California governor accuses Trump of tyranny as mass arrests underway in under-curfew LA
LOS ANGELES POLICE have said that 'mass arrests' are underway as people gathered on downtown streets after an overnight curfew went into effect following days of protests against immigration arrests.
'Multiple groups continue to congregate on 1st St between Spring and Alameda' within the designated downtown curfew area, the Los Angeles Police Department wrote on X.
'Those groups are being addressed and mass arrests are being initiated. Curfew is in effect.'
The nighttime curfew was imposed by Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass as officials sought to get a handle on protests that Donald Trump claimed were an invasion by a 'foreign enemy.'
Looting and vandalism has scarred the heart of America's second biggest city as largely peaceful protests over immigration arrests turned ugly after dark.
'I have declared a local emergency and issued a curfew for downtown Los Angeles to stop the vandalism, to stop the looting,' Bass told reporters.
One square mile (2.5 square kilometers) of the city's more-than-500 square mile area is off-limits until 6am local time (2pm Irish time) for everyone apart from residents, journalists and emergency services, she added.
California Highway Patrol officers detain protesters.
Alamy Stock Photo
Alamy Stock Photo
One protester told AFP the arrest of migrants in a city with large foreign-born and Latino populations was the root of the unrest.
'I think that obviously they're doing it for safety,' she said of the curfew.
'But I don't think that part of the problem is the peaceful protests. It's whatever else is happening on the other side that is inciting violence.'
Small-scale and largely peaceful protests – marred by eye-catching acts of violence – began in the city on Friday as anger swelled over ramped up arrests by immigration authorities.
Advertisement
At their largest, a few thousand people have taken to the streets, but smaller mobs have used the cover of darkness to set fires, daub graffiti and smash windows.
Some 23 businesses were looted overnight on Monday, police said, adding that more than 500 people had been arrested over recent days.
Protests have also sprung up in cities around the country, including New York, Atlanta, Chicago and San Francisco.
'Provide protection'
Trump has ordered 4,000 National Guard to Los Angeles, along with 700 active-duty US Marines, in what he has claimed is a necessary escalation to take back control – despite the insistence of local law enforcement that they could handle matters.
A protester draped in an American flag stands in front of the Federal Building in Los Angeles during a demonstration.
Alamy Stock Photo
Alamy Stock Photo
A military spokeswoman said the soldiers were expected to be on the streets some time today.
Their mission will be to guard federal facilities and to accompany 'federal officers in immigration enforcement operations in order to provide protection.'
Demonstrators told AFP the soldiers 'should be respected' because they hadn't chosen to be in LA, but Lisa Orman blasted it as 'ridiculous.'
'I was here for the Dodger parade,' she said referring to the LA team's World Series victory.
'It was 100 times bigger. So the idea that the Marines here, it's a big show. The president wants a big show.'
The Pentagon said the deployment would cost US taxpayers $134 million (€117 million).
Photographs issued by the Marine Corps showed men in combat fatigues using riot shields to practice crowd control techniques at the Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach.
'Behaving like a tyrant'
Some 40 kilometers north, the sprawling city of Los Angeles spent the day much as it usually does: tourists thronged Hollywood Boulevard, tens of thousands of children went to school and commuter traffic choked the streets.
But at a military base in North Carolina, Trump was painting a much darker picture.
Related Reads
Trump orders 700 US Marines and more National Guard troops to Los Angeles as unrest continues
What's happening in LA, where Trump has deployed the National Guard?
'What you're witnessing in California is a full-blown assault on peace, on public order and national sovereignty,' he told troops at Fort Bragg.
'This anarchy will not stand. We will not allow an American city to be invaded and conquered by a foreign enemy.'
[FULL ADDRESS] Governor Newsom addresses Californians in response to President Trump's assault on democracy and the President's illegal militarization of Los Angeles.
pic.twitter.com/8Md1TFJbRm
— Governor Gavin Newsom (@CAgovernor)
June 11, 2025
California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat who has clashed with the president before, said Trump's shock militarisation of the city was the behavior of 'a tyrant, not a president.'
'Sending trained warfighters onto the streets is unprecedented and threatens the very core of our democracy,' he said.
In a live-streamed address, Newsom called Trump a 'president who wants to be bound by no law or constitution, perpetuating a unified assault on American tradition.
'California may be first, but it clearly will not end here.'
In a filing to the US District Court in Northern California, Newsom asked for an injunction preventing the use of troops for policing.
'Incredibly rare'
Trump's use of the military is an 'incredibly rare' move for a US president, Rachel VanLandingham, a professor at Southwestern Law School in Los Angeles and a former US Air Force lieutenant colonel, told AFP.
US law largely prevents the use of the military as a policing force – absent the declaration of an insurrection, which Trump again mused about on Tuesday.
Trump 'is trying to use emergency declarations to justify bringing in first the National Guard and then mobilising Marines,' said law professor Frank Bowman of the University of Missouri.
© AFP 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
23 minutes ago
- Irish Times
US warns nations against attending UN conference on two-state solution
US president Donald Trump 's administration has discouraged governments from attending a United Nations conference next week on the implementation of a two-state solution to the Palestine - Israel conflict. The conference will take place in New York and will be hosted by France and Saudi Arabia. It will discuss ways of establishing a two-state solution – which would create a Palestinian state in Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem alongside Israel. On Tuesday, Washington sent a cable warning countries that unilaterally recognising a Palestinian state and taking 'anti-Israel actions' – such as sanctions and boycotts – would be seen as acting against United States interests and could yield diplomatic consequences. The message also said the conference undermined Washington's efforts with Egypt and Qatar to secure a ceasefire in Gaza and free Israeli captives held hostage by Hamas, according to Reuters news agency. READ MORE Washington has supported a two-state solution for decades, but on Tuesday its ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, said it is no longer a US goal. While the original intention of the conference was to encourage unified multi-state recognition of a Palestinian state, the Guardian has quoted French officials as saying this would be the goal of a step-by-step process to halt the Gaza war, end Hamas rule in Gaza, release Israeli hostages, secure Palestinian Authority reform and launch economic reconstruction of Gaza. French president Emmanuel Macron's regional adviser, Anne-Claire Legendre, said the conference 'must mark a transformative milestone for the effective implementation of the two-state solution. We must move from words to deeds; we must move from the end of the war in Gaza to the end of the conflict.' Mr Macron has confirmed his attendance at the New York meeting while Saudi crown prince Mohammed Bin Salman has ordered aides to prepare for his participation if a plan is to be adopted. Other world leaders who will be in Canada for a G7 summit could also attend the UN conference. Israel has sharply criticised the conference and lobbied France against recognition of a Palestinian state, claiming it would 'reward' Hamas for the 2023 attack on Israel in which it killed 1,200 people and abducted about 250 hostages. The attack triggered the Gaza war, in which about 55,000 Palestinians have been killed. [ Israeli strikes kill at least 60 in Gaza, many at aid site, say health officials Opens in new window ] Of 27 European Union member states, 11 recognise Palestine, including Ireland. Israeli and international rights organisations have accused Israel of trying to thwart a two-state solution by illegally establishing 160 settlements which house 700,000 Israelis in the occupied West Bank and occupied East Jerusalem. Israel recently announced construction of a further 22 settlements, prompting Israeli independent rights group Peace Now to say this was 'the most extensive move of its kind' in three decades. It warned that the move would 'dramatically reshape the West Bank and entrench the occupation even further'. – Additional reporting: Reuters


Irish Examiner
25 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Donald Trump 'wants trade deal with EU'
US president Donald Trump wants to reach a trade deal with the EU, Tánaiste Simon Harris has said. Mr Harris said there are now 'real and meaningful' trade talks underway between the EU and US, after a call with US trade representative Jamieson Greer. While Mr Harris said the talks are now moving in a more positive direction, he believed there is still a 'way to go' before a deal is reached between the EU and US on trade. I think it's fair to say there is a way to go in relation to this, but I am encouraged by the fact that engagement has now begun in earnest between the EU and the United States. "I know from an EU perspective and from an Irish perspective, we want a negotiated outcome. From my conversation with president Trump's trade representative today, I think he wants that as well." 'What we need to find out in the days ahead, is there a landing zone that can work for everyone. Quite frankly, there has to be, because this transatlantic relationship matters.' Mr Harris acknowledged the deadline would run out next month, adding it was important for negotiators to 'intensely engage' and there 'isn't a day to lose here'. He added: I do now think the mood music, in terms of trying to find a deal, trying to find an agreement, is somewhat better than it was days ago. 'This will require the US and the EU to be really willing now to work to try find some common ground.' Mr Harris said the trading relationship between the EU and US was worth more than €1.4 trillion and this should not be 'snuffed at'. In an Irish readout of the call between Mr Harris and Mr Greer, the two had a 'constructive exchange of views' on the ongoing negotiations. Mr Greer recently met with EU Commissioner for trade, Maros Sefcovic, while Mr Harris travelled to Washington DC in recent months to meet with US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick. The ongoing negotiations come weeks after Mr Trump threatened to introduce a 50% tariff on all imports from the EU, after saying the talks between the two were 'going nowhere'. It led to a flurry of activity, with EU Commission president Ursula von der Leyen calling Mr Trump, before the US president opted to delay their introduction to allow for 'serious negotiations'. The deadline for negotiations to be completed are now July 9.


Irish Examiner
41 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Defence Forces taking part in EU missions without triple lock 'could breach neutrality'
Ireland's Defence Forces could become embroiled in peacekeeping missions that could jeopardise Ireland's military neutrality if Government proposals to scrap UN authorisation for such deployments is passed, an Oireachtas committee has heard. Ray Murphy, a professor at the Irish Centre for Human Rights, University of Galway, said if Ireland took part in an EU force without a UN mandate — with the monitoring and controls coming with that — it could end up in situations not originally envisaged that would end up breaching our neutrality. Prof Murphy was one of three academics who took part in a three-hour session at the Oireachtas defence and national security committee, which is holding hearings on the Defence Bill 2025. The draft legislation proposes to remove the requirement for UN approval to send Defence Forces abroad. It also plans to increase from 12 to 50 the number of personnel that can be sent overseas without the Government needing the support of the Dáil. Defence Bill 2025 The bill would authorise Irish troops to take part in an 'international force' for the purposes of peacekeeping, conflict prevention, and international security 'consistent with the principles of the United Nations charter'. Examples of such bodies include the OSCE, the EU, or 'any other body' that operates in manner consistent with UN principles. All three academics at the committee are strongly opposed to the Government proposals to remove the 'triple lock'. It is not clear if the committee is due to hear from academics who are non-committed on the issue or who are in favour of removing the triple lock. Prof Murphy said: 'Any deployment of Defence Forces with an international force will be subject to certain mandatory principles. These are that the particular international force will be mandated to operate for peacekeeping, conflict prevention, and/or strengthening international security, in accordance with international law and consistent with the principles of the UN.' He asked who would determine if a regional body 'operates in a manner consistent' with the UN charter and international law, especially if Security Council or General Assembly approval is not obtained. Situations on the ground 'can change' Prof Murphy said situations on the ground can change and that Irish troops 'could become embroiled in something' that wasn't originally envisaged — and that such a situation could 'certainly jeopardise' military neutrality. He described the proposals as a 'betrayal' to commitments made by governments to its citizens and that they would grant any government 'excessive authority'. Karen Devine, lecturer in European politics at DCU, told the committee that as an academic her job is to 'tell the truth'. She said public support for neutrality has been consistent over the decades, with four in five people in favour of it. She alleged that 'militarists', consisting of the EU, Nato, and the military-industrial complex, 'seek to eradicate' Irish neutrality including the triple lock and want to 'militarise' the EU. She further alleged that these were joined by 'university agents', (professors she effectively identified), think tanks, and the 'mass media', who promoted this agenda.