China's rare earth weapon changes contours of trade war battlefield
BEIJING - China has signalled for more than 15 years that it was looking to weaponise areas of the global supply chain, a strategy modelled on longstanding American export controls Beijing views as aimed at stalling its rise.
The scramble in recent weeks to secure export licences for rare earths, capped by Thursday's telephone call between U.S. and Chinese leaders Donald Trump and Xi Jinping, shows China has devised a better, more precisely targeted weapon for trade war.
Industry executives and analysts say while China is showing signs of approving more exports of the key elements, it will not dismantle its new system.
Modelled on the United States' own, Beijing's export licence system gives it unprecedented insight into supplier chokepoints in areas ranging from motors for electric vehicles to flight-control systems for guided missiles.
"China originally took inspiration for these export control methods from the comprehensive U.S. sanctions regime," said Zhu Junwei, a scholar at the Grandview Institution, a Beijing-based think tank focused on international relations.
"China has been trying to build its own export control systems since then, to be used as a last resort."
After Thursday's call, Trump said both leaders had been "straightening out some of the points, having to do mostly with rare earth magnets and some other things".
He did not say whether China committed to speeding up licences for exports of rare earth magnets, after Washington curbed exports of chip design software and jet engines to Beijing in response to its perceived slow-rolling on licences.
China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in EV motors.
In April it added some of the most sophisticated types to an export control list in its trade war with the United States, forcing all exporters to apply to Beijing for licences.
That put a once-obscure department of China's commerce ministry, with a staff of about 60, in charge of a chokepoint for global manufacturing.
The ministry did not immediately respond to Reuters' questions sent by fax.
Several European auto suppliers shut down production lines this week after running out of supplies. While China's April curbs coincided with a broader package of retaliation against Washington's tariffs, the measures apply globally.
"Beijing has a degree of plausible deniability – no one can prove China is doing this on purpose," said Noah Barkin, senior adviser at Rhodium Group, a China-focused U.S. thinktank.
"But the rate of approvals is a pretty clear signal that China is sending a message, exerting pressure to prevent trade negotiations with the U.S. leading to additional technology control."
China mines about 70% of the world's rare earths but has a virtual monopoly on refining and processing.
Even if the pace of export approvals quickens as Trump suggested, the new system gives Beijing unprecedented glimpses of how companies in a supply chain deploy the rare earths it processes, European and U.S. executives have warned.
Other governments are denied that insight because of the complexity of supply chain operations.
For example, hundreds of Japanese suppliers are believed to need China to approve export licences for rare earth magnets in coming weeks to avert production disruptions, said a person who has lobbied on their behalf with Beijing.
"It's sharpening China's scalpel," said a U.S.-based executive at a company seeking to piece together an alternative supply chain who sought anonymity.
"It's not a way to oversee the export of magnets, but a way to gain influence and advantage over America."
DECADES IN THE MAKING
Fears that China could weaponise its global supply chain strength first emerged after its temporary ban of rare earth exports to Japan in 2010, following a territorial dispute.
As early as 1992, former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping was quoted as saying, "The Middle East has oil, China has rare earths."
Beijing's landmark 2020 Export Control Law broadened curbs to cover any items affecting national security, from critical goods and materials to technology and data.
China has since built its own sanctions power while pouring the equivalent of billions of dollars into developing workarounds in response to U.S. policies.
In 2022, the United States put sweeping curbs on sales of advanced semiconductor chips and tools to China over concerns the technology could advance Beijing's military power.
But the move failed to halt China's development of advanced chips and artificial intelligence, analysts have said.
Beijing punched back a year later by introducing export licenses for gallium and germanium, and some graphite products. Exports to the United States of the two critical minerals, along with germanium, were banned last December.
In February China restricted exports of five more metals key to the defence and clean energy industries.
Analysts face a hard task in tracking the pace of China's approvals following the Trump-Xi call.
"It's virtually impossible to know what percentage of requests for non-military end users get approved because the data is not public and companies don't want to publicly confirm either way," said Cory Combs, a critical minerals analyst with Trivium, a policy consultancy focused on China. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
27 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Thailand and Cambodia reinforcing troops on disputed border after May skirmish, Thai minister says
Royalist activists hold placards as they protest in front of the Royal Embassy of Cambodia in Bangkok on June 6, 2025. PHOTO: REUTERS Thailand and Cambodia reinforcing troops on disputed border after May skirmish, Thai minister says BANGKOK - Thailand has reinforced its military presence along a disputed border with Cambodia, following an increase in troops on the other side, Thailand's defence minister said on June 7, as tensions simmer following a deadly clash. For days, the two South-east Asian governments have exchanged carefully worded statements committing to dialogue after a brief skirmish in an undemarcated border area on May 28 in which a Cambodian soldier was killed. But Mr Phumtham Wechayachai, who also serves as Thailand's deputy prime minister, said that during talks bilateral talks held on June 5, Cambodia had rejected proposals that could have led to a de-escalation. "Furthermore, there has been a reinforcement of military presence, which has exacerbated tensions along the border," Mr Phumtham said in a statement. "Consequently, the Royal Thai Government has deemed it necessary to implement additional measures and to reinforce our military posture accordingly." He did not provide details on the extent of reinforcements by either side. In a separate statement on June 7, the Thai army said Cambodian soldiers and civilians had repeatedly made incursions into Thailand's territory. "These provocations, and the build up of military forces, indicate a clear intent to use force," the Thai army said, adding that it would take control of all Thai checkpoints along the border with Cambodia. A spokesperson for Cambodia's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to questions from Reuters. The military reinforcements come despite efforts by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, who is the current chair of the Association of South-east Asian Nations (Asean) bloc, and China to reduce tensions. Thailand and Cambodia have for more than a century contested sovereignty at various undemarcated points along their 817km land border, which was first mapped by France in 1907 when Cambodia was its colony. Tension escalated in 2008 over an 11th-century Hindu temple, leading to skirmishes over several years and at least a dozen deaths, including during a weeklong exchange of artillery in 2011. Current governments in both countries, however, have enjoyed warm ties. Former leaders Thaksin Shinawatra of Thailand and Cambodia's Hun Sen have had a close relationship, and Mr Thaksin's daughter and Mr Hun Sen's son are now the incumbent prime ministers of their countries. Still, nationalist sentiment has risen in Thailand and the Thai military said on June 6 that it is ready to launch a "high-level operation" to counter any violation of its sovereignty. Cambodia said this week it would refer disputes over four parts of the border to the International Court of Justice and asked Thailand to cooperate. Mr Phumtham reiterated in his June 7 statement that Thailand does not recognise the jurisdiction of the court and proposed that all boundary-related issues be resolved through bilateral negotiations. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Straits Times
44 minutes ago
- Straits Times
S'pore embassy in Washington seeking US clarification on Harvard's visa ban
SINGAPORE - Singapore's embassy in Washington has been seeking clarification from the US State Department and Department of Homeland Security on President Donald Trump's directive prohibiting foreigners from entering the country to study at Harvard University. The embassy is hoping for clarity from US authorities in the next few days, including on whether there will be any delay in the processing of visas for Singaporeans hoping to study in the US, Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan said on June 7. In a zoom call with Singapore media to wrap up his five-day visit to Washington, he noted that many current and prospective students looking to study in the United States had expressed their concern to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs over potential visa delays. Asked to elaborate on contingencies being planned should Singaporean students find themselves unable to proceeds with their plans to study in the US, he said the Government is trying to find solutions to deal with the worst case scenario where students are not able to physically study in Boston. 'We've got some ideas for how we can help them to, in a sense, deal with that eventuality without impairing their academic and professional progress,' said Dr Balakrishnan. 'For others who are not yet here, who have not yet secured visas, you may also need to have backup plans, but my main point is we will stay in touch, and we will continue to keep you informed.' Dr Balakrishnan noted that Singapore's ambassador to the US Lui Tuck Yew has also held a virtual town hall with students currently studying in Harvard. In the virtual town hall on May 30, Mr Lui told Singaporean students at Harvard that the Republic's autonomous universities can offer them placements if they wish to discontinue their studies in the US and return home. A Ministry of Education spokesperson said this message was shared with affected students so they could consider returning to Singapore as a possible option to continue their studies. There are six autonomous universities here: National University of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Management University, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore University of Technology and Design and Singapore Institute of Technology. University statistics show that there are currently 151 Singaporean students in Harvard. Among them are 12 Public Service Commission scholarship holders. Foreign students at Harvard were thrown into limbo after Mr Trump's administration announced on May 22 that it had revoked Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Programme certification with immediate effect. The nearly 6,800 international students in the Ivy League college were given an ultimatum to either transfer to another institution, or face deportation. A federal judge later blocked the move, with the Trump administration rolling back its stance on May 29 and giving Harvard 30 days to submit evidence contesting the administration's plan to revoke the school's right to enrol international students. International students make up more than a quarter of Harvard's student body, but Mr Trump said the university should cap its international intake at 15 per cent. Dr Balakrishnan said the situation confronting international students stems from domestic political issues within the US. But students, including from Singapore, can become affected as collateral damage, and there will be a period of uncertainty of at least a few days or weeks. 'Nevertheless, we will continue to pursue this with the American authorities, and I hope we'll be able to find suitable solutions for our students who want to pursue educational opportunities in the United States.' At a macro level, it remains in both Singapore and the US' interests to keep opportunities open for Singaporeans who want to study and work in the US to expand their domain experience and their networks, he added. 'So this is an issue that we will continue to pursue with the State Department.' Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump has options to punish Musk even if his federal contracts continue
The relationship between US President Donald Trump and Mr Elon Musk exploded into warfare on June 5. PHOTO: HAIYUN JIANG/NYTIMES WASHINGTON - After the relationship between President Donald Trump and Mr Elon Musk exploded into warfare on June 5, Mr Trump suggested that he might eliminate the tech titan's federal contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it,' Mr Trump posted on his social media platform. That's not as easy as Mr Trump implies. The Pentagon and Nasa remain intensely reliant on SpaceX, Mr Musk's rocket launch and space-based communications company, to get to orbit and move government data across the world. But there are options available to the president that could make Mr Musk's relationship with the federal government much more difficult than it has been so far in Mr Trump's second administration. Mr Trump's most accessible weapon to punish Mr Musk is the ability to instruct federal regulators to intensify oversight of his business operations, reversing a slowdown in regulatory actions that benefited Mr Musk's businesses after Mr Trump was elected. 'In an administration that has defined itself by reducing regulation and oversight, it would not be difficult to selectively ramp up oversight again,' said Mr Steven Schooner, a former White House contracts lawyer who is now a professor at George Washington University. With a decree, Mr Trump could suspend Mr Musk's security clearance, a step that the Trump administration has also taken against some of its Biden-era critics. That move would make it harder for Mr Musk to continue in his role as CEO of SpaceX, given its billions of dollars in Pentagon contracts. Pentagon investigators had been examining whether Mr Musk has violated federal security clearance requirements for disclosing contacts with foreign government leaders, The New York Times reported in 2024. The Trump administration could also slow down new contracts going to SpaceX in the years to come, perhaps by looking for ways to drive more work to its rivals, such as Mr Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin or the Boeing and Lockheed partnership called United Launch Alliance. But billions of dollars in financial commitments have been made to SpaceX for launches that will be spread out over the rest of Mr Trump's term to deliver astronauts and cargo to the International Space Station and even the moon, as well as to send military and spy satellites into orbit. Moreover, the services SpaceX provides are vital to some of Mr Trump's top agenda items, such as building a new space-based missile defence programme that the Pentagon is calling Golden Dome. That programme will require dozens of launches to orbit as well as space-based observation and data transmission systems to track and help intercept missile threats. SpaceX is by far the dominant global player in these launches. While Blue Origin and other companies like Rocket Lab and Relativity Space are building or have recently built their own new rockets, none has the kind of launch record and reliability that SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket has. Overall, the federal government has awarded nearly US$18 billion (S$23 billion) in contracts to SpaceX over the past decade, including US$3.8 billion just in the 2024 fiscal year, according to a tally by the Times. That makes SpaceX one of the largest federal contractors, with most of that money coming from Nasa and the Pentagon. Terminating SpaceX's contracts 'would end the US capability to launch astronauts to orbit for the foreseeable future,' said Ms Laura Seward Forczyk, founder of the space consulting firm Astralytical. It would also significantly delay the US effort to return humans to the moon, she said. Ms Bethany Stevens, Nasa's press secretary, hinted on Mr Musk's X social platform late on June 5 afternoon – as the verbal war between Mr Musk and Mr Trump continued to play out – that the deals with SpaceX are in fact not going to be cancelled anytime soon. 'Nasa will continue to execute upon the President's vision for the future of space,' Ms Stevens said, without mentioning Musk or SpaceX by name. 'We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the President's objectives in space are met.' But Mr Trump has more flexibility when it comes to the alphabet soup of federal agencies that regulate SpaceX as well as Tesla, Mr Musk's car company; X; the Boring Co., his underground drilling outfit; and Neuralink, his computer chip brain implant startup. The federal government, by most historical and ethical norms, is not supposed to be used as a retaliatory machine to punish political enemies. And that practice by Mr Trump would be abnormal and inappropriate, Schooner said. But the Trump administration, including the Justice Department, has shown itself willing to take up investigations that target Mr Trump's enemies or organisations that he dislikes, like Harvard University or even his former aides who have become critics, like Mr Chris Krebs, his former top cybersecurity official. Before Mr Trump was elected, at least 11 federal agencies had ongoing investigations or lawsuits targeting Mr Musk's companies. These included the Federal Aviation Administration's scrutiny of launch safety issues, the Environmental Protection Agency's inquiry into potential water pollution at SpaceX's Texas launch site and transportation regulators' questions about fatal accidents involving Tesla cars using autopilot. Several of those inquiries were put on hold. In other instances, fines that Mr Musk's companies had been assessed were being reconsidered, including one that the FAA announced in September for what it said were safety violations during launches in Florida. Mr Trump's top transportation official vowed at his confirmation hearing to 'review' that fine. As of last week, it had still not been paid, an agency official said. The Fish and Wildlife Service also has slowed down its oversight of SpaceX's Texas launch site, where the company for years has been accused of damaging adjacent state park and National Wildlife Refuge lands. That enforcement effort could be turned back on almost overnight if Mr Trump ordered it. But no other US company can currently do what Nasa needs. Boeing, the other company Nasa hired to take astronauts to orbit, has yet to complete fixes for its Starliner capsule after a test mission left two Nasa astronauts, Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore, in orbit for nine months before they finally returned to Earth in a SpaceX Crew Dragon. Aerospace company Northrop Grumman also has a contract to take cargo to the space station with its Cygnus spacecraft, but the most recent Cygnus had to be scrapped after it was damaged during shipment to Florida for launch. Mr Musk appears to recognise this leverage he has over Nasa. He initially threatened on June 5, as the war of words with Mr Trump played out, to stop future flights to deliver astronauts to the space station, but he appeared to walk back that threat later in the day. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.