'He kept saying I'm a murderer': Polish doctor targeted for legal abortion
A leading Polish doctor has told the BBC she fears for her patients' safety after being targeted by anti-abortion activists.
Gizela Jagielska says she has received thousands of death threats in relation to her work administering legal abortions in a hospital in the town of Olesnica in southwestern Poland.
The facility specialises in complicated pregnancies.
On 17 April, a group of activists led by radical, far-right MEP Grzegorz Braun came to the hospital, prevented Dr Jagielska from leaving her office and attempted to carry out a citizen's arrest.
Footage posted on social media also shows the activists praying.
"[Braun] kept repeating that I am a murderer, and the police should arrest me as I am a dangerous person," said Dr Jagielska. "He grabbed me, pushed me and blocked me in the [office]."
The gynaecologist says police were called, but officers failed to arrest the activists.
As a member of the European Parliament, Braun has immunity from detention.
A spokesman for Poland's interior ministry said police "took steps to ensure the safety of the hospital in Olesnica and the doctor who was verbally attacked by Grzegorz Braun".
The Polish government has condemned Mr Braun's actions.
Since the incident, the doctor has been inundated with abuse, and the hospital has been targeted by a bomb threat.
"I had many, many mails, messages and posts about me in social media; pictures, for example, where I am covered in blood, with the statement 'murderer'," she told the BBC. "Some people wanted to gather in front of my house; my private address was there."
Dr Jagielska says the police are investigating the threats, and offered to arrange close protection, which she turned down due to the nature of her work.
But the police did provide "special numbers" to call in case of an emergency.
"I'm really worried that anybody could come into the hospital - not for me, but for the patients that are having abortions. I think it's a dangerous situation for them also."
The confrontation at Olesnica hospital was sparked by the case of a woman who had a legal, late-term abortion after her unborn baby was diagnosed with a severe foetal anomaly, which is fatal to the child shortly after birth.
The termination was carried out by Dr Jagielska, who explained that the condition was initially misdiagnosed at another hospital, resulting in a late-term abortion.
Poland has some of the strictest abortion laws in Europe which only permit the procedure in cases of rape, incest, or if the mother's life is threatened.
Prime Minister Donald Tusk's coalition, which came to power in late 2023, promised to liberalise abortion laws, but internal disagreements have hampered his efforts.
Rhetoric over a hot-button topic like abortion has become more heated in recent weeks amidst a crucial presidential election campaign in Poland.
Grzegorz Braun, who instigated the attack against Dr Jagielska, is one of those standing for president, but is polling at just 2%.
In a televised presidential election debate on Monday, he made several antisemitic remarks.
Braun was expelled from the Polish parliament in 2023 for putting out candles during the Jewish festival of Hanukkah with a fire extinguisher. Earlier this year he was removed from the European Parliament for disrupting a Holocaust memorial ceremony.
Two of the three frontrunners in the election race, Karol Nawrocki and Slawomir Mentzen, have both spoken out against abortion.
Mentzen, from the far-right Confederation Party, caused controversy recently after he said abortion should be illegal in all cases, including rape, which he appeared to describe as "unpleasantness".
Liberal candidate Rafal Trzaskowski, from Mr Tusk's coalition, has promised abortion reform.
Last week, President Andrzej Duda waded into the debate, describing the controversial abortion case at Olesnica hospital as "barbaric" and "murder".
Dr Jagielska said intimidation of medical staff who carry out abortions in Poland was common, and described Duda's statements as "inappropriate".
"I perform abortions when they are wanted by women and within legal circumstances according to Polish law, so I don't feel like a murderer," she told the BBC. "I feel like an obstetrician who gives proper care for women."
Polish MP who doused Hanukkah candles loses immunity
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Will Musk's explosive row with Trump help or harm his businesses?
When Elon Musk recently announced that he was stepping back from politics, investors hoped that would mean he would step up his involvement in the many tech firms he runs. His explosive row with President Donald Trump - and the very public airing of his dirty White House laundry - suggests Musk's changing priorities might not quite be the salve they had been hoping for. Instead of Musk retreating somewhat from the public eye and focusing on boosting the fortunes of Tesla and his other enterprises, he now finds himself being threatened with a boycott from one of his main customers - Trump's federal government. Tesla shares were sent into freefall on Thursday - falling 14% - as he sounded off about President Donald Trump on social media. They rebounded a little on Friday following some indications tempers were cooling. Even so, for the investors and analysts who, for months, had made clear they wanted Musk off his phone and back at work, the situation is far from ideal. Some though argue the problems for Musk's businesses run much deeper than this spat - and the controversial role in the Trump administration it has brought a spectacular end to. For veteran tech journalist Kara Swisher, that is especially so for Tesla. "Tesla's finished," she told the BBC on the sidelines of the San Francisco Media Summit early this week. "It was a great car company. They could compete in the autonomous taxi space but they're way behind." Tesla has long attempted to play catch-up against rival Waymo, owned by Google-parent Alphabet, whose driverless taxis have traversed the streets of San Francisco for years - and now operate in several more cities. This month, Musk is supposed to be overseeing Tesla's launch of a batch of autonomous robo-taxis in Austin, Texas. He posted to X last week that the electric vehicle maker had been testing the Model Y with no drivers on board. "I believe 90% of the future value of Tesla is going to be autonomous and robotics," Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives told the BBC this week, adding that the Austin launch would be "a watershed moment". "The first task at hand is ensuring the autonomous vision gets off to a phenomenal start," Ives added. Who is Elon Musk? How the Trump-Musk feud erupted But with Musk's attention divided, the project's odds of success would appear to have lengthened. And there's something else to factor in too: Musk's own motivation. The talk in Silicon Valley lately centres less on whether Musk can turn things around and more on whether he even cares. "He's a really powerful person when he's focused on something," said Ross Gerber, President and CEO of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management. "Before, it was about proving to the world that he would make EVs - the tech that nobody else could do. It was about proving he could make rockets. He had a lot to prove." A longtime Tesla investor, Gerber has soured on the stock, and has been pairing back his holdings since Musk's foray into right-wing politics. He called Thursday an "extremely painful day." "It's the dumbest thing you could possibly do to think that you have more power than the president of the United States," Gerber said, referring to Musk's social media tirade against Trump. The BBC reached out to X, Tesla, and SpaceX seeking comment from Mr Musk but did not receive a response. A particular problem for Musk is that, before he seemingly created an enemy in Donald Trump, he already had one in the grassroots social media campaign against his car-maker. Protests, dubbed #TeslaTakedown, have played out across the country every weekend since Trump took office. In April, Tesla reported a 20% drop in car sales for the first three months of the year. Profits plunged more than 70%, and the share price went down with it. "He should not be deciding the fate of our democracy by disassembling our government piece by piece. It's not right," protestor Linda Koistinen told me at a demonstration outside a Berkeley, California Tesla dealership in February. Koistinen said she wanted to make a "visible stand" against Musk personally. "Ultimately it's not about the tech or the Tesla corporation," said Joan Donovan, a prominent disinformation researcher who co-organized the #TeslaTakedown protests on social media. "It's about the way in which the stock of Tesla has been able to be weaponized against the people and it has put Musk in such a position to have an incredible amount of power with no transparency," Donovan added. Another aspect of Musk's empire that has raised the ire of his detractors is X, the social media platform once known as Twitter. "He bought Twitter so that he had clout and would be able to - at the drop of a hat - reach hundreds of millions of people," Donovan said. There is another possibility here though. Could Musk's high-profile falling out with Trump help rehabilitate him in the eyes of people who turned against him because of his previous closeness to the president? Patrick Moorhead, chief analyst at Moor Insights & Strategy, thinks it could. "We're a very forgiving country," Moorhead says in a telephone interview. "These things take time," he acknowledges, but "it's not unprecedented". Swisher likened Musk's personal brand to that of Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates more than two decades ago. She said Gates was once regarded as "the Darth Vader of Silicon Valley" because of his "arrogant and rude" personality. Today, despite his flaws, Gates has largely rehabilitated his image. "He learned. He grew up. People can change," Swisher told me, even though Musk is "clearly troubled." The problem for Musk is the future for him and his companies is not just about what he does - but what Trump decides too. And while Trump needed Musk in the past, not least to help fund his presidential race, it's not so clear he does now. Noah Smith, writer of the Noahpinion Substack, said Trump's highly lucrative foray into cryptocurrencies - as unseemly as it has been - may have freed him from depending on Musk to carry out his will. "My guess is that this was so he could get out from under Elon," Smith said. In Trump's most menacing comment of the day, he suggested cutting Musk's government contracts, which have an estimated value of $38 billion. A significant chunk of that goes to Musk's rocket company SpaceX - seemingly threatening its future. However, despite the bluster, Trump's warning may be a little more hollow than it seems. That's because SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft ferries people and cargo to the International Space Station where three NASA astronauts are currently posted. It demonstrates that SpaceX has so entrenched itself in the US space and national security apparatus, that Trump's threat could be difficult to carry out. You could make a similar argument about Musk's internet satellite company, Starlink. Finding an alternative could be easier said than done. But, if there are limits on what Trump can do, the same is also true of Musk. In the middle of his row with Trump, he threatened to decommission the Dragon - but it wasn't long before he was rowing back. Responding to an X user's suggestion he that he "cool down" he wrote, "Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon." It's clear Musk and Trump's friendship is over. It's less certain their reliance on each other is. Whatever the future for Musk's businesses is then, it seems Trump - and his administration's actions - will continue to have a big say in them. Trump and Musk trade insults as row erupts in public view Tesla shares tumble as Trump-Musk feud erupts Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Legal Experts: How U.S. Supreme Court's Ruling on ‘Reverse Discrimination' Will Make Things Worse For Black Americans
After the Supreme Court ruled in favor of a 'reverse discrimination' claim, Black Americans are left wondering how this new precedent will impact them. The court's decision came down on Thursday (June 5), adding to the growing list of the judges' past controversial decisions on civil and social liberties. A woman named Marlean Ames is suing her employer in Ohio after she alleged she was passed up on a promotion because she is a straight woman, according to BBC. Instead, her gay boss hired another gay employee for the job, which Ames claims was a clear act of gender discrimination. Several lower level courts didn't agree with her. That's when she took things to the highest court in the land, who ultimately ruled with an unanimous vote. The Root spoke to Marc Brown, founding attorney at Marc Brown law Firm, who said 'the floodgates have been let open' for discrimination cases of all kinds. In a country where anti-DEI legislation and other attacks to Black history and education has become the norm, the court's ruling is a 'rolling back of some protections that the Supreme Court previously made available for minorities– people that have been subjected to centuries of discrimination,' Brown said. 'But it doesn't mean that she [Ames] wins.' The Supreme Court ruled on the principle of the Constitution, not Ames' case itself. She still must present her case in a lower level court. Regardless, it's not lost on Brown the future implications of such a decision. 'There will likely be a heavy increase of these reverse discrimination lawsuits,' Brown continued. For him, this ruling emphasizes a trend started by majority groups. 'I've noticed over the years, whenever the majority feels threatened or upset, new terms are created.' The term 'reverse discrimination' was in direct retaliation to the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s. 'When you look at the historical systemic inequalities over the years or centuries, you know there is no way that minorities are in the power to really discriminate against these individuals,' Brown added. For anyone paying attention to the conservative-led Supreme Court recent history, Ames decision is one of the many giving legs to right-wing agendas. Whether it's reversing Roe v. Wade or Affirmative action in schools back in 2023, the Justices — three of whom were hand picked by President Donald Trump — have made their position clear. But according to Stacey Marques, ESQ, Black Americans shouldn't panic. 'What I tell my sons is the same thing I tell myself: Make sure you bring your A-game to everything that you have the opportunity to work on,' she said. The mother of two also knows the challenges of being Black in America, and she warned Black folks to get prepared. 'With this anti-DEI climate that we're in — also this climate that is encouraging reverse discrimination lawsuits, it's gonna require the younger generation to adopt the ideals as well as the work ethic of the older generation in order to not only survive but to excel,' she added. Marques has been practicing for 25 years, and she said the ruling only adds more to the already full plates of lawyers nationwide. 'Lawyers are so busy now because there's so many things happening,' she said referring to Trump's blitz of pending lawsuits and court decisions. 'We are in a constitutional crisis.' continued to 11 years 'Anytime the Supreme Court speaks, everyone listens.' '
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Musk Vs. Trump: Watch Joe Rogan & FBI Director Kash Patel React To Claim POTUS Is In Epstein Files
Joe Rogan and FBI Director Kash Patel were left gobstruck Thursday as Elon Musk offloaded on Donald Trump with claims the one time playboy real estate developer is in the Jeffrey Epstein files and that's why they haven't been released. 'I'm not participating in any of that conversation,' proclaims a clearly shaken Patel, a person who has supposedly seen the files on the very well-connected pedophile billionaire who died mysteriously in police custody in 2019. Up to this point in the nearly two-hour conversation between Rogan and Trump ultra-loyalist Patel there didn't seem to be any topic he wouldn't address. More from Deadline Donald Trump Lets News Outlets Know He's Got No Plans To Talk To Elon Musk: "The Poor Guy Has Got A Problem" U.S. Job Growth Stays In Line With Expectations At 139,000 In May Even Amid Federal Workforce Cuts Trump Vs Musk Gets BBC 'Have I Got News For You' Treatment After Meltdown Occurs During Recording Watch the nervous exchange here starting at the 1:28 mark: 'Jesus Christ, that's a crazy thing to say,' sputtered UFC commentator Rogan as his producer showed the duo the tweet from the SpaceX boss and frequent Joe Rogan Experience guest. Saying that someone should take Musk's 'phone away, Rogan turns to the wide eyed Patel and says 'How does he know? Does he know that Donald Trump is in the Epstein files? Or does he have access to the Epstein files?' 'I don't know how he would, but I'm just staying out of the Trump/Elon thing. That's way outside my lane.' In point of fact, with lots of evidence that Trump and Epstein were very close back in the 1990s, Musk's allegations are exactly in the lane of the top cop in the USA. A lawyer for Epstein said Friday that his client told him Trump was not a part of his ring of young girls and sex-trafficking. Add to that, no matter the true circumstances of Epstein's death — which former conspiracy theory advocated and now Deputy FBJ Director Dan Bongino recently poured cold water on — releasing the Epstein files has been a major demand of MAGA influencers and pundits. Almost from the day Trump returned to power, Attorney General Pam Bondi has promised to release the files, but hasn't. After the ruffle of the Musk vs. Trump blow-up and the Epstein file accusation, Rogan and Patel waste little time diving right back into their mutual safe space of Deep State antics, Hunter Biden laptops, media TDS, and Joe Biden's weaponization of the FBI. 'We're winning this fight!' Patel brags. While proving dismissive of his former bestie and top donor, Trump has not yet responded to Musk's allegations. Best of Deadline 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 'Stick' Soundtrack: All The Songs You'll Hear In The Apple TV+ Golf Series
