Pentagon planted UFO myths to hide secret weapons programs, report finds
A 2024 Pentagon review found the U.S. military spread fake UFO stories to conceal Cold War weapons testing
An Air Force colonel admitted planting false flying saucer photos near Area 51 to hide stealth jet development
AARO investigators uncovered decades of military disinformation that fueled popular alien conspiracy theories
LOS ANGELES - In the shadow of the Cold War, while America raced to outpace the Soviet Union in military innovation, the Pentagon turned to an unexpected tactic: alien conspiracy theories.
A newly revealed Department of Defense review shows that the U.S. military deliberately spread UFO rumors—including staged photos and false briefings—to protect classified weapons programs. The practice wasn't just passive denial or silence. In some cases, it was policy.
One such incident, first uncovered by the Wall Street Journal, involves an Air Force colonel who, in the 1980s, handed fake photos of flying saucers to a bar owner near the top-secret Area 51 base in Nevada. The colonel, now retired, later admitted to investigators that he was acting under official orders to deflect attention away from the then-classified F-117 Nighthawk stealth fighter.
The backstory
The findings stem from a 2024 report by the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), a unit created in 2022 to sift through decades of military records and claims of unidentified aerial phenomena.
While the office was originally intended to investigate possible extraterrestrial sightings, much of what it uncovered pointed back at the government itself.
According to the report, several UFO legends were intentionally stoked to mislead the public and foreign adversaries about advanced weapons programs. One example is the use of fabricated photos and stories placed in local communities near sensitive testing sites like Area 51.
What we know
The Air Force colonel's fake UFO photos helped launch decades of speculation around Area 51
The military saw the spread of alien rumors as a form of "camouflage," a Pentagon official said
The disinformation helped obscure the testing of advanced technologies like stealth jets
AARO found multiple examples of fabricated narratives designed to deflect attention from classified work
What we don't know
The full scope of disinformation programs remains classified
Some events, including specific pranks and altered documents, were redacted from the report
The Pentagon has not released names of individuals involved, beyond the now-retired colonel
By the numbers
At least a dozen personnel were reportedly introduced to a fictional alien-investigation program called "Yankee Blue" as part of a hazing ritual
The practice began in the 1980s and reportedly continued until 2023
The Pentagon formally banned the practice after AARO flagged it during its review
What they're saying
"These episodes reveal how secrecy and misinformation, even when well-intentioned, can spiral into myth," said Sean Kirkpatrick, AARO's first director. He told the Wall Street Journal that many popular conspiracy theories can be traced to actual efforts by the U.S. military to conceal vulnerabilities or capabilities during tense periods of geopolitical rivalry.
Kirkpatrick added that not all findings from the review have been made public, but promised more details in a forthcoming report.
Big picture view
The revelations come as public trust in government transparency around UFOs continues to grow. While recent years have seen serious Congressional inquiries into unidentified aerial phenomena, this new report adds a surprising twist: that many UFO legends were never about aliens at all—they were cover stories engineered by the military itself.
What's next
The Pentagon says it will publish a follow-up to the Historical Record Report later in 2025, which will include more details on the disinformation programs, hazing rituals, and instances of "inauthentic materials" being used as deception tools.
The Source
This report is based on information first published by The Wall Street Journal, which reviewed findings from a 2024 Department of Defense analysis led by the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). Additional details were obtained through official Pentagon statements and interviews conducted by WSJ with AARO staff and other defense officials involved in the review.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
2 days ago
- The Hill
Trump is returning NASA to its glory days
Back in the day, I had the honor to speak with all 12 men who walked on the Moon — heroes, all. While each was unique in their own way, they were all in agreement with regard to one critically important subject: that a president of the United States could make or break NASA. All agreed that back on Sept. 12, 1962, during his now iconic speech at Rice University on the need for the U.S. to become the 'preeminent spacefaring nation,' President John F. Kennedy made NASA. 'We mean to be a part of it — we mean to lead it,' said the young president. 'For the eyes of the world now look into space, to the Moon and to the planets beyond, and we have vowed that we shall not see it governed by a hostile flag of conquest, but by a banner of freedom and peace. … For space science, like nuclear science and all technology, has no conscience of its own. Whether it will become a force for good or ill depends on man, and only if the United States occupies a position of preeminence can we help decide whether this new ocean will be a sea of peace or a new terrifying theater of war.' More than six decades later, many people in and out of the space business believe that Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden combined to break NASA — Biden much more than Obama, in several ways. While Obama simply had no interest in NASA and liked to pretend he was using part of what would have been the space agency's budget for 'education,' Biden — or more likely, as we are learning, his handlers — wanted to use NASA as a test bed for various identity politics and climate-change initiatives. As I have stressed in the past, I don't care what you look like or what you believe. If you are the most qualified for the job, you should get it. Period. To that point, I have long believed that four-time Space Shuttle astronaut Eileen Collins is one of the greatest and most accomplished astronauts in NASA history. A history she added to by not only becoming the first woman to pilot the Space Shuttle, but the first to command a Space Shuttle mission. How? Because she earned it thanks entirely to her exceptional real-world background in the Air Force as not only a multi-aircraft pilot, but as a test pilot. Collins's background not only includes over 6,700 hours in Air Force jets and various aircraft, and over 36 days in space, but real-time problem solving to make the Space Shuttle safer. A number of people — myself included — believe that President Trump should appoint her the first (non-acting) female administrator of NASA. As of now, Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy is serving as the interim administrator for NASA as well. To be sure, he is already making desperately needed improvements to the once proud agency decimated by Biden's focus on identity politics, the proper use of pronouns and global warming. Duffy serves under Trump, a leader who surely hears the echoes of JFK's warning and believes the U.S. must once again become the 'preeminent spacefaring nation.' Why? Because Kennedy — and now Trump — saw a reality ignored by many. He knew that once humans cut through Earth's atmosphere into the vacuum of space, our flaws, greed, prejudices and military ambitions would not be left behind. Rather, they would be the catalyst to drive some into space. Today, many believe that China — with its entirely military-controlled space program — is the 'preeminent spacefaring nation.' China is targeting all our satellites in low and geosynchronous orbit. Satellites that control the fate of our military, our economy and our nation. The Chinese military is taking dead aim at the Moon and the helium-3 that litters its surface. The helium-3 isotope could provide a potentially limitless supply of safe, clean, green energy. Some experts estimate the Moon's surface holds over 1 million metric tons of helium-3, and that just 25 metric tons could fuel America's energy needs for a year. China was beside itself in glee as Biden and his allies pushed NASA, our military, our defense contractors and our universities ever more 'woke.' But China is smiling no more. Trump is back in the White House and believes NASA should be focused on the national and economic security of America. The military leadership in China now sees a president who intends to double-down on Kennedy's vow to make the U.S. the 'preeminent spacefaring nation.' NASA should never have been made into a plaything for the left. It is a national asset that must once again serve a nation in need. If not, China will eventually control all, from low-earth orbit to the surface of Mars.
Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
Pentagon Cut Staff At Repository Of Scientific And Technical Data
The United States Department of Defense has long sought to maintain a quantitative edge over its potential adversaries, but developing the military hardware for the future could be increasingly challenging as it slashed the staff of the Defense Technical Information Center by 80%. The White House has argued that the group had become too unfocused and that reducing the workforce could save $25 million. DTIC was founded in 1945, and in the 80 years since, has been the office responsible for sharing the Pentagon's science and technology investments across the United States Armed Forces. As noted on its website, it has enabled "lab scientists, engineers, and researchers to build upon past and present research." Of the 193 employees who worked at DTIC, just 40 remain. Critics have blasted the move, warning that the work is critical to national security. "DTIC was established with a clear mandate to collect, preserve, and disseminate the accumulated technical and scientific knowledge produced by the Department of Defense," explained geopolitical analyst Irina Tsukerman, president of threat assessment firm Scarab Rising. "It was intended as a bridge between generations of military innovation, a central repository where past discoveries, failures, and experimental paths could inform future research and prevent costly reinvention," she added. "With only 40 employees now remaining from a workforce of nearly 200, this vital function is no longer preserved but actively dismantled." Eliminating Duplicative Functions The Pentagon has defended the cuts, suggesting that it simply removed unneeded redundancy, including those with duplicate functions and roles. However, leaving just 40 employees could hinder the ability of DoD researchers, scientists, and engineers to access and share important scientific and technological information, warned Dr. Lance Hunter, professor of International Relations and faculty member within the Master of Arts in Intelligence and Security Studies Program at Augusta University. "The Pentagon's decision to cut nearly 80 percent of the workforce at the Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) is not a routine bureaucratic action," added Tsukerman. She suggested that the cuts represent a strategic abandonment of a legacy institution that once served as the intellectual core of the military's scientific enterprise. "Beneath the language of streamlining and cost efficiency lies a deeper realignment that favors speed, digital fluidity, and tactical immediacy over institutional memory, historical depth, and long-term continuity," said Tsukerman. Short And long-term Effects Yet To Be Seen There are concerns that the planned workforce reductions could impact the DTIC's ability to conduct essential research, data, and analysis for informed decision-making. "Planned workforce reductions threaten the ability to maintain this baseline, which is crucial for reference and collaboration across the DoD," suggested Professor Justin Miller, associate professor of Practice in the School of Cyber Studies at the University of Tulsa. He said that the implications of these cuts extend across operational, strategic, and organizational levels, with significant consequences for defense research and technological progress. Moreover, by cutting essential resources that support defense research and technological advancement, the DoD risks creating vulnerabilities that adversaries may exploit, ultimately weakening the nation's defense capabilities. "The planned downsizing at DTIC raises concerns about the long-term impact on the DoD's ability to innovate and respond to emerging global threats," said Miller. "Operationally, the reductions may disrupt the center's capacity to disseminate critical technical information and maintain a robust database of resources." That could slow the development and deployment of new technologies essential for national security. "Strategically, the downsizing risks diminishing DTIC's role in supporting research and development, particularly in fields like cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and autonomous systems," Miller added. "A smaller workforce could also hinder collaboration with external partners, such as academic institutions and private industry, limiting access to valuable insights." AI To The Rescue? Not Quite Pentagon officials have suggested that the remaining personnel can be reinforced by artificial intelligence and machine learning. "While AI could support some aspects of the reduced workforce, who is guaranteeing that the institutional knowledge required to implement and manage these AI systems effectively remains intact?" Miller continued. "As the DoD continues to streamline operations, it must ask whether cutting personnel in specialized areas like DTIC compromises the very foundation of the nation's defense capabilities, especially when only 40 staff members are expected to carry the load." Even if AI can do that job, it isn't clear that the systems are even in place. It could be months or years before AI is ready to handle the work. Then there is the trust issue that comes with AI. This might not be a situation where the machines will rise, but the accuracy of the data could be put in question. "AI systems can be extremely useful in collecting, organizing, and disseminating data and information, but they can also make mistakes, and human oversight is often needed to ensure accuracy," warned Hunter. For the foreseeable future, human involvement is essential in terms of identifying inaccurate information, eliminating redundancies, highlighting gaps in research and development, and understanding the nuances and contexts of particular data and information, Hunter added. "Reducing human involvement in many of these activities at DTIC in favor of AI systems could affect the ability of DoD researchers, scientists, and engineers to access important scientific and technical information," he continued. The other issue is that AI cannot function effectively in a vacuum. "Its results depend heavily on the quality of the data it is trained on. If the historical context, failed experiments, and methodological details stored within DTIC become inaccessible or poorly structured for AI ingestion, the likelihood of flawed conclusions rises," said Tsukerman. "This endangers not only the quality of research but also the strategic decisions based on it." Penny Smart, Pound Foolish The cost savings have been the Pentagon's primary focus with the cuts, not how it will impact the jobs carried out within the DTIC. "The reductions at DTIC may offer short-term financial savings, but the long-term consequences could severely undermine the DoD's operational efficiency, innovation capabilities, and strategic readiness," said Miller. The cuts also align fully with the administration's broader restructuring campaign. "Similar reductions in the Office of the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation, along with the February purge of over 60,000 civilian defense workers, show a defense apparatus shedding institutional weight to achieve real-time responsiveness," said Tsukerman. "Within this framework, legacy systems that cannot be integrated into agile, technology-driven workflows are seen not as protectors of history but as bureaucratic burdens." The consequences of this transformation are thus serious and far-reaching. One of the most immediate concerns is over the erosion of institutional knowledge. "DTIC served as a safeguard against historical amnesia," Tsukerman added. "Without its infrastructure, defense scientists and engineers face a greater risk of repeating past mistakes, overlooking valuable research, or misunderstanding the evolution of technologies they aim to develop. This is not mere redundancy but continuity, and without it, progress risks becoming fragmented and hazardous."
Miami Herald
3 days ago
- Miami Herald
China Announces Breakthrough in Planned Moon Landing
China announced a major breakthrough in its planned moon landing mission as the East Asian power and the United States race to send humans back to Earth's natural satellite. China is moving toward its goal of landing astronauts on the moon by 2030. Meanwhile, the U.S.—the first and, to date, only country to land humans on the moon—has planned its crewed moon landing mission for mid-2027. However, the program's progress has faced challenges. Newsweek has contacted NASA via email for updates on its moon landing mission. During the height of the Cold War between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, NASA launched the Apollo program, which landed the first humans on the moon in 1969. A total of six lunar landing missions—with 12 astronauts—were conducted until the program ended in 1972. China is advancing several space programs as it pushes for supremacy in this domain. In addition to its moon landing mission, it has constructed a network of 16 space-enabling facilities in Latin America while operating a modern space station known as the Tiangong. The space race between China and the U.S. could define whether the 21st century is the Chinese or American century, Colonel Terry Virts, a former NASA astronaut, previously told Newsweek, warning that China could absolutely beat the U.S. back to the moon. The China Manned Space Agency announced that its manned lunar lander—named Lanyue, which means embracing the moon—successfully completed the first "comprehensive landing and takeoff test" at a test site in Huailai County in Hebei province, northern China, on Wednesday. Footage of the test shows the lander—a test vehicle—igniting its rocket engines while descending to the ground. Meanwhile, a ladderlike structure can be seen installed on the outside of the lander, which could be used by astronauts to exit onto the moon's surface. The event marked the first time China tested the "extraterrestrial landing and takeoff capabilities" of a manned spacecraft, according to the agency, which described the test as a breakthrough in the research and development of its manned lunar exploration program. According to Xinhua News Agency, the Lanyue consists of two modules—one for landing and the other for propulsion. It is designed to transport two astronauts between the moon's orbit and its surface. The lander serves as a base during astronauts' activities on the moon. The design of Lanyue is similar to that used in the Apollo program. The Apollo Lunar Module consisted of an upper stage—which contained a crew compartment and an ascent rocket engine—and a lower stage that had the landing gear and a rocket engine for descent. China is also advancing another moon mission aimed at building the International Lunar Research Station, a scientific experimental facility located both on the moon's surface and in its orbit. The project's two phases are scheduled for completion by 2035 and 2050, respectively. China's Global Times reported on Thursday: "The test validated key systems, including the lander's design, control strategies, lunar contact shutdown procedures, and interface compatibility between subsystems such as GNC (Guidance, Navigation, and Control) and propulsion." U.S. Transportation Secretary and interim NASA Administrator Sean Duffy outlined a plan to build a nuclear reactor on the moon on Tuesday: "We're in a race to the moon, in a race with China to the moon. And to have a base on the moon, we need energy." Besides the moon landing mission, U.S. President Donald Trump pledged to send astronauts to Mars, a goal supported by billionaire Elon Musk of SpaceX, who believes the moon "is a distraction." Related Articles US Ally Throws Down Gauntlet at ChinaMap Shows China Surrounded by ConflictsUS Intelligence Flight Detected on China's DoorstepUS Ally Near China Receives Major Boost to F-35 Fleet 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
