Private hospital operator Healthscope falls into receivership but assures patients it's business as usual
Healthscope's lenders on Monday appointed McGrathNicol Restructuring as receivers after being handed control by its former owner, US private equity giant Brookfield, earlier in May.
KordaMentha has been appointed as administrator.
Health Minister Mark Butler — who was reappointed to his role in Anthony Albanese's second term of government — has already said it would not bail Healthscope out.
In a statement, Healthscope said while the parent companies were in receivership, the operational business — which runs the hospitals — is not.
It said all 37 hospitals across the country — including the Prince of Wales in Sydney and Melbourne's Knox Private Hospital — would remain open and operating on a business-as-usual basis with no impact on its 19,000 staff, doctors or patient care.
In WA, it operates the Mount Hospital on Mounts Bay Road in central Perth.
Healthscope chief executive Tino La Spina said there was no interruption to patient care.
'Our incredible teams are all working as normal, providing the high standard of care they always have,' he said.
McGrathNicol partner and receiver Keith Crawford said there were no plans for closures or redundancies, and the intention was to transition to new ownership.
'We want to make it clear that the subsidiaries that own and operate Healthscope's network of hospitals are not affected by our appointment to the shareholding companies,' he said.
'Our immediate focus is to engage constructively with all key stakeholders to ensure uninterrupted operation of Healthscope hospitals and continuity of best practice standards of patient care.'
It comes as Commonwealth Bank provides an additional $100 million in loan funding to help keep the hospitals operating while McGrathNicol undertakes a sales process.
The funding package from CBA was in addition to Healthscope's current cash balance of $110m. Healthscope's existing working capital financier is also providing support.
Healthscope said key supplier relationships would remain unaffected, with payment terms maintained.
The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation said it was in discussions with State and Federal governments to avoid closures, and wanted a say in who would control the company.
Mr Butler expects an orderly sales process for Healthscope.
'Throughout this process the government has been meeting regularly with Healthscope and we have clear expectations the hospital group, lenders, and landlords to act cooperatively and deliver the least disruptive outcome for patients, staff, and the broader health system,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canberra Times
43 minutes ago
- Canberra Times
AI regulation at the heart of the public sector's roundtable pitch
A pause on changes to the National Construction Code and a plan to clear a backlog of housing approvals could also be on the agenda, according to leaked Treasury documents that Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese have both played down.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Government must make clear roundtable is only the first step
A month after the election, Anthony Albanese gave a speech to the National Press Club. Eight days later, Jim Chalmers did the same. The two speeches were monologues, of course – but seemed to be in dialogue with each other. Albanese announced a roundtable at which the government would try to build support for economic reform, 'to drive growth, boost productivity, strengthen the budget and secure the resilience of our economy'. Chalmers, speaking of that same roundtable, said – almost as though replying directly to the prime minister – 'No sensible progress can be made on productivity, resilience or budget sustainability without proper consideration of more tax reform.' So if we don't see any tax reform coming directly out of this roundtable – which finally arrives this week – will the rest of us be justified in saying 'no sensible progress' has been made? The short answer is no – but with some important caveats. Why shouldn't the government be ridiculed if it fails to do much on tax this week? The answer lies in timing. Labor has been careful to keep its goals for the roundtable pretty broad. It has talked about building consensus and shaping long-term directions; it wants the event to 'lead to' concrete actions, with ideas generated for the next three budgets. All this can sound a bit of a squib – but there are good political reasons to proceed cautiously. It's highly unlikely most voters are ready for a series of tax announcements. Remember that Labor, early in its first term, foreshadowed tough conversations with voters about precisely these topics: spending and taxing. We need more services, which means we need more tax, which is harder to get with an ageing population. The government knew those conversations needed time. In the end, though, it didn't end up having them, for good reason: inflation made it a pretty stupid time to be asking people to pay more tax. Loading Now the government is having to start that process again. This time, that tax conversation has been reframed, to be about productivity. Productivity has been the government's buzzword since election night. But in political terms, that's no time at all. If anyone at the summit thinks 'productivity' has penetrated the dinner table discussions of most families yet, they're crazy. That's the argument for not acting straightaway. At the other end of the spectrum is the idea Labor will take only big changes – in particular on tax – to the next election. The prime minister has previously spoken of perhaps taking more of his universal childcare agenda to the next election. So you can imagine the government offering, at that poll, a new tax agenda alongside other changes – so that, say, higher taxes were balanced by better or cheaper services, such as childcare. This approach would be consistent with past Labor policies to introduce universal care, such as Medicare and the NDIS, both of which came with levies attached. (The opposition says, 'you don't raise living standards by raising taxes', which sounds like common sense until you remember Medicare did exactly that.)
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Government must make clear roundtable is only the first step
A month after the election, Anthony Albanese gave a speech to the National Press Club. Eight days later, Jim Chalmers did the same. The two speeches were monologues, of course – but seemed to be in dialogue with each other. Albanese announced a roundtable at which the government would try to build support for economic reform, 'to drive growth, boost productivity, strengthen the budget and secure the resilience of our economy'. Chalmers, speaking of that same roundtable, said – almost as though replying directly to the prime minister – 'No sensible progress can be made on productivity, resilience or budget sustainability without proper consideration of more tax reform.' So if we don't see any tax reform coming directly out of this roundtable – which finally arrives this week – will the rest of us be justified in saying 'no sensible progress' has been made? The short answer is no – but with some important caveats. Why shouldn't the government be ridiculed if it fails to do much on tax this week? The answer lies in timing. Labor has been careful to keep its goals for the roundtable pretty broad. It has talked about building consensus and shaping long-term directions; it wants the event to 'lead to' concrete actions, with ideas generated for the next three budgets. All this can sound a bit of a squib – but there are good political reasons to proceed cautiously. It's highly unlikely most voters are ready for a series of tax announcements. Remember that Labor, early in its first term, foreshadowed tough conversations with voters about precisely these topics: spending and taxing. We need more services, which means we need more tax, which is harder to get with an ageing population. The government knew those conversations needed time. In the end, though, it didn't end up having them, for good reason: inflation made it a pretty stupid time to be asking people to pay more tax. Loading Now the government is having to start that process again. This time, that tax conversation has been reframed, to be about productivity. Productivity has been the government's buzzword since election night. But in political terms, that's no time at all. If anyone at the summit thinks 'productivity' has penetrated the dinner table discussions of most families yet, they're crazy. That's the argument for not acting straightaway. At the other end of the spectrum is the idea Labor will take only big changes – in particular on tax – to the next election. The prime minister has previously spoken of perhaps taking more of his universal childcare agenda to the next election. So you can imagine the government offering, at that poll, a new tax agenda alongside other changes – so that, say, higher taxes were balanced by better or cheaper services, such as childcare. This approach would be consistent with past Labor policies to introduce universal care, such as Medicare and the NDIS, both of which came with levies attached. (The opposition says, 'you don't raise living standards by raising taxes', which sounds like common sense until you remember Medicare did exactly that.)
