cents, or 0.1%. Both benchmarks climbed about 2% on Tuesday to a two-week high, supported by worries over supply disruptions from Canadian wildfires and expectations that Iran will reject a U.S. nuclear deal proposal that is key to easing sanctions on the major oil producer. "Despite fears over Canadian supply and stalled Iran-U.S. nuclear talks, oil markets are struggling to extend gains," said Tsuyoshi Ueno, senior economist at NLI Research Institute, adding that OPEC+ production increases were capping the upside. Ueno said hopes for progress in U.S.-China trade talks were overshadowed by profit-taking, as investors remained cautious over the broader economic fallout from tariffs. U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping will likely speak this week, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Monday, days after Trump accused China of violating an agreement to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions. As the Trump administration pressed U.S. trading partners to provide their best offers by Wednesday, the protracted negotiations and moving deadlines have led economists to scale back growth forecasts. On Tuesday, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) cut its global growth forecast as the fallout from Trump's trade war takes a bigger toll on the U.S. economy. Meanwhile, scores of wildfires have swept across Canada since the start of May, forcing thousands of evacuations and disrupting crude oil production in the country. U.S. crude stocks fell by 3.3 million barrels in the week ended May 30, market sources said, citing American Petroleum Institute figures on Tuesday. Gasoline inventories rose by 4.7 million barrels and distillate stocks rose by about 760,000 barrels. [API/S] A Reuters poll of nine analysts estimated an average draw of 1 million barrels in crude stocks. [EIA/S] Official inventory data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) is due on Wednesday.

White House allies ‘disappointed' at Musk's opposition to the megabill
White House allies ‘disappointed' at Musk's opposition to the megabill

Politico

time44 minutes ago

  • Politico

White House allies ‘disappointed' at Musk's opposition to the megabill

Republican allies close to the White House are privately argue that the former special government employee — who spent Tuesday afternoon blasting the spending bill and threatening to retaliate against its supporters — is opposing the bill because it harms the tech billionaire's business interests. The House-passed megabill represents the president's chief — and potentially only — major legislative priority this Congress. But Musk's opposition suggests that the coalition that vaulted Trump to the White House is still facing internal disagreement over it as it makes its way through the Senate. It marks another dust-up between the MAGA and Tech Right. And it raises the possibility some members face pressure from Musk if they ultimately support it. 'The West Wing is perplexed, unenthused, and disappointed' with Musk, who left the White House to attend to his ailing business empire, according to one White House official, who like others interviewed for this story were granted anonymity to be candid about an ally who spent hundreds of millions to ensconce them in the White House.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store