Putin outlines prospects for nuclear deal with US
The New START treaty, the only remaining nuclear arms control accord between the two countries, was suspended by Moscow in 2023 over obstacles to inspections and Western military participation in the Ukraine conflict.
'If we move to the next stages and reach agreements in the field of strategic offensive arms control, this will create long-term conditions for peace between our countries, in Europe, and in the world as a whole,' Putin said.
In force since 2011, the treaty limits the US and Russia to no more than 1,550 deployed strategic nuclear warheads and provides for mutual inspections to verify compliance.
Russia suspended its participation in the treaty, which expires next February, in 2023. Putin said Moscow's requests to visit certain sites were either ignored or rejected on 'formal grounds.' He also pointed to the West being 'directly involved' in Kiev's attempts to strike Russian strategic bomber bases.
Moscow has stressed, however, that it intends to abide by the New START provisions.
Trump said in July that he would like to maintain the limits on US and Russian strategic nuclear arsenals. 'That's not an agreement you want expiring. We're starting to work on that,' the US president said.
Last month, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov noted that Russia and the US are not holding any talks on a New START treaty extension, citing the deplorable state of relations between the two countries caused by the policies of the administration of former US President Joe Biden.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
US gov't ditches Musk's AI over ‘anti-Semitism'
The US government has dropped Elon Musk's AI chatbot Grok from a planned federal technology program following controversy over anti-Semitic content and conspiracy theories produced by the bot, Wired reported on Thursday. Grok, developed by Musk's AI startup xAI, is built into his social media platform X. It offers fact checks, quick context on trending topics, and replies to user arguments. Musk has promoted xAI as a rival to OpenAI and Google's DeepMind, but the chatbot has faced criticism over offensive and inflammatory outputs. According to the report, xAI was in advanced talks with the General Services Administration (GSA), the agency in charge of US government tech procurement, to give federal workers access to its AI tools. Grok had already been added to the GSA's long-term procurement list, enabling agencies to buy it. Earlier this month, the GSA announced partnerships with other AI providers – Anthropic, Google's Gemini, and Box's AI-powered content platform – while reportedly also telling staff to remove xAI's Grok from the offering. Two GSA employees told Wired they believe the chatbot was dropped over its anti-Semitic tirade last month, when it praised Adolf Hitler and called itself 'MechaHitler.' The posts were deleted, and xAI apologized for the 'horrific behavior,' pledging to block hate speech before Grok goes live. The bot also pushed the 'white genocide' conspiracy theory and echoed Holocaust denial rhetoric, which xAI blamed on unauthorized prompt changes. This week, it was briefly suspended from X after stating that Israel and the US were committing genocide in Gaza – allegations both countries reject. Musk has continued to praise the chatbot, recently writing: 'East, West, @Grok is the best.' The move to drop Grok comes as part of a broader push by the administration of US President Donald Trump to modernize the federal government under an action plan unveiled last month that provides for less regulation and wider adoption of AI. However, the rapid growth of AI has triggered concern about its potential to spread misinformation, reinforce bias, and operate without accountability. Experts say that unless strong safeguards are in place, poorly moderated AI tools could also expose children to harmful or inappropriate content.
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
The EU throws an epic tantrum as Trump meets with Putin
The European Union had been wailing about 'transatlantic unity' in the run-up to US President Trump heading to the negotiating table with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday – without it. It sounded like a toddler stomping their feet because Daddy let go of their hand in the mall and now they're lost between Cinnabon and Burger King. A lot of good their dogmatic rhetoric has done them so far. If it wasn't for Brussels getting drunk on its own transatlantic solidarity and unity propaganda, maybe it wouldn't currently be in economic and political dire straits. The kind where you're trying to duct-tape your economy back together with overpriced American gas. They could have charted a different path vis-a-vis Russia. Maybe one that involved spearheading diplomacy rather than marching in lockstep behind the US-led NATO parade of weapons and fighters on Russia's border with Ukraine, which helped supercharge the conflict in the first place. They could have insisted on keeping their cheap Russian energy instead of sanctioning their own imports like they were vying for a Nobel Prize in masochism. Now, the US is daring them to even close their clever little loophole in their own anti-Russian sanctions. The one that lets them moralize about helping Ukraine and the need to avoid negotiations with Russia while guzzling Russian fuel on the down-low. Trump Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told them to 'put up or shut up' and sanction the Indian and Chinese importers of Russian petroleum through which the EU still buys Russian fuel. While the EU indulges itself in rhetorical games, Trump has dropped all pretexts of serving any interests but America's first, and isn't following any agenda beyond trying to wrap things up with Russia in Ukraine and to score some economic wins in the process. Brussels has had more than three years to do the same. Instead, it kept repeating the mantra that Kiev had to win on the battlefield. There were no other options, it said. Whoops! Now that the option has materialized, the Europeans are relegated to running behind Trump, pleading with him to indulge them by letting Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky decide where the post-conflict borders will be. What did they think the downside of their 'win by force' gamble would be, if not changed borders? The EU insists on Ukraine fighting Russia with EU cash and weapons, and when Kiev loses, they say, 'Ok, well this sucks – how about if everyone just pretends that none of this happened and we dial all the territorial gains and losses back to a point of our choosing, okay?' The EU insisted on waiting for someone else to take the initiative for peace. Now all it can do is pick up its pom-poms and cheer Trump on. Then hope that he rewards it. As Zelensky's self-appointed babysitters, instead of spending the past week in the run-up to the Alaska summit insisting that Putin and Trump allow a high chair booster seat and a pack of crayons at the negotiating table so he can show them where he wants the borders, maybe the Europeans should have been calming him down and managing expectations. He sounded like he was treating his phone like a toy, calling up everyone in the contacts under 'EU' – Estonia, Denmark, probably a few pizza places… The EU has tried to gaslight Trump with the same rhetoric that it constantly firehoses onto European citizens about peace in Ukraine being a dangerous gateway drug for Russia to invade Western Europe – a convenient marketing pitch to justify boosting the weapons industry to the detriment of domestic priorities. Not even warhawk US Senator Lindsey Graham is saying that now, telling NBC News that 'Russia is not going to Kiev'...let alone the EU. European leaders treated Wednesday's video call with Trump like a win. Perhaps because he didn't explicitly tell them off, for once. But they really have no idea what he'll actually discuss with Putin, nor do they have leverage over any eventual US–Russia deal. They don't know whether Trump is just placating them because he doesn't need a bunch of hysterical circus clowns in the mix. So how could the EU spin this to avoid looking completely irrelevant? 'Today Europe, the US and NATO have strengthened the common ground for Ukraine, we will remain in close coordination. Nobody wants peace more than us. A just and lasting peace,' said unelected EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. Yeah, sounds desperate for peace, alright. Which must be why the EU is building weapons factories at breakneck speed, according to the Financial Times. Nothing says 'we're committed to ending the war' like tripling down on weapons. What are you going to do with all those if peace breaks out? Toss them in the landfill and hope that taxpayers forget about the boondoggle, like you did with the hundreds of millions of unused Covid jabs? Brussels talks like a co-architect of global policy, but in practice it's more like a subcontractor who has to implement someone else's blueprint. The Alaska summit exclusion exposes how little agency it actually has in resolving conflicts that it has been funding and fueling. So much for a 'feminist' foreign policy. The EU is behaving like a geopolitical tradwife. Whatever happens between Trump and Putin, the EU has already vowed to adopt Ukraine's problems while crossing its fingers that Trump might pitch in with 'assistance' – military or otherwise. Why would Trump want a piece of that when Brussels has already welcomed it being dumped on its lap? Why settle for normalization with Russia, business, trade, and peace when you can have endless soap opera reruns instead?
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
Modi vows to ‘stand like a wall' to protect India's farmers
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has declared that his government will 'stand like a wall' to protect the interests of the nation's farmers. The remark comes amid escalating trade tensions with the US after President Donald Trump imposed a 50% tariff on Indian goods. New Delhi and Washington have been engaged in talks over a trade deal, with multiple reports suggesting that the negotiations hit a roadblock as the Indian government was reluctant to open up its agriculture and dairy markets to American products. 'I am standing like a wall for our farmers,' Modi said in his Independence Day speech at Delhi's Red Fort on Friday. He added that self-reliance in agriculture and industry was a way to protect India's sovereignty. The Indian leader called on the country to increase its economic resilience by making products with lower costs and higher value. 'Self-reliance is not just about exports, imports, the rupee, or the dollar. It is about our capabilities, our strength to stand on our own,' Modi added. "Slavery Made Us Dependent"... India Must Drive Towards Self-Reliant, Developed 🇮🇳 - Narendra Modi Hails Farmers' Sacrifice to Feed India # He said that those who 'rely too much on others invite a big question mark over their freedom,' adding that 'the real misfortune begins when dependence becomes a habit.' US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday called India 'a bit recalcitrant' in trade talks with the US, sparking backlash in New Delhi. Indian Congress Party MP and head of the country's Parliamentary Committee on External Affairs, Shashi Tharoor, responded to Bessent's remarks on Thursday, suggesting in a post on X that it is 'far better to be recalcitrant than to be tractable, submissive, or acquiescent in injustice.' Vassal State Complex? US Treasury Sec. Bessent: India has been "Recalcitrant"Does Washington think New Delhi is being... disobedient?📹 FOX BUSINESS NETWORK Trade negotiations between India and the US collapsed earlier this month, and Washington initially imposed 25% tariffs on Indian imports before adding another 25% for the South Asian country's continued purchases of Russian oil. The second set of tariffs will be implemented starting on August 27. New Delhi has called the US tariffs 'unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable,' and has vowed to protect its national interests.
