
Democrats urge spiking of Trump watchdog nominee who would ‘traumatize' workforce
Two Democratic committee leaders are urging the Senate to reject the nomination of Paul Ingrassia to lead a top whistleblower office, calling him 'unfit' for the role and arguing he would help the Trump administration 'traumatize the federal workforce and consolidate unchecked power.'
Ingrassia, a former podcast host, was nominated last month to lead the Office of the Special Counsel (OSC). He has come under fire for a series of controversial remarks about Jan. 6, 2021, as well as his praise for other right-wing figures.
OSC is a unique office within government, one with a dual mission to both enforce the electioneering prohibitions of the Hatch Act and to protect federal employees — fighting unlawful firings and serving as an outlet for whistleblowers.
Reps. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) and Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the top Democrats on the House Oversight and Judiciary committees, said Ingrassia would not tackle either mission 'without fear or favor.'
'[OSC] is an independent guardian of accountability within the executive branch. Mr. Ingrassia's loyalty to Donald Trump over the Constitution, his calls for imposing martial law and celebrating violent January 6th insurrectionists, and his close associations with antisemitic extremists all make it clear that he lacks the temperament, experience, and fundamental constitutional fidelity required to lead this office,' Garcia and Raskin, the top Democrats on the House Oversight and Judiciary committees, wrote in the letter.
'He is not simply unqualified — his confirmation would pose a direct threat to federal whistleblowers, the credibility of the OSC, and the integrity of our oversight institutions.'
Ingrassia was previously a writer for the Daily Caller and hosted the podcast Right On Point. He is also an attorney and served on the legal team representing self-described misogynist Andrew Tate.
Ingrassia has called Tate, who has been charged with human trafficking in Romania as well as rape in the United Kingdom, the 'embodiment of the ancient ideal of excellence.'
In 2020, he said it was 'time for @realDonaldTrump to declare martial law and secure his re-election.'
He also said in December that Trump should 'offer reparations to the tune of $1 million per family (at least)' for Jan. 6 defendants.
The letter notes that Ingrassia graduated law school three years ago and describes him as being fired from a job at the Justice Department he had at the start of the Trump administration.
Various outlets have reported Ingrassia walked the halls of DOJ telling people he was the 'eyes and ears' of the White House and clashed with leadership as he pushed to hire those with 'exceptional loyalty' to Trump.
Garcia and Raskin noted numerous Trump officials were cited for Hatch Act violations during Trump's first term.
'It is hard to imagine a nominee less likely to enforce the Hatch Act in a fair and even-handed way if an investigation implicated anyone close to the Trump Administration,' they wrote.
The lawmakers also expressed fear for whistleblowers, who often report matters to OSC if they fear they will face retribution at their own agencies.
'When whistleblowers come forward, they are speaking truth to power. They do so at great personal risk to bring transparency where secrecy and misconduct might otherwise prevail.
Yet Mr. Ingrassia has time and again made clear that he is blindly loyal to the President—a view that is utterly disqualifying for any position of public trust, but particularly one charged with defending the rights of whistleblowers,' they wrote.
The White House defended their selection in a Thursday statement.
'Paul Ingrassia is a respected attorney who has served President Trump exceptionally well and will continue to do so as the next head of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel. The eleventh-hour smear campaign will not deter the President from supporting this nomination, and the administration continues to have full confidence in his ability to advance the President's agenda,' said White House spokesman Harrison Fields.
Trump fired previous special counsel Hampton Dellinger, despite his Senate confirmation to a five-year term, amid his battle to restore fired federal workers to their posts after the Trump administration booted federal workers still in their probationary period.
Dellinger, who sued to keep this job, was initially reinstated to his post, but ended his legal battle after an appeals court declined to keep him in his role while the case continued.
His departure also meant the end of the OSC's battle to protect fired probationary workers, and the office has since shifted its position on the matter.
The Thursday letter is the first from Garcia since his election to serve as the ranking member of the Oversight Committee.
A hearing date for Ingrassia has not yet been set by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, but the lawmakers encouraged the panel to reject his nomination.
'President Trump wants to appoint Mr. Ingrassia because he knows that this nominee will treat treasonous, secessionist rhetoric as acceptable political discourse; reward extremism instead of condemning it; and work to tear down, not build up, the democratic institutions we have sworn to protect,' the two lawmakers wrote.
'The ultimate victims of Mr. Ingrassia's installation as special counsel would be the brave civil servant whistleblowers, the credibility of the federal workforce and civil servants, and the American people they serve.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
30 minutes ago
- New York Post
Press pouts after Trump's Iran strike
President Trump's strikes on Iranian nuclear sites and the cease-fire he brokered soon after between Israel and Iran were awesome accomplishments, but much of the media hate him so much, they can only find fault in them. Indeed, they'd prefer he failed — even if Americans suffer as a result. NY Post editorial page editor Adam Brodksy shares this story.

31 minutes ago
Ohio budget bill with Browns stadium funding, LGBTQ+ restrictions heads to Gov. Mike DeWine
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- The two-year, $60 billion operating budget sent to Republican Gov. Mike DeWine calls for flattening Ohio's income tax and setting aside $600 million in unclaimed funds for a new Cleveland Browns stadium, among hundreds of spending decisions. He has until Monday to sign it and issue any line-item vetoes. State Sen. George Lang described the massive spending blueprint as 'a budget of abundance,' as he and other members of the GOP supermajority touted its $1 billion in income tax relief, pathways to address Ohio's property tax crisis and how — like the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency initiative — it trims spending at administrative agencies and curtails regulations. Democrats voted uniformly against the bill, alongside a handful of Republicans, casting it as a collection of misguided policy tradeoffs that prioritize the wealthy over the middle class. Those opponents argued that joining what the Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit Tax Foundation has described as a 'flat tax revolution' in the states would stand to mostly benefit higher income earners at the expense of local governments and libraries. Another key Democratic sticking point: Though it increases public education funding by about $3 billion over the biennium, the bill underfunds, by hundreds of millions of dollars or more, the final stage of a bipartisan, legislatively approved overhaul of Ohio's unconstitutional school funding system. Here's a closer look: It includes the $600 million Haslam Sports Group, owner of the Browns, requested from the state to help build a new domed stadium in suburban Brook Park south of Cleveland. DeWine proposed doubling taxes on sports betting to help the Browns, as well as the Bengals and other teams who might seek facility upgrades. But the Legislature settled on using some of the $4.8 billion in unclaimed funds the state is holding on to — in small sums residents left behind from dormant bank accounts, uncashed checks and forgotten utility deposits. The budget earmarks $1.7 billion from that fund to create an Ohio Cultural and Sports Facility Performance Grant Fund and designates the Browns as the first grant recipient. The budget doesn't explicitly include money for the Bengals, who reached a tentative deal on stadium renovations with their home county Thursday, but the fund would assist such projects going forward. Lawmakers who represent Cleveland and surrounding communities, mostly Democrats, blasted the proposal as a gift to the team's billionaire owners. Democrats outside the Legislature threatened to sue if DeWine signs the plan, arguing it would be unconstitutionally raiding the unclaimed funds without due process. The Republican attorney general vowed their effort would fail. The budget phases in a single flat-tax rate of 2.75% over two years, effective on anyone making over $26,050 a year. Those making less would continue to pay nothing. The plan eliminates the existing 3.5% rate on those making over $100,000 a year by the 2026 tax year. Ohio would be the 15th state with a flat tax rate if the plan is enacted. Republicans tout that as a benefit to working Ohioans and the economy and another step in their continuing efforts to reduce the state's tax burden, with the aim of some of them being to eventually eliminate the income tax entirely. Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a Washington, D.C. nonprofit, found 98% of the benefit would go to the top 20% of income earners, or those making over $139,900. To address skyrocketing property taxes largely collected by public school districts, the bill prohibits any new emergency or new replacement levies and requires wording changes on ballots when seeking any future levies. It also caps districts' operating budget carryovers, requiring them to spend down surpluses that exceed 40% or return the excess to taxpayers. Opponents argued that penalizes districts that have been good stewards of their money. Echoing the approach of Trump's DOGE as one of that program's architects runs for governor with Trump's support, lawmakers boasted of the legislation's 3% to 4% cuts to administrative agency budgets. Beyond that, it defunds, defangs, reassigns or abolishes bodies that punish election law violations, craft public school policy, monitor rare diseases, field complaints about Ohio's state prisons and oversee state spending on Medicaid — the largest and most foundational portion of the state budget. Most of the affected boards, commissions and committees were bipartisan. It also reduces funding for tobacco use prevention, food banks and several housing programs, while devoting $7 million to quantum computing research at Miami University and $5 million to child cancer research. In anticipation of potential cuts to the federal budget, Republicans also included a trigger mechanism that would end coverage under Medicaid expansion if the federal government match falls below 90%. Democrats criticized the decision, which affects health insurance coverage for more than 800,000 Ohioans. The legislation declares as not only state policy but 'incontrovertible reality' that there are 'only two sexes, male and female." It prohibits, to the extent allowed under federal law, the distribution of Medicaid funds for mental health services that "promote or affirm social gender transition' and bans state funds from going to youth shelters that do the same. It also would require public libraries to move children's books 'related to sexual orientation or gender identity or expression' out of view of minors. Republican Rep. Gary Click, a Baptist pastor, called it unfortunate that lawmakers have to assert such positions on sexuality but said it's what constituents want. 'What's next?" he asked. "In the next budget, do we have to say water is wet and the Earth is round?' Senate Democratic Leader Nickie Antonio, the state's first openly gay legislative leader, rebuked Republicans for sowing 'the seeds of division, of suspicion and shame' and suggesting LGBTQ+ people are 'too extreme to be seen in the light of day.' 'These actions aren't going to erase us," she said. "Just because you put the materials behind a curtain doesn't mean the people suddenly — poof! — don't exist. Because you know what? We do. We are the very fabric of every single one of your communities in every single one of your districts.'

USA Today
34 minutes ago
- USA Today
A year ago today: The Biden-Trump debate rematch that changed the election
June 27, 2025, marks a year since President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump faced off in a presidential debate that would definitively change the race. The highly anticipated rematch occurred much earlier in the election than previous debates, as both candidates were all but certain to become their party's nominees. Usually, the debates are hosted throughout October by the Commission on Presidential Debates. But after some social media goading, the two candidates opted two debates, the first on June 27, 2024. What happened shocked the country. Biden's performance prompted a groundswell of questions about his mental acuity, questions that are still being asked today. Then, on July 21, Biden announced he was ending his re-election campaign and endorsing former Vice President Kamala Harris as his replacement. The Democrats backed her swiftly, but it wasn't enough to defeat Trump in the November election. Here is a look back at some of the most viral moments in the debate that upended the 2024 presidential election. More: Trump stumbles up the stairs to Air Force One, stoking memory of Biden tripping video Age debate spirals into competitive golf jabs In a moment everyone has heard about, the presidential candidates were derailed by a back-and-forth over golf and whose game is better. In a conversation about competency at an older age, Trump responded by bragging about the alleged cognitive tests he's passed and his golf game, saying he'd recently won two club championships. 'He challenged me to a golf match,' Trump said of Biden. 'He can't hit a ball 50 yards.' 'I'd be happy to have a driving contest with him," Biden responded, saying he had accomplished a handicap of six during his vice presidency. 'I'm happy to play golf with you if you carry your own bag. Think you can do it?' 'That's the biggest lie, that he's a six handicap, of all,' Trump shot back. Biden then accused Trump of having a handicap of eight, to which the former president responded. 'I've seen your swing. I know your swing.' The exchange ended with both men accusing the other of acting childish. Biden freezes before landing on 'we finally beat Medicare.' YIKES: Joe Biden starts to freeze Social media quickly took to what is being called the "Biden freeze," making several posts and memes about the president stumbling on his words. The big "freeze moment" came when Biden was discussing healthcare, the economy and the high debt levels under Trump's administration. He mentioned increasing taxes on billionaires but his response then became briefly meandering, concluding with 'if we finally beat Medicare" after a pause. 'Three years younger and a lot less competent': The great age debate Concerns over the ages of the candidates have been a major talking point this election season − whether their answers during the debate assuaged or intensified these concerns is up to the viewer, but they were asked about their cognitive abilities head-on. "I spent half my career being criticized for being the youngest person in politics," Biden said, referring to his election to the U.S. Senate at age 30, "Now I'm the oldest. This guy is three years younger and a lot less competent." "I took two tests, cognitive tests, I aced them, both of them, as you know," Trump responded. "I'd like to see him take on, just one, a real easy one, like go through the first five questions, you couldn't do it," he said of Biden. Biden to Trump: 'You're the sucker, you're the loser' During an exchange in which Trump and Biden each accused the other of failing veterans, Trump claimed that veterans and soldiers "can't stand this guy" about Biden. "And they like me more than just about any of them," he said. Biden shot back by referring to his own late son, Joseph "Beau" Biden, who served in the Army National Guard as a major and deployed to Iraq before dying of brain cancer in 2015 at 46 years old. He also referred to an Atlantic report from 2020 in which anonymous sources said Trump had called soldiers that died in battles "suckers and losers." Trump has denied this report since its release, though other news outlets have corroborated it. "I went to the WWI cemetery he refused to go to," Biden said, referring to Trump. "He was standing with his four-star general and he told me 'I don't want to go in there because they're a bunch of losers and suckers.' My son was not a loser, he was not a sucker, you're the sucker, you're the loser." Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @