Heist with a sleight: Con man swipes $260K in diamonds; pleads guilty in Tiffany-Cartier theft case
Yaorong Wan acknowledged stealing expensive goods from the upscale Fifth Avenue shops of the luxury merchants in March of last year during his appearance before the Manhattan Supreme Court on Monday. At Tiffany's flagship shop, Wan utilized distraction methods and a phony ring to switch out a $225,000 diamond ring.
According to the New York Post, Wan visited the Tiffany store last year and asked about many pieces of jewelry, according to the prosecution.
The DA claims that he left without buying anything after exchanging the real platinum-mounted ring for a cubic zirconia imitation.
A little more than a week later, he hit Cartier once more while distracting workers and pocketing a $24,000 ring. Wan looked at two watches and two engagement rings at the Cartier store in Hudson Yards, but he pocketed one of the rings while the salesperson was preoccupied.
According to authorities, Wan's methods—rapid, deft hand movements, deception, and the calculated use of imitation jewelry—are typical of the upscale thefts that brought him notorious fame throughout the world.
Wan has a transcontinental criminal past. He has been connected to similar instances in New Jersey, California, Florida, and South Korea. Previously, Interpol wanted him in connection with a $330,000 diamond heist in South Korea. According to law enforcement officials, he committed robberies with the dexterity of a magician, targeting both smaller independent jewelers and international luxury names.
Using a sleight-of-hand maneuver, Wan allegedly stole a Chopard watch worth over $17,000 from London Jewelers in the Manhasset neighborhood of Nassau County in April of last year.
In 2018, Wan is also accused of stealing jewels valued at $332,000 in Seoul, the capital of South Korea.
A
fter a joint NYPD, Nassau County Police, and US Marshals investigation, Wan was taken into custody at his Flushing, Queens, residence in May of last year. Officers found other stolen items during the arrest, including the $17,000 Chopard watch that had been reported missing from the jewelry store on Long Island.
Wan entered a guilty plea to second-degree grand larceny and was detained without bail because of pending warrants in other jurisdictions. He could spend three to nine years in New York State jail when he is sentenced on July 14, 2025.
In a statement announcing the plea, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg said, "This defendant stole hundreds of thousands of dollars' worth of high-end jewelry using deceptive sleight-of-hand techniques."
"We've stopped his worldwide theft operation because law enforcement agencies worked together."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Brigitte Macron Gender Uproar: Spies Watch Owens As Claims Explode
/ Aug 18, 2025, 05:59PM IST French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte have reportedly hired Manhattan-based investigative firm Nardello & Co to track Candace Owens as part of their defamation lawsuit. The couple is determined to counter Owens' claims that Brigitte was 'born male,' allegations she pushed on her podcast Becoming Brigitte. Investigators dug into Owens' political ties, finding links with far-right figures in France, the UK, and the US, as well as connections to Russian media. The Macrons' legal team argues the probes will help jurors understand Owens' motives, dismissing the rumors as 'far-fetched fictions.' Owens, meanwhile, has brushed off the lawsuit as an 'overreaction,' even as reports reveal her shifting political identity. The theory itself first surfaced in 2017 via a Spanish blogger and was later amplified by French writer Xavier Poussard.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
6 days ago
- Business Standard
Sharing your credit card for rewards? It could trigger a tax headache
Do you let friends use your credit card for big purchases, or swipe it for others to earn cashback and reward points? It may sound like a harmless way to make some extra money, but tax experts caution that it can put you on the Income Tax Department's radar. That's exactly the situation a Reddit user claims to be in. Identifying himself as a student with no job or business, he revealed spending nearly Rs 24 lakh on a credit card in a single year, most of it by letting friends use the card in exchange for cashback and reward points. The massive spend now shows up in his Annual Information Statement (AIS) and Taxpayer Information Summary (TIS), leaving him worried about possible tax notices. Why this is a red flag for tax authorities Under the Income-Tax Act, banks must report credit card payments exceeding Rs 10 lakh a year as Specified Financial Transactions (SFT). 'In this case, the expenses are not commensurate with the student's declared income, which is nil. The department could treat the funds used to pay the bills as unexplained income under Section 69 and impose heavy penalties,' said Ritika Nayyar, partner, Singhania & Co. Nayyar added that while cashback on personal expenses is usually treated as a discount, if total annual cashback exceeds Rs 50,000, it may be taxed as a gift under 'Income from Other Sources'. For simple income sources, ITR-1 could apply, but the choice of form depends on the individual's income profile. Scrutiny triggers and legal exposure 'The transaction qualifies as high-value under Section 285BA read with Rule 114E,' said Saumya, associate, PSL Advocates & Solicitors. 'Tax officers look for mismatches between repayment sources and declared income, multiple cards splitting large spends, high foreign transactions, or signs of money rotation,' she added She warned that letting friends use a credit card violates bank terms and could lead to liability under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) or even cheating provisions under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Safer routes for reward hunting According to Shefali Mundra, tax expert at ClearTax, 'Using a card for others' spending can breach agreements and invite money laundering suspicion. Instead, use cards for personal expenses, maintain transaction records, and report substantial cashback earnings in tax returns.' She cites the case of an Ahmedabad trader who lost Rs 32 lakh after allowing a friend to use 34 credit cards, a costly reminder that 'cashback chasing' can backfire. Bottom line: In the age of AIS and SFT reporting, spending far beyond your declared means, even in the name of reward points, risks drawing the taxman's attention, along with potential legal consequences.
New Indian Express
6 days ago
- New Indian Express
Workers' share not deposited, ESIC freezes bank account of contractor
TIRUNELVELI: The sub-regional office of Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) on Wednesday froze the bank account of Raam & Co, which supplies manpower to Tirunelveli corporation, and confiscated Rs 72 lakh towards penalty after the agency was allegedly found to have swindled the ESI contribution of 887 sanitation workers. The ESIC action comes after Raam & Co failed to respond to its show-cause notice and pay Rs 72 lakh penalty. 'Till the process to unfreeze the bank account is completed, Raam & Co cannot use it for any transaction,' said sources. B Radha Sankar, an activist, and a few sanitation workers submitted several petitions stating Raam & Co deducted ESI contribution from workers for nearly 20 months but did not remit it to ESIC. When contacted, Tirunelveli Corporation Commissioner Monika Rana said, 'We received a notice from the ESIC and instructed Raam & Co to fulfil the requirements. We also served a separate notice to the agency.' K Senthil, an administrator of Raam & Co, said they were taking steps to enrol sanitation workers with the ESIC. 'We have practical difficulties in registering workers who are aged above 50. We faced data mismatch errors while submitting their documents. We have already paid ESI contributions for a portion of the workers,' he added.
