
Why eating less carbs burns just as much fat as fasting
It's a fact that pleases nutritionists, doctors and diabetes experts alike. Keeping our eating to a tight timeframe 'can help your body shift from burning food as fuel to burning fat, helping with weight management or weight loss, regulating your blood sugar levels and giving you more energy throughout the day,' says nutritionist Rhian Stephenson, founder of the supplement brand Artah.
But there is an obvious downside to time-restricted eating. The hours spent waiting for the eating window to open are often spent feeling ravenous, miserable and totally drained, and the early dinners that are necessary on this diet – as eating typically stops at 8pm sharp – can become anti-social. What if there was a way to get all of the health benefits of intermittent fasting, and at the same time enjoy both a filling breakfast and a late evening meal?
New research suggests that this could be possible after all – if you're willing to cut carbohydrates out of some of your meals. A study from the University of Surrey, published in April, suggests that 'by restricting carbohydrate intake, without restricting calorie consumption, people can potentially reap all the same benefits that are associated with short-term fasting,' says Dr Adam Collins, an associate professor of nutrition who led the research.
A recent study led by Dr Collins found that by reducing the amount of pasta, potatoes of bread you eat and following a low-carb diet, it can bring all the benefits that we've come to associate with fasting. Most importantly, a switch to burning fat rather than food for fuel, which can lower blood sugar and inflammation and potentially make us less prone to heart disease and diabetes in the long run
'Cutting down on carbs for a few days each week could therefore be a more sustainable but equally effective way for people to manage and improve their metabolic health,' he adds. 'That could take the form of having a 'carb window' instead of a food window, or something similar to the 5:2 diet, which is where people eat normally five days a week, and on the remaining two they eat one meal or five to six hundred calories.'
How it works
Dr Collins' study followed the same group of 32 people, all of whom were overweight according to their BMI, across three different days (with five 'washout' days in between).
On day one, the participants ate enough calories to meet their daily needs, ranging from 1,800 to 3,000 based on their weight and gender. On day two, they ate a low-carb, low-calorie diet: women in the study were restricted to around 550 calories, while men ate around 650 calories, and both groups ate 50g of carbohydrates (roughly the amount of carbs in a small portion of cooked pasta).
On the third day, the group could eat as many calories as they needed, but had to keep their carbohydrate consumption to 50g a day. 'Both low-carb days led to improvements in the participants' metabolic health markers, including a shift into a fat-burning state, and how well they could process a high-fat meal after we observed them,' Dr Collins says. 'Essentially, all the benefits you usually get from fasting were still observed when people just ate fewer carbs.'
The Surrey University team were 'tease out the effects of carb restriction from those of calorie restriction,' explains Dr Collins. Crucially, the study didn't look at weight loss – 'you can't measure that after just one day,' he points out. But in the real world, 'when people eat fewer carbohydrates, they take on fewer calories,' leading to a loss in weight, primarily in the form of fat.
This is important to understanding metabolic health as a whole, not only for those who want to lose weight. 'Restricting your carb intake for a few days each week means that you avoid over-fuelling your body and will only ever be burning food as fuel. Being able to switch into fat-burning mode is crucial to avoiding health complications as you age, like diabetes, heart disease and weight gain,' Dr Collins says.
Though you'll only get visibly slimmer if you eat fewer calories than you burn, fasting and carb-restricted eating in any amount 'could both potentially burn some of the fat that develops inside of your organs when you consistently eat more carbohydrates than you burn,' a huge health boost as this kind of fat has been linked to increased risk of heart disease, stroke, and Type 2 diabetes.
As Naveed Sattar, a professor of metabolic medicine from the University of Glasgow points out, 'this study is small, and you'd need a big, long-term study to see exactly what the effects of this type of eating would be'. But 'it's very exciting, and potentially could do a lot to inform the dietary advice we give to people at risk of diabetes and heart disease in future'.
This study only involved people who are over a healthy weight range for their height, 'but we'd expect to see similar impacts in people who are a healthy weight too,' says Dr Collins, 'though the less metabolically healthy someone is, the more exaggerated the effect will be'. This is good news if you're attempting to turn your health around quickly.
Intermittent fasting vs low-carb diets
For all the benefits that come with intermittent fasting there are also drawbacks, and more serious ones than raging hunger. 'When people practise intermittent fasting consistently for weeks or months, they often put themselves at risk of nutrient deficiencies,' says Stephenson. 'The fewer calories you eat every day, the harder it is for you to get all of the nutrients you need – and keeping a small eating window doesn't mean that you will eat healthily.'
There are also groups of people who don't get on well with fasting for reasons other than hunger. 'I don't recommend fasting to perimenopausal or menopausal women, because fasting can disrupt your hormones and put more strain on your body at a time when it is already under a lot of stress,' she says. A carb-cycling diet could give these women 'some of the same benefits of fasting without the drawbacks,' Stephenson adds.
And while fasting can be good for all of us, not everyone wants – or needs – to lose weight. 'Weight loss is a product of eating fewer calories than you expend, so if you eat enough or more than enough calories while limiting your carb consumption, you won't lose weight,' Stephenson explains. This could make a few low-carb days 'a particularly good option for people who have lost weight and are looking for a way to maintain it,' says Dr Collins. 'That's very difficult to do, and currently we don't have much to offer people in that position.'
That said, restricting carbohydrates could come with its own risks. 'There's some evidence to suggest that low-carbohydrate diets can be bad for your heart, where you replace the carbs primarily with fat,' says Prof Sattar. 'There could be other dangers that we wouldn't be able to identify outside of a large-scale randomised clinical trial.'
For this reason, Stephenson suggests cutting your daily carbohydrate intake to no less than 100g, unless you're working with a nutritionist or doctor. 'It's also worth considering counting 'net carbs' rather than total carbs, by subtracting the grams of fibre in your food from the total carb count on the packet,' she adds. This is because your body doesn't use all of the carbohydrates you consume. Net carbs represent the amount of carb that can impact your blood sugar.
One day on a low-carb, fat-burning diet
Eating a low-carb diet for one or two days each week can be a lot easier than you might think. Here are two plans put together by Rhian Stephenson, so that you can eat well while you give it a go.
Option 1
50g of carbohydrates, 1,800 calories
'This is similar to what participants ate in terms of carbohydrates in the study, and is concentrated within one meal to mimic a 'window' style of eating,' says Stephenson. 'It might also lead to weight loss if you follow this plan regularly, depending on your current weight and how much you exercise.'
Breakfast: Spinach and egg scramble
2g net carbs
Ingredients
150g chicken breast cooked with olive oil, lemon, salt, pepper and herbs
200g lentils cooked with half an onion and olive oil
150g cherry tomatoes
1 kiwi
Option 2
Under 100g of carbohydrates, 1800 calories
'This is a more realistic version of a low-carb day that would better support your health if followed regularly, as it involves more carbohydrate intake that is spread throughout the day,' says Stephenson. 'Depending on your weight and how much you move, eating with this plan regularly might also lead to weight loss, but you could reduce some portion sizes or skip the snack to create a calorie deficit if you want to lose weight.'
Breakfast: Overnight oats
34g net carbs
Ingredients
45g of jumbo oats
1 tbsp peanut butter
200ml unsweetened soy milk
1 tbsp walnuts
100g raspberries
Sprinkle of cinnamon
1 boiled egg
Lunch: Tuna and chickpea salad
14g net carbs
Ingredients
Large green salad with mixed veg, cucumber, tomatoes and red pepper
1 can tuna in olive oil
50g chickpeas
Oil and vinegar to dress
Dinner: Chicken stir fry
12g net carbs
Ingredients
Half a head of cauliflower (to make cauliflower rice)
One head of pak choi
150g chicken
100g mushrooms
35g sugar snap peas
Sauce with tamari, sesame oil, vinegar, garlic and ginger
Snack: Yogurt and fruit
10g net carb
Ingredients
100g Greek yogurt
80g low-sugar fruit (eg Cantaloupe)
2 tbsp sunflower seeds
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Hundreds of CDC employees get layoff notices just days after workers return to HQ in wake of shooting
At least 600 employees at the Center for Disease Control and Prevention are expected to receive layoff notices this week as the administration seeks to downsize the agency – just weeks after its headquarters became the target of a deadly shooting. Some workers in the U.S. public health agency began receiving notices this week of final terminations, but others have not, making it difficult to determine how many people are being let go, the American Federation of Government Employees, the union representing hundreds of thousands of government employees, said. The agency cuts are occurring roughly a week after a federal judge ruled that hundreds of CDC employees could be laid off, with some exceptions. The cuts also come just as CDC employees are returning to its headquarters in Georgia after a gunman fired 180 shots at the building, causing dozens of windows to shatter and leaving bullet holes scattered across the building. Employees who returned to the office this week after the traumatic shooting shared photos with NOTUS that showed windows still damaged by bullet holes and handwritten signs taped to chairs warning people of glass on the carpet. While no CDC employees were killed in the shooting, the gunman, reportedly disgruntled about the Covid-19 vaccine, fatally shot one police officer. Some of those employees being laid off include those in the CDC's violence prevention division, who, in an open letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., called the cuts 'harmful' and 'negligent.' 'Cutting this work now, especially after the horrific and tragic shooting that killed DeKalb County Police Officer David Rose and trapped our children in the on-site daycare center into the night while targeting federal employees, is not just harmful — it is negligent,' the 150 employees said. In a separate letter, hundreds of other CDC and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry employees scolded Kennedy for spreading health misinformation – the same kind that may have led the gunman to blame the Covid-19 vaccine for mental health issues. 'When the federal workforce is not safe, America is not safe,' the employees wrote. 'Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is complicit in dismantling America's public health infrastructure and endangering the nation's health by repeatedly spreading inaccurate health information.' Kennedy has a long history of spreading false information about vaccines, bolstering pseudosciences, and downplaying the seriousness of diseases such as measles or HIV/AIDS. The agency has pushed back against the criticism of Kennedy from staff, however. 'Secretary Kennedy is standing firmly with CDC employees — both on the ground and across every center — ensuring their safety and well-being remain a top priority,' HHS said in a statement to the Washington Post. 'Any attempt to conflate widely supported public health reforms with the violence of a suicidal mass shooter is an attempt to politicize a tragedy.' The Independent has contacted CDC for comment. Some CDC employees told NOTUS that morale was low upon returning to the office recently, due to the impending layoffs and leadership's stance toward their lifesaving medical research and development. 'We trudge on because we believe in what we do, and we feel a sense of responsibility to the American people, and for some of us, to those beyond the U.S.,' the CDC employees said.

Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
Leading Researchers Reject FDA's Position, Find No Evidence of Harm From 7-OH in Response From Shaman Botanicals to FDA
WASHINGTON, DC, August 21, 2025 (EZ Newswire) -- Shaman Botanicals has issued a formal response to the FDA's recent warning letter on its 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) products, backed by reports from leading researchers at Johns Hopkins, Harvard, UCLA, and other institutions. The company argues that current scientific evidence supports the safety of 7-OH, directly countering FDA's claims. Experts consulted — including those previously cited by FDA — stress that 7-OH should not be considered a public health crisis and that available data shows no evidence of overdose deaths, respiratory depression, or widespread dependence. The experts also emphasize that 7-OH is a naturally occurring kratom-derived compound, not synthetic, and that preclinical studies commissioned by Shaman found no serious toxicity. Collectively, the findings point toward a favorable safety profile and call for continued study rather than scheduling. Shaman Botanicals maintains its commitment to scientific transparency and consumer safety, urging FDA to follow the science. Key Points See the full Shaman Botanicals, LLC response below: Shaman Botanicals, LLC Responds to FDA Warning Letter with Scientific Reports by Renowned Experts Shaman Botanicals, LLC, a leading innovator in botanical wellness, has formally responded to a recent warning letter from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding its 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) products. In support of its mission and to defend its products, attorneys for Shaman Botanicals have assembled an interdisciplinary team of renowned researchers, scientists, and clinicians to prepare reports that directly address the FDA's claims concerning 7-OH. "The FDA asserts that there is insufficient information about the safety of our 7-OH products. However, the scientists consulted by our legal team have found that the evidence to date supports the safety of our products,' stated Stephen 'Vince' Sanders, II, founder of Shaman Botanicals. Scientists Cited by the FDA Express Concerns About the Scheduling of 7-OH Scientific reviews were provided by Dr. Kirsten Smith, PhD, widely regarded as the leading clinical researcher on kratom in the United States and an Assistant Professor at Johns Hopkins University, and Dr. Edward Boyer, MD, PhD, a Harvard-educated medical toxicologist with extensive experience in kratom research. The support for further study and regulation of 7-OH products by Drs. Smith and Boyer reflects a growing and dynamic shift in the scientific community's perspective on 7-OH. Work by Drs. Smith and Boyer was cited by the FDA in their recent report recommending the scheduling of 7-OH. Both Drs. Smith and Boyer are currently leading projects to better understand 7-OH use patterns in the United States. But, having looked at the latest data, they do not agree with FDA's position. Other scientists cited in Shaman's response to the FDA include Dr. Michael Levine, MD, a medical toxicologist educated at Chicago Medical School and an associate professor at the University of California-Los Angeles, recognized for his research in botanical toxicology, and Dr. Jackob Moskovitz, a Technion-Israel Institute of Technology-trained biochemist and internationally recognized expert in molecular biology. Drs. Levine and Moskovitz were provided with three preclinical studies commissioned by Shaman and asked to comment on them. Shaman's response also cited Dr. Glenn Prestwich, PhD, a Stanford-educated chemist and internationally recognized authority on natural products chemistry and chemical biology, and Dr. Andrew Monte, MD, PhD, the Associate Director of the Rocky Mountain Poison & Drug Center in Denver, Colorado, and an expert in nationwide monitoring for adverse events from opioids. 7-OH Should Not Be Considered a Public Health Crisis Dr. Smith strongly disagrees with the FDA's recent recommendation to schedule 7-OH. According to Dr. Smith, the use of 7-OH does not constitute a public health crisis. Furthermore, Dr. Smith asserts that, much like kratom, 7-OH currently offers a net benefit to its users. According to Dr. Smith, who estimates that at least 4 million adults have tried 7-OH, there are no confirmed human cases of respiratory depression caused by 7-OH. Additionally, reports of physical dependence or substance use disorder related to 7-OH are even rarer than those associated with kratom. 7-OH Is Not Causing Widespread Illness or Injury Dr. Boyer reviewed nationwide toxicology databases, including poison center data, and found limited evidence of acute overdose risk from 7-hydroxymitragynine. No deaths have been attributed to 7-hydroxymitragynine, a finding confirmed by America's Poison Center in their August 12, 2025 report. As Dr. Boyer stated, 'A signal arising from overdose death from 7-hydroxymitragynine is absent. Based upon data available at this time, given the degree of population exposure, the lack of findings suggests that 7-hydroxymitragynine carries no unreasonable risk of overdose death.' Dr. Monte arrived at the same conclusion as Dr. Boyer, that there is currently no evidence of a safety signal regarding 7-OH as reported by independent poison control and toxicology centers across the United States. Dr. Boyer also disagreed with the FDA's report regarding the putative safety or danger of 7-OH. According to Dr. Boyer, the FDA assessment relies on animal studies receiving intravenous 7-hydroxymitragynine (a route of administration never used in humans) and overlooks existing data indicating low bioavailability, rapid clearance, and poor brain penetration characteristic of oral 7-hydroxymitragynine. 7-OH is a Natural Product; Not Synthetic Opponents of 7-OH often mistakenly label these kratom-derived products as 'synthetic.' According to Dr. Prestwich, '7-OH is not manufactured synthetically.' Instead, 7-OH is a naturally occurring selective oxidation product of mitragynine, already present among the indole alkaloids in kratom plant extract. These products contain 7-OH that is chemically identical to the natural metabolite of mitragynine produced by the kratom plant and through metabolism in the human body. Thus, 7-OH is a natural product. Pre-Clinical Data Conducted by Shaman Botanicals Supports the Favorable Safety Profile of 7-OH Drs. Levine and Moskovitz each reviewed three preclinical studies commissioned by Shaman: (1) 'Acute Toxicity Assessment of 7-Hydroxymitragynine in Rodents,' (2) 'Pilot Safety Study of Escalating Doses of 7-Hydroxymitragynine and Mitragynine Pseudoindoxyl Administered Daily for 7-day Intervals to Mature Dogs,' and (3) 'An In-Vitro Pre-Clinical Safety Comparison of Mitragynine and its Oxidative Metabolites: 7-Hydroxymitragynine and Mitragynine Pseudoindoxyl.' In the two animal studies, no serious clinical toxicity or adverse events were observed. Dr. Levine stated these studies support initial safety and warrant further evaluation. Dr. Moskovitz concluded, 'Based on all the obtained data (i.e., in vitro studies, mice and dogs' models), it seems that the therapeutic potency and safety profile of 7HMG are either the same or better compared to mitragynine.' Current Science Supports a Reasonable Basis of Safety and Recommends Continued Study, Not Scheduling Full copies of each expert report have been provided to the FDA. 'The FDA pledged to follow the science. The aforementioned experts, some of the top scientists in the world, maintain the science supports a reasonable basis of safety in our 7-OH products,' said Sanders. Commitment to Transparency and Consumer Safety Shaman Botanicals remains deeply committed to transparency, scientific rigor, and consumer welfare. The company welcomes continued dialogue. About Holistic Alternative Recovery Trust (HART) Holistic Alternative Recovery Trust (HART) is a national nonprofit organization advocating for science-based policy, regulatory transparency, and access to safe, plant-based alternatives to opioids and other pharmaceuticals. 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH), a metabolite of mitragynine, the most abundant alkaloid found in kratom, is a new tool being used to combat opioid misuse and improve public health. HART strongly supports robust regulation to mandate that all 7-OH products are manufactured safely, are marketed transparently, and are kept out of the hands of children. Learn more at opens new tab. Media Contact HART Mediamedia@ ### SOURCE: Holistic Alternative Recovery Trust (HART) Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire See release on EZ Newswire


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Millions of people threatened by wildfires near their homes, research finds
Why you can trust Sky News The number of people whose lives or property are at risk from wildfires has surged by almost 40% in just two decades, according to new research. Analysis by an international team of scientists showed that 440 million people were threatened by fire encroaching on their homes between 2002 and 2021. And while the area affected decreased over the study period, the number of people affected each year rose by 7.7 million. Dr Matthew Jones, from the University of East Anglia, told Sky News that a combination of climate change and population movements is driving the increase. "We're seeing hotter, drier conditions, and that's leading to more fire-prone weather," he said. "We're also seeing people migrating more and more into areas that are historically fire-prone. In the western US, we see this idyllic, romantic image of living closer to nature. "And that's a trend which is putting people closer to fire-prone landscapes than in the past." The researchers analysed 18.6 million records of wildfires over 20 years. High-profile disasters in the US, Europe and Australia grab public attention, but they only account for 2.5% of the global burned area, according to results published in the journal Science. The vast majority of affected land - 85% - is in Africa. But that is falling as more savannah scrub and grassland is taken over by agriculture - a change so significant that it shows up in global totals, with a 26% fall in land burned over the study period. "The apparent increase in damaging and destructive wildfire impacts on society has until now seemed perplexing because the area burned by fires globally has been falling," said Dr Jones. He added: "By closely analysing the shifting geography of both fire and population, this study brings vital clarity - our work shows that wildfires really are becoming more frequent and intense in populated areas. "These changes bring danger to life, damage to property, and threat to livelihood." The researchers say the increasing vulnerability of human populations to wildfire underlines the urgent need for proactive measures to protect communities. That could include deliberately starting small, controlled fires to burn off vegetation, so it doesn't build up.