logo
MP's career in tatters after being found guilty of sexually abusing two men

MP's career in tatters after being found guilty of sexually abusing two men

Daily Mail​3 days ago
A state MP is set to lose his seat after he was found guilty of sexually abusing two young men - one of whom was a teenager - during his time in office.
Kiama MP Gareth Ward, 44, stood trial in the NSW District Court after pleading not guilty to sexual intercourse without consent and indecent assault charges.
He was accused of inviting a drunk 18-year-old man - whom he had met a year prior - to his South Coast home in February 2013.
The man told the jury that Ward plied him with drinks before indecently assaulting him three times in one night, despite his attempts to resist.
Two years later, the long-time MP sexually assaulted an intoxicated political staffer after a mid-week event at NSW Parliament House in 2015.
The man, who was 24 at the time but is now in his 30s, said Ward climbed into bed with him, groped his backside, and sexually assaulted him despite him repeatedly saying 'no'.
After deliberating for two-and-a-half days, the jury on Friday returned unanimous guilty verdicts for the four sexual offences.
A verdict on a fifth charge of common assault was not necessary because the jurors found the act amounted to an indecent assault.
Ward will be sentenced at a later date.
After the jury was dismissed, crown prosecutor Monika Knowles applied for Ward to be taken into custody.
The application was adjourned until Wednesday but Ward will be restrained by strict bail conditions until then.
He is required to report to police daily and notify officers when he is planning to move between his Sydney and South Coast homes.
Ward didn't speak as he walked out of Darlinghurst Courthouse on Friday afternoon - a stark contrast to his usual smile at waiting photographers.
His parliamentary position could become vacant as a result of the convictions, one of which carries a maximum penalty of 14 years in jail.
The NSW Constitution states MPs will have their seat vacated if convicted of offences punishable with a term of more than five years' imprisonment.
But Ward still has time to lodge an appeal.
A NSW government spokesperson said the justice system had delivered a decisive outcome and Ward should resign from parliament immediately.
'Should Mr Ward refuse to resign, the government will take steps to protect the Legislative Assembly's integrity,' the spokesperson said in a statement.
Liberal Party leader Mark Speakman has called for Ward's resignation.
'The Member for Kiama must resign from Parliament. If Mr Ward does not resign, then upon its resumption the Parliament should swiftly take all appropriate steps to protect its integrity,' Speakman said.
Ward denied the allegations against him, claiming the incidents either didn't happen or didn't amount to sexual abuse.
But Ms Knowles said there were too many similarities between the accounts of the two complainants - who didn't know each other - to be a coincidence.
They were emotionally vulnerable and had been drinking when Ward invited them over, plied them with more drinks and sexually abused them without consent while they were lying down, she said.
'You might think what happened to (the complainants) did not happen by random chance or just dumb luck,' Ms Knowles told the jury.
'Similar behaviour, similar setting, same man, same conclusion. This is not a coincidence.'
The evidence showed Ward had a tendency to act on his sexual interest in young men less powerful than he was by committing sexual offences against them, the prosecutor argued.
'These people weren't overtaken by force, they were taken by surprise,' Ms Knowles said.
Ward has held the Kiama electorate since 2011, winning three elections under the Liberal banner before securing the 2023 poll as an independent.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

David Crisafulli claims drop in Queensland crime victim rates but Labor says he's cherrypicking data
David Crisafulli claims drop in Queensland crime victim rates but Labor says he's cherrypicking data

The Guardian

time19 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

David Crisafulli claims drop in Queensland crime victim rates but Labor says he's cherrypicking data

Queensland's LNP government has released figures claiming a substantial drop in the state's victims of crime rate, as the Labor opposition accuses it of cherrypicking data. During last year's state election campaign, the premier, David Crisafulli, staked his leadership on reducing the crime victim rates each year of his first term in government. He initially vowed to resign if crime victim numbers did not reduce under a government led by him, but later walked that back, claiming that he was referring to per capita rates, and not the overall number of victims. The government released police statistics on Tuesday, which Crisafulli claimed show crime victim rates had fallen by almost 6% in the first six months of the 2025 calendar year, compared to the first six months of 2024. He said there were 75,084 victims in the first half of 2024 compared to 72,588 this year. This represented about a 5.7% fall when adjusted for population growth. Crisafulli said he had done 'a little better' than his electoral commitment. 'A reduction of five and a bit per cent, it can only be described as the first step in the journey, because we are still off such historically high bases,' he said. 'So if you're asking whether or not I'm popping champagne corks, we're a long way off that.' Sign up: AU Breaking News email The state's victims of crime data is particularly significant politically, because during last year's election campaign the premier vowed to resign if the number went up. But these numbers do not include the largest category of crime captured by the Australian Bureau of Statistics – 'other theft' – which measures offending like shoplifting. There were more than 150,000 victims of 'other theft' in the latest ABS data, from 2023, more than half the overall number. More than half of other theft offences occurred at a retail location, such as shoplifting, but the category also includes a broad range of other offences. 'Robbery is down 13.2%. Break and enters are down 12%. Stolen cars are down 6.4%,' Crisafulli said. 'Just to be clear, the information that we are presenting is Queensland police service data. It's been there since 2001, so it is apples with apples.' In an estimates hearing on Tuesday, the Labor leader, Steven Miles, accused the government of cherrypicking victim numbers. 'Tens of thousands of Queenslanders are no longer considered victims in the eyes of David Crisafulli,' he said. 'His victim data isn't worth the paper that it's printed on, because he's cut corners, cherrypicked, and removed offences that should matter. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'Victims of other theft could be the local independent grocer who has had stock swiped from their shelves, or someone who's had items stolen from their car.' Crisafulli said the commonwealth methodology included crimes 'that don't relate to a victim'. 'You're counting a street sign as a victim of crime,' he said. The premier said the broader statistics 'will be released' and the new numbers were simply an 'additional tool – so not to replace it'. The new data also revealed the effect of the state's brand new statute banning coercive control. There were just 42 registered victims of the crime since it became an enforceable offence in May. The release of the latest crime statistics came as the government announced a deal with the police union, hailed as the 'largest ever' by the police union general president, Shane Prior. Police would receive an increase in base pay of at least 8% over the next three years, plus an $8,000 'retention bonus' and additional bonuses for working in a regional or rural area, or for working night or evening shifts.

Sharing statement by terrorist organisation could contravene racial discrimination act, lawyers in Mary Kostakidis case argue
Sharing statement by terrorist organisation could contravene racial discrimination act, lawyers in Mary Kostakidis case argue

The Guardian

time19 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Sharing statement by terrorist organisation could contravene racial discrimination act, lawyers in Mary Kostakidis case argue

Sharing a statement by the leader of a proscribed terrorist organisation committed to the destruction of the Jewish state of Israel could arguably contravene the racial discrimination act, the federal court has heard. Former SBS newsreader Mary Kostakidis has been accused by the Zionist Federation of Australia of breaching the Racial Discrimination Act (RDA) by sharing two X posts about a speech by the late Hezbollah secretary general Hassan Nasrallah in January 2024. Kostakidis is trying to strike out the human rights claim on the grounds it fails to identify which race, ethnicity or nationality was offended and is so vague as to be embarrassing. Lawyers for the ZFA told Justice Stephen McDonald in the Adelaide federal court it is 'plainly at least arguable that that victim group, people of Israeli national origin, could be offended or insulted'. Under section 18C of the RDA it is unlawful for a person to do something that is reasonably likely to offend if the act is done because of the national or ethnic origin of the person. 'This is not a claim or a case in which a strikeout application should be seriously entertained,' the barrister for the ZFA, Michael Borsky KC, said. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Borsky said the applicant, the chief executive of the ZFA, Alon Cassuto, accepts that criticising Israel or the Israeli government is not necessarily antisemitic but a statement can be 'both a criticism of Israel and antisemitic'. 'And where that line is drawn in relation to a particular statement or a particular act, is a difficult and important question,' which would be determined at trial, he said. Borsky dismissed the submission by Kostakidis that there was confusion about who the victim was in this case because a Jewish person could be 'ethnically Swedish' and an ethnic Arab could be Jewish. 'There's no confusion or relevant difference between, on the one hand, Israelis in Australia, and on the other hand, people of Israeli national origin in Australia,' he said. Borsky said the respondents were 'looking for criticisms' to 'assert confusion' where there was none and the application to strike out should be dismissed. Cassuto's claim alleges that since the 7 October attack, Kostakidis has posted on X 'about Israel and/or Jews, including among other things spreading various antisemitic conspiracy theories, including that there was an alliance between Zionists and the Nazis. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'It was not a coincidence that many antisemites use nazism; they are seeking to criticise Israel or the Israeli government, Zionists, and your honour will hear evidence about this at trial,' he said. Borsky said although Kostakidis 'used to be a newsreader', the X post was not a 'straightforward news report' and that sharing the posts with commentary was a form of endorsement of the content. In her post, Kostakidis said 'The Israeli govt getting some of its own medicine. Israel has started something it can't finish with this genocide.' Borsky said the commentary is 'relevant to the question the court will need to determine should the case go to trial. He said the court will have to decide 'whether a reasonable member of the victim group or groups was offended or insulted because of who was posting it and how she was posting it'. McDonald reserved his decision.

In a generation, we went from begging for immigrants to begging our leaders to keep them out. Here's the TRUTH about why the Left and Right are finally saying enough is enough - and it has nothing to do with race: PVO
In a generation, we went from begging for immigrants to begging our leaders to keep them out. Here's the TRUTH about why the Left and Right are finally saying enough is enough - and it has nothing to do with race: PVO

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

In a generation, we went from begging for immigrants to begging our leaders to keep them out. Here's the TRUTH about why the Left and Right are finally saying enough is enough - and it has nothing to do with race: PVO

There was a time, not all that long ago, when Australia couldn't open the gates wide enough to let more migrants in. Skilled migrants were needed and international students were welcomed with open arms. Why? Birth rates were down, economic growth was flat, and politicians of all stripes embraced immigration as an economic necessity.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store