logo
Bereaved family intend to apply to access Freddie Scappaticci's will

Bereaved family intend to apply to access Freddie Scappaticci's will

A solicitor has indicated applications will be made at the High Court in Belfast to access the will of a man believed to be the IRA agent known as Stakeknife.
Earlier this week, the High Court in London ruled that the will of Freddie Scappaticci, believed to be Britain's top agent inside the IRA, will not be made public.
In 2003, media reports claimed that Scappaticci had spied on the IRA for the British government, and that while working for both organisations, 'was responsible for the torture and murder of dozens of alleged IRA informers'.
There is nothing in the will, which is in fairly standard form, which could conceivably be of interest to the public or the media
Scappaticci, from west Belfast, had always denied the claims before his death aged 77 in 2023.
In a ruling on Monday, judge Julian Flaux ordered that Scappaticci's will should be sealed for 70 years, meaning that its contents will not be made public.
The judge said that this is the first time, except for members of the royal family, where a court has ordered that a will not be made open to public inspection in the way the document would usually be.
He said: 'There is nothing in the will, which is in fairly standard form, which could conceivably be of interest to the public or the media.'
On Tuesday, solicitor Kevin Winters said his firm acts on behalf of more than 30 plaintiffs in ongoing High Court proceedings against the State and Scappaticci.
He said the existence of a will 'points to this man having assets and funds, the origin of which will greatly interest the next of kin of so many murder victims'.
(Families have) battled for too long now and won't be easily fobbed off in trying to get more information
'We are now instructed to look at making applications to the High Court in Belfast to access the will,' he said.
'All our clients will have a vested interest in the out workings of its contents as they will likely touch upon liability in the cases, as well as determining which defendant may be liable to pay out damages.
'We shouldn't forget that, as well as the State agencies, families are suing Freddie Scappaticci on the basis that he's a mark for damages.
'That entitlement to continue the actions didn't end with Stakeknife's death.
'The cases against his estate continue, so we're interested in the out workings of this testamentary document.'
Mr Winters added that the families 'won't settle in being told that the details of his will are to be shelved for 70 years'.
'They've battled for too long now and won't be easily fobbed off in trying to get more information,' he said.
'Their interest will be piqued all the more on the revelation that a number of years ago we queried Scappaticci's legal aid status, only to be told that he was in receipt of state benefits.
'We now intend to revisit the circumstances in which this State-funded killer was able to claim State benefits to support his legal aid status in defending the ongoing tranche of cases against him.
'From the sale of his house in Guildford, he presents as a person of means.
'That has to be the subject of an investigation and to that end, we look forward to a renewed judicial scrutiny in Belfast into Stakeknife's finances.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brit tourist claims he spotted Tommy Robinson ‘boarding flight to Tenerife' morning after St Pancras ‘assault'
Brit tourist claims he spotted Tommy Robinson ‘boarding flight to Tenerife' morning after St Pancras ‘assault'

The Irish Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Irish Sun

Brit tourist claims he spotted Tommy Robinson ‘boarding flight to Tenerife' morning after St Pancras ‘assault'

A BRITISH tourist has claimed he spotted Tommy Robinson seemingly boarding a flight to Tenerife the morning after an alleged assault. The far-right activist, 42, left the country amid an investigation into an in London . 7 A British tourist has claimed he spotted Tommy Robinson seemingly boarding a flight to Tenerife 7 The man, dressed in black with a cap on, boarded a shuttle 7 Tommy Robinson was filmed standing over a man lying face down on the floor at St Pancras Station in London on Monday evening Credit: Twitter/@CrimeLdn 7 He fled the country in the early hours of Tuesday morning Credit: PA Video posted by a Brit flying to Tenerife showed a man matching Tommy Robinson's description boarding an airport shuttle. He was wearing white socks and trainers and black shorts, t-shirt and cap, with a tattoo visible on his leg. A video posted on TikTok captioned: "Spotted Tommy Robinson getting on my flight this morning " also showed the man going through security. He quickly lifted his cap so that staff could check his face against his passport photo. Read more The footage which the tourist claimed showed Robinson - whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon - comes as the EDL founder fled the UK. Robinson was A witness has claimed they saw him engaging in an argument with an older man before punching him so hard it apparently knocked him out. In video which circulated on Monday, an agitated Robinson was seen shouting "you saw him, he came at me" as a man appeared to lay unresponsive and bleeding on the floor. Most read in The Sun He said that as he approached the top, he saw Robinson and an older man "facing off and standing very close to each other". SHOCKED witness reveals what happened seconds before Tommy Robinson St Pancras 'assault' The witness claimed that the alleged assault seemed "very serious" as the man "wasn't moving afterwards". Robinson later shared a clip from US activist Don Keith - who calls himself a "faithful MAGA" supporter and "patriot" - that claimed there is "more footage that vindicates Tommy". In the video, he claimed the injured man was "intoxicated and warned to leave Tommy alone" - and calls him the "aggressor". Keith said the man was warned to stay away, but "proceeded to aggressively rush Robinson anyway", and added that he was "100 per cent in the right defending himself". Keith - who says he's spoken to Robinson - went on to address reports that the political activist fled the country following the alleged assault. He claimed that the former EDL leader had "work obligations" abroad, emphatically denying that Robinson left the country as a result of the allegations and footage. In the wake of the altercation, right-wing media site Rebel News - which Robinson has appeared on in the past - shared a post about Robinson, claiming he didn't "flee" Britain but was instead abroad for scheduled meetings and interviews . The website has also launched a crowdfunder to help raise funds for any legal proceedings that may follow. Since the footage emerged, In the video, Robinson could be seen leaving down a staircase while another man can be heard saying "quick, quick, can we get someone here quick" to staff. Another bystander is heard shouting "Tommy, Tommy" in the background. As Robinson then comes back up the stairs, he appears to tell the man: "He come at me bruv, you saw that, he come at me," before the clip ends. Police said that a man was taken to hospital with "serious injuries" although they were not believed to be life-threatening. Earlier on Monday, the former EDL leader had filmed himself at the station where he was handing out flyers for an upcoming protest. A police spokesperson said on Tuesday: "British Transport Police (BTP) were called to St Pancras station just after 8.40pm yesterday (28 July) following reports of an assault. "Officers attended and a man was taken to hospital with serious injuries, which are not thought to be life threatening. "Overnight the investigation has been ongoing and officers have been making arrest enquiries. "Officers have confirmed that the suspect, a 42-year-old man from Bedfordshire, boarded a flight out of the country in the early hours of this morning. "Detectives are continuing to work closely to progress the investigation and bring him into custody for questioning." 7 Footage shows an agitated Robinson at the scene on Monday Credit: Twitter/@CrimeLdn 7 Police at the scene in the aftermath of the alleged attack' Credit: UKNIP 7 A man was taken to hospital with serious injuries Credit: Twitter/@CrimeLdn

Court to rule on Conor McGregor's appeal against civil finding he assaulted Nikita Hand
Court to rule on Conor McGregor's appeal against civil finding he assaulted Nikita Hand

Irish Examiner

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Court to rule on Conor McGregor's appeal against civil finding he assaulted Nikita Hand

The Court of Appeal will deliver its ruling on Thursday in the appeal by Conor McGregor against the High Court civil jury finding that he assaulted Nikita Hand. Last November, a jury found in Ms Hand's favour, in a case where she alleged Mr McGregor had raped her in a hotel room in Dublin in 2018. The jury awarded her €250,000 in damages. Mr McGregor, who denied the allegations, was also ordered to pay Ms Hand's costs in the case. The Court of Appeal has heard the legal costs involved in the civil assault trial totalled €1.3m. Earlier this month, the MMA fighter dramatically withdrew one of his main grounds of appeal in the case which was fresh evidence he wanted to introduce. The fresh evidence in question had related to testimony to be given by the former Northern Irish state pathologist Professor Jack Crane. This was regarding sworn affidavits from Ms Hand's neighbours at the time of the alleged assault - Samantha O'Reilly and Stephen Cummins - claiming they had heard an altercation within Ms Hand's apartment at the time of the issues in dispute in December 2018. Nikita Hand was awarded €250,000 in damages in the original case. File photo: Niall Carson/PA On foot of this, John Gordon SC, for Ms Hand, said that Mr McGregor should face a charge of inducing others to commit perjury on his behalf. He added that it was designed to "undermine [his] client's reputation" and she didn't have a chance to refute the claims in court. The other grounds of appeal centred around Mr McGregor's answers to gardaí when he was interviewed after Ms Hand alleged he had raped her. His lawyers said that the jury hearing that he said 'no comment' about 100 times was prejudicial evidence which should not have been introduced. Mr McGregor's legal team also appealed on the basis of the 'issue paper' given to the jury, which laid out the questions they had to answer in reaching their verdict. James Lawrence Separately, no costs order was made against Ms Hand for those associated with co-defendant James Lawrence in the case. Mr Lawrence, a friend of Mr McGregor, also denied assaulting Ms Hand on the same day in the Beacon Hotel. Both men said they had consensual sex with her. Mr Lawrence appealed the High Court's decision not to award him his costs even though the jury found he did not assault Ms Hand. During the trial, the court heard that Mr McGregor had paid all of Mr Lawrence's costs. The judgement will be delivered by Ms Justice Kennedy, Mr Justice O'Moore and Mr Justice MacGrath at 2pm on Thursday.

Man asked mother on Snapchat if he could have sex with her two-year-old daughter
Man asked mother on Snapchat if he could have sex with her two-year-old daughter

Irish Daily Mirror

time7 hours ago

  • Irish Daily Mirror

Man asked mother on Snapchat if he could have sex with her two-year-old daughter

A judge has jailed a 27-year-old Ennis man for asking a mother on Snapchat could he have sex with her two year old daughter. At Ennis Circuit Court, Judge Francis Comerford imposed the 18- month prison term on father-of three, Thomas Quinn of Watery Rd, Ennis and with a bail address in Co Cork for the offence committed on August 29, 2020. Judge Comerford said that there was an intent to harm a child and the public understandably shows revulsion at this type of crime. Judge Comerford said that there has been no admission by Mr Quinn to the offence of communicating with the woman online for the purpose of facilitating the sexual exploitation of her then two-year-old girl. A jury convicted Mr Quinn of the offence at a trial at Ennis Circuit Court in May and the case was adjourned for sentencing. At the sentencing hearing, Judge Comerford said that Mr Quinn's crime was 'a crime of intent'. Judge Comerford said that Mr Quinn's actions in the Snapchat exchange with the mother were 'irrational and impulsive'. He said: 'The child was never going to be in danger because her mother was always going to protect her.' Judge Comerford said that he was going to put the offence in the lower level of such offending for one to four years in prison where prison terms of up to 14 years can be imposed. The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week He said that there was 'an absence of direct or indirect consequence for the victim'. Judge Comerford said that the offence didn't seem to be in any way calculated. Investigating Garda in the case, Garda Nadine Keane said that the two year old girl's mother came to Ennis Garda Station to make a complaint that Mr Quinn had communicated via Snapchat and asked her if he could have sex with her two year old daughter. Counsel for the State, Sarah Jane Comerford BL (instructed by State Solicitor for Clare, Aisling Casey) said that in the Snapchat, Mr Quinn said that during the conversation he asked the woman if he could 'feek' her two year daughter. Ms Comerford said that there is no dictionary definition for 'feek but the woman understood that Mr Quinn wanted to have sex with her daughter. Later in the exchange on his request, Mr Quinn asked 'if you let me, I would…' and persisted when asking 'but would you let me?' Garda Keane said that the mother had known Mr Quinn for a number of years and had been messaging him on and off for six months before August 29, 2020. Garda Keane said that the woman kept screenshots of Mr Quinn's request. Judge Comerford said that Mr Quinn always denied making the comments and had argued that some third party had interposed themselves on his Snapchat. However, Judge Comerford said that 'those denials set at nought by really good police work'. Judge Comerford set a headline sentence of 26 months and reduced it to 18 months. Judge Comerford said that he could not suspend any part of that 18 months due to no admissions being made by Mr Quinn so there can't be any steps towards rehabilitation. Judge Comerford said that Mr Quinn is now on the Sex Offenders register as a result of the conviction and can be identified in the reporting of the case. Sign up to the Irish Mirror's Courts and Crime newsletter here and get breaking crime updates and news from the courts direct to your inbox.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store