Tarrant County Redraws District Lines, Boosting Republican Advantage
'I don't apologize for being a Republican; I don't apologize for conservative values,' said Tarrant County Judge Tim O'Hare in the June 3 commissioners' meeting, attended by The Dallas Express. 'I never ever, on anything I vote on, think I'm doing this for the Republicans. I think the things that I stand for and ask for are good for everyone.'
After hours of public comment and deliberation, the Tarrant County Commissioners passed a redistricting measure on June 3. O'Hare and County Commissioners Matt Krause and Manny Ramirez voted in favor, and County Commissioners Roderick Miles Jr. and Alisa Simmons voted against.
The commissioners adopted 'map 7' out of multiple possible options. District 1 – which previously ran from Tarrant County's southwest corner to north of Arlington – now reaches from south-central Tarrant County to north of Arlington, then across the county's southeast border. The map also reshapes District 2 – which previously contained Arlington and Mansfield – to reach from Arlington, across the south side of the county, and up to Benbrook.
The county commissioners met on June 3 at 10 a.m. to consider the redistricting proposal. So many residents showed up that they filled the room, and deputies had to keep crowds – including several local journalists – waiting in the hall outside until there was enough space.
Racist Maps Or Good Government?
Public comment started close to 11 a.m. and lasted until after 2:15 p.m. Many residents opposed the redistricting plan, claiming it was 'racist' and 'gerrymandering.'
'Even Stevie Wonder can see that these maps are racist,' said Ebony Turner, who unsuccessfully ran for the Texas state House in 2024.
Turner called the maps 'gerrymandering' and suggested they could violate the Voting Rights Act and 14th Amendment. Another young lady approached the microphone to call the commissioners supporting redistricting 'sore Confederate losers with no shame.'
'When you disenfranchise voters by gerrymandering, you undermine our democracy,' said League of Women Voters Tarrant County President Janet Mattern at the meeting. 'When the people have no say in creating these maps, then you cannot say that they are created in the interests of the people.'
O'Hare ordered deputies to remove several attendees who violated decorum or spoke over their time, including a young woman wearing a keffiyeh – the black and white garment associated with Palestine and the terror group Hamas.
Many others, however, supported the redistricting measure as a way to ensure conservative governance.
A man who identified himself as Joe Jordan said he supported 'whatever turns out to be the most conservative' map. Another said the redistricting plan 'will ensure that our elected officials are truly accountable to the people' and will help compensate for the county's growth as the population recently surpassed 2.2 million. True Texas Project President Fran Rhodes supported redistricting as 'important' and suggested Map 7.
A statement on behalf of State Rep. Nate Schatzline was delivered by his district director: 'It is only right that our county representation reflects that conservative majority. We must ensure our voices are accurately represented,' Schatzline's statement read. 'We urge the commissioners to continue supporting this fair and transparent redistricting effort and encourage all conservatives to stay engaged and help secure strong, accurate representation for our future.'
Debating The Merits
Miles and Simmons were the measure's most vocal opponents on the commission.
Miles called for further deliberation, adding that other commissioners 'could have called' to speak with him about the proposed maps.
'It appears that race discrimination against blacks, Hispanics, and other racial minorities in Tarrant County is a substantial factor in the decision to redistrict mid-decade and to adopt this map,' Miles said.
Simmons explained that the proposed maps would 'put the majority of the communities of color in one precinct' and remove the 'key economic engines.'
'It's racial gerrymandering. It's intentional discrimination,' Simmons said.
County commissioners approved an agreement in April to consult with the conservative law firm Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) on redistricting. PILF lawyers were in the building at the time of the meeting but had planned to be in a back room for the commissioners' consultation.
Simmons demanded the PILF lawyers come before the public meeting for questioning. She apparently attempted to filibuster the meeting until O'Hare called a recess.
'They're going to bring their butts out here, and stand at that podium, and answer my questions,' she said. 'I'm going to continue speaking until they make their way out here.'
Arlington Mayor Jim Ross and Mansfield Mayor Michael Evans expressed concerns over the plan, suggesting future legal challenges. Ross said he was concerned the plan could violate 'state and federal law.' Evans said he agreed with commissioners that redistricting is important 'but not by any means necessary.'
'My concern is with ensuring that the current county process is compliant with the law,' Evans said. 'The current proposal maps could be subject to challenges at both the state and federal level.'
Fort Worth passed a resolution last month condemning Tarrant County's redistricting efforts, as The Dallas Express reported at the time. Ten mayors—including Ross, Evans, and Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker—also signed a letter opposing the redistricting plan on May 10.
Two of the mayors later withdrew their signatures after conducting further research, and several others have continued to support the redistricting plan.
Krause thanked those mayors for the 'courageous move,' adding that the letter operated on 'flawed information.' He also explained the legal basis for the redistricting proposal in the state election code.
'It's a simple read. It's a simple exception that they should have been able to find really clearly,' Krause said. 'So to me, when you get something that obvious, that clear, wrong – that puts into doubt all their other analysis.'
Ramirez said he did his 'due diligence' independently and ran the plan through multiple lawyers. He thanked anyone with 'legitimate concern' about the legal issues for voicing their objections.
'I wanted to make sure that what we were doing was absolutely legally justified,' Ramirez said. 'I hoped that we could have had some ideas presented from our other colleagues up here, but that was not the case. So we are where we are.'
In a previous article for The Dallas Express, Ramirez explained that Democrats used redistricting to gain an advantage in Dallas and Harris counties, but it can help maintain Republican governance in Tarrant County.
Changing Tune
After the federal census of 2020, Dallas conducted redistricting, but Tarrant County refrained from the process.
When Dallas County redrew its district lines to give Democrats an advantage in 2021, The Dallas Morning News admitted this would 'dilute Republican voting power while solidifying Democratic control' – but said it would 'improve the voting power of Hispanics and keep cities grouped in single districts.' The sole Republican county commissioner, J.J. Koch, was then ousted in the next election.
However, when Tarrant County planned redistricting for a Republican advantage, The Dallas Morning News published several articles criticizing the plan. The paper's editorial staff wrote an article titled 'Tarrant County redistricting proposal is bad government,' which claimed, 'hyperpartisan gerrymandering weakens the diversity of viewpoints among our elected leaders, eroding the resilience of our democracy.'
Chris Putnam, CEO of The Dallas Express, explained on X that this is a stark change from The Dallas Morning News' approach to Dallas' redistricting plan in 2021:
'The only difference of course is that one is a D controlled commissioner's court and the other is R controlled,' Putnam wrote. 'And the Dallas Morning News is literally the daily newsletter for the woke, far-left.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
9 minutes ago
- New York Post
Democrats facing crisis as more than 2M voters leave party in four years: analysis
The Democratic Party is bleeding registered voters, suffering a 4.5 million swing against it that could take years to recover from, according to a new report. Between the 2020 and 2024 presidential elections, Democrats lost about 2.1 million voters across the 30 states that track registration by political party, according to a New York Times analysis of data gathered by the L2 tracking firm. Over the same period, the Republican Party gained 2.4 million registered voters. Officially, there are still more registered Democrats than Republicans nationwide, but that number is incomplete because blue states like California and New York allow voters to register by party — as does the District of Columbia — while reliably red states like Texas, Missouri and Ohio do not. Most alarmingly for Democrats, the decline is nationwide, with the US seeing more new voters registering with the GOP in 2024 for the first time in six years. Democrats also saw their registered voter advantage dwindle in four 2024 battleground states — Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina and Pennsylvania — all of which President Trump carried this past Nov. 5. Democrats lost about 2.1 million registered voters in the 30 states that track registration by political party. AP Michael Pruser, who tracks voter registration closely as the director of data science for Decision Desk HQ, warned that the numbers not only help explain Trump's victory last year — in which he became the first Republican presidential candidate to win the popular vote in 20 years — but also forecast significant headwinds for Democrats in next year's midterm elections as well as the 2028 presidential vote. 'I don't want to say, 'The death cycle of the Democratic Party,'' Pruser told the Times, 'but there seems to be no end to this.' 'There is no silver lining or cavalry coming across the hill. This is month after month, year after year,' he added. In North Carolina, Democrats lost 115,523 voters between the 2020 and 2024 election, with Republicans gaining more than 140,000 members and erasing the Dems' registration advantage, according to the L2 data. More new voters registered to be Republican than Democrat last year, the first time since 2018. Michael Nagle Democrats suffered similar losses in Arizona and Pennsylvania, while in Nevada — a state whose politics were long dominated by the Las Vegas-based Culinary Workers Union — the share of registered Democrats suffered the second-steepest plunge of those states measured between 2020 and 2024. (Only deep-red West Virginia saw more precipitous losses.). Even Democratic bastions like New York and California were not safe from voter erosion, with Dems losing 305,922 registered voters in the Empire State in between the two elections. In California, Democrats lost 680,556 voters between 2020 and 2024. All in all, Democrats went from enjoying an advantage of nearly 11 percentage points over Republicans in registered voter numbers in 2020 to just over six percentage points across the 30 states and DC in 2024, the Times found. Experts believe that the fall of new Democratic registrations can be linked to the growing number of voters choosing to be independents or unaffiliated, a trend that is sapping both parties' rolls. In 2018, more than one-third (34%) of new voter registrations nationwide were Democrats, while registered Republicans made up just 20% of new voters. As of last year, however, Republicans had erased that gap, with party supporters making up 29% of new voters, while Democrats made up 26% of new voters.
Newsweek
9 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Gavin Newsom's Redistricting Ballot Measure Chances of Passing—New Poll
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California Governor Gavin Newsom's redistricting ballot measure has support from a majority of the state's voters, according to a new poll. Newsweek reached out to Newsom and the California GOP for comment via email. Why It Matters The redistricting arms race between California, Texas and other states could have key implications for the midterms. Texas, with the support of President Donald Trump, first announced plans to redraw its map to become more favorable to Republicans and thwart losses in the midterms, but Newsom has warned California could redraw its map to benefit Democrats in return. California Democrats' ability to do so may hinge on the outcome of a ballot measure Newsom announced last week that would allow a new map drafted by legislators to temporarily replace the boundaries drawn up by the state's independent redistricting committee following the 2020 census. If the ballot measure is successful, it could neutralize efforts from Texas Republicans. But if it fails, Republicans may be able to net several seats in not only Texas, but also other GOP states like Indiana and Missouri. What to Know A new poll from Newsom's pollster, reported by Axios, suggests a majority of voters are prepared to support the ballot measure. The poll, conducted by David Binder, showed that 57 percent of California voters are in support of the proposal. Only 35 percent were opposed to it, while 8 percent remained undecided. Among Democrats, the ballot measure had 84 percent support, while only 13 percent opposed it. Among Republicans, 79 percent were opposed, the poll found, according to Axios. California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks during a press conference in Los Angeles on August 14, 2025. California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks during a press conference in Los Angeles on August 14, poll surveyed 1,000 likely voters from August 10 to August 14, 2025, and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. California remains a solidly blue state where Democrats handily outnumber Republicans. Former Vice President Kamala Harris carried it by 20 points last November, so Democrats are hopeful this ballot measure will fall on partisan lines. But the state has an independent redistricting community that was passed by voters and remains popular. A Politico poll released last week found that 64 percent of California voters support keeping the commission, while only 36 percent support returning redistricting authority to the state legislature. Newsom, who is viewed as a potential 2028 presidential candidate, has cast the ballot measure as a temporary measure, which would no longer be in effect after the 2030 census, which is only in response to Texas' redistricting efforts. It would not go into effect unless Texas or other Republican states first redraw their lines. Republicans, however, have described it as a power grab that violates the will of Californians. What People Are Saying David Binder wrote in the poll, per Axios: "Voter trends on this measure closely mirror the presidential election results of November 2024, in which Kamala Harris defeated Donald Trump in California by 58% to 38%. Poll results indicate that Proposition 50 will fall along similar partisan lines." Representative Kevin Kiley, a California Republican, wrote to X on Tuesday: "Newsom is overthrowing the Redistricting Commission in order to make California 'a whole lot bluer.' To accomplish this, his proposal expressly overrides the entire State Constitution. Partisan gerrymandering will become the supreme law of the land." Governor Newsom wrote to X on Tuesday: "Unlike Texas, we're not following @realDonaldTrump's orders to quietly try to redistrict our way out of losing the next election. In California, we're working transparently to respond if Texas enacts new maps — and we'll give the power to the people to make our final decision." What Happens Next Voters will make their decision about the redistricting plan in November. Both Democrats and Republicans will spend the coming months making their case to voters on whether the ballot measure should pass. Meanwhile, the redistricting war continues across the country, with Trump urging Texas Republicans to pass their plan "ASAP."
Axios
9 minutes ago
- Axios
Texas law requiring Ten Commandments temporarily halted in some schools
A federal judge in San Antonio temporarily barred some school districts from implementing a Texas law requiring every public school classroom to display the Ten Commandments. Why it matters: The ruling slows one of the nation's most aggressive pushes to mandate religious displays in public schools — setting up a likely First Amendment fight that could reach the Supreme Court. Catch up quick: The law, passed by the Republican-controlled Legislature earlier this year, mandated a 16x20-inch Ten Commandments poster in every classroom and was set to take effect Sept. 1. Sixteen Texas families from San Antonio, Austin, Houston and elsewhere — backed by the American Civil Liberties Union — sued in July to stop it, naming 11 school districts, including Alamo Heights, Northside, Northeast and Lackland ISDs. Caveat: U.S. District Judge Fred Biery's order only blocks the law in the 11 districts named in the lawsuit — in the Austin, San Antonio, Houston and Dallas areas — not statewide. What they're saying: Biery wrote that the law would likely result in unconstitutional religious coercion. "The displays are likely to pressure the child-Plaintiffs into religious observance, meditation on, veneration, and adoption of the State's favored religious scripture, and into suppressing expression of their own religious or nonreligious background and beliefs while at school," he wrote. "Children's religious beliefs should be instilled by parents and faith communities, not politicians and public schools," San Antonio plaintiff Rabbi Mara Nathan said in a statement. The other side: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton told CBS he would appeal the ruling. "The Ten Commandments are a cornerstone of our moral and legal heritage, and their presence in classrooms serves as a reminder of the values that guide responsible citizenship," Paxton said in a statement. Texas will always defend our right to uphold the foundational principles that have built this nation, and I will absolutely be appealing this flawed decision."
