logo
Half of Iowa Tuition Grant funds could go to students in ‘high-demand' fields

Half of Iowa Tuition Grant funds could go to students in ‘high-demand' fields

Yahoo12-02-2025

A bill to allocate half of Iowa Tuition Grant dollars to students pursuing degrees leading to a high-demand career will move to committee. (Photo by)
A bill that would funnel a portion of Iowa Tuition Grant dollars toward high-demand job fields passed out of subcommittee Tuesday afternoon despite concerns from private college representatives about how it could impact students.
House Study Bill 62 would require the Iowa College Student Aid Commission, which oversees the Iowa Tuition Grant program, to allocate 50% of funds for the program to students earning degrees that 'correspond to high-wage and high-demand jobs,' based on a list created by the state workforce development board and the Iowa Association of Independent Colleges and Universities.
Criteria for job fields to be put on the list include a starting salary of at least $40,000, the acquirement of a bachelor's degree or initial or intern teaching license for Iowa, and either a projected at-least 1% annual growth rate of new job openings or predicted annual job openings of at least 250 positions over the next five years, according to the legislation.
The Iowa Tuition Grant program, founded more than 50 years ago, provides scholarships to qualifying students attending an Iowa private university. Gary Steinke, president of the Iowa Association of Independent Colleges and Universities, said during the meeting this bill would negatively impact students who most need the financial aid, and those who hope to study religion, alongside other important programs.
'This is a bill that really targets most low-income Iowa students,' Steinke said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Steinke said faith-based universities are also concerned about the legislation, as it could impact the many students who are seeking an education grounded in faith and religion, with majors that might not qualify as leading to a high-demand job field.
Mark Felderman, who spoke during public comment on behalf of Faith Baptist Bible College in Ankeny, shared the concerns Steinke brought up and asked if majors mentioning the Bible or faith are the ones being targeted by this legislation.
'If we look at what's our best return on investment in these dollars, I think you want students who graduate from a good institution, who can think, who can communicate … those who know how to interact with each other, have grounding in some of the classics and literature, have some philosophy, all of those things,' Felderman said. 'And ultimately, these are the folks we want in Iowa, because they're formed to be good people.'
Subcommittee member Rep. Jennifer Konfrst, D-Windsor Heights, asked Steinke how many students change their major while attending university, to which he said it can vary from year to year, but it generally averages around 50%.
Rep. Taylor Collins, R-Mediapolis, chaired the subcommittee, joined by Konfrst and Rep. Jeff Shipley, R-Birmingham. Shipley said he feels it is important for the state to exercise oversight of the Iowa Tuition Grant program and ensure it aids in completing state objectives.
Collins said discussion on the Iowa Tuition Grant program was a long time coming, as it was formed more than 50 years ago. He said the point of the Higher Education Committee is to review all areas of higher education in the state, including public universities, community and private colleges. He said he's also looking for colleges to provide data on how many students are using the Iowa Tuition Grant, and Konfrst said she'd like to know if these students are staying in Iowa after graduation.
The bill will be considered next by the full Higher Education Committee.
'The point of this is really to start this is really to start this conversation,' Collins said.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

We're all going to die but Joni Ernst wants to speed it up
We're all going to die but Joni Ernst wants to speed it up

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

We're all going to die but Joni Ernst wants to speed it up

By now, I'm sure you all have seen U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst's statement to an Iowa town hall audience, after a woman cried out that people are going to die because of Medicaid cuts. Ernst's response was, "Well, we all are going to die." If that ridiculously glib statement wasn't enough, Ernst's sarcastic 'apology,' given in a cemetery, was even worse. She's in a graveyard, using dead people as props, looking eerily like the crypt keeper. That apology was so insincere, it should have come with a laugh track. Ernst is saying that people are just too sensitive to understand that cutting health care is just natural selection. She should have made her video in a funeral home instead. She could tell watchers that they don't need health care because they are all going to be here soon, anyway. More: What's next for the Iowan who shouted 'people will die' at Joni Ernst over Medicaid cuts Then, Ernst told people that if they really want eternal life, maybe they should just get right with Jesus. Sen. Ernst, you're gutting Medicaid. I think Jesus said, "Love thy neighbor," not, "Strip their health insurance, and then sell them a prayer cloth on eBay." Nothing says do unto others, like gutting Medicaid while standing in a graveyard, like a ghoul. Why worry about your cancer diagnosis when you can just accept Jesus? And get ready to meet him, real soon. The Republican Party is not only pro-life until birth, they are pro-death once you can't pay your doctor bill. Opinion: Sen. Joni Ernst helps GOP find its authentic voice: 'We all are going to die.' Jesus said to feed the hungry and heal the sick. Ernst's idea of Christian charity is to hand out shovels and tell you to dig your own grave. This self-appointed apostle of corn-fed Christian virtue, with a Bible in one hand and a military budget in the other, acts like she's in the "Real Housewives of Gallilee." Ernst is the kind of Christian who invites you to Bible study, and then sends your kids to war, to keep us safe, but not safe enough to give the kids affordable health care when they come back. Jesus said to welcome the stranger and let him in. Republicans say that we can't let "woke" Jesus mess with our America First policy of arresting, detaining and deporting refugees. The next time Joni Ernst tells you about her deep Christian faith, remember, if Jesus were handing out loaves of bread and fish, Ernst would be demanding he privatize the fish market. People are gonna die, and Ernst is making sure they die faster, with the most insincere apology video the world has ever seen. No Medicaid? No problem. The cemetery is open all day long. So here's to you, Sen. Ernst. May your "We all are going to die" tour sell out fast − faster than your next fundraiser with Big Pharma. And you are right, we all are going to die. But it ain't supposed to be because of you. Mel Shuller, Montgomery This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: Joni Ernst thinks gutting Medicaid is just natural selection | Letter

As a Christian teacher, Biden's Title IX rule made my job nearly impossible
As a Christian teacher, Biden's Title IX rule made my job nearly impossible

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

As a Christian teacher, Biden's Title IX rule made my job nearly impossible

It may be hard for government officials to believe that rewriting the 52-year-old Title IX law to include "gender identity" as a protected category could seriously impact one teacher in one small county of south-central Tennessee. It's difficult enough convincing those officials that doing so is causing irreparable harm to countless girls and young women all over the damage to all of us is no less real for the fact that the Biden administration deliberately turned a blind eye to it and a deaf ear to a growing chorus of response, 26 states, represented in multiple lawsuits, sued and won injunctions temporarily blocking the administration's Title IX rule in some parts of the country. More: Judge axes Biden Title IX rule against transgender discrimination after Tenn., other states sue But now, a ruling issued by a federal district court in Kentucky, in a case involving Tennessee, blocks enforcement of that rule nationwide, permanently wiping away every part of it across the entire country. And since then, the Trump administration has issued a letter agreeing with that court decision and declaring it would not try to enforce the rule anywhere across the ruling, bolstered by the recent Trump administration letter, now protects school districts, teachers, and students across the country from a brutal government overreach that tried to redefine 'sex' in federal law. The Biden Title IX rule violated biological reality, science, and common sense; threatened women's advancements in education and athletics; callously dismissed the rights of parents and their children; and posed a potent threat to the privacy and safety of young women. As a teacher, not all of those particular dangers and humiliations impact me directly. But I'm a member of Christian Educators Association International, an organization represented by Alliance Defending Freedom in one of those federal lawsuits (State of Tennessee v. Cardona) because the Biden administration's Title IX rule did threaten my work and freedom. Opinion: Riley Gaines: I'm in Nashville to protest Biden's Title IX changes and fight for women's sports I just finished my 11th year as a public high school teacher. My current classes include statistics, geometry, and the Bible as literature. I'm also moderator for a Christian club on our campus. My statistics classes often involve comparing results of studies between men and women. How could I discuss those comparisons in a way that didn't violate some student's notions of gender identity?How could I lead a discussion of the biblical story of creation, sex and marriage without contradicting the administration's regulations on those subjects?How could I participate in any casual conversation on these subjects with my colleagues without potentially provoking the outrage of someone who disagrees with me?If the Biden rule went into effect, my district's policy on these issues would require faculty, staff and students to report any conduct they consider a violation to the district's official Title IX coordinator. That means anyone taking offense at anything I say (or don't say) could have gotten me into a great deal of trouble — career-ending trouble. Obviously, my best bet is to just not 'go there.' Don't compare statistics on men and women. Don't teach gender-related passages of the Bible. Drop out of my role with the Christian club. But that would mean compromising my work and surrendering my freedom of speech, as surely as so many young women are surrendering their privacy, safety, and dreams of athletic achievement — and as surely as so many of us are being asked to ignore biological an incredibly high price for all of us to pay for changing — to gain political capital — a federal law that, as is, has reaped enormous benefits for women across America for 52 benefit of teaching geometry is that I've learned where to draw the line. Now a federal court has confirmed what most people can plainly see: The Biden administration illegally stepped over the line when it tried to write gender ideology into Title IX. I just hope — for all our sakes — that common sense continues to make progress like this across the Taylor teaches high school in Coffee County, Tennessee. This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: I'm a teacher who's glad Biden couldn't redefine sex | Opinion

When My Teacher Made Me Pray
When My Teacher Made Me Pray

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

When My Teacher Made Me Pray

When I was in second grade, my teacher made us pray that the law would change so that a day at school could once again begin with a prayer. I was 7, but even at that age, I knew there was something nonsensical about praying to be allowed to pray. This was at a public school outside Philadelphia in the 1960s, not that long after the Supreme Court ruled that prayer in public schools violated the Constitution. In our predominantly Catholic neighborhood, my family, with its three kids, seemed to me to be abnormally small. There were 30 students or more in that class, and I was probably the only Jewish kid. I bowed my head to my desk and mouthed the words the teacher asked us to recite. She also asked us to bring Bibles to class. I don't know why—maybe to ascertain who among us had one at home. We didn't have anything at home we called a Bible. My family attended a Reform synagogue, and we were not particularly observant. But I would have known by then that I was different from my classmates, because we did not celebrate Christmas. I felt singled out as different, Bible-less and unholy, and it caused me to shut down. That year, I came home with C's and D's on my report cards. [Elizabeth Bruenig: Who counts as Christian?] When my parents asked what was wrong, I would say 'nothing.' I was a middle child, and my role in the family was to never be too much trouble. But my silence ran deeper than that. I knew that if I told my parents about my teacher, they would go to my school and raise objections. That would shine an even brighter spotlight on me, which was the last thing I wanted. I must have figured that it was better for my parents to think I was kind of dumb. I've thought about that long-ago experience a lot recently, now that religion, and specifically Christianity, is ascending in public life. A couple weeks ago, Pete Hegseth, the nation's top military leader, led what was called the 'Secretary of Defense Christian Prayer & Worship Service' at the Pentagon. As described in a New York Times story, it sounded like a revival meeting. 'This is precisely where I need to be, and I think exactly where we need to be as a nation, at this moment,' Hegseth said: 'in prayer, on bended knee, recognizing the providence of our Lord and savior Jesus Christ.' He continued, 'King Jesus, we come humbly before you, seeking your face, seeking your grace, in humble obedience to your law and to your word.' In Texas, Governor Greg Abbott is expected to sign legislation requiring classrooms in the state's roughly 9,000 public schools to be postered with copies of the Ten Commandments. This school year, for the first time, teachers in Oklahoma were ordered to keep a Bible in their classroom: 'Every teacher, every classroom in the state, will have a Bible in the classroom, and will be teaching from the Bible in the classroom,' said the state superintendent. He stressed the historical importance of the text for America's Founding Fathers and suggested that it could be brought into science classes as part of discussions about how it inspired investigations into 'God's creation.' He expected 'immediate and strict compliance' with the mandate. To make the case for more religious content in schools and elsewhere in public life, proponents often argue that the Fathers were men of faith who believed that the nation and even the Constitution itself were divinely inspired. History suggests this is an exaggeration at best. The Founders were men of the Enlightenment, and some, including Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and Ben Franklin, were attracted to Deism—a belief system that stresses rationality over superstition and rejects the notion of a supreme being who intervenes in the universe. That's a long way from the Christian nationalism of Hegseth and others who are now seeking to bring their faith into the public square. [Molly Worthen: What the fastest-growing Christian group reveals about America] But we are of course a Christian nation and probably will always remain so. No one knows that better than non-Christians. It is a fact of life, and not an unhappy one, or at least not for me. I am married to a woman who grew up attending a Presbyterian church. We raised our children in both of our traditions. There is a big difference, however, between the choices we make and the ones forced on us. The aggressive push to flood the nation with religious faith—a specific faith, and a particular strain of that faith—undermines any notion of American plurality. It comes at a cost not just to the nation, but to individual Americans. You want to advance in Hegseth's Pentagon? You would do well to attend one of his prayer services—they are going to be held monthly—to pray, and to do so conspicuously and in full voice. Thirty-one million people live in Texas—67 percent of whom identify as Christian. The rest, about 10 million Texans, are Muslim, Jewish, Buddhist, Hindu, or a mix that a Pew Research Center study identified as atheists, agnostics, and 'nothing in particular.' Some children from those families will now have to sit in school while a faith other than their own is pressed on them. They'll feel, as I did, like an interloper—unwelcome in their own classroom. Article originally published at The Atlantic

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store