British Ambassador visits Lebanon's eastern borders with Syria
British Ambassador to Lebanon Hamish Cowell visited Thursday Lebanon's eastern borders with Syria to see first-hand the UK's efforts to support the Lebanese Armed Forces' (LAF) enhanced border security capabilities.
"This visit underscores the UK's commitment to strengthening LAF capabilities in extending state authority over its border with Syria, countering smuggling activities, and safeguarding local communities," the British Embassy said in a statement.
During the visit, Cowell met with military and local officials. The Ambassador and the Mokhtar of Yanta Riad Saab and other local citizens visited a solar-powered water pumping station as part of initiatives aimed at strengthening civil-military cooperation, within areas of operation for the Land Border Regiments (LBRs).
Following his visit Ambassador Cowell said: "The United Kingdom remains steadfast in its support for Lebanon's sovereignty and security. Our partnership with the Lebanese Armed Forces is crucial in helping to maintain stability across Lebanon, and protecting the livelihoods of those living near the border.
I am proud of our support and the UK's role as a key partner to the LAF; through the UK Integrated Security Fund we have supported the establishment of the Land Border Regiments (LBRs) on the border with Syria since 2013 and have provided over £115m worth of assistance to the LAF.
The Land Border Regiments have helped reinforce the security of this border and the authority of the Lebanese State's authority over these areas.
In Yanta, I was impressed to see the solar-powered water pumping station project benefiting hundreds in the area. This project delivers a sustainable, environmentally friendly solution to the water supply needs of the Yanta community. An excellent example of the LAF and communities coming together."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
L'Orient-Le Jour
3 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Iran says 'working with China and Russia' to stop European sanctions
Iran said Thursday it was working with China and Russia to prevent the snapback of European sanctions over Tehran's nuclear program after Britain, France and Germany threatened to reimpose them. "We will try to prevent it," Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said in an interview with state TV. "We are working with China and Russia to stop it. If this does not work and they apply it, we have tools to respond. We will discuss them in due course." The trio of European powers, known as the E3, told the United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Wednesday that they were ready to reimpose sanctions on Tehran if no diplomatic solution was found by the end of August. All three were signatories to a 2015 deal that lifted sanctions in return for curbs on Iran's nuclear program. The agreement, which terminates in October, includes a "snapback mechanism" allowing sanctions to be restored. "We have made clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism," the group's foreign ministers said in the letter. "If Iran continues to violate its international obligations, France and its German and British partners will reimpose the global embargoes on arms, nuclear equipment and banking restrictions that were lifted 10 years ago at the end of August," French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot posted on X on Wednesday. Araghchi said the return of sanctions would be "negative" but that the predicted economic effects "have been exaggerated." 'Legally justified' The 2015 deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA, effectively collapsed after U.S. President Donald Trump withdrew from it in 2018 during his first term and restored crippling sanctions. European countries attempted to keep the deal alive, while Iran initially stuck to the terms before later ramping up its uranium enrichment. Earlier this year, the United States joined Israel in bombing Iran's nuclear facilities. Israel launched its attacks while Washington and Tehran were still pursuing nuclear talks, which have not since resumed. Western powers have long accused Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons, a charge the Iranian government strongly denies. Even before Israel attacked Iran, they had raised concerns about the lack of access given to inspectors from the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. Iran halted all cooperation with the IAEA after the strikes. Last month, Araghchi sent a letter to the U.N. saying the European countries did not have the legal right to restore sanctions. The European ministers called the claim "unfounded." They insisted that, as JCPOA signatories, they would be "clearly and unambiguously legally justified in using relevant provisions" of U.N. resolutions "to trigger U.N. snapback to reinstate UNSC resolutions against Iran which would prohibit enrichment and re-impose U.N. sanctions."
Nahar Net
5 hours ago
- Nahar Net
Iran says 'working with China and Russia' to stop European sanctions
Iran said Thursday it was working with China and Russia to prevent the snapback of European sanctions over Tehran's nuclear program after Britain, France and Germany threatened to reimpose them. "We will try to prevent it," Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said in an interview with state TV. "We are working with China and Russia to stop it. If this does not work and they apply it, we have tools to respond. We will discuss them in due course." The trio of European powers, known as the E3, told the United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Wednesday that they were ready to reimpose sanctions on Tehran if no diplomatic solution was found by the end of August. All three were signatories to a 2015 deal that lifted sanctions in return for curbs on Iran's nuclear program. The agreement, which terminates in October, includes a "snapback mechanism" allowing sanctions to be restored. "We have made clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism," the group's foreign ministers said in the letter. "If Iran continues to violate its international obligations, France and its German and British partners will reimpose the global embargoes on arms, nuclear equipment and banking restrictions that were lifted 10 years ago at the end of August," French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot posted on X on Wednesday. Araghchi said the return of sanctions would be "negative" but that the predicted economic effects "have been exaggerated". - 'Legally justified' - The 2015 deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA, effectively collapsed after US President Donald Trump withdrew from it in 2018 during his first term and restored crippling sanctions. European countries attempted to keep the deal alive, while Iran initially stuck to the terms before later ramping up its uranium enrichment. Earlier this year, the United States joined Israel in bombing Iran's nuclear facilities. Israel launched its attacks while Washington and Tehran were still pursuing nuclear talks, which have not since resumed. Western powers have long accused Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons, a charge the Iranian government strongly denies. Even before Israel attacked Iran, they had raised concerns about the lack of access given to inspectors from the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. Iran halted all cooperation with the IAEA after the strikes. Last month, Araghchi sent a letter to the U.N. saying the European countries did not have the legal right to restore sanctions. The European ministers called the claim "unfounded". They insisted that, as JCPOA signatories, they would be "clearly and unambiguously legally justified in using relevant provisions" of UN resolutions "to trigger UN snapback to reinstate UNSC resolutions against Iran which would prohibit enrichment and re-impose U.N. sanctions."
Ya Libnan
18 hours ago
- Ya Libnan
All Eyes on Alaska – Will Trump be Churchill or Chamberlain?
At the Alaska summit, Trump must decide whether to resist Putin's demands or repeat the fatal appeasement mistakes of 1938 — with Ukraine's fate, and Taiwan's future, hanging in the balance. The US leader will have to choose who he wants to be like and how his role will be described in history. By: Vlad Green In 1938, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain returned from Munich proclaiming 'peace for our time' after conceding to Adolf Hitler's demand to annex part of Czechoslovakia. Winston Churchill, however, warned that appeasement would not satisfy Hitler's ambitions — it would only encourage them. Within a year, Europe was engulfed in war. Today, as U.S. President Donald Trump prepares to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, the world faces an unsettling historical echo. Putin's demands — Ukraine's withdrawal from key territories and abandonment of NATO aspirations — follow the same dangerous logic as Munich: trade land for the promise of peace. History has shown us that such deals often pave the way for even greater conflict. Trump has suggested that both sides might 'swap' territory to end the war. To many, this sounds less like a peace plan and more like a potential capitulation. If he agrees to Putin's conditions, it would not just be Ukraine's sovereignty on the bargaining table — it would be the credibility of the United States and the security architecture of Europe. European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky are already voicing concerns. They fear the U.S. could dictate terms that favor Moscow, especially given Trump's track record of praising Putin and downplaying Russian aggression. If this summit ends with territorial concessions, it will be viewed by many as a surrender in all but name. The stakes stretch far beyond Eastern Europe. China is watching. Any territorial gains secured by Putin through pressure and force would send a clear signal to Beijing that similar tactics could work in Taiwan. The Alaska summit, therefore, is not just about Ukraine's future — it is about the stability of the global order. If Trump chooses the path of concessions, it will be his Chamberlain moment — a deal that offers the illusion of peace while inviting greater danger. But if he stands firm and defends the principle that borders cannot be changed by force, he may yet be remembered as a leader who, like Churchill, refused to yield to tyranny. The choice he makes in Alaska will echo far beyond the frozen north — it will reverberate through Kyiv, across Europe, and all the way to Taipei.
