logo
Hontiveros 'open' to possibility of running in 2028 presidential race

Hontiveros 'open' to possibility of running in 2028 presidential race

GMA Network21-05-2025
Senator Risa Hontiveros said Wednesday that she is not dismissing the possibility of being the opposition's standard bearer in the 2028 presidential elections.
Hontiveros made the remark during the Kapihan sa Senado forum when asked if she would consider seeking the presidency three years from now.
'I'm not saying no. I'm open to all possibilities. At yun yung hinihingi ko din sa lahat na mga kasama sa oposisyon or independent bloc na maging bukas kami sa lahat ng possibilities at sa isa't isa, alang-alang sa oposisyon at alang-alang sa ating mga kababayan,' Hontiveros said.
(I'm not saying no. I'm open to all possibilities. And that's what I'm asking to those belonging to the opposition or independent bloc to be open to all possibilities and to one another for the sake of the opposition and to our countrymen.)
As the 2025 midterm polls just concluded, Hontiveros said her focus is not on the 2028 polls, but more on uniting the allies that supported Akbayan, and senators-elect Francis Pangilinan and Bam Aquino in the next nine months.
''Yung natural competition about it naturally will come somewhere up the road pa. Pero ang priority ko sa ngayon, at sinasabi ko yun sa lahat ng mga kasama at ka-alyado, lalo na itong unang siyam na buwan after the election, pag-isahin talaga. Hamigin. I-consolidate to a greater degree than we were able to do after 2022. Mag-consolidate kami,' Hontiveros said.
(My priority right now is unite, consolidate during the first nine months after election. We should consolidate to a greater degree than we were able to do after the 2022 elections.)
Now that she has Pangilinan and Aquino in the next Congress, Hontiveros said they will serve as a 'center of gravity that will serve as check and balance' and fiscalizers.
While there are newly elected allies, Hontiveros said that they may still have different decisions and stands on various issues.
'Kami lahat ng mga senador dito, we have our own decision-making process, we have our own pananaw. At nagre-respetuhan kami dyan kahit at lalo na sa loob ng tinatawag kong oposisyon…ang optimal senaryo ko ay magsama-sama kami either sa minority or sa independent bloc, sa loob at sa labas ng Senado' she added.
(We senators have our own decision-making process, we have our own perspectives. We respect each other, especially those in the opposition. The optimal scenario is we remain together either in the minority or in the independent bloc, in and out of the Senate.)
2026 General Appropriations Act
At the same press conference, Hontiveros aired concern on the statement of Budget Secretary Amenah Pangandaman stating that President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. will sit in the budget process for the 2026 General Appropriations Act.
'Kahit willing si Presidente, he cannot. He should not. Hindi pinapayagan niyan ng Constitution. Hindi pinapayagan niyan ng Konstitusyon. The power of the purse is wielded by Congress and Congress alone, not the executive, not any member of the executive, not even the chief executive,' she said.
(Even if the President is willing, he cannot. He should not ... that is not allowed by the Constitution.)
'Sapat na na yung executive ay magpadala ng national expenditure program sa House. From then on, it is in the legislature's hands and in our hands alone. Paglabas sa bicam na dalawang panel lang ang uupo, saka lang magkakapapel ulit ang Office of the President to either sign or line item veto,' she added.
(It's enough that the executive sends the National Expenditure Program to the House (of Representatives). From then on, it is in the legislature's hands and in our hands alone. After the bicam, it is only then that the Office of the President acts up again, either to sign or line item veto [the budget bill].)
Meanwhile, the opposition senator vowed to refile bills on SOGIESC, dissolution of marriage, and anti-teenage pregnancy in the 20th Congress should it fail to be approved before the end of the 19th Congress on June 13.
She will also seek retaining the chairmanship of the Senate committee on women, children, family relations and gender equality in the next Congress. — RSJ, GMA Integrated News
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Palace: Funds withheld by Marcos were for Congress-inserted projects
Palace: Funds withheld by Marcos were for Congress-inserted projects

GMA Network

time21 hours ago

  • GMA Network

Palace: Funds withheld by Marcos were for Congress-inserted projects

The P60 billion to P80 billion worth of funds withheld by President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. in the then-proposed P6.352-trillion national budget for 2025 was for infrastructure projects that were inserted by Congress. This was reported by Palace Press Officer Undersecretary Atty. Claire Castro during a briefing on Wednesday. "Ayon po sa DBM (Department of Budget and Management), karamihan po dito ay mga infrastructure po ng DPWH na karamihan po ay inserted po by the Congress. So iyon lang po ang ibinigay sa ating impormasyon ng DBM," Castro said. (According to the DBM, most of these were infrastructure projects of DPWH that were inserted by Congress. That's the only information given by the DBM.) Finance Secretary Ralph Recto conveyed Monday the President's decision during the questioning of Caloocan City Representative Edgar Erice at the House budget deliberations. To recall, Erice asked the economic team how the administration dealt with the fact that P375 billion worth of programmed, meaning funded budget items under the proposed 2025 budget of the Executive, was cut by Congress and placed under the unprogrammed fund. Recto said Marcos had withheld the release of the billion funds as the budget items were not aligned with the administration's priorities. "If the President sees, for example, that there are double entries in a particular project, he's not bound to release this appropriation," Recto had said. An unprogrammed fund is for budget items whose funding are dependent on tax collection exceeding targets and other special laws. — VDV, GMA Integrated News

Palace says proposed mandatory drug test violates Constitution
Palace says proposed mandatory drug test violates Constitution

GMA Network

time21 hours ago

  • GMA Network

Palace says proposed mandatory drug test violates Constitution

Malacañang said Wednesday that the proposal of Senator Robin Padilla for a mandatory drug test among elected and appointed government officials violates the 1987 Constitution. ''So, ang nais po ni Senator Robin Padilla ay lahat ng public officers? Sana po ay nabasa niya na po ang desisyon ng korte patungkol po dito. Social Justice Society versus Dangerous Drugs Board 2008 kung saan hindi po hinahayaan at ito ay labag sa Konstitusyon at sa privacy kung lahat po,'' Palace Press Officer Undersecretary Atty. Claire Castro said in a briefing. (So, Senator Robin Padilla wants all public officers? I hope he was able to read the court's decision on the matter. Social Justice Society versus Dangerous Drugs Board 2008 wherein this was not allowed as this is against the Constitution and everyone's privacy.) '''Pag sinabi po nating lahat, universal testing – mandatory universal or universal testing. Ang allowed lamang po ay ang random drug testing. So, baka magsayang lang po ng oras at pera/pondo si Senator Robin Padilla. Aralin po muna niya po ang nais niyang gawing batas,'' she added. (What's allowed is the random drug testing. So maybe Senator Robin Padilla will just waste funds. I suggest he study first the law that he wants.) To recall, the Supreme Court, in November 2008, declared as unconstitutional a provision in the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002 requiring mandatory drug testing on all candidates for public office and people facing criminal charges. The same decision however affirmed the validity of a provision mandating random and 'suspicionless' drug tests for students in secondary and tertiary schools, as well as employees of public and private offices. Under Padilla's Senate Bill No. 1200, also known as the proposed Drug-Free Government Act, he proposed that the initiative be implemented first through a screening process via a hair follicle drug test. The confirmation of the screening test will then be done through a urine drug test, the proposed measure stated. Subject to this are all elected and appointed government officials as well as government instrumentalities or government-owned and controlled corporations (GOCCs), whether domestic or overseas. Further, any official found positive for the use of dangerous drugs shall be dealt with administratively, which may result in suspension or termination from office, subject to pertinent laws. The bill also sought to institutionalize the voluntary random hair follicle drug testing of candidates for electoral posts within 90 days before election day. —KG, GMA Integrated News

Political dynasty ban should cover up to 2nd degree of consanguinity
Political dynasty ban should cover up to 2nd degree of consanguinity

GMA Network

time2 days ago

  • GMA Network

Political dynasty ban should cover up to 2nd degree of consanguinity

An anti-political dynasty law should prohibit family members of incumbent officials up to the second degree of consanguinity from seeking public office, the Commission on Elections (Comelec) said Tuesday. 'Sa amin pong palagay ang second degree of consanguinity ang mas practical at mas reasonable in order not to deprive others of the opportunity to run for public office,' Comelec Chairperson George Erwin Garcia said at a Senate committee on electoral reforms hearing. (For the Comelec, the second degree of consanguinity is the more practical and reasonable option in order not to deprive others of the opportunity to run for public office.) Second degree of consanguinity refers to blood relatives, including siblings, grandparents, grandchildren, aunts, uncles, nieces, and nephews. 'Kung magkakaroon tayo ng national policy at law sa political dynasties, at least yung second degree para consistent sa lahat. But again, ang issue na ito, the question of to what degree is a policy decision, and it is for Congress to determine,' said Garcia. (If there will be a law and national policy on political dynasties, we want the second degree for consistency. But again, this issue is a policy decision, and it is for Congress to determine.) Section 26 of the 1987 Constitution explicitly prohibits political dynasties in the country, but an enabling law has yet to be passed. Nonetheless, efforts have been made to implement the provision. Republic Act 10742 or the Sangguniang Kabataan (SK) Reform Law states that a candidate must not be related within the second civil degree of consanguinity or affinity to any incumbent elected official. Likewise, the Bangsamoro Election Code imposed a ban on political dynasties. According to the poll body, the Comelec 'effectively implemented' the ban under the SK Reform Law, as at least 1,000 candidates were prohibited from running in the October 2023 polls due to the provision. 'Nakapag-prevent sa mga makakamag-anak na mag-file. To a certain extent, it drove away those who intended to file, although may relationship na mali base sa definition ng political dynasty,'' Garcia said. (The provision prevented candidates with a second degree of relations from filing their candidacy. To a certain extent, it drove away those who intended to file, although may relationship na mali base sa definition ng political dynasty.) Garcia further proposed that legislators allow a registered voter as well as the Comelec to motu proprio initiate a petition to cancel the candidacy of erring aspirants. The poll chief also urged lawmakers to clarify if violating the ban would be considered an election offense and its possible implication on nuisance candidates. 'Maganda ring mailagay natin sa batas na maliwanag that those who will be filing their candidacies in violation of the anti-political dynasty law shall be liable as an election offense, even including those who will be filing their candidacies as nuisance candidates,' he added. (It would be better if the law would clarify if those who will be filing their candidacies in violation of the anti-political dynasty law shall be liable for an election offense, even including those who will be filing their candidacies as nuisance candidates.) Lawyer Christian Monsod, one of the framers of the 1987 Constitution, proposed that aspirants must not be related within the third degree of consanguinity to any elected official. 'I think the Congress owes it to the people to pass an anti-dynasty law,' he said. 'When we were writing the Constitution, we trusted that Congress would carry out this mission and duty on their part and that the Congress would have the capability and the courage to change it as our democracy changes,' Monsod added. –VBL, GMA Integrated News

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store