Is the U.S. officially in a recession?
Speculation of a potential recession has been circulating for some time, but conversations have reached a fever pitch in recent weeks.
With a new administration in the White House, economists are scrambling to predict what markets will do in response to new policies and an uncertain financial environment. The U.S. economy contracted by 0.3% in the first quarter of 2025 — the first decline since early 2022 — partly due to a surge in imports as businesses rushed to stockpile goods ahead of President Trump's newly announced tariffs.
Further, in late March and early April, global investment bank Goldman Sachs raised its estimate of the likelihood of a U.S. recession twice — from 20% to 35%, then up to 45%. With predictions like these (plus not-too-distant memories from the Great Recession), it's no wonder fears of another economic downturn are rising.
So, is the U.S. in a recession? If not, is a recession coming? And finally, what can you do to prepare?
A recession is a period of declining economic activity, commonly defined by at least two consecutive quarters of economic contraction. Although difficult to experience, recessions are a normal part of the economic cycle.
According to the definition above, the U.S. isn't currently in a recession. Though the economy contracted in the first quarter of 2025, the Bureau of Economic Analysis estimated the U.S. economy grew by 2.4% in the final quarter of 2024.
Time will tell what happens during the second quarter of 2025. If we experience another period of negative economic growth, the U.S. may officially be in a recession by summer.
Read more: What is GDP, and why does it matter?
Many economists, financial experts, and investment banks are predicting increasing odds of a U.S. recession in the near future. In addition to Goldman Sachs' estimation of a 45% likelihood of a looming recession, other major players are issuing similar odds. For example, the world's largest investment bank, JPMorgan, recently raised its predicted odds of a recession from 40% to 60%. And according to a CNBC Fed Survey, the risk of recession grew to 36% in March from 23% in January.
As with any uncertainty, the likelihood of an impending recession depends on who you ask. But even though downturns are impossible to predict with complete accuracy, the following metrics can provide some hints:
Consumer sentiment: Measures of consumer sentiment often correlate with the health of the economy, and a drop in consumer sentiment often precedes a recession. Currently, consumer sentiment is low: A measure from The Conference Board, a business membership group, shows consumer sentiment dropped to a 12-year low in March.
Policy uncertainty: General uncertainty can affect the economy in several ways. For example, it can lead to decreases in hiring, investing, and spending, all of which can slow the economy. Changes in the administration can bring about plenty of uncertainty, and the recent inauguration was no exception — especially regarding tariffs and trade.
Inflation: Recessions can also follow inflationary periods, which the U.S. has been experiencing over the past few years. Inflation can cause banks to raise interest rates, slowing borrowing and the economy in general. This, in turn, can lead to layoffs, a decrease in spending, higher unemployment, and, potentially, a recession.
Read more: How does inflation impact savings and CD rates?
Regardless of whether we're headed for a recession, it doesn't hurt to prepare. General financial health goes a long way during hard times, so use the following tips to get your finances in order:
Build your emergency fund: It's always smart to save cash for emergencies, but it's particularly important to have an emergency fund when a recession hits. Having plenty of cash available to make ends meet can make the difference between staying afloat and sinking into debt. If you don't have at least six months' worth of essential expenses in a high-yield savings account, make it a priority.
Audit your spending: Economic uncertainty is a good signal to audit your spending, which can help you tighten the purse strings if a recession does hit. Review your bank and credit card statements to identify unnecessary spending, forgotten subscriptions, and bills you may be able to negotiate.
Pay off high-interest debt: Having a monthly debt payment adds another bill to your budget, which can add unwelcome stress during tough financial times. If possible, put any extra money toward paying off high-interest debt, such as credit cards and personal loans. The quicker you pay off the debt, the sooner you'll have more cash to put toward savings or other goals.
Plan for big expenses: A recession is a bad time for big expenses to sneak up on you, such as an annual insurance premium or a new set of tires. Do yourself a favor and plan ahead. Add any major, irregular expenses to your budget and save for them each month. It's much easier to save $100 each month than to scramble to find $1,200 when a big bill is due.
Don't panic: If economic uncertainty and talk of a potential recession make you nervous, you're not alone. Anxiety and fear are natural reactions to the threat of financial hardship. But it's important not to let your emotions lead to drastic financial decisions, such as selling all your investments. Typically, the best thing you can do for your finances is to keep calm and stay the course.
Read more: How to recession-proof your savings
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mass. Sen. Warren: DOGE accessed ‘sensitive' student loan data at Education Dept., calls for probe
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren says she wants to know how the quasi-governmental Department of Government Efficiency gained access to 'sensitive' student loan information at the U.S. Department of Education. On Monday, Warren and U.S. Sen. Ed Markey, both Democrats, called for the agency's acting inspector general to find out how that breach happened. They were joined by Democratic senators from eight states, including U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut. Warren said lawmakers learned of the potential breach of systems at Federal Student Aid after DOGE, which was helmed until recently by tech titan Elon Musk, infiltrated the agency. In response, Education Department officials revealed that DOGE workers 'supported' a review of the FSA's contracts. As a part of that review, one employee was granted 'read-only' access to two internal systems that held sensitive personal information about borrowers. The agency said it had since revoked that access. But, according to Warren, it did not explain why that access had been revoked, or whether the employee had continued access to other databases. 'Because of the [Education] department's refusal to provide full and complete information, the full extent of DOGE's role and influence at ED remains unknown,' the lawmakers wrote in a June 8 letter to René L. Rocque, the agency's acting inspector general. That 'lack of clarity is not only frustrating for borrowers but also dangerous for the future of an agency that handles an extensive student loan portfolio and a range of federal aid programs for higher education,' the lawmakers continued. Warren, Markey and their colleagues have called on Roque's office to determine whether the department adhered to the Federal Privacy Act, which dictates how the government can collect and use personal information. They also asked Roque to 'determine the impact of DOGE's new plans to consolidate Americans' personal information across government databases.' 'It won't end well for Trump' if he does this amid LA protests, ex-GOP rep says All Ivy League schools are supporting Harvard lawsuit — except these 2 Embassies directed to resume processing Harvard University student visas Over 12,000 Harvard alums lend weight to court battle with Trump in new filing Markey: Trump using National Guard in LA to distract from big cuts in 'Big Beautiful Bill' Read the original article on MassLive.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump cancels $87 million grant for planned low-carbon cement plant in Holyoke
HOLYOKE — President Donald Trump's administration recently canceled an $87 million grant issued to Sublime Systems, whose low-carbon cement manufacturing plant is scheduled to open in Holyoke in 2027. Sublime has technology developed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to make cement using electricity, a process designed to cut down the amount of carbon released by a traditionally emission-heavy process. It planned to employ 70 to 90 people with production expected to begin in 2027 or 2028. It already secured and cleared a 16-acre site in Holyoke's industrial flats area. Sublime chose the area, in part, because of Holyoke's hydropower, which is a successor to the 19th century turbines that made Holyoke famous as the 'Paper City.' Sublime is still seeking financing despite the loss of federal money. 'All our meetings with the Sublime team indicate this project is moving forward,' said Aaron Vega, head of planning and economic development for Holyoke. 'We do not yet have site plans submitted for review, but the city has had pre-application meetings with their design team and are working through the issues and opportunities at their location.' U.S. Rep. Richard E. Neal, D-Springfield, said the Trump administration terminated $3.7 billion in grants issued by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Clean Energy. That includes the Holyoke grant. 'The Trump Administration's decision to kill critical clean energy projects is deeply irresponsible and is a betrayal of American innovation, workers, and the fight against climate change,' Neal said in a statement Monday. 'Scrapping funding for projects for innovators like Sublime Systems in Holyoke undercuts years of progress in decarbonizing heavy industry, and it jeopardizes good-paying jobs and economic development in communities that need it most.' The funding came through the Inflation Reduction Act, which was written in the House Ways and Means Committee that Neal chaired at the time. 'I can say unequivocally that this was not the intention of the bill; it was designed to accelerate the clean energy transition through innovation, not stall it,' Neal said. 'This isn't just about climate — it's about global competitiveness and leadership. Calling the move to shortsighted, Neal's statement called on the Trump administration to reinstate the grant. Sublime already had a deal to sell 623,000 tons of cement products to Microsoft over six to nine years. Previously, Neal said he expected the climate provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act to survive because many of the projects are in Republican-leaning southern states where GOP congress members would fight for them. In January, Joe Hicken, Sublime's vice president of business development and policy, said he would be surprised if the incoming adminstration canceled the 'investments in clean American manufacturing,' because the United States imports millions of tons of cement. Springfield Pride headliner Dawn Richard told 'Diddy' jurors of threats, violence, abuse Breeze Airways adds new flights from Bradley to NC Western New England University names interim president Read the original article on MassLive.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.S.-China trade war on hold as talks reboot in London
Top trade officials from the U.S. and China were meeting in London on Monday, the second such meeting in the past month and one aiming to quell rising tensions between the two superpowers over tariffs and other trade policies. The meeting kicked off just days after President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping engaged in an extended phone conversation, after which Trump offered an upbeat download on the conversation. 'I just concluded a very good phone call with President Xi, of China, discussing some of the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, Trade Deal,' Trump said on Truth Social last Friday. 'The call lasted approximately one and a half hours, and resulted in a very positive conclusion for both Countries. There should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of Rare Earth products. Our respective teams will be meeting shortly at a location to be determined.' U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative, Ambassador Jamieson Greer are leading the U.S. delegation and early reports on the talks were optimistic. National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett on Monday told CNBC's 'Squawk Box' that the U.S. was seeking confirmation China would restore the flows of critical minerals. 'The purpose of the meeting today is to make sure that they're serious, but to literally get handshakes ... and get this thing behind us,' Hassett said. He added that he expected it 'to be a short meeting with a big, strong handshake.' While White House officials were signaling expectations for a positive outcome from the latest round of talks, some trade experts predicted the road to a new U.S.-China agreement could be a long one. Zhiwei Zhang, president and chief economist of Pinpoint Asset Management, told CNBC that it could take months for trade tensions to be resolved. 'I don't really have very high expectations for these trade talks ... I doubt they will reach an agreement very soon,' he told CNBC on Monday. 'There could be some resolution on specific issues, like a rare earths, for instance, China already announced that they will give some permits to foreign firms applying for imports. Now, those kind of a temporary solution, we might see some of that come out. But I doubt we will have a complete solution coming from this dialogue in the U.K.,' Zhang added. In spite of a temporary U.S.-China trade agreement coming out of talks held on May 12 in Geneva, Switzerland, tensions arose earlier this month after Trump accused China of breaching terms of the deal. 'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US. So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' Trump wrote on Truth Social. Last week, ahead of the call between Trump and Xi, China hit back on Trump's claims the Asian country was in breach of a new trade agreement, countering that the U.S. itself was undermining the deal with new sanctions. A statement from China's Ministry of Commerce released last Monday said Trump administration actions 'seriously undermine the existing consensus reached at the Geneva economic and trade talks, and seriously damage China's legitimate rights and interests.' Chinese officials also pointed to recent signaling from the U.S. about potential new regulations for advanced microchips and the revocation of U.S. visas for Chinese students, per CBS News, as evidence that the U.S. was acting in bad faith following the trade deal. Trump's complaint stemmed from his concerns over China's export rules on rare earth minerals. China controls 90% of the world's rare earth elements production capacity and, according to the U.S. Department of Energy, the minerals play a critical role in U.S. national security, energy independence and economic growth. Many advanced technologies have components made from rare earth materials such as magnets, batteries, phosphors and catalysts.