
Tariff Tracker, May 26: After EU reprieve, will South Korea secure a deal with the US?
Two days after threatening to impose 50% tariffs on the European Union, US President Donald Trump announced on Sunday (May 25) that he would hold off implementing these until July 9.
In a social media post, he said he had spoken to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who had requested an extension of the June 1 deadline he imposed on Friday. In a separate social post, von der Leyen wrote that the two leaders had a 'good call,' and that Europe was 'ready to advance talks swiftly and decisively.'
On Friday (May 23), Trump announced he would impose 50% tariffs on imports from the EU, effective June 1, signalling his impatience with the pace of the talks. This builds on his animosity towards the bloc, a longtime ally of the US. His tariff threat sent markets spiralling downward on fears of an escalating trade war.
According to a report by The New York Times, European officials had submitted a term sheet with details of their offers towards a trade deal with the US. This included mutually ending tariffs on industrial goods, a commitment to increase purchases of US fuel, and seeking reduced tariffs on European goods, specifically on cars and pharma. The Trump administration has taken issue with EU policies it cites as discriminating against US businesses, including the European value-added tax.
The US is the EU's largest trading partner, accounting for 20% of its goods exports last year. Data from the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) revealed that the US ran a $235.6 billion trade deficit with the EU in 2024, a 12.9% increase over the previous year.
The European Commission estimates that American tariffs would impact around 70% of the bloc's goods trade with the US. As things stand, the EU already faces 25% tariffs on exports of automobiles and metals, as well as 10% retaliatory tariffs on all non-goods exports, slated to increase to 20% from July 8.
Overall tariffs on the EU could increase to 97%, following the Section 232 investigations opened by the White House into pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, critical minerals, and trucks.
Should all talks fail and Trump's tariffs become effective, the EU is set to unfurl countermeasures worth €21 billion. These would impact US exports of maize, wheat, motorcycles and clothing. A separate set of tariffs targets €95 billion of items, including Boeing aircraft, cars and bourbon whiskey, excluded from the earlier list.
South Korea next in the firing line?
The US has reportedly asked South Korea, its long-time ally with which it enjoys a Free Trade Agreement, to resolve the trade imbalance in commodities between both countries, Reuters reported on Monday. USTR data reveals that the US ran a $66 billion trade deficit with South Korea in 2024, a 29.2% increase over 2023.
According to the report, the two countries entered technical consultations in Washington last week to discuss tariff and non-tariff measures flagged in the USTR's 2025 National Trade Estimate (NTE) Report on Foreign Trade Barriers. Among other things, the NTE Report took note of the Korean import ban on American beef from cattle aged over 30 months, emissions regulations on imported cars and pharma pricing policies.
The US and South Korea also reportedly engaged in discussions on economic security and goods origins. In the past, Trump has threatened to withdraw some American troops from South Korea, which would expose it to threats from North Korea. South Korea is dependent on nuclear deterrence from the US, with interim President Han Duck-soo describing the support of the US as 'absolutely critical for us' to The Economist.
The two countries have engaged in talks since Trump announced the 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April, with a view to finalising a trade deal. South Korea currently faces 25% 'reciprocal' tariffs on its exports, and continues to push for tariff exemptions. It will also be affected by the 25% tariffs on automobiles and metals.
The IMF reduced South Korea's growth forecast to 1% following the tariff announcements, while Trump's Korea tariffs violate several terms of the US-Korea FTA in place since 2012. Trump claims that South Korea tariffs American goods by 50%, which the South Korean government has refuted, saying the average tariff rate on US imports under the FTA is less than 1%.
Last week, poll-bound South Korea announced a round of support measures for its key export industries of biopharmaceuticals and automotives against Trump's tariffs.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
22 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Canada PM's emergency economy move amid Trump's '51st State' threats, tariffs
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced economic measures on June 6, in response to mounting fears over U.S. President Donald Trump's threats of new tariffs and rhetoric about Canada becoming America's '51st state.' Speaking at a news conference on Parliament Hill alongside Dominic LeBlanc and Chrystia Freeland, Carney unveiled the 'One Canadian Economy' legislative package, aimed at strengthening internal free trade. Watch for more


Economic Times
23 minutes ago
- Economic Times
SEC's crypto confusion deepens as next-gen ETFs test limits
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel A new line of yield-chasing crypto funds is forcing the Securities and Exchange Commission to confront unresolved gaps in its regulatory framework, just as the Trump administration eases oversight of digital immediate dispute centres on two proposed funds from ETF firms REX Financial and Osprey Funds that would allow investors to earn rewards by deploying Ether and Solana tokens to help validate blockchain transactions, a process known as staking. The firms said they had cleared an initial SEC registration hurdle last week, but agency staff took the unusual step of objecting that very same evening. Staff warned the products may not meet standards to qualify as investment companies under federal law, raising broader questions about the regulation of a hot corner of the crypto-investment staff noted that to meet the definition of an investment company, a firm must primarily invest in securities. That's a problem when it comes to digital assets: there are no clear lines around what crypto activities trip securities laws and what don't.'When ETFs generate income from staking, they may start to resemble traditional investment companies under the Investment Company Act — especially if investors are relying on the managerial efforts of others to earn those returns,' said Adam Gana, an attorney at law firm Gana Weinstein LLP. 'However, these types of ETFs are testing the boundaries of what counts as an investment company, and the SEC is sending mixed signals.'Gana added that 'just because you throw some stocks into the mix doesn't mean the SEC will look the other way.'The SEC, REX and Osprey declined to comment. The general counsel at REX said earlier that the firm expected to satisfy the SEC's crypto industry has long argued that many tokens aren't securities and shouldn't fall under the SEC rules. Under Trump, the agency has appeared open to these arguments, and its new chair, Paul Atkins, is a proponent of digital currencies. SEC staff guidance has signalled that memecoins and stablecoins may fall outside securities recently as May 29, the staff said federal securities laws generally don't apply to staking activities — further complicating the regulatory picture as firms try to launch novel piecemeal statements create inconsistent policy, according to Corey Frayer, director of investor protection at the Consumer Federation of America.'The SEC and the industry don't get to treat crypto assets as securities when it's convenient, and not as securities when they want weaker regulation,' said Frayer, who served as a senior adviser to former SEC Chair Gary Gensler, a frequent target of crypto industry the crux of the matter is the so-called Howey test , which comes from a 1946 Supreme Court decision that still governs securities classification. Under the test, an asset can be considered a security — and thus will fall under SEC purview — if investors contribute capital with the expectation derived from the managerial efforts of others. Bitcoin is generally considered a commodity but the status of other tokens like Ether and Solana are less Commissioner Hester Peirce, head of the agency's crypto task force, took the unusual step of highlighting the SEC staff's queries about whether the proposed funds met the definition.'I have those same questions,' Peirce wrote in a post on Trump embraced the digital-asset industry during his reelection campaign, pledging to make the US the 'crypto capital of the planet.' Since re-entering the White House, he has established a national stockpile of Bitcoin, anointed a 'crypto czar' and welcomed memecoin enthusiasts to a private dinner in have recently been successful in resolving SEC staff concerns about novel offerings. Earlier this year, agency staffers rebuked an ETF by State Street Corp. and Apollo Global Management — the world's first to invest in private credit — hours after the fund listed over concerns about the fund's liquidity and its ability to comply with valuation rules. The firms took action to rectify the executives are optimistic that US regulators will eventually greenlight the staking ETFs.'They've followed a crawl-walk-run approach — first futures ETFs, then spot ETFs, and hopefully staking ETFs,' said Matt Hougan, chief investment officer at Bitwise Asset Management Inc., which acquired an Ethereum staking platform last year. 'I'm hopeful we'll get to the finish line soon.'


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
'It could have gone nuclear': Trump again claims he 'stopped India-Pakistan war'; doubles down on trade angle
US President Donald Trump (PTI photo) US President Donald Trump on Friday once again claimed that he played a key role in stopping a possible war between India and Pakistan - a conflict he said might have gone nuclear if not for his intervention. Speaking to reports on Air Force One, Trump said he used trade as a tool to get both sides to halt hostilities immediately. "You know, I did something that people don't talk about, and I don't talk about very much, but we solved a big problem, a nuclear problem potentially with India and with Pakistan. I spoke to Pakistan, I spoke to India, they have really great leaders, but they were going at it, and they could have gone at it nuclear," US President said. He explained that both countries stopped their attacks after he warned them the US would suspend trade if the fighting continued. "Both nuclear countries, strong nuclear countries, and I talked about trade and said, 'We're not doing trade if you guys are going to be throwing bombs at each other.' They both stopped, and I stopped that war immediately. It was going much further, and hopefully, it would not go to nuclear, but it might have gone to nuclear. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo In fact, it might have gone to nuclear in the next round, but we stopped it, and I'd like to commend the leaders of both countries, Pakistan and India. " Trump's version of events got a rare endorsement from Moscow. Russian President Vladimir Putin 's aide Yury Ushakov backed Trump's claim, saying his direct involvement helped end the conflict - something that even came up in a phone call between Trump and Putin. "The Middle East was discussed, as well as the armed conflict between India and Pakistan, which has been halted with the personal involvement of President Trump," Ushakov said. The US president's comments, however, stirred diplomatic pushback. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor , who is leading an all-party delegation to the US, said they addressed Trump's mediation claims directly with US Vice President JD Vance. "The meeting with Vice President Vance was outstanding, very good, very clear. I think we made our position amply clear on this question of mediation, and Vice President Vance fully understood our points," Tharoor said. Trump has made similar claims in the past, especially after India carried out Operation Sindoor -- precision strike on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu & Kashmir (PoJK) on May 7, in retaliation for the Pahalgam terror attack. India later responded to Pakistani military aggression with airbase strikes. Eventually, tensions eased after Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) contacted his Indian counterpart and agreed to stop further action.