logo
TruBridge, Inc. (NASDAQ:TBRG) is favoured by institutional owners who hold 64% of the company

TruBridge, Inc. (NASDAQ:TBRG) is favoured by institutional owners who hold 64% of the company

Yahoo30-05-2025

Institutions' substantial holdings in TruBridge implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
52% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
Recent sales by insiders
We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free.
If you want to know who really controls TruBridge, Inc. (NASDAQ:TBRG), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 64% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of TruBridge.
See our latest analysis for TruBridge
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
We can see that TruBridge does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of TruBridge, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in TruBridge. The company's largest shareholder is L6 Holdings Inc., with ownership of 14%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.7% and 5.3% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Christopher Fowler directly holds 0.9% of the total shares outstanding.
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 52% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in TruBridge, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$14m worth of stock in the US$346m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
With a stake of 5.3%, private equity firms could influence the TruBridge board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 14%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for TruBridge you should be aware of, and 1 of them is potentially serious.
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Congress should think again about foreign investor tax: UK ambassador to US
Congress should think again about foreign investor tax: UK ambassador to US

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Congress should think again about foreign investor tax: UK ambassador to US

British Ambassador to the U.S. Peter Mandelson is appealing to Congress to think again about the proposed new retaliatory tax on certain foreign investment in the US. 'I think that there's something wrong in principle that you should punish a country's businesses and individuals in America because you don't like what their governments are doing at home,' Mandelson said of Section 899 of the House's 'big, beautiful bill' to implement Trump's agenda. Section 899 would create a retaliatory tax on nationals of countries that impose 'unfair foreign taxes' on American businesses. 'If you've got an argument with their governments, then take it out on the governments. Don't take it out on the businesses and the individuals,' he added. Mandelson also believes that this new foreign investor tax is 'counterproductive' for the United States. 'If you're creating such a risk or potential uncertainty tax on businesses here, then many will think twice about investing further in the United States. I would ask Congress to think again about 899,' he said. According to Mandelson, both Congress and the Trump administration should resolve these matters by negotiation, and 'not by means of a legislative bludgeon', where he says the 'innocent are being punished because it's felt that revenge is due against a country and it's taken out on businesses and individuals here in the US.' He added that Section 899 also sets a 'very difficult precedent,' and it's better resolved by 'government to government negotiation and by discretionary means, not statutory ones.' The provision has stoked concerns on Wall Street over whether foreign investors would pull out of U.S. investments over fears of retribution from Trump. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Musk-Trump Space Showdown Sends Rocket Lab Shares Soaring
Musk-Trump Space Showdown Sends Rocket Lab Shares Soaring

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Musk-Trump Space Showdown Sends Rocket Lab Shares Soaring

June 9 - Rocket Lab USA Inc (NASDAQ:RKLB) shares climbed about 8% on Monday as investors reacted to a weekend spat between SpaceX CEO Elon Musk and former President Donald Trump. The feud began when Musk criticized Trump's proposed tax legislation on X, prompting Trump to suggest cutting Musk's government contracts. Musk fired back, hinting he might decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, currently the only U.S. vehicle for ferrying astronauts to the International Space Station, before retracting the comment. Over the weekend, Musk posted that we have got the spaceships, and they do not, implying U.S. reliance on SpaceX. That argument appears to be fueling interest in rival aerospace firms. RKLB, which holds multiple NASA contracts and is viewed as a contender for Trump's $175 billion Golden Dome missile defense initiative, saw its stock hit $31.21 in morning trading. AST SpaceMobile Inc (NASDAQ:ASTS) shares surged about 17% after reports suggested U.S. policymakers may look beyond SpaceX for various space investments. ASTS, a top customer of Blue Origin, inked a November launch deal with Jeff Bezos' company to deploy up to 45 satellites. Both RKLB and ASTS traded on above-average volume, signaling heightened investor focus on alternative space players amid the high-profile Musk-Trump clash. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Are Companies About to Dump Their Bitcoin? The Warning Signs Are Here
Are Companies About to Dump Their Bitcoin? The Warning Signs Are Here

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Are Companies About to Dump Their Bitcoin? The Warning Signs Are Here

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. The cryptocurrency landscape has witnessed a significant shift as corporations increasingly adopt bitcoin as a treasury asset. While this trend has contributed to bitcoin's recent price surge, it may also be creating new vulnerabilities in the market that warrant careful consideration. Corporate adoption of bitcoin has accelerated notably, with companies following the playbook pioneered by MicroStrategy (NASDAQ:MSTR). According to Bitcoin Treasuries data, 110 publicly listed companies globally now hold bitcoin, representing a substantial institutional commitment to the digital asset. Don't Miss: — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . Standard Chartered's analysis focuses on a refined sample of 61 companies that purchase bitcoin purely as a treasury holding, excluding industry participants like miners, exchanges, and service providers. This subset collectively owned nearly 674,000 bitcoins as of May's end—representing 3.2% of bitcoin's total 21 million coin supply. The numbers tell a compelling story: these 'bitcoin treasuries' have doubled their holdings over just two months, accumulating close to 100,000 additional bitcoins during this period. This buying pressure has been a key factor driving bitcoin to recent all-time highs. However, Standard Chartered's analysis reveals a concerning dynamic that could eventually reverse this supportive trend. Unlike Strategy, which accumulated bitcoin over time at various price points, many newer corporate entrants have purchased at significantly higher average prices. The bank's research suggests that approximately half of the monitored corporate treasuries would find themselves underwater if bitcoin fell below $90,000. This creates a potential domino effect where companies that entered the bitcoin treasury strategy during price peaks could become forced sellers during market downturns. The risk stems from several interconnected factors: Purchase Price Disparities: Most corporate treasuries in Standard Chartered's sample have average purchase prices well above Strategy's cost basis, making them more vulnerable to market volatility. NAV Multiple Justification: Currently, companies holding bitcoin trade at Net Asset Value multiples above 1, justified by market inefficiencies such as regulatory constraints and conservative institutional investment processes. As these barriers diminish over time, the premium valuations may compress. Corporate Pain Thresholds: Unlike dedicated cryptocurrency companies, traditional corporations may have lower tolerance for significant losses on treasury holdings. Standard Chartered estimates that newer entrants likely couldn't withstand a 50% decline from their average purchase price—a threshold that Strategy weathered during the 2022 crypto winter. Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase. The analysis suggests that if bitcoin drops more than 22% below companies' average purchase prices, forced selling could emerge. This creates a feedback loop where price declines trigger corporate selling, potentially accelerating further declines. This dynamic differs markedly from Strategy's experience in November 2022, when bitcoin halved but the company maintained its position. Several factors may have aided Strategy's resilience: smaller absolute dollar losses at the time, the absence of U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs providing alternative exposure, and the company's fundamental commitment to bitcoin as a long-term strategy. This corporate treasury trend presents both opportunities and risks for the broader bitcoin market: Positive Factors: Corporate adoption provides institutional legitimacy and substantial buying pressure that has supported recent price appreciation. Risk Factors: The concentration of recent purchases at higher price levels creates potential selling pressure during market stress, possibly amplifying volatility. Timing Considerations: As market inefficiencies that currently justify premium valuations are resolved, bitcoin treasuries could shift from price supporters to sources of downside pressure. While corporate bitcoin adoption represents a significant maturation of the cryptocurrency market, investors should recognize that these treasury strategies may behave differently than those of dedicated bitcoin companies during market stress. The sustainability of this trend will likely depend on bitcoin's price stability and these companies' ability to maintain their positions through potential volatility. As Standard Chartered notes, the question isn't whether these companies will face pressure, but rather how much volatility they can withstand before strategic considerations shift. For market participants, understanding these dynamics becomes crucial as corporate treasuries represent an increasingly significant portion of bitcoin's circulating supply. Their behavior during the next major market downturn will provide important insights into the resilience of this newer form of institutional bitcoin adoption. Read Next: A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: . Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Image: Shutterstock This article Are Companies About to Dump Their Bitcoin? The Warning Signs Are Here originally appeared on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store