
Calls for ‘landscape-wide' action to protect butterflies amid falling numbers
The latest annual update on butterfly monitoring published by the Environment Department (Defra) reveal abundance across all butterfly species has declined 18% in the UK and 19% in England over the long-term.
The situation is even worse for specialists which need specific habitats such as flower-rich grassland, heathland and woodland clearings to thrive, with numbers declining by more than a third (39%) across the UK, and 25% in England.
And some individual species of butterflies have seen numbers plummet by more than 80% since 1976, the monitoring suggests.
Conservationists warn falls in the abundance of butterflies are a signal of problems in the wider environment, and reveal what is happening to many other insects that are a key part of ecosystems.
The latest figures include 2024, which wildlife charity Butterfly Conservation's head of science Dr Richard Fox described as a 'terrible year for the UK's butterflies'.
May last year was the warmest on record, but had notably low levels of sunshine, and overall 2024 ranked as the fourth warmest and eighth wettest year since the early 1900s, disrupting seasonal patterns essential to many butterfly species.
The weather conditions hit butterflies which were already struggling with habitat loss and pollution, conservationists warn.
Dr Fox said: 'With the addition of data from 2024, which was a terrible year for the UK's butterflies, these updated indicators reiterate the long-term decline of these beautiful insects.
'In particular, habitat specialists – butterfly species that rely on specific habitats such as heathland, woodland clearings or flower-rich grassland – have fared poorly since the 1970s as humans have destroyed and polluted these habitats.
'When we also factor in the implications of climate change, which is resulting in unpredictable extremes of weather, it is more important than ever that we take conservation action on a landscape-wide scale.'
The data indicate nearly half (46%) of individual species that are restricted to certain habitats have seen declines in the UK, while 50% have seen numbers fall in England.
Across the UK, heath fritillary has seen the most severe declines since 1976 with an 89% drop in abundance, while other habitat specialists including wood white, small-bordered fritillary, grayling and pearl-bordered fritillary have seen declines of 70% to 80%.
The assessment from Defra said the main causes for the declines in habitat specialist butterflies were the loss, fragmentation and degradation of those landscapes, with more intensive agriculture also contributing to the drop in numbers.
Many have not recovered from declines experienced in the late 1970s, which were partly as a result of the knock-on effects of the drought conditions in 1976, but a lack of suitable habitat after that is the main driver for persistent declines and lack of recovery since, it said.
Butterflies found on farmland have declined by around a third in both the UK and England, with those that require the specific habitat to thrive seeing falls in abundance of 42% in the UK and 47% in England.
Woodland butterflies have fared even worse with declines of more than half (54%) since the 1970s when monitoring began, with woodland specialist species declining by 55% in the UK and 57% in England.
Butterflies have also seen short-term declines on farmland, with numbers falling 12% across the UK and 11% in England over the past decade, the figures suggest, while woodland butterflies have shown no significant change over the same period.
But the findings also indicate some specialist species are on the increase, including black hairstreak, silver-spotted skippers, large heath, dark green fritillary, silver-washed fritillary and purple emperor.
Officials said some recent increases could be attributed to targeted conservation action, while some species are benefiting from climate change which is allowing them to expand their range.
Dr Fox urged: 'Looking at the specific conditions these species need to thrive and working to reinstate them where we can will offer some of these very vulnerable species an opportunity to recover.'
Across more 'generalist' species, which are not restricted to specific habitats, there has been no change over the long or short-term, but the fortunes of individual species have differed wildly.
Small tortoiseshell butterflies have seen falls of 86% between 1976 and 2024, while wall and white-letter hairstreak butterflies have seen almost as severe declines.
But ringlet butterflies have increased by 273%, and holly blue and comma butterflies have also seen some of the largest increases in abundance over five decades, the figures suggest.
Across the 50 species monitored across the UK, 44% have suffered declines since 1976, while 47% of the 49 species assessed in England have seen drops since then.
Some 28% of individual species have increased across the UK and 24% have increased in England, the statistics indicate.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
34 minutes ago
- Sky News
Millions of people threatened by wildfires near their homes, research finds
Why you can trust Sky News The number of people whose lives or property are at risk from wildfires has surged by almost 40% in just two decades, according to new research. Analysis by an international team of scientists showed that 440 million people were threatened by fire encroaching on their homes between 2002 and 2021. And while the area affected decreased over the study period, the number of people affected each year rose by 7.7 million. Dr Matthew Jones, from the University of East Anglia, told Sky News that a combination of climate change and population movements is driving the increase. "We're seeing hotter, drier conditions, and that's leading to more fire-prone weather," he said. "We're also seeing people migrating more and more into areas that are historically fire-prone. In the western US, we see this idyllic, romantic image of living closer to nature. "And that's a trend which is putting people closer to fire-prone landscapes than in the past." The researchers analysed 18.6 million records of wildfires over 20 years. High-profile disasters in the US, Europe and Australia grab public attention, but they only account for 2.5% of the global burned area, according to results published in the journal Science. The vast majority of affected land - 85% - is in Africa. But that is falling as more savannah scrub and grassland is taken over by agriculture - a change so significant that it shows up in global totals, with a 26% fall in land burned over the study period. "The apparent increase in damaging and destructive wildfire impacts on society has until now seemed perplexing because the area burned by fires globally has been falling," said Dr Jones. He added: "By closely analysing the shifting geography of both fire and population, this study brings vital clarity - our work shows that wildfires really are becoming more frequent and intense in populated areas. "These changes bring danger to life, damage to property, and threat to livelihood." The researchers say the increasing vulnerability of human populations to wildfire underlines the urgent need for proactive measures to protect communities. That could include deliberately starting small, controlled fires to burn off vegetation, so it doesn't build up.


Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Gruesome pit of tortured warriors is uncovered in France after being laid undiscovered for 6,000 years
A gruesome pit of Stone Age human skeletons has been uncovered after being hidden for more than 6,000 years. Dozens of warriors came to their brutal end after being captured in northeastern France, where warfare was widespread across the region. However, rather than kill their enemies, 'victory' celebrations were held where researchers say invaders were tortured and mutilated. Dating back to between 4300 and 4150 B.C, a total of 82 human skeletons were unearthed in the pits, with some having their left arms severed or hands completely dismembered. Writing in the Science Advances journal, experts said: 'The severed upper limbs would represent war trophies removed at the battle site following the violent encounter and then taken back to the settlement for perhaps further transformation and display.' Dr Teresa Fernandez-Crespo, who worked on the findings, told Live Science that the warriors had their lower limbs fractured to stop them from fleeing. She said: 'We believe they were brutalised in the context of rituals of triumph or celebrations of victory that followed one or several battles.' Researchers also found they had suffered 'blunt force traumas' as well as signs of piercing holes through their bones, which could point to the invaders being put up on display as a warning for others. Food evidence found on their teeth suggests the tortured warriors may have come from Paris. However, chemical signatures from their remains indicate the group may have also moved around different regions. While some remains showed no signs of being mutilated, which could be the skeletons of warriors who did not survive when attempting to defend the area. Another theory put forward by scientists is that skeletons could be the result of 'collective punishments or sacrifices of social outcasts'.


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Stonehenge cow tooth helps scientists understand mystery of monument
It's one of the world's greatest monuments and greatest mysteries; how and why did the famous stones of Stonehenge end up in south-west England? However, scientists say an unlikely object might help them moo-ve an udder step closer to solving the taken a closer look at a cow's tooth, which was previously found close to Stonehenge's south now believe the cow originated from Wales and could have played an important role in transporting the stones across the UK. What did experts find at Stonehenge? More than one hundred years ago, in 1924, archaeologists discovered an ancient cow's jawbone that had been carefully placed next to Stonehenge's south dated the find to the monument's very beginning, around 3000BC - however the strange discovery has puzzled historians ever since. A team of researchers from the British Geological Survey, Cardiff University and University College London decided to take a closer look at one of the teeth from the ancient wanted to understand why it had been placed there and why was the cow considered special?Scientists carried out tests on the tooth to find out what it was made of, which offered clues about the cow's diet, environment and discovered data which suggests that the cow originated from Wales, before moving to say this is the first time that they have seen evidence linking cattle from Stonehenge to Wales - and it supports the theory that the animals were used in the transportation of the enormous rocks across the country. What is Stonehenge? Stonehenge is one of the world's most famous stands on Salisbury Plain in Wiltshire, in south-west England, and its giant stones can be seen from miles took many hundreds of years to build, and work is believed to have began around 3000 BC, in the late Neolithic the next thousand years, people changed parts of the monument. The last changes were made in the early Bronze Age, around 1500 may never know exactly why Stonehenge was built, but it's widely believed that people gathered there for religious ceremonies.