
Under the microscope: Looking at B.C.'s wastewater surveillance for viruses
Testing wastewater for diseases and viral activity gained prominence during the pandemic, but scientists are concerned that funding for such work could be threatened.
Monitoring wastewater for pathogens — and even illicit and prescription drugs — was around for decades before the pandemic, but the method of estimating virus levels gained public attention at the peak of the pandemic when it was unclear how much disease was circulating.
The B.C. Centre for Disease Control (BCCDC) stepped up its surveillance and now regularly monitors the wastewater from around the province to gauge virus levels — not just for COVID-19, but also for influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).
Scientists say they hope Canada continues to fund that work. Ontario ended its COVID-19 wastewater surveillance program in July 2024 and a research vacuum is looming south of the border.
"Before the pandemic, there was no routine use of wastewater data," said Natalie Prystajecky, an environmental microbiologist at the BCCDC. "That was this huge innovation that occurred because of the pandemic."
Prystajecky has worked on the wastewater program since the pandemic began in 2020, and has been monitoring the other respiratory pathogens since 2022.
Humans who contract COVID-19 will shed traces of SARS-CoV-2 — the virus that causes the disease — in their feces, and authorities collect multiple samples per week to show trends in virus loads over time.
During the Omicron wave of the pandemic in late 2021, B.C.'s testing capacity became overwhelmed — which is when the wastewater monitoring dashboard became one of the more reliable sources of information about virus levels in the community.
"That data became available publicly, and it seemed like the public really ... was able to understand it and relied on it," Prystajecky said.
The researcher said that the wastewater surveillance program, which expanded outside Metro Vancouver during the pandemic, is now in a place where researchers can better deal with the next pandemic.
How does it work?
Jesse Shapiro, an associate professor of microbiology and immunology at McGill University, was among many researchers who analyzed wastewater samples shipped to labs around the country.
There, he says a "bunch of chemistry" is done to take wastewater from test tubes and concentrate it into substances that can then be sequenced to find genetic code.
The microbiologist said that, initially, trying to find the signals for a novel virus like SARS-CoV-2 would have been like finding a needle in a haystack.
But as scientists gained better testing methods, it became a lot more cost effective to detect how much virus was circulating and what variants were more dominant.
"An advantage of wastewater surveillance is that it can be incredibly effective, because those lab methods are actually not very expensive at all," the professor said.
Future of wastewater surveillance
Shapiro was part of the Coronavirus Variants Rapid Response Network (CoVaRR-Net), a cross-Canada network of researchers that was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and produced a number of studies on COVID-19 and other viruses.
However, the funding for the program ended this month, and other wastewater surveillance programs have been removed in provinces like Ontario.
WATCH | Ontario ends wastewater testing program:
Health minister defends Ontario's decision to end its wastewater testing program
8 months ago
Duration 0:57
Ontario Health Minister Sylvia Jones said the province increased wastewater surveillance during the COVID-19 pandemic, but is now returning to a "normal state of affairs."
"We are seeing fewer programs like this continuing to be run," Prystajecky acknowledged.
"[In] these next stages, we're starting to really think about the best and most meaningful way of using wastewater surveillance."
Prystajecky said she is now using the data to look at gut-based pathogens like norovirus and salmonella, as well as antimicrobial resistance among pathogens.
Shapiro said he hopes that Canada is moving toward a future where there's more open data sharing based on wastewater surveillance, with academics on hand to interpret the data and make public health recommendations.
"It's incredibly important for things like surveillance of bird flu, H5N1, emerging pathogens, things that are spreading," he said. "If you don't look, you won't find it."
As the U.S. government moves to cut funding to the National Institute of Health and Center for Disease Control, which are both heavily involved with wastewater surveillance, Shapiro said there's an opportunity for Canada to fill the looming void and fund science research more broadly.
"I think it's actually quite essential for Canada and other countries to step up and not just be entirely reliant on the U.S. for this kind of thing," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Global News
3 hours ago
- Global News
RFK Jr. removes all 17 members of U.S. vaccine advisory panel
U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Monday removed every member of a scientific committee that advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on how to use vaccines and pledged to replace them with his own picks. Major physicians and public health groups criticized the move to oust all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Kennedy, who was one of the nation's leading anti-vaccine activists before becoming the nation's top health official, has not said who he would appoint to the panel, but said it would convene in just two weeks in Atlanta. Although it's typically not viewed as a partisan board, the Biden administration had installed the entire committee. 'Without removing the current members, the current Trump administration would not have been able to appoint a majority of new members until 2028,' Kennedy wrote in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece. 'A clean sweep is needed to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science.' Story continues below advertisement Kennedy said the committee members had too many conflicts of interest. Committee members routinely disclose any possible conflicts at the start of public meetings. Dr. Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, called Kennedy's mass ouster 'a coup.' 'It's not how democracies work. It's not good for the health of the nation,' Benjamin told The Associated Press. 0:37 RFK announces COVID vaccine removal from immunization schedule for pregnant women and children Benjamin said the move raises real concerns about whether future committee members will be viewed as impartial. He added that Kennedy is going against what he told lawmakers and the public, and the public health association plans to watch Kennedy 'like a hawk.' Get weekly health news Receive the latest medical news and health information delivered to you every Sunday. Sign up for weekly health newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'He is breaking a promise,' Benjamin said. 'He said he wasn't going to do this.' Dr. Bruce A. Scott, president of the American Medical Association, called the committee a trusted source of science- and data-driven advice and said Kennedy's move, coupled with declining vaccination rates across the country, will help drive an increase in vaccine-preventable diseases. Story continues below advertisement 'Today's action to remove the 17 sitting members of ACIP undermines that trust and upends a transparent process that has saved countless lives,' Scott said in a statement. Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, a doctor who had expressed reservations about Kennedy's nomination but voted to install him as the nation's health secretary nonetheless, said he had spoken with Kennedy moments after the announcement. 'Of course, now the fear is that the ACIP will be filled up with people who know nothing about vaccines except suspicion,' Cassidy said in a social media post. 'I've just spoken with Secretary Kennedy, and I'll continue to talk with him to ensure this is not the case.' 9:34 RFK Jr. and Elizabeth Warren get into heated debate over vaccine question at confirmation hearing The committee had been in a state of flux since Kennedy took over. Its first meeting this year had been delayed when the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services abruptly postponed its February meeting. Story continues below advertisement During Kennedy's confirmation, Cassidy had expressed concerns about preserving the committee, saying he had sought assurances that Kennedy would keep the panel's current vaccine recommendations. Kennedy did not stick to that. He recently took the unusual step of changing COVID-19 recommendations without first consulting the advisers. The webpage that featured the committee's members was deleted Monday evening, shortly after Kennedy's announcement.


Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
RFK Jr. ousts entire CDC vaccine advisory committee
WASHINGTON (AP) — Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Monday removed every member of a scientific committee that advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on how to use vaccines and pledged to replace them with his own picks. The 17-member Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices had been in a state of flux since Kennedy took over. Its first meeting this year had been delayed when the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services abruptly postponed its February meeting. Kennedy, who was one of the nation's leading anti-vaccine activists before becoming the nation's top health official, recently took the unusual step of changing COVID-19 recommendations without first consulting the panel. Kennedy, in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece, said the committee members had too many conflicts of interest. Committee members routinely disclose any possible conflicts at the start of public meetings. Wednesdays Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Montreal Gazette
5 hours ago
- Montreal Gazette
‘It's destroyed a lot of lives': Families attend authorization hearings in Montreal for brainwashing class-action suit
News By Lana Ponting was only 15 years old when she was admitted to the Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal. As a rebellious teenager, it was believed the psychiatric hospital could address her 'stubbornness and disobedience.' Instead, she says, she was subjected to severe physical and mental abuse, along with psychiatric experimentation that would later become infamously known as the Montreal experiments. Now 83, frail and requiring a walker, Ponting travelled from Winnipeg to be at the Montreal courthouse Monday as authorization hearings in a class-action lawsuit over the alleged abuse began. 'It's destroyed a lot of lives,' Ponting said outside the courtroom, anger in her voice. '(I want them) to see us, to feel us. I'm alive. I will not stop. I will fight until the end.' Filed in 2019, the class-action request alleges the Canadian government funded psychiatric treatments by Dr. Donald Ewen Cameron at the institute between 1948 and 1964. The experiments were allegedly part of the CIA's MK-ULTRA program of covert mind-control. In addition to the government, the lawsuit also targets McGill University, which was affiliated to the psychiatric hospital, and Montreal's Royal Victoria Hospital. 'This is not a medical or professional malpractice case. ... This is a case of systemic abuse,' lawyer Jeff Orenstein told the court on Monday. 'When people went to the Allan Memorial, they were told they would be receiving legitimate treatment,' he added. 'Instead they were human guinea pigs.' The defendants are contesting the class-action request, partly arguing the families waited too long to file their claims according to the law. The Canadian government also contends that some families accepted $100,000 payments from the federal government in the 1990s, which then barred them from pursuing further legal action. They will plead their case on Tuesday. Orenstein, for his part, argues the victims were unable to act earlier because of the trauma and psychological pain they endured. He believes the suit could grow to include several hundred people. The lawsuit had tried to include the U.S. government as a defendant, but Quebec's Court of Appeal ruled that the U.S. cannot be sued in Canada for its alleged role in the experiments; the Supreme Court of Canada refused to review the case. Julie Tanny, the lead plaintiff in the case, said she spent years not speaking about what happened to her father, Charles, because of the stigma attached. The few times she did, she added, she was met with disbelief. Present for the hearing, Tanny said she still can't accept the way her father changed after his stay at the institute in 1957 to treat facial pain. She described the warm and engaged father she once knew as having completely 'evaporated' after his treatment. He grew distant and barely recognized his children. 'For a kid, it's very traumatizing to have that relationship go away and not really understand why,' said Tanny, 71. 'It was the beginning of a nightmare for hundreds and hundreds of families.' In court on Monday, Orenstein detailed the experiments Cameron carried out on patients, noting how they were all well-documented at the time. Rather than scientific efforts, he compared them to acts of psychological torture. He described how patients were allegedly subjected to sensory deprivation and drug-induced comas, forced to listen to repeated audio messages on loop and to undergo extensive electroshock treatment. In some cases, he said, people were reduced to a childlike state. Others left the hospital as 'robots with no human emotions.' Lisa Moore, whose mother Hélène was sent to the hospital in the early 1960s, left the courtroom in tears as the alleged abuse was described, her emotions too difficult to contain. Now 54, Moore grew up in foster care and spent decades resenting her mother for how she treated her. But hearing the extent of what she went through laid bare in court on Monday provided a new perspective. 'It wasn't her fault. They took away her ability for compassion,' said Moore, who reconciled with her mother in recent years. 'It's very overwhelming,' she added. 'I just keep imagining what it was like for her.'