logo
Revealed: The true cost of climate crisis for world's poorest countries

Revealed: The true cost of climate crisis for world's poorest countries

Yahoo25-05-2025

Extreme weather fuelled by the climate crisis has cost some of the world's poorest countries $156 billion (£116bn) across the past two decades, the Independent can reveal.
Intense drought, flooding, cyclones and more have impacted 364 million people and caused more than 42,000 deaths since 2000– 17,000 of which can be directly attributed to climate change. The nations hardest hit are Somalia, Haiti and Uganda.
Researchers at ODI Global, an international think tank, also found the climate crisis had contributed to billions of dollars worth of agricultural losses, with farmers across Somalia and Ethiopia forced to abandon their livelihoods amid growing food scarcity, saying the stark findings should serve as a 'wake-up call for global policymakers'.
"If the UK suffered tens of billions of pounds worth of damage caused by other countries' actions, our government and the public would rightfully be shouting from the rooftops about the injustice,' Mike Childs, head of policy at Friends of the Earth told The Independent.
"Yet this is the reality for many countries on the frontlines of climate breakdown that have contributed virtually nothing to global emissions'.
The figures come after Donald Trump slashed US aid spending, with the UK also planning on cutting billions of pounds in funding, with The Independent reporting on the devastating impact for countries most affected by the climate crisis thanks to losing support for food and disaster prevention.
'It's deeply unjust that those who have done the least to contribute to the climate crisis are paying most dearly for it – the UK has a central role to play in righting that injustice,' Carla Denyer, co-leader of the Green Party, said. 'While governments like ours delay, countries like Somalia and Ethiopia, and small island nations - some of the world's poorest countries - are paying the price.'
'The government's recent cuts to the foreign aid budget are particularly disturbing in this context, with so many across the world relying on essential humanitarian aid as a result of extreme weather caused by the climate crisis,' added Ms Denyer.
The study of 53 low-income countries includes 36 small-island developing states in the Caribbean, Pacific and the Atlantic, and 17 countries in the Sahel and the Greater Horn of Africa.
Since the year 2000, these countries suffered $395 billion in losses and damages from extreme weather events, $156bn of which can be attributed to the climate crisis.
'Every year, we see more devastation from the worsening effects of climate change,' said Emily Wilkinson, principal research fellow at ODI Global.
'Wealthier nations urgently need to scale up climate finance and also make sure it reaches the right places. For remote or unstable places [facing conflict or other vulnerabilities], such as those featured in the study, getting projects off the ground might be harder, but the benefits will also be more keenly felt by affected populations.'
In 2023, the Cop28 climate summit agreed to the creation of the Loss and Damage Fund, which would provide financial support for some destruction caused by climate change. But wealthy, higher polluting countries pledged a total of $768 million to the fund; a fraction of the financial losses that vulnerable countries face, and will continue to face. It was agreed this year that the fund will pay out $250 million of this sum until the end of 2026.
To calculate the proportion of losses and damages resulting from climate change, ODI Global's research uses climate mapping studies combined with figures from EM-DAT, the international database covering 26,000 mass disasters worldwide, and United Nations disaster reports.
Tropical cyclones – often referred to as hurricanes or typhoons – and flooding have caused the most damage in small island developing states like the Bahamas, which has lost at least $4 billion from climate-attributed events.
Scientists believe tropical cyclones are becoming more intense thanks to the climate crisis, due to warmer seas and stronger winds heightening their impact. Meanwhile, rising sea levels from melting ice caps will contribute to increased flooding of low-elevation islands.
Severe droughts and deadly flooding have ravaged the Sahel and the Horn of Africa, severely impacting many communities that rely on agriculture. The ODI Global report found that climate change contributed to at least $11.5 billion in losses and damages to livestock and crops in these countries— causing lasting harm to livelihoods and food supplies in agrarian areas, with already high poverty rates.
Nigeria, Kenya, Uganda and Ethiopia have suffered tens of billions of dollars in losses between them, but Somalia has suffered worst of all. Devastating droughts and subsequent floods have led to $151bn in loss and damages; $75 billion of which ODI Global estimates is attributable to climate change.
Somalia's extended droughts have been exacerbated by the climate crisis, researchers have found, contributing to lower rainfall, warmer air temperatures, and higher evapotranspiration – or the combined processes that move water from the Earth's surface into the atmosphere.
These droughts in recent years have caused widespread crop failures and livestock losses, plunging many farmers and herders into poverty Nearly half of Somalia's eight million-strong population have also faced food insecurity. As The Independent has reported, Somalia is facing drought and low crop yields once again; but this time, charities are worried that aid cuts will limit their ability to respond to food shortages.
Many of the nations included in the ODI Global study have smaller economies, increasing the impact of climate crisis-related losses. On the Caribbean island of Dominica, such damage has cost nearly a tenth (9.25 per cent) of gross domestic product (GDP) each year on average over the last two decades.
Haiti, Kenya and Grenada are among the nations already facing substantial losses, more than two per cent of their GDP per year, thanks to climate change. Extreme weather events such as hurricanes can increase that number substantially, given the damge that can do quickly.
This means that poorer nations, some of whom are facing further strain from regional conflicts, are disproportionately taking the brunt of climate-related destruction.
These effects will only continue to get worse, warn ODI Global's researchers; estimating at least a further $235 billion in these countries from climate-related damages if the planet warms by 2°C compared to pre-industrial levels. According to climate scientists at Europe's Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S), each of the past 10 years (2015–2024) was one of the 10 warmest years on record. The monthly global average temperature exceeded 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels for 11 months of the year.
"The escalating costs from climate change will have a serious toll on economic growth and living standards, and a wider risk of geopolitical stability in some regions,' said Ms Wilkinson, a research fellow at ODI Global. 'Climate change contributing to a poorer, more dangerous, future is bad for everyone but we are not too late to change course.'
In the wake of extreme weather events, communities are heavily reliant on aid as people are displaced from their homes and access to food and infrastructure are disrupted.
In 2023 alone, the countries in this study received some £7.5 billion in aid from the US and UK, with millions of people relying on life-saving food assistance.
But with the total dismantling of the US Agency for International Development (USAID), and UK cuts threatening access to aid for some 55 million people, this support is drying up; but the consequences of climate change are worsening.
In Ethiopia, food shortages in the Northern region have led to starvation. But a funding gap of $222 million has already forced the World Food Program to suspend malnutrition treatment for 650,000 women and children.
Just this week, the government refused to reconsider its cuts to aid spending, and could not commit to funding for nutrition, the International Development Committee reported.
A spokesperson for the UK's Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said: 'Demands for action from the world's most vulnerable and the requirements for delivering security for British citizens are fundamentally aligned.
'That is why we are supporting those who are experiencing the worst impacts of the climate crisis and working together with partners to meet the objectives of the Paris Agreement."
This article was produced as part of The Independent's Rethinking Global Aid project

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pennsylvania is suing the USDA over cutting funding to a $1 billion food aid program for states
Pennsylvania is suing the USDA over cutting funding to a $1 billion food aid program for states

San Francisco Chronicle​

time25 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Pennsylvania is suing the USDA over cutting funding to a $1 billion food aid program for states

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — Pennsylvania sued the U.S. Department of Agriculture on Wednesday, saying the agency, under President Donald Trump, had illegally cut off funding to it through a program designed to distribute more than $1 billion in aid to states to purchase food from farms for schools, child care centers, and food banks. The lawsuit in federal court, announced by Gov. Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, comes three months after the USDA advised states that it was ending the pandemic-era assistance program because it no longer reflected agency priorities. 'I don't get what the hell their priorities are if not feeding people and taking care of our farmers," Shapiro said at a news conference at a food bank warehouse in Philadelphia. The USDA did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Harrisburg, asks the court to reverse the USDA's decision to end the reimbursement program. Shapiro's administration, in the lawsuit, said the USDA's termination of the contract was illegal, saying the USDA didn't explain why it no longer reflected agency priorities and that the contract didn't expressly allow the USDA to terminate it for those reasons. Shapiro said he was confident that Pennsylvania would win the lawsuit. 'A deal is a deal,' Shapiro told the news conference. 'They made a deal with our farmers, they made a deal with Pennsylvania and they broke it.' The loss to Pennsylvania is $13 million under a three-year contract, money that the state planned to use to buy food from farms to stock food banks. States also use the money to buy food from farms for school nutrition programs and child care centers. Purchases include commodities such as cheese, eggs, meat, fruits and vegetables. The department, under then-President Joe Biden, announced a second round of funding through the program last year.

GOP Senator's Shocking Healthcare Comment Goes Viral
GOP Senator's Shocking Healthcare Comment Goes Viral

Buzz Feed

time25 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

GOP Senator's Shocking Healthcare Comment Goes Viral

Republicans are currently having a PR nightmare while bending over backwards to convince Americans that Donald Trump's proposed cuts to Medicaid in his "Big, beautiful, bill" are a good thing. (Spoiler alert: they're not). At least $880 billion in cuts have been proposed, largely from Medicaid, to fund tax breaks. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that under Trump's bill, 8.6 million people would lose healthcare over a decade. In a recent town hall, voters raised concerns about Trump's proposed Medicaid cuts potentially allowing people to die from lack of coverage. Republican Iowa Senator Joni Ernst flippantly told voters, "Well, we are all going to die." "A rising tide lifts all boats. And, uh, you know, the best for the people looking for healthcare, the best healthcare is a job." "And a lot of times, healthcare comes with a job, and so creating those better-paying jobs that come with benefits is ultimately the goal here." Obviously, people are pissed at Thune's comments. "Cool I'll just tell the literally [nearly] 40 million children on Medicaid this," one person wrote. "'The best health care is a job' = 'You are only valuable to us if you're able-bodied and work full time to make us richer and if you can't then you should just die.'" "This assumption that people on Medicaid don't want to work is just wrong. For folks like my constituent Emmanuel, Medicaid is the lifeline they need to get and hold a job. The best health care is health care," lawmaker Lisa Blunt Rochester wrote. "i work over 40 hours per week, our health insurance barely covers anything, and i WORK IN HEALTHCARE" "There are a lot of jobs that don't offer health care coverage, and dont pay enough to afford health care premiums. But John Thune doesn't care about that. His job offers health care coverage, and he's got plenty of cash." Needless to say, the midterms should be interesting!

Donald Trump to double tariffs on foreign steel to 50%
Donald Trump to double tariffs on foreign steel to 50%

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Donald Trump to double tariffs on foreign steel to 50%

President Donald Trump said he's doubling tariffs on foreign steel to 50%, making the announcement during a May 30 visit to a U.S. Steel facility in Pennsylvania. Trump previously reversed his threat to impose 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum from Canada. Trump bulked up tariffs on foreign steel and aluminum after taking office for a second time, restoring the 25% levy that had been weakened by numerous country exclusions and quotas and thousands of product-specific exclusions. Trump said the higher tariffs will even further secure the steel industry in the United States. "Nobody's going to get around that," he said. While hiking tariffs could help U.S. steel producers, it is expected to increase costs for consumers and American makers of a variety of products − from cars to homes − that use steel. Trump pitched the tariff increase as a way to eliminate competition from foreign steel producers, saying at 25% foreign companies "can sort of get over that fence." The higher tariff goes into effect June 4, Trump said. "At 50% they can no longer get over the fence," he said. Canadian Chamber of Commerce President & CEO Candace Laing said hiking the steel tariffs is "antithetical to North American economic security." 'Unwinding the efficient, competitive and reliable cross border supply chains like we have in steel and aluminum comes at a great cost to both countries,' Laing said in a statement reacting to Trump's announcement. The steel tariffs were among the earliest put into effect by Trump when he returned to office in January. The tariffs of 25% on most steel and aluminum imported to the U.S. went into effect in March, and he had briefly threatened a 50% levy on Canadian steel but ultimately backed off. Under the so-called Section 232 national security authority, the import taxes include both raw metals and derivative products as diverse as stainless-steel sinks, gas ranges, air conditioner evaporator coils, horseshoes, aluminum fry pans and steel door hinges. The total 2024 import value for the 289 product categories came to $147.3 billion with nearly two-thirds aluminum and one-third steel, according to Census Bureau data retrieved through the U.S. International Trade Commission's Data Web system. By contrast, Trump's first two rounds of punitive tariffs on Chinese industrial goods in 2018 during his first term totaled $50 billion in annual import value. Trump was in Pennsylvania to tout what he described as a "partnership" between U.S. Steel and Japan's Nippon Steel, which he said would strengthen the steel industry in the U.S.. Nippon plans to invest billions in U.S. steel production as part of the deal, Trump said. "There'll be no layoffs and no outsourcing whatsoever, and every U.S. steel worker will soon receive a well deserved $5,000 bonus," Trump said. Trump later told reporters that the deal isn't final. "I have to approve the final deal with Nippon and we haven't seen that final deal yet," Trump said after returning from the rally. Trump previously opposed a bid by Nippon to purchase U.S. Steel, but said that over time the 'deal got better and better.' Contributing: Reuters This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Donald Trump doubling tariffs on foreign steel

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store