logo
Gary's Historic Fight Against Gunmakers Faces New Challenge

Gary's Historic Fight Against Gunmakers Faces New Challenge

Yahoo19-03-2025

One of the nation's longest-running legal battles over guns — with a predominantly Black city facing off against the nation's leading gun manufacturers, retailers, and the state of Indiana — is intensifying as Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita seeks its dismissal after Lake County Superior Court Judge John M. Sedia ruled in the city's favor last year.
The city of Gary's historic lawsuit, which has entangled courts and lawmakers for decades, now hinges on the appellate court's view of a newly passed state law that could abruptly end the case. The lawsuit, initially filed in 1999, seeks to hold gunmakers accountable for their role in supplying firearms to criminals in a city that once bore the grim title of the nation's 'murder capital.' As Gary continues its fight against gun violence, the case remains a symbol of the broader struggle between local governments seeking accountability and state lawmakers siding with the firearms industry.
'The state legislature — acting on behalf of the everyday Hoosiers who elect its members — confers to cities and towns certain powers and functions,' Rokita said after submitting a brief for dismissal.
'The City of Gary cannot, then, choose to exercise powers that the legislature expressly has forbidden.'
Rokita is referring to Indiana House Bill 1235, which then-Gov. Eric Holcomb signed last year. The law prohibits Indiana municipalities from suing firearm manufacturers, dealers, or trade groups. It also applies retroactively to August 27, 1999 — just three days before Gary filed its original lawsuit.
While he acknowledged the constitutionality of the bill, Judge Sedia, in his ruling, highlighted that Gary and its residents are the true parties affected by gun violence, meaning the city has a legitimate claim and not the state.
'It [the Indiana General Assembly] cannot end this lawsuit, which the Appellate Courts of this state have found to be permitted by prior statute. To do so would violate years of vested rights and constitutional guarantees set forth so eloquently in Gary's memorandum of law,' Sedia said in his ruling.
'Gary made its decision to file and pursue this lawsuit on behalf of its residents against the defendants for damages sustained as a result of gun violence. Although the Court of Appeals has narrowed the scope of the claims, those remaining have been found to be legitimate.'
A spokesperson with the attorney general's office told Capital B Gary shortly after Sedia's ruling: 'The General Assembly passed a common-sense law, and we were pleased the court agreed with our office on its constitutionality. This lawsuit, which was filed a quarter-of-a-century ago, is an embarrassing example of inefficient courtroom posturing and hollow anti-gun activism.'
In 2023, Sedia ruled to open discovery — a process requiring the exchange of evidence between plaintiffs and defendants — potentially leading to the disclosure of decades of internal records for gun companies like Smith & Wesson, Glock, and Beretta.
In court, Gary's attorney, Phillip Bangle, argued that HB 1235 responded directly to that court order.
'The defendants call [House Bill] 1235 a restoration statute, but its real title should be the Judge Sedia Discovery Order Override Act. That's what it is, and that's what it does,' Bangle said during oral arguments.
Bangle also pointed out that the state legislature had multiple opportunities to pass similar laws in previous years, but only introduced HB 1235 in 2024 after the court ordered the discovery process.
'No one introduced 1235 in 2021, 2022, or 2023. Four years passed — four legislative sessions came and went — and suddenly, in January 2024, we have 1235,' Bangle argued.
The bill's passage places Gary in a legal battle on two fronts: one against the gun companies and, at least for now, another against the state, as it attempts to squash the lawsuit.
'Supporters of the bill say Gary's lawsuit is 'frivolous.' But there is nothing frivolous about taking away the power of Hoosiers and violating our Constitution,' said Gary Mayor Eddie Melton.
'It's simple. You should not be able to change the law to avoid losing a lawsuit. But that is the sole goal of HB 1235.'
Paul Helmke, director of the Civic Leaders Center at Indiana University Bloomington and former president and CEO of the Brady Center, sees the state bill as a hurdle that distracts from the lawsuit's merits.
'We need to get to the crucial point, which is that gun dealers, through their negligence, are they contributing to the gun violence in cities like Gary and neighboring communities?' Helmke told Capital B Gary.
'If you've got gun dealers who are irresponsible and negligent, that leads to more gun violence in our communities in Northwest Indiana, across the state, and across the region. And they should be liable for that,' Hemke said.
In 1999, Gary officials strategically attempted to expose that alleged negligence through the lawsuit, which originated from an undercover sting operation called Operation Hollowpoint. Undercover officers conducted stings at several gun stores in the region, posing as suspicious buyers and successfully making straw purchases, where one person illegally buys a firearm for someone who is not legally allowed to purchase one.
State Rep. Ragen Hatcher believes the lawsuit's mere existence has positively affected the city.
'I was in school in 1999, and at that time, Gary was the murder capital of the world. Gary has improved immensely since then, in part due to this lawsuit,' she said. 'This lawsuit warns firearms manufacturers that we noticed their predatory practices. We noticed that they were pumping guns to retailers, even though our community was suffering.'
Gary shed its 'murder capital' label decades ago — indeed, 2024 Gary Police Department data shows a 10% drop in nonfatal shootings and a 23% decline in homicides compared to the previous year. Nonetheless, gun violence remains a concern for lawmakers.
'The City of Gary is committed to public safety and improving the health and well-being of its residents,' Melton said.
'Guns, however, do not respect municipal borders. We have seen many tragic instances in which guns sold by irresponsible dealers were trafficked into the hands of our citizens, resulting in terrible tragedies.'
During this year's legislative session, state Rep. Earl Harris, chair of the Indiana Black Legislative Caucus, authored House Bill 1095, which extends the Indiana Crime Guns Task Force into Lake County to help prevent gun violence in the Region. The bill has passed both chambers of the legislature and now awaits the governor's signature.
'While homicides in Lake County have dropped in recent years, it's still imperative that we find ways to mitigate gun violence and enhance public safety in our community,' Harris said.
'This bill will help us get illegal guns and dangerous narcotics off our streets and make Lake County a safer place to live and raise a family.'
'I'd like to thank my sponsors in the Senate for their work to get this across the finish line, and I now look forward to working with Gov. [Mike] Braun to get this legislation signed into law.'
State Sen. Rodney Pol, who served as a city attorney on the case, said he believes its significance lies at the heart of American democracy, and hopes the appellate judges share his perspective.
'My hope is that they see that no other industry gets to go and get out of court cases that are ongoing by going to the legislature and saying, 'Hey, we can't get a court to dismiss this based on … the merits of the case, can you just go ahead and dismiss this?'' Pol said.
'I think that is a massive disruption in the separation of powers, which is the foundational aspect of our government. My hope is that you have the courts that will look at this clear-eyed and can see the forest for the trees on that.'
The post Gary's Historic Fight Against Gunmakers Faces New Challenge appeared first on Capital B Gary.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Poll shows low-profile New York City comptroller race narrowing in the home stretch
Poll shows low-profile New York City comptroller race narrowing in the home stretch

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Poll shows low-profile New York City comptroller race narrowing in the home stretch

NEW YORK — A new poll shows the race for New York City comptroller tightening, with Justin Brannan narrowing the gap in a contest still led by Mark Levine. And with less than two weeks until the Democratic primary, nearly half of New Yorkers remain undecided in the race to be the city's top fiscal watchdog, according to the poll Brannan's team commissioned and shared in full with POLITICO. It was conducted by Public Policy Polling, and queried 573 likely primary voters between June 6 and 7, with a 4.1 percent margin of error. Levine, the Manhattan borough president, led Brannan — the City Council finance committee chair — 30 percent to 19 percent among likely Democratic voters, according to the poll. That same survey showed state Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani leapfrogging Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic mayoral primary. The 11-point gap was smaller than a May 27 survey from Honan Strategy Group that had Levine at 38 percent and Brannan at 13 percent, a shift that left the Brooklyn lawmaker's team feeling bullish. Both surveys found 44 percent of likely voters undecided. 'A race that was once considered locked up is now anything but,' Brannan campaign adviser Alyssa Cass wrote in a campaign memo shared with POLITICO. 'As nearly half the electorate remains undecided, Brannan is the candidate with the most room to grow and the clearest path to an upset.' Brannan's team believes the tides will continue to shift in his favor. They cited the smaller gap that came after 10 days of going on air with a television ad along with a niche stat from their poll: Of voters who had seen Brannan's ads, they preferred him 40 percent to 37 percent. Those viewers, however, made up a small slice of the electorate at 23 percent. And it was unclear how many of those people knew of Levine or his campaign. Levine's camp countered that the polls have consistently shown him ahead of Brannan by double digits. And they touted the endorsement Wednesday night of a major municipal labor group. 'Mark has all the momentum in this race. We just earned the endorsement of the United Federation of Teachers, representing hundreds of thousands of NYC public school educators — adding to the 180-plus elected officials, faith leaders, labor unions and community groups backing our campaign,' Campaign Manager Matt Rubin said in a statement. 'Right now, we're focused on connecting with New Yorkers where they are — on the streets, at subway stops and at their doors.' A person on Levine's team also took issue with the survey methodology, suggesting it over sampled Brannan's home borough of Brooklyn — especially with affluent voters — and under sampled Black voters Levine is doing better with. The Public Policy Polling showed few New Yorkers have barely tuned into the contest: More than half of those surveyed had no opinion about the favorability of the two candidates, and around half of the likely Democratic primary voters had not seen an ad for either. Brannan and Levine were the only two comptroller candidates to qualify for a pair of televised debates, which mainly showcased how little they differ on policy. During their first meeting, they engaged in several back-and-forths over President Donald Trump and New York City Mayor Eric Adams, but had a conspicuous aversion to talking about Andrew Cuomo, who at the time had been leading the mayoral Democratic primary in every poll.

Poll shows low-profile New York City comptroller race narrowing in the home stretch
Poll shows low-profile New York City comptroller race narrowing in the home stretch

Politico

time5 hours ago

  • Politico

Poll shows low-profile New York City comptroller race narrowing in the home stretch

NEW YORK — A new poll shows the race for New York City comptroller tightening, with Justin Brannan narrowing the gap in a contest still led by Mark Levine. And with less than two weeks until the Democratic primary, nearly half of New Yorkers remain undecided in the race to be the city's top fiscal watchdog, according to the poll Brannan's team commissioned and shared in full with POLITICO. It was conducted by Public Policy Polling, and queried 573 likely primary voters between June 6 and 7, with a 4.1 percent margin of error. Levine, the Manhattan borough president, led Brannan — the City Council finance committee chair — 30 percent to 19 percent among likely Democratic voters, according to the poll. That same survey showed state Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani leapfrogging Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic mayoral primary. The 11-point gap was smaller than a May 27 survey from Honan Strategy Group that had Levine at 38 percent and Brannan at 13 percent, a shift that left the Brooklyn lawmaker's team feeling bullish. Both surveys found 44 percent of likely voters undecided. 'A race that was once considered locked up is now anything but,' Brannan campaign adviser Alyssa Cass wrote in a campaign memo shared with POLITICO. 'As nearly half the electorate remains undecided, Brannan is the candidate with the most room to grow and the clearest path to an upset.' Brannan's team believes the tides will continue to shift in his favor. They cited the smaller gap that came after 10 days of going on air with a television ad along with a niche stat from their poll: Of voters who had seen Brannan's ads, they preferred him 40 percent to 37 percent. Those viewers, however, made up a small slice of the electorate at 23 percent. And it was unclear how many of those people knew of Levine or his campaign. Levine's camp countered that the polls have consistently shown him ahead of Brannan by double digits. And they touted the endorsement Wednesday night of a major municipal labor group. 'Mark has all the momentum in this race. We just earned the endorsement of the United Federation of Teachers, representing hundreds of thousands of NYC public school educators — adding to the 180-plus elected officials, faith leaders, labor unions and community groups backing our campaign,' Campaign Manager Matt Rubin said in a statement. 'Right now, we're focused on connecting with New Yorkers where they are — on the streets, at subway stops and at their doors.' A person on Levine's team also took issue with the survey methodology, suggesting it over sampled Brannan's home borough of Brooklyn — especially with affluent voters — and under sampled Black voters Levine is doing better with. The Public Policy Polling showed few New Yorkers have barely tuned into the contest: More than half of those surveyed had no opinion about the favorability of the two candidates, and around half of the likely Democratic primary voters had not seen an ad for either. Brannan and Levine were the only two comptroller candidates to qualify for a pair of televised debates, which mainly showcased how little they differ on policy. During their first meeting, they engaged in several back-and-forths over President Donald Trump and New York City Mayor Eric Adams, but had a conspicuous aversion to talking about Andrew Cuomo, who at the time had been leading the mayoral Democratic primary in every poll.

Challenge to Tampa Bay Senate seat revisits how it was created in 2022
Challenge to Tampa Bay Senate seat revisits how it was created in 2022

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Challenge to Tampa Bay Senate seat revisits how it was created in 2022

The federal courthouse in Tampa on June 11, 2025. (Photo by Mitch Perry/Florida Phoenix) Day Three of the federal lawsuit alleging that a Tampa Bay area state Senate district was racially gerrymandered focused in part on how that district was created in 2022. The suit, filed by the ACLU of Florida and the Civil Rights & Racial Justice Clinic at New York University on behalf of three residents of Tampa and St. Petersburg, alleges the Legislature packed Black voters into District 16 to reduce their influence in nearby District 18, in violation of their equal-protection rights. Democrat Darryl Rouson serves in SD 16, while Republican Nick DiCeglie is the incumbent in SD 18. The defendants are Senate President Ben Albritton and Florida Secretary of State Cord Byrd, and their attorneys began their defense on Wednesday, bringing Jay Ferrin back to the witness stand in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida in Tampa. Ferrin is now a senior adviser to the Florida Senate, but he served as staff director of the Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment in the fall of 2021, when the districts lines were created. He discussed how he and his staff went about drawing up the Senate districts that year and the guidelines they followed. The reapportionment process beginning that fall was taking place under the guidance of Ray Rodrigues, who chaired the Senate Reapportionment Committee. Defense attorneys aired several Florida Channel video excerpts on Wednesday showing Rodrigues explaining how 'hard lessons were learned' following the Florida Supreme Court's decision in 2015 to throw out the GOP-controlled Legislature's maps after deeming them unlawful under the Fair Districts constitutional amendments adopted by voters in 2010. Rodrigues was insistent that he wanted the 2022 Legislature to conduct itself in such a fashion that the courts would not reject the maps lawmakers would produce. 'This map will withstand a court challenge,' Rodrigues declared on the floor of the Senate. That's what the trial taking place this week will ultimately determine. Ferrin testified that, after his staff created other Senate districts in the Tampa Bay area, there remained about 100,000 residents in Pinellas County who would have to be inserted into another Senate district. (With the population of Florida in 2021 at 21.5 million people, Ferrin said, his staff were tasked to draw approximately 538,438 voters into each of the 40 Senate districts). The resultant SD 16, which encompasses parts of St. Petersburg and Hillsborough County, is similar to the 'benchmark' map created in 2015 that was then known as Senate District 19. Ferrin denied that he was instructed to maintain that same configuration. He also said that under the rules promulgated by Rodrigues, he and his fellow staffers could speak about any new maps only with either the Senate's general counsel or other Senate members — and not the general public. He was not supposed to review public submissions. Florida senators were allowed to propose amendments during the reapportionment process, to add their own maps. Rodrigues and Democratic Sen. Audrey Gibson had filed such amendments, Ferrin said, but no senator had asked him to directly to create any Senate maps. ACLU attorney Nicholas Warren said at the beginning of the morning that he had sought to depose Rodrigues and fellow Republican and committee member Danny Burgess before the trial, but both had asserted legislative privilege, which shields them having to testify in certain lawsuits. In the afternoon, the defense called two expert witnesses who criticized the expert witness testimony and voting analysis that came from the plaintiffs on Tuesday. Steven Voss is a political science professor at the University of Kentucky. When asked to break down the political partisanship of the Tampa Bay area, he included four counties that make up the Tampa Bay metropolitan statistical area — Hillsborough, Pinellas, Polk and Hernando. Based on population, he said, five Senate districts could be folded into the area, and that three historically were reliably Republican while two would favor Democrats. Currently, that breakdown is four Republican districts and one Democratic — with Senate District 14, which Voss said historically favored Democrats, going to the GOP in 2022. Voss took aim at the alternative voting maps produced for the ACLU by Penn State University professor of statistics Cory McCartan. Those maps showed that a district could have been fairly drawn up exclusively in Hillsborough County while still protecting Tier-1 standards there and in Pinellas County. (That involves the Florida Constitution's Fair District Amendment, which says that districts shall not be drawn with the intent or result of denying or abridging the equal opportunity of racial or language minorities to participate in the political process or diminish their ability to elect representatives of their choice). Voss said that the result of McCartan's work was that he was 'cracking and packing' voters in his maps to ultimately help Democrats at the voting booth. Sean Trende, senior elections analyst for RealClearPolitics, also testified for the defense. He praised the composition of the Senate maps passed by the Legislature in 2022, saying it was 'pretty incompetent racial gerrymandering, if that's what's going on.' The trial is expected to conclude on Thursday. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store