South Carolina's highest court refuses to stop second firing squad execution
South Carolina 's highest court on Monday rejected the last major appeal from Mikal Mahdi, who is scheduled to die by firing squad later this week for the ambush killing of an off-duty police officer.
Mahdi's lawyers said his original attorneys put on a shallow case trying to spare his life that didn't call on relatives, teachers or people who knew him and ignored the impact of weeks spent in solitary confinement in prison as a teen.
But the state Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, ruled that many of those arguments were made in earlier unsuccessful appeals and refused to stop Friday's scheduled execution so further hearings could be held.
Mahdi, who admitted killing an off-duty police officer in an ambush at the officer's Calhoun County shed, is the fifth person set to be executed in South Carolina in less than eight months. All made final appeals to the state Supreme Court but all were rejected.
Mahdi has one more opportunity to live, by asking Republican Gov. Henry McMaster to reduce his sentence to life in prison without parole just minutes before his scheduled execution time. He is to be put to death with three bullets to the heart at 6 p.m. on April 11 at the Broad River Correctional Institution in Columbia.
But no South Carolina governor has offered clemency in the 47 executions carried out in the state since the death penalty resumed in the U.S. in 1976.
Mahdi, 41, was convicted of killing Orangeburg Public Safety officer James Myers in 2004, shooting him at least eight times, then burning his body. Myers' wife found him in the shed, which had been the backdrop to their wedding 15 months earlier.
Myers' shed was a short distance through the woods from a gas station where Mahdi tried but failed to buy gas with a stolen credit card and left behind a vehicle he had carjacked in Columbia. Mahdi was arrested afterward in Florida while driving Myers' unmarked police pickup truck.
Mahdi also admitted to the killing three days earlier of Christopher Biggs, a Winston-Salem, North Carolina, convenience store clerk who was shot twice in the head as he checked Mahdi's ID. Mahdi was sentenced to life in prison for that killing.
Mahdi pleaded guilty to killing Myers, leaving a judge under South Carolina law to decide if he would be sentenced to death or life without parole.
Prosecutors called 28 witnesses for Circuit Court Judge Clifton Newman to hear. The defense called two, according to Mahdi's appeal.
The defense's case to spare Mahdi's life lasted only about 30 minutes. It 'didn't even span the length of a Law & Order episode, and was just as superficial,' Mahdi's lawyers wrote.
Prosecutors said Mahdi was able to present much more evidence during a 2011 appeal that had to be heard inside a prison because Mahdi had stabbed a death row guard during an escape attempt. A judge rejected the appeal.
'In Mahdi's vernacular, if his mitigation presentation before Judge Newman 'didn't even span the length of a Law & Order episode,' the review of any potential error is in its 24th season,' the state Attorney General's Office wrote in court papers.
As a prisoner, Mahdi has been caught three times with tools he could have used to escape, including a piece of sharpened metal that could be used as a knife, according to prison records. While he was on death row, he stabbed a guard and hit another worker with a concrete block, the records show.
'The nature of the man is violence,' prosecutors wrote.
Mahdi is to be the second inmate executed by South Carolina's new firing squad after Brad Sigmon chose that way to die last month.
The firing squad is an execution method with a long and violent history in the U.S. and around the world. Death in a hail of bullets has been used to punish mutinies and desertion in armies, as frontier justice in America's Old West and as a tool of terror and political repression in the former Soviet Union and Nazi Germany.
Before Sigmon's execution last month, only three other prisoners in the U.S. had been executed by firing squad in the past 50 years. All were in Utah, most recently Ronnie Lee Gardner in 2010.
Three prison employees who volunteer for the role will fire high-powered rifles at Mahdi from 15 feet (about 4.5 meters) away, aiming for a target on his heart.
Mahdi also could have chosen the electric chair or lethal injection.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
Lawyers face sanctions for citing fake cases with AI, warns UK judge
LONDON, June 6 (Reuters) - Lawyers who use artificial intelligence to cite non-existent cases can be held in contempt of court or even face criminal charges, London's High Court warned on Friday, in the latest example of generative AI leading lawyers astray. A senior judge lambasted lawyers in two cases who apparently used AI tools when preparing written arguments, which referred to fake case law, and called on regulators and industry leaders to ensure lawyers know their ethical obligations. "There are serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the justice system if artificial intelligence is misused," Judge Victoria Sharp said in a written ruling, opens new tab. "In those circumstances, practical and effective measures must now be taken by those within the legal profession with individual leadership responsibilities ... and by those with the responsibility for regulating the provision of legal services." The ruling comes after lawyers around the world have been forced to explain themselves for relying on false authorities, since ChatGPT and other generative AI tools became widely available more than two years ago. Sharp warned in her ruling that lawyers who refer to non-existent cases will be in breach of their duty to not mislead the court, which could also amount to contempt of court. She added that "in the most egregious cases, deliberately placing false material before the court with the intention of interfering with the administration of justice amounts to the common law criminal offence of perverting the course of justice". Sharp noted that legal regulators and the judiciary had issued guidance about the use of AI by lawyers, but said that "guidance on its own is insufficient to address the misuse of artificial intelligence".
Daily Mail
8 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Drug dealer who ran over and killed 'respected' man thinking his prone body lying in the road was a 'Halloween prank' is jailed
A drug dealer who ran over and killed a 'loyal' and 'respected' man after thinking his body lying in the road was a Halloween prank has been jailed. Karl Twyford, 29, knocked down Steve Day, 67, shortly before 10pm on October 30, 2021, in Sutton Bonington, Nottinghamshire. Mr Day, a keen motorcyclist, was walking in the village at the time he was run over. He suffered catastrophic injuries to his chest and head and died at the scene. At Nottingham Crown Court, prosecutor Esther Harrison revealed Twyford saw an 'obstacle' as he drove down the road in his silver Ford Ranger. She said: 'He said he did not know what it was and by the time he saw it he was unable to avoid it and drove over it. He said he thought it was a Halloween prank.' Miss Harrison said other people had stopped and saw Mr Day's body lying in the road, but Twyford made impact and drove on. She said: 'A witness was driving her car with a passenger and she saw something lying in the road and realised it was a person. 'She said he was laying on his back in the road with his hand over his chest and she slowed down and maneuvered around it. 'The defendant's silver Ford Ranger followed and drove over Mr Day causing catastrophic injuries to the chest and head. That vehicle stopped, reversed back and then drove off.' Twyford handed himself into police two days after the horror collision. There is no suggestion as to why Mr Day was lying in the road at the time. When police searched Twyford's home in Kegworth, they found three rooms set aside for growing cannabis and nearly a kilo of the Class B drug - worth £11,000. High purity cocaine worth £2,000 was also discovered. Following a retrial earlier this year, a jury took just an hour to unanimously find Twyford guilty of causing the death of Mr Day by careless or inconsiderate driving. The 29-year-old also pleaded guilty to charges of possession with intent to supply drugs and production of cannabis. Richard Thatcher, mitigating, said Twyford, now of Ashbourne in Derbyshire, works as a self-employed bricklayer and became a father in October last year. He said: 'He has perhaps matured and now has something of a family life. He made money (from drug dealing) but that does not mean he had an extravagant lifestyle.' In a victim impact statement read out in court, Mr Day's wife Gina said she was 'distraught and empty' without her husband, calling him a 'well-respected' man in Sutton Bonington where he had lived for almost four decades. She said: 'As his wife I am so distraught and empty. He had so much more living to do, he loved life, especially walking in Cornwall and Scotland with his dogs and loved motorcycling. 'He was kind, loving, loyal and would help anyone. He loved village life and was well known and respected in Sutton Bonington where he had lived for 38 years. He was my life and it will be so hard without him.' Judge Michael Auty KC jailed Twyford for four-and-a-half-years. He received a nine-month sentence for causing Mr Day's death and three years and nine months for the drug offences. The judge also disqualified him from driving until he passes a further test following his release. Judge Auty said: 'Steven Day's wife, Gina, describes her husband as a happy, kind and loving man who enjoyed life to the full. 'That does not surprise me because I have seen photographs of him which reveal a smiling gentleman utterly at peace with the world. 'Precisely why it was that you did not see him or slow down must be, as the jury found, inattentiveness and tragedy followed. You then panicked and left the scene leaving Mr Day.'
The Herald Scotland
14 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Supreme Court rules Mexico can't sue US gunmakers over cartel violence
"An action cannot be brought against a manufacturer if, like Mexico's, it is founded on a third-party's criminal use of the company's product," Justice Elena Kagan wrote. The decision landed against a backdrop of strained diplomatic relations between the United States and Mexico. President Donald Trump wants Mexico to do more to stop illegal drugs from flowing into the United States and Mexico wants to stop illegal arms from flowing south. Mexico has maintained tighter regulations on firearms than its neighbor to the north. The case was also the first time the Supreme Court ruled on a 2005 law that shields gunmakers from liability for crimes committed by third parties. An exception in the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act allows suits if a gunmaker is accused of knowingly violating a state or federal law. Attorneys representing Mexico argued that gun companies are "aiding and abetting" the trafficking of hundreds of thousands of high-powered firearms into Mexico through deliberate design, marketing and distribution choices. That includes doing business with dealers who repeatedly sell large quantities of guns to cartel traffickers, Mexico's counsel alleged. Firearms makers, led by Smith & Wesson Brands, said the chain of events between the manufacture of a gun and the harm it causes after being sold, transported, and used to commit crime in Mexico involves too many steps to blame the industry. Guns made in the United States are sold to federally licensed distributors who sell them to federally licensed dealers - some of whom knowingly or negligently sell them to criminals who smuggle them into Mexico, where they end up in the hands of cartel members. Mexico's attorneys stressed that the suit was in its early stages and said Mexico should be allowed a chance to prove its allegations in court. A federal judge in Massachusetts dismissed the suit, ruling it was barred by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms. But the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the challenge met an exception in the law and could move forward. Mexico, it said, had adequately alleged the gunmakers "aided and abetted the knowingly unlawful downstream trafficking of their guns into Mexico." Mexico was seeking an unspecified amount of monetary damages, estimated in the range of $10 billion, and a court order requiring gun companies to change their practices. Lawyers for gun rights groups told the Supreme Court that Mexico's suit is an attempt to bankrupt the American firearms industry and undermine the Second Amendment. Gun violence prevention groups worried the case could make it harder to bring domestic lawsuits against the gun industry. The case is Smith & Wesson Brands Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos.
