'Eyesore' Wellington flats to lose heritage status
The Gordon Wilson Flats were used as social housing until 2012, when a engineer's report deemed them unsafe.
They have been left vacant since.
However as they are listed as heritage protected in the Wellington City District Plan, it became nearly impossible for anyone to get a resource consent to demolish them or alter them.
RMA Reform and Housing Minister Chris Bishop said the building has become "more dangerous and more of an eyesore every year" that it has sat empty.
ADVERTISEMENT
"There has been attempt after attempt to deal with the Gordon Wilson Flats since 2012, all of which have failed. The Flats sit as an ugly scar on the Wellington skyline, emblematic of a failed planning system that prioritises preservation of heritage, no matter the economic cost."
The morning's headlines in 90 seconds including disposable vape ban, Auckland Airport meth find, and why Europe hates tourists right now. (Source: 1News)
He said the Government had agreed to enable the demolition of the flats by amending the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill.
"The amendment will remove the Flats' protected heritage status and will make its demolition a permitted activity under the RMA. This means the building can finally be demolished, without a resource consent.
"The Wellington City Council wants the Gordon Wilson flats demolished, the University (the current owner) wants them demolished, and the people of Wellington want them demolished too," Bishop said.
RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop announced the changes at today's Post-Cabinet press conference. (Source: 1News)
"The amendments will not apply to any other heritage-protected buildings around the country. The Gordon Wilson Flats have been singled out because the building is owned by a public institution – Victoria University – and because that owner, the council and the community all want it gone.
ADVERTISEMENT
"I know many Wellingtonians will be relieved to know the Gordon Wilson Flats' days of heritage protection are numbered, and that it is unlikely to mar our beautiful city's skyline for too much longer," Bishop said.
The Amendment Paper to the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill will be introduced during the Bill's Committee of the Whole House stage, between its second and third readings. The Bill is expected to pass into law in the middle of 2025.
"The Bill also contains wider amendments to allow councils to de-list heritage buildings in their district plans faster and more easily. The wider issue of heritage protection is also being actively considered as part of the government's replacement legislation for the Resource Management Act, expected to be introduced later in the year."
Victoria University would still need demolition consent to start knocking them down.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
The govt's capacity for opacity
The Beehive is urgently in need of some metaphorical window cleaning. The literal window cleaners have no doubt already been sacked by the government to save a few thousand dollars. But the cry for the metaphorical ones is stronger — every week another layer of political grime seems to affix itself to any surface which may once have let light through and allowed those outside to see what might be happening within. It is upsetting to see — or, perhaps not see — how much this government is doing behind closed doors. Far too much is being done secretively and, when details are finally liberated to the public, efforts are made to ensure that that is done in the most inconvenient way at the worst possible time — as happened with the release of documents around its approval of a third medical school at the University of Waikato. There is nothing new, of course, in ministers and officials playing these games and tinkering with the public and the media, but there appears to be a degree more cynicism in recent behaviour. Unfortunately, the previous government can hardly be held up to the current administration as a shining example of how to be transparent. Despite Labour making Chris Hipkins the minister responsible for open government, the amount of obfuscation and spin which it generated has not faded from memory. Anyone who voted for the current government in the hope of greater transparency and a breather from such tactics must be very disenchanted with the efforts of the coalition partners to date. Concerning details have now come to light of how the government deliberately hid what it was up to regarding the provocative changes to pay equity, which saved the coalition's bacon by freeing up billions of dollars to make this year's Budget figures appear more sanguine. Thirty-three active claims were immediately cancelled by the Bill, which was passed under urgency in May. RNZ and Newsroom have been delving into the government's management and manipulation of pay equity changes to ensure the public remained in the dark until it was too late for them to be able to make any difference. Documents released under the Official Information Act show the assiduous stage management included even Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, who attended one of the ministerial meetings at which instructions were issued to withhold the proactive release of their diaries. Photo: RNZ An email from Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden said officials should remove digital access to Cabinet papers on the topic, with hard copies instead hand-delivered to ministers. The whole strategy was given a name, Project 10. There were recommendations that nothing be said publicly until the Bill had been introduced to the House — the reason being there could be a raft of new claims if the public knew beforehand. However, as Newsroom points out, that is fallacious, given the existing pending claims were cancelled anyway by the new legislation. Despite warnings that the furtive approach potentially breached people's human rights, the government carried on regardless. Sometimes there are valid reasons for keeping matters confidential. But more often, secrecy is a way of keeping knowledge and power close to the chests of one group to deliberately disadvantage others. Hiding matters can also suggest lack of confidence in one's decision-making abilities and the desire to avoid scrutiny of such. The documents reveal a government more concerned with meeting its mantra of economic prudence than it is with looking after the public. This is all very disappointing, from a government which continues to disappoint and blame others for its own lack of progress. At least we now know the kind of thinking which has gone on behind those murky Beehive windows and can keep on the government's case for greater transparency — transparency which New Zealanders have a right to. Use some judgement We support the vigilant policing of mobility parks to ensure people with disabilities can stop as close as possible to their destinations. However, the $750 fine a Dunedin City Council parking officer handed to injured 78-year-old Swava Pociecha for her husband's momentary stop to pick her up outside Moana Pool after a physiotherapy session seems unfair. The council clearly needs to hold some lessons on using discretion.
Otago Daily Times
13 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
High Court case and contentious letterbox drop: Who is Andrew Clark?
An Invercargill mayoral candidate says he is still fit for office despite past events landing him in the headlines and court. Andrew Clark is contesting the position currently held by his brother Nobby, in a move which has surprised and irked his older sibling. In Tasman, where Clark currently lives, he is also running for mayor under the first name Maxwell. The business owner made headlines for a range of incidents following the early 2000s including a land dispute, receiving money from a gang-affiliated event and spreading misinformation through pamphlets. Clark said he gave a lot of voluntary help to people and the issues were 'out of perspective' compared to what normal life had been for a long time. 'We've dealt with everything that comes up in a fair and reasonable basis, and I don't see any issue there whatsoever." In 2004, Clark faced legal action after the purchase of a neighbouring estate went awry. Problems arose when Clark and his partner presented a written agreement which was signed by all parties, only to be later contested for not reflecting the verbal agreement. The elderly neighbour - a trustee - said it was clear they were retaining the house and a parcel of land, but Clark and his partner maintained the $300,000 price tag included everything. Judge Ronald Young said in his judgement he did not find Clark to be 'a credible witness at all'. 'I had the distinct impression throughout his evidence that if he had no recollection of a proposition he was prepared to construct the happening and timing of it to suit himself,' Young wrote. He believed Clark knew he was getting a 'remarkable bargain' at $300,000 - a figure which was at least 50% under market value - and ordered the written contract be corrected. Clark told Local Democracy Reporting the neighbour "begged" them to buy the property with the sale only falling through after the other party pulled out thinking they could get more. He said the judge did not like him and he would have challenged the court ruling if he had money at the time. 'Very unfortunate. I'm very saddened by it all... I wish I could undo what had happened, but that's not possible.' Between 2012 and 2018, Clark was linked in media reports to a controversial Nelson biking event called Poker Run. Stuff reported the event was traditionally run by motorcycle gang associates with money raised going towards Clark's ambulance business Medimax. The events were monitored by police. Clark is still running Medimax and confirmed it operates as a business, not a charity. There were never any problems with the motorcycle group, which was charged like any other organisation, he said. 'These people, whether it's liked or not liked, they live in the community, they work in the community. 'For us it was just a professional role, do a professional job. That's all that was.' In 2018, Clark featured in a 1News bulletin as the man behind a pamphlet drop warning of a potential 8-metre tidal wave if the proposed Waimea Dam failed. Two thousand leaflets were distributed in Brightwater - a move labelled 'dirty and sneaky' by then-Nelson MP Nick Smith. Former Tasman mayor Richard Kempthorne said a catastrophic failure would see water going through houses at levels between 50cm and 100cm. Clark confirmed to Local Democracy Reporting he personally delivered the brochures and said he was just trying to share a risk which he thought hadn't been fully considered. The information included contact details for elected representatives. Clark is one of eight candidates contesting the Invercargill mayoralty this year and said he would move south, if elected. He will be in attendance the Southland Business Chamber mayoral debate on Tuesday. • LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air
NZ Herald
13 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Auckland housing: Three-storey designation to go from hundreds of thousands of homes
Auckland Council's proposed changes are a response to a new framework for urban development in Auckland being established by the RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. Bishop has already told councils in large cities they may 'opt out' of the medium density residential standards (MDRS) introduced by the last Government. The MDRS are regulations that allow three-storey developments on almost every residential property. But Bishop said the MDRS could be abandoned only if the council adopted new planning rules to allow for an equivalent number of homes. In Auckland, this means the council must provide for 2 million homes over the coming decades. This is more than the 900,000 homes allowed for under the Unitary Plan adopted in 2016. The council's general manager of planning, John Duguid, said on Monday the new plan change will not fully make up for the loss of MDRS capacity and tighter rules for flood-prone areas. But hundreds of thousands of suburban properties will no longer be liable for development, and in exchange there will be more higher buildings, with greater density, in designated parts of the city. The 44 'walkable catchments' will apply to town centres such as Botany, Henderson and Panmure, as well as to transit stations. In some cases, there will be overlap. In Albany, for example, the town centre catchment will overlap with the Northern Busway station, creating a single larger catchment area. Bishop declared earlier this year that 15-storey apartment buildings should be permitted within the walkable catchments of Maungawhau, Kingsland and Morningside railway stations on the Western Line. Developments in Kingsland have proceeded unevenly, but the new rules could change that. Photo / Melanie Earley The council's head of planning, Megan Tyler, said today the new proposal will enable this in Kingsland by 'removing 70-80% of the 'special character' designation' that preserves the cottages and villas of the suburb. The four 'avenues' will not be affected. No details for other stations or town centres have yet been revealed. The council will publish maps showing where the proposed changes will take effect, along with its full report, but the Herald has been advised technical issues have delayed the release of this information. Owners of land designated at risk of flooding and/or coastal erosion will find it harder to develop. They will have to produce a viable plan to mitigate the risks and in many cases even that will not be enough because development is designated as a 'non-complying' activity. That will allow consent officials to turn it down. A spokesperson for Mayor Wayne Brown said today that he is 'generally supportive' of the proposed plan change, but 'could not say more at this stage'. Chairman of the council's Policy and Planning Committee, councillor Richard Hills, said he has not yet seen the final proposal or the maps, but the plan change is 'largely in line' with what the minister has asked the council to do, and creates 'more capacity for housing close to transport, jobs and other amenities'. Auckland councillor Christine Fletcher says she is concerned everyone will be shortchanged if the planning is not done well. Photo / Nick Reed Councillor Christine Fletcher has been vocal in her opposition to the minister's density requirements. She said today she was 'not opposed' to council preparing the new plan and she had 'no implied criticism of council officials'. But the minister's timetable was 'very rushed'. 'I'm concerned we're going to shortchange everybody if the planning is not done well. It will give intensification a bad name.' The minister told the Herald: 'These changes are a matter for Auckland Council and I've so far only seen the press release. I will be receiving further advice on the proposed changes from officials in due course.' Simon Wilson is an award-winning senior writer covering politics, the climate crisis, transport, housing, urban design and social issues, with a focus on Auckland. He joined the Herald in 2018.
